Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • TECHZONE BUXTON LTD overview - Find and update company information - GOV.UK FIND-AND-UPDATE.COMPANY-INFORMATION.SERVICE.GOV.UK TECHZONE BUXTON LTD - Free company information from Companies House including registered office address, filing history, accounts, annual... thread title updated. dx
    • next time dont upload 19 single page pdfs use the sites listed on upload to merge them into one multipage pdf.. we aint got all day to download load single page files 2024-01-15 DBCLegal SAR.pdf
    • If you have not kept the original PCN you can always send an SAR to Excel and they have to send you all the info they have on you within a month. failure to do so can lead to you being able to sue them for their failure.......................................nice irony.
    • Thank you and well done  for posting up all those notices it must have have taken you ages.. The entrance sign is very helpful since the headline states                    FREE PARKING FOR CUSTOMERS ONLY in capitals with not time limit mentioned. Underneath and not in capitals they then give the actual times of parking which would not be possible to read when driving into the car park unless you actually stopped and read them. Very unlikely especially arriving at 5.30 pm with possibly other cars behind. On top of that the Notice goes on to say that the terms and conditions are inside the car park so the entrance sign cannot offer a contract it is merely an offer to treat. Inside the car park the signs are mostly too high up and the font size too small to be able to read much of their signs. DCBL have not shown a single sign that can be read on their SAR. Although as they show photographs which were taken the year after your alleged breach we do not know what the signs were when you were there. For instance the new signs showed the charge was then £100 whereas your PCN was for £85. Who knows, when you were there perhaps the time was for 3 hours. They were asked to produce  planning permission which would have been necessary for the ANPR cameras alone and didn't do so. Nor did they provide a copy of the contract-DCBL  "deeming them disproportionate or not relevant to the substantive issues in the dispute" How arrogant and untruthful is that? The contract and planning permission could be vital to having the claim thrown out. I can find no trace of planning permission for the signs nor the cameras on Tonbridge Council planning portal. and the contract of course is highly relevant since some contracts advise the parking rouges that they cannot take motorists to Court. I understand that Europarks are now running that car park which means that nexus didn't  last long before being thrown out.....................................
    • Hi,   I am not sure if I posted this already here but I don't think I did. I attach a judgement that raises very interesting points IMO. Essentially EVRi did their usual non attendance that we normally see, however the judge (for the first time I've seen in these threads) dismissed the notice and awarded me judgement by default because their notice misses the "confirmation of compliance" paragraph. in and out in 3 minutes (aside from the chat at the end with the judge about his problems with evri) Redacted - evri CPR loss.pdf
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Redlizzie v Cap 1


redlizzie
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5966 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi all,

 

I actually found this site whilst doing research on a company that has just offered me a job.... my mid week euphoria has had the shine knocked off it I will say.. unfortunately my gut was right, and they do appear to be a load of cowboys.... which is a shame, cause I could really do with the money! However, the silver lining is, having browsed the threads, I can think of many ways the wealth of information and experience here will be of benefit to me as I start the process of sorting out my finances thrown into disarray over the last (and worst!) 8 years of my life!

 

I am patiently waiting for the outcome of the bank charges ruling, as my own rough estimation tells me, I could be looking at being able to claim back a serious amount of money if it goes in the consumer's favour...have parachute account, will jump if neccessary!

 

In the meantime, I have had a problem with car insurance which I would like to pursue. It relates to automatic renewals, so I will take some time to look for the appropriate place to post.

 

Also a problem with a Capitol One card, again, I'll spend time finding the right place to post my problem with that...

 

Finally, if anyone knows of a job for an ETHICAL direct sales person (and yes, there IS such an animal!) I would be happy to hear from you!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi and welcome to CAG :)

 

Glad you found us take some time familiarise yourself with the forum rules here http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/forum-rules-please-read/

 

and the FAQ's here http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/faqs-please-read-these/24031-frequently-asked-questions.html

 

You can still tackle bank charges at the moment have a read of http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/general/107550-oft-test-claim-what.html

 

When your ready start a new thread in the appropriate forum.

 

 

saint

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for that!

 

Well, I have spent the last few hours looking around the forums and it to be honest I am bemused! There's so much information my head is spinning!Or maybe its because I have several things all on the go at the moment, I am struggling to know where to start!

 

Could someone point me in the right direction? I am clear about where to post with reference my bank charges and Lloyds TSB credit card, but what about my Capital One Credit card? Which section should I post that under?

 

Thanks:?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi, redlizzie.

 

Cap1 Forum here..........

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/capital-one/

 

Its a sub-forum of Other Institutions.

 

Regards.

 

Scott.

  • Haha 1
Any advice I give is honest and in good faith.:)

If in doubt, you should seek the opinion of a Qualified Professional.

If you can, please donate to this site.

Help keep it up and active, helping people like you.

If you no longer require help, please do what you can to help others

RIP: Rooster-UK - MARTIN3030 - cerberusalert

Link to post
Share on other sites

Although I have been aware of the bank charges thing for a while, I hadn't before today connected them to my problems with Cap 1, and have been going off down a different route, and now I am wondering what to do for the best, and would be grateful for anyone's input.

 

In order to prevent late payment charges (of which I had many!) in May last year I set up a direct debit mandate with them for the minimum amount. I also moved, (and notified them of my new address)

 

In Oct I realised my card had expired, and no new one had been sent. I also realised I had not received any statement since I moved, I called them to notify them that it hadn't arrived, and to confirm that they were actually sending stuff to my new address, but to my surprise was put straight through to Customer Collections! Apparently it hadn't been sent out because I was over my limit. "How so, you have a D/D mandate, and have been taking money every month, how can I be over my limit?" (I haven't used the card for purchases at all) Because, I was told, minimum payment means the 5% or whatever, NOT any amounts required to bring the account back under the agreed limit. And I should look at my statements, then I should know.

"What statements??" said I.

 

So, during that conversation I was assured I would be sent all my missing statements. A month later I had the same conversation on the phone, however this time they assured me that "copy statements" would be sent. I only got 2, 3 are still missing.However since my conversation I have been receiving current statements, which clearly state "minimum payments" of an amount which INCLUDES an amount to bring the account under the limit again.. so why don't they take this clearly stated "minimum amount" in d/d's????

 

I have now written to them twice, asking them to close the account and freeze all interest etc on the account, whilst this matter is looked into and have had no reply.Each months statement includes additional PPI and late payment fees.

 

My last letter, sent 2 days ago gave them 14 days to respond before I contacted the FSA. So, my question is, should I scrap this line of attack completely and simply go the "normal" way by sending another request via DPA?

 

All advice gratefully received!

Link to post
Share on other sites

I personally think you'd be quicker sending a Prelim etc than FOS. If you have all statements you won't need to send SAR.

 

Also, if you don't need or want PPI then ring/write to them to cancel it.

If you've got all statements send Prelim with a schedule of charges, then LBA, then file N1. You'll have your money back in about 6 weeks or so, in my experience.

PPi can be tackled at a later date if yu feel it was missold or you didn't ask for it in the first place.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks, but I don't have all my statements, I'm still missing two that they haven't sent me. My last letter offered them 2 weeks to send me the missing statements.. so wait for 2 weeks then go straight in with an SAR?

Link to post
Share on other sites

2 threads merged.

Keep us posted.They would have 40 days to comply with a S.A.R - (Subject Access Request).

Personally IMHO it may be worth making an application under the consumer credit act for both a true signed copy of your agreement AND account transactional history that clearly show charges and interest applied.

There is a requirement to comply with this request much more quickly and the fee is only £1.00.

More info in the stickies at the top of the debt forums.

Dont forget -credit card charges are not being dealt with under the current OFT test case,having already been investigated and deemed excessive previously by the OFT.

Have a happy and prosperous 2013 by avoiiding Payday loans. If you are sent a private message directing you for advice or support with your issues to another website,this is your choice.Before you decide,consider the users here who have already offered help and support.

Advice offered by Martin3030 is not supported by any legal training or qualification.Members are advised to use the services of fully insured legal professionals when needed.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

It's a pretty straightforward approach to Capital One. I would do the following (using templates in the Bank Templates forum):

 

  1. Send the SAR request. As Martin says, they're obliged to provide them within 40 days. At the same time;
  2. Send a CCA request to them, it's doubtful they can even provide you with an enforceable agreement, but you never know.
  3. Once you've got your statements, send the Preliminary Approach for Repayment letter. They'll tell you their charges are fair;
  4. Send the Letter before action letter, they'll offer you a reduced amount, reject this and then;
  5. File an N1 Court Form, they'll pay up soon after.

NatWest - WON! £3350 Paid back

Vodafone - Default removed

Citicards - Judgement awarded for £1898, default remains though...for now....

Capital One- WON! Settled out of Court £392 + Default Removal!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...