Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • The ISA quoted vehicle CY08JCJ entering 12.49 and exiting 14.19 this is not my sons vehicle. These times also vary from the two payments made?
    • Not completely black and white. ICO says if you ask for the information to be sent in a particula way, in your case electronically, then they should send in that way "if possible". So I suggest making that request firmly. I would guess if they actually only hold paper copies they'd be with their rIght to decline to scan everything for you. Or they could transcribe just your personal information. 
    • Hey guys, just wanting to double check since it's been a a year since my last claims mediation, this is the best stance to have during the mediation right?: "I am willing to be flexible by not taking Evri to court to get a judgement against  them and i'm willing to settle now. but I'm not here to compromise on my rights or the amount i'm owed as I have all the rights in this claim and Evri know this, despite what they may say now. I do not wish to waste the courts time and our time, it's Evri who are being inflexible and they are just wasting evryones time if the are not just paying up now. they should just offer the full £ and we can proceed The function of mediation is not to persuade you to give up some of your rights. The function of mediation is to help you obtain what you are entitled to without having to go to court and without having to inconvenience or trouble anyone further. The benefit to the defendant is that they are saved the expense and the inconvenience of going to court." I can also bring up that 1. they no showed this court in our previous mediation call and wasted all our time, and 2. they already settled in full with me last year on an identical parcel and case so we're going down the same road?
    • Regarding SARs - does the recipient provide hard or digital copies of info?  I sent out a request recently. All the info was digital and I'd like it sent digitally - for expedience -  but they want to post hard copies.  Can I demand digitally?  If it's hard then I will have to labour over scanning it all back in to my computer - which is a waste of my resources.  I had this issue recently with a lawyer - they said they had too much info to send by email. Yet miraculously found a way within 2h. (It would be useful to have hard copies too - but in terms of short-term follow up communication digital is best for me)
    • As the tories declare they will do all sorts of err things they had already promised, and often actually themselves blocked,  including 40 hospitals policy, ground rent caps, abolishing no-fault evictions and restoring historic train lines .. all feature in the 2019 and 2024 documents.   .. in perhaps better news Man, 46, arrested in connection with criminal investigation into PPE Medpro | UK news | The Guardian WWW.THEGUARDIAN.COM Suspect understood to have been arrested on suspicion of offences including conspiracy to commit fraud     Man, 46, arrested in probe into PPE linked to ex-Tory peer Michelle Mone - Mirror Online WWW.MIRROR.CO.UK The National Crime Agency said a 46-year-old man was arrested in Barnet, North London, in an ongoing investigation into how PPE...   Correcting the mirror - thats current tory peer isnt it?   Arrest in probe into Michelle Mone-linked company PPE Medpro WWW.HERALDSCOTLAND.COM A 46-year-old man has been arrested as part of the National Crime Agency (NCA) investigation into PPE Medpro.  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Credit Solutions Ltd RE: Reliable Collections & Simply Be


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5807 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi

 

I was wondering if anyone can help me?

 

I left a message about Reliable Collections and Credit Solutions, Was advised to send a CCA to get the original credit agreement because I dispute the amount that was added to the account.

 

This is the letter I have received from them: -

 

14th February 2008 Credit Solutions Limited

` Capella Court, Brighton Road Parley, Surrey CR8 2PG

*

Fax: 0870 3000 589

Dear Mrs Mummy_of_five,

Re: JD Williams & Company:

Thank you for your letter, received on the 12th February 2008 which has been forwarded to the Training & Quality department for response.

I have looked into this account it would seem that this agreement is not regulated by the Consumer Credit Act 1974.

Credit Solutions Ltd does not enter into any disputes between the customer and our client, however I would advise you to check your terms and conditions. The terms and conditions should provide all the responses to your queries regarding liability for this debt. All other questions of this nature should be forwarded to our client.

We have been advised us that as the goods have been supplied by our client, you are liable for the balance outstanding. Furthermore, should this balance not be cleared, our client will register a Default against your name with the Credit Reference Agencies which could impair your ability to obtain credit in future.

Your payment of £1.00 that accompanied your letter has accepted as a token payment towards the balance leaving your current balance at £411.07.

Please contact our offices within 5 days of receiving this letter to discuss your proposals to clear the outstanding balance.

Thank you. Yours sincerely,

Image1.gif

Ludmila O'Brien

Senior Quality Officer

As ypu can see the balance of the account is now £411.07, when the opening balance of the account was £52.29. The rest is the charges and interest that they have added while I was trying to get some help paying them. I had to leave work due to my husband having a very serious illness diagnosed and him needing a very serious brain operation, so i had to care for him and our 3 children whilst i was half way through pregnancy with our 4th. They were not interested on why I was having difficulties and ignored all letters i sent until this year when they answered me gave me 10 days to pay the balance, (obviously I couldn't) then sent it on to Credit solutions.

Now I dont have any idea on what to do. Any help would be gratefully received.

Kind Regards

Mummy_of_Five

Link to post
Share on other sites

Oh dear, talking about confusing the issue.

Now JD Williams and their subsidiaries ARE covered by CCA, as are ALL home shopping companies.

 

Formal Complaint

Letter before Action

 

Dear Sir/Madam,

 

With reference to my previous letters, I wish to draw you attention to your company's lack of compliance with my legal request.

 

On **DATE** I made a formal request for a true signed agreement for the alleged account under consumer credit Act 1974 s77/8. A copy of which is enclosed for your perusal and ease of reference.

You have failed to comply with my request, and as such the account entered default on **DATE**.

 

The document that you are obliged to send me is a true copy of the executed agreement that contained all of the prescribed terms, all other required terms and statutory notices and was signed by both your company and myself as defined in section 61(1) of CCA 74 and subsequent Statutory Instruments. If the executed agreement contained any reference to any other document, you are also obliged to send me a copy of that document.

 

As you may not be aware , failure to comply with this request within 12 working days renders the alleged debt UNENFORCEABLE in law. Furthermore, if this non-compliance continues for a further month then a summary, criminal offence is committed.

 

Furthermore you should be aware that a creditor is not permitted to take ANY action against an account whilst it remains in dispute.

 

The lack of a compliant credit agreement is a very clear dispute and as such the following applies.

 

* may not demand any payment on the account, nor am I obliged to offer any payment to you.

* may not add further interest or any charges to the account.

* may not pass the account to a third party.

* may not register any information in respect of the account with any credit reference agency.

* may not issue a default notice related to the account.

 

Therefore this account has become unenforceable at law.

 

Consequentially any legal action you pursue will be averred as both UNLAWFUL and VEXATIOUS.

 

To address you comments that this account is NOT covered by the Consumer Credit Act 1974.

I believe that your comments are designed to obfuscate and generally confuse as this is clearly a running credit account as defined within CCA s78.

 

After taking advice, I am of the opinion that your continued pursuit is in violation of the Administration of Justice Act 1970 section 40, Protection from harassment Act 1997 section 3 as well as breaching a number of the OFT Collection Guidelines.

 

I reserve the right to report your actions to any such regulatory authorities as I see fit.

You have 14 days from receiving this letter to contact me with your intentions to resolve this matter which is now a formal complaint.

 

I hope that you will enter into a sincere dialogue with me about this matter and I am writing this letter to you on the assumption that you would prefer to do this than merely respond with standard letters and leaflets.

 

I would appreciate your due diligence in this matter.

 

I await your rapid response.

 

Yours Faithfully

Be VERY careful whose advice you listen too

Link to post
Share on other sites

Any agreement between you and a corporate body whereby you are permitted to pay by installments is by default a Credit Agreement and is therefore regulated by the Consumer Credit Act. I would contact Consumer Direct with a view to making a complaint to the Trading Standards Office in your area. At the same time I would write to the original creditor (JD Williams trading as Simply Be) explaining your situation (copy in Credit Solutions) explaining why you have been having difficulties paying the balance and also pointing out that the agreement IS regulated as per the Act. I'm sure that others will be along to give more detail to this but the actions I post above are a reasonable start. Essentially ALL credit between a body corporate and a consumer is regulated by the CCA, whether you signed a CCA-based agreement or not and whether or not the body corporate acknowledges it.

 

EDIT: I wrote this while Curly was writing his; but his contains the further detail I spoke of. He's a good guy - listen to him :)

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Don't know if you wanted to add something like ..

I must emphasize that the £1 payment is the statutory fee in accordance with the consumer credit act 1974 s 77 (1) and is not an aknowledgement nor token payment off the alleged debt . May I draw your attention to the Theft (Amendment) Act 1996 S 24(a) in respect to this.

 

Dishonestly retaining a wrongful credit.

 

24A. — (1) A person is guilty of an offence if—

(a) a wrongful credit has been made to an account kept by him or in respect of which he has any right or interest;

(b) he knows or believes that the credit is wrongful; and

© he dishonestly fails to take such steps as are reasonable in the circumstances to secure that the credit is cancelled.

 

or not . I suppose it doesn't matter what they do with the £1 thou really , it's just that they might use it as a way to say you are acknowledging the debt amount as it stands.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Hiya all

 

Wrote the letter to Credit Solutions and I got my reply today. Heres what it says:-

 

Further to my letter to you on the 14th February 2008 I wish to confirm that Credit Solutions Ltd has not purchased your account and we are acting on behalf of our client JD Williams. In addition to this, I would draw to your attention that your legal request was responded to within 2 days of your letter being received at this office.

 

Upon recipet of your letter dated the 12th February 2008 I can confirm that Credit Solutions Ltd consulted with our client to ascertain the content of your agreement with them. Should you have specific questions regarding the validity of your debt with JD Williams that are unanswered by the terms and conditions as supplied to you, then please send these directly to our client for response.

 

Your letter dated the 26th february 2008 refers to interest being applied to your account. I can confirm that the referred ammount for collection was £412.07 and no interest or referal fees have been added to this account by Credit Solutions Ltd. As stated in my letter on the 14th February 2008, the £1.00 payment for information was put towards your balance, however if you are contesting this action, please advise me by return and i will arrange for the payment to be refunded to you.

 

As mentioned above, we act on our client's instructions and they have advised us that this account in enforceable and therefore we have been authorized to continue with our co0llections activity.

 

In order to progress your account you must contact us within 7 days of receipt of this letter to discuss your proposals for clearing the balance on this account.

 

Thank you

 

Yours sincerely

Ludmila O'Brian

SENIOR QUALITY OFFICER

 

I only sent my letter to Credit Solutions, I think I should now send a CCA request to JD Williams and a letter to Ms O'Brian to say that I am contacting them direct with regards to the account. Is this right?

 

Any help would be great. Thanks in advance.

 

Mummy_of_Five

Link to post
Share on other sites

You've sent a CCA which is valid; there's no need to send another. CSL are agents for JD Williams, and it seems to me that they have argued themselves into a corner somewhat.

 

Time to turn the tables a little.

 

Try something along these lines:

 

Dear Sirs

 

I refer to your letters dated xxx and xxx. I do not acknowledge any debt to you or any company you represent.

 

For the avoidance of doubt, this account is in dispute. I am advised that any credit arrangement whereby the customer is allowed to pay in installments is by default a regulated agreement within the meaning of the Consumer Credit Act 1974. Therefore, the formal request I made pursuant to s.77/78 of the CCA 1974 remains extant, and you are reminded of your duty under s.175 of the Act.

 

You are no doubt aware that s.78(6) states that whilst a creditor is in default of a request for copy documentation he may not enforce the agreement. The statutory time limit of 12 working days having passed some time ago, you and your client are clearly in default.

 

As holders of consumer credit licences, both you and your client are required to comply with the Office of Fair Trading Guidance on Debt Collection, which are quite clear that failing to suspend collection activity whilst a debt is in dispute is an unfair practice. It appears, therefore, that your continued demands for payment are contrary to both the law and the OFT Guidance; you should take this letter as a formal complaint about these breaches. I require you to send me a copy of your complaint procedure, together with your proposal for resolving my complaint.

 

If you and/or your client is unable to comply fully and properly with my s.77/78 request, please confirm this in writing without delay, and refund the fee.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hiya

 

Going to send this letter to Credit Solutuins and a copy to Simply Be and JD Williams, for reference, all posted recored so they will all need to be signed for.

 

Its costing me a small fortune in popstage lol.

 

Thanks for your help again

 

Mummy_of_Five

Link to post
Share on other sites

Your postage can all go down as "costs" if this ever comes to court - or indeed once they capitulate you could demand that they pay your costs and if they don't you can take them to court yourself!

 

Well done so far and please keep us informed.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi just to show that it can be done the following is my thread for my wifes catalogue with The Value Catalogue (JD Williams) this will show it can be done and some of the things that JD Williams will say and do.

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/debt-collection-industry/104426-dpick-oh-reliable-collections.html

 

all the best dpick:)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Hi everyone

 

Today i got another letter from Credit Solutions, heres what it says:

 

Dear Mummy_of_Five

Thank you for your letter dated 16th March 2008 which has been forwarded to me for response.

I can confirm that we have received correspondence from our cllient who has instructed us to close your account on the system.

Please note that no further action will be taken by Credit Solution Ltd with regards to the above reference number, unless instructed by our client.

All further correspondance regarding your account must now be via JD Williams & Company.

Thank you.

So it seems like they have given up on trying to get the money with out having a signed agreement. I will be waiting for the next company it gets passed to now, but at least I no know where to go for help.

 

Thanks to everyone that has help me.

 

Kind regards

 

Mummy_of_Five

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well done for standing up for yourself /your rights.

OFT debt collection guidance

 

Please remember the only stupid question is the one you dont ask so dont worry about asking the stupid questions.

 

Essex girl in pc world looking 4 curtains 4 her pc,the assistant says u dont need curtains 4 a computer!!Essex girl says,''HELLOOO!! i,ve got WINDOWS!!'.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

hello every one i have bin reading the post and i have found them very helpfull. thankyou to everyone

 

and i hope the out come of my dealing with CSL will be the same as this one

 

i sent a prove it letter to csl on the 3 july and i got one back today 18 july saying

 

dear mr --------

 

re : acount info

 

Thank you for your letter which was received on the 3th july 2008 and has been forwarded to our training and quality department for response

 

Thank you for your request for a copy of your credit agreement under the consumer credit act 1974. Please note that this account refers to an oversdraft Facility. Therefore our client has advised us that a copy of your agreement is not available for this acount.

 

Accordingly, I have enclosed you £1.00 Payment. Should you have any Further queries of this nature please correspond directly with our client.

 

Dispite numerous attempts to contact you and several conversations with you, we are yet to receive a payment towards your account or negotiate a repayment plan.

 

Please contact our recovery agent on --------------- to discuss your proposals.

 

your sincerely

 

 

can any one help please im not shaw what to do now

Link to post
Share on other sites

please note anything in red may need changing.

 

Dear Morons.

 

I DO NOT ACKNOWLEDGE ANY DEBT TO THIS COMPANY OR ANY COMPANY YOU CLIAM TO REPRESENT.

 

Re Account number XXXXXXXXXX.

 

Thank you for your letter dated XXXXXXX. Contents of which have been noted.

 

You have clearly stated that your client has advised you that there is no cca under the cca1974 rules.

 

As the cca1974 act clearly states you are not allowed to ask for payment on a account where no cca is availbe upon request from me then i am advising you that as of immediate effect i will not be paying you or any company money for this alledged debt. This is within my rights as a consumer under the cca1974.

 

I understand that the CCA1974 has been about long enough for your clients and your selfs to have read and understood this act. If either your clients or yourself have not read this act the i would advise you do. I would also advise if your client or yourself have not understood this act then it is best you consult a solicitor.

 

Your sincerley.

 

PRINT DONT SIGN.

 

send by recorded delivery at least.

OFT debt collection guidance

 

Please remember the only stupid question is the one you dont ask so dont worry about asking the stupid questions.

 

Essex girl in pc world looking 4 curtains 4 her pc,the assistant says u dont need curtains 4 a computer!!Essex girl says,''HELLOOO!! i,ve got WINDOWS!!'.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hold on a tic.

 

Current accounts - and overdrafts on these - are not covered by the Consumer Credit Act. There isn't a credit agreement (although there may some other form of agreement for the overdraft) so any request under the CCA cannot be fulfilled as has happened here.

I really do appreciate all those 'thank you' emails - I'm glad I've been able to help. Apologies if I haven't acknowledged all of them.

You can also ding my gong if you prefer. :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

i thought they do as there would need to be a repayment agreement

OFT debt collection guidance

 

Please remember the only stupid question is the one you dont ask so dont worry about asking the stupid questions.

 

Essex girl in pc world looking 4 curtains 4 her pc,the assistant says u dont need curtains 4 a computer!!Essex girl says,''HELLOOO!! i,ve got WINDOWS!!'.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...