Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • "We suffer more in imagination than in reality" - really pleased this all happened. Settled by TO, full amount save as to costs and without interest claimed. I consider this a success but feel free to move this thread to wherever it's appropriate. I say it's a success because when I started this journey I was in a position of looking to pay interest on all these accounts, allowing them to default stopped that and so even though I am paying the full amount, it is without a doubt reduced from my position 3 years ago and I feel knowing this outcome was possible, happy to gotten this far, defended myself in person and left with a loan with terms I could only dream of, written into law as interest free! I will make better decisions in the future on other accounts, knowing key stages of this whole process. We had the opportunity to speak in court, Judge (feels like just before a ruling) was clear in such that he 'had all the relevant paperwork to make a judgement'. He wasn't pleased I hadn't settled before Court.. but then stated due to WS and verbal arguments on why I haven't settled, from my WS conclusion as follows: "11. The Defendant was not given ample evidence to prove the debt and therefore was not required to enter settlement negotiations. Should the debt be proved in the future, the Defendant is willing to enter such negotiations with the Claimant. "  He offered to stand down the case to give us chance to settle and that that was for my benefit specifically - their Sols didn't want to, he asked me whether I wanted to proceed to judgement or be given the opportunity to settle. Naturally, I snapped his hand off and we entered negotiations (took about 45 minutes). He added I should get legal advice for matters such as these. They were unwilling to agree to a TO unless it was full amount claimed, plus costs, plus interest. Which I rejected as I felt that was unfair in light of the circumstances and the judges comments, I then countered with full amount minus all costs and interest over 84 months. They accepted that. I believe the Judge wouldn't have been happy if they didn't accept a payment plan for the full amount, at this late stage. The judge was very impressed by my articulate defence and WS (Thanks CAG!) he respected that I was wiling to engage with the process but commented only I  can know whether this debt is mine, but stated that Civil cases were based on balance of probabilities, not without shadow of a doubt, and all he needs to determine is whether the account existed. Verbal arguments aside; he has enough evidence in paperwork for that. He clarified that a copy of a DN and NOA is sufficient proof based on balance of probabilities that they were served. I still disagree, but hey, I'm just me.. It's definitely not strict proof as basically I have to prove the negative (I didn't receive them/they were not served), which is impossible. Overall, a great result I think! BT  
    • Seeking further advice now. The 33 days in which the defendant has to submit a defence expires at 16:00 tomorrow. The defendant has submitted an acknowledgement of service but looking to get the claim awarded by default in failure to submit the defence. This is MoneyClaim Online and can see an option to request a default judgement but believe that is for failure to acknowledge the claim within 14 days??  So being MoneyClaim Online, how do I request the claim be awarded in my favour?
    • Have to agree with the above Health and safety legislation is specific in that the service provider in so far as is reasonably practicable, the health, safety and welfare at work of all his employees and those not in the employ of the business. You claim is like saying you slipped in the swimming pool area while taking a dip. As rightly stated by by the leisure centre, a sports hall has dedicated equipment and you yourself personally have a legal obligation in mitigating danger or injury to yourself by taking account of your immediate surroundings. Where your claim will fail is if it is reasonable and proportionate to impose liability of the Leisure Centre? The answer has to be no.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

RBS cca or not


Honey1932
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5877 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 68
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

By the way Pt

 

 

NatWest /RBOS dont normaly issue a default note till the third missed payment for your information

 

 

Regards

Andy:)

 

So thats just Natwests choice and NOT a Statutory requirement ;) so they could change their minds and issue at any point then really

 

thanks for clarifying what i sad was correct

 

regards

paul

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just wanted to share this (not really relevant to above) I was reading different threads earlier and someone was giving us an ear bashing about the morallity of basically trying to avoid our debts and that we were behaving no better than the creditors. Like everyone else probably, if I could pay I would be happily do so, but if there is a legality out there that can help save my home, then I'm sorry but I'm up for it (I used to be under the misconception that an unsecured debt was just that)

 

Last Year I applied to RBS for a refund of unfair bank charges on our family business account amounting to £23,000. They very kindly and generously offered us £4000 as a gesture of "good will". I hadn't found CAG then and was disputing this when the FO put a hold on further claims due to court case. Because I had already received an offer, I decided £4000 was better than nothing if it ruled in the Banks' favour.

 

Together with that and how RSB are currently handling my current account, I am viewing this as getting my money back if I can, rightly or wrongly.

 

I don't care what anybody does to my credit rating at this moment in time because when I get out of this big hole, that my creditors have helped me dig, then I don't intend to seek further credit.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I admire your opinion Honey

 

 

 

ps thanks for the rep

 

 

regards

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Hi

 

I have been waiting for RBS to start ringing and yesterday I received 3 automated calls and today at least 4 automated calls. Tonight I pressed the option that I am no longer available on this tel no.

 

I wasn't expecting this, does anyone know how long before a real live person will get round to calling me and should I act now or wait a bit longer.

 

Honey

Link to post
Share on other sites

If you can take the calls, continue ignoring them.

If you feel like it answer them and demand that ALL contact is in writing ONLY.

Don't be drawn to comment on anything else ;)

The old stuck record technique

Wait until they put something in writing and then we'll respond.

Be VERY careful whose advice you listen too

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

I received standard letter from Mint on Friday, just pointing out that my account is in arrears as they did not receive the min payment. Late payment fee has been added and the following consequences may occur:

 

I may experience difficulty in using the card

Credit rating may be impacted

Will incur higher interest charges as a reult of a higher balance through

insufficient payment.

 

If I am in financial difficulties please contact etc.

 

What should I do now?

 

I have sent the telephone harassment letter to RBS, enough was enough when they called me at work! I never gave them this tel no, I told them in no uncertain terms I would not discuss personal information at work.

Link to post
Share on other sites

As a result of this thread I have requested a copy of my CCA from the DCA dealing with an RBS account.

 

The account was defaulted 7 years ago and no longer on my credit file. Am I right in thinking they can't default it for a second time. I wouldn't want that as my file is looking pretty good now. If they can't produce the CCA then I guess their only option would be to take me to court. That doesn't really bother me as a relative has said they would lend me the money if I lost so I wouldn't get a CCJ. I guess I'm in quite a strong position.

 

Good luck honey, keep us posted.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi, I have not been defaulted on anything yet and am quite new at this, learning each step of the way. unfortunately I am not knowledgeable enough to help anyone else yet, but by posting what is happening to me, I hope it helps others behind me and I will keep you up to date.

 

Honey

Link to post
Share on other sites

RBS are phoning me on average 4 times per day, sometimes every few minutes.

 

I have sent the telephone letter but it doesn't seem to have kicked in yet, either that or they are ignoring it.

 

Shall I now send letter before action. My second missed payment date is coming up in a few days and I haven't informed them yet the account is in dispute, I just stopped paying. They sent me the unenforceable agreement in October but I carried on paying until recently.

 

Honey

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yeah time to hit them with a non-compliance letter:

 

Account In Dispute

 

Ref:

 

Dear Sir/Madam

 

Thank you for your letter of xx/xx/xx, the contents of which have been noted.

 

You have failed to respond to my legal request to supply me a true copy of the original Consumer Credit Agreement for the above account.

 

In my letter of the **DATE** I made a formal request for a copy of the signed, executed credit agreement for the above account under section 78(1) of the Consumer Credit Act 1974. The document that you are obliged to send me is a true copy of the executed agreement that contained all of the prescribed terms, all other required terms and statutory notices and was signed by both your company and myself as defined in section 61(1) of CCA 74 and subsequent Statutory Instruments. If the executed agreement contained any reference to any other document, you are also obliged to send me a copy of that document.

 

Furthermore

 

 

You are aware that the Consumer Credit Act allows 12 working days for a request for a true copy of a credit agreement to be carried out before your client enters into a default situation.

 

If that request is not satisfied after a further 30 calendar days your client commits a summary criminal offence.

 

These limits have expired.

 

As you are no doubt aware section 77(6) states:

 

If the creditor fails to comply with Subsection (1)

 

(a) He is not entitled , while the default continues, to enforce the agreement.

 

And

 

(b) If the default continues for one month he commits an offence.

 

Therefore this account has become unenforceable at law.

 

As you have Failed to comply with a lawful request for a true, signed copy of the said agreement and other relevant documents mentioned in it, Failed to send a full statement of the account and Failed to provide any of the documentation requested.

 

Consequentially any legal action you pursue will be averred as both UNLAWFUL and VEXATIOUS.

 

Furthermore I shall counterclaim that any such action constitutes unlawful harassment.

 

Please note you may also consider this letter as a statutory notice under section 10 of the Data Protection Act to cease processing any data in relation to this account with immediate effect.

 

This means you must remove all information regarding this account from your own internal records and from my records with any credit reference agencies.

 

Should you refuse to comply, you must within 21 days provide me with a detailed breakdown of your reasoning behind continuing to process my data.

 

It is not sufficient to simply state that you have a ‘legal right’; You must outline your reasoning in this matter and state upon which legislation this reasoning depends.

 

Should you not respond within 14 days I expect that this means you agree to remove all such data.

 

Furthermore you should be aware that a creditor is not permitted to take ANY

Action against an account whilst it remains in dispute.

 

The lack of a credit agreement is a very clear dispute and as such the following applies.

 

* You may not demand any payment on the account, nor am I obliged to offer any payment to you.

* You may not add further interest or any charges to the account.

* You may not pass the account to a third party.

* You may not register any information in respect of the account with any credit reference agency.

* You may not issue a default notice related to the account.

 

After taking advice, I am of the opinion that your continued pursuit is in violation of the Administration of Justice Act 1970 section 40, Protection from harrassment Act 1997 section 3 as well as breaching a number of the OFT Collection Guidelines.

 

 

I reserve the right to report your actions to any such regulatory authorities as I see fit.

You have 14 days from receiving this letter to contact me with your intentions to resolve this matter which is now a formal complaint.

 

I would appreciate your due diligence in this matter.

 

I look forward to hearing from you in writing.

 

Yours faithfully

BLAH

  • Haha 1

Be VERY careful whose advice you listen too

Link to post
Share on other sites

Curly, I have just come across this paragraph in their letter to me enclosing the application form:

 

The provision of the "true copy" in this form is made in reliance of Regulations 3(3) and 7(1)(b) of the Consumer Credit (Cancellation Notices and Copies of Documents) Regulations 1983. Particulary 3(2) which permits the copy agreement not to show signatures or personal details that my have appeared on the application part of the document. There is no statutory requirement under the Act for us to ever give a copy to a customer with a signature on it.

 

and they they have met their obligations under s.78(1)

 

Could you please explain.

 

honey

Link to post
Share on other sites

Don't worry about the 1983/1557 as a number of "people" hide behind this as a get out clause. Also this doesn't apply to s77/78, but pre-contractual documents.

 

After all if they omit your address and signature how can you verify that it is indeed a true copy ?!?!

Be VERY careful whose advice you listen too

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...