Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Worth noting that all of these firms - either the alleged EIS investment, the rebate company themselves or the payee were all registered to the same address. Clavering House is 3 miles away from HMRC Benton Park view offices.   Wardrop - unfortunately unsuccessful due to late appeal - assessments opened by HMRC in March 2019. Scammed by Richard Hall (Capital allowances consultants ltd - Clavering House) investments into Cryoblast Limited 15/16 (Paul Huggins - Clavering House) and Eco Cooling solutions 16/17 (Anthony Fitches - Clavering House).    Mccuminsky - scammed by Capital Allowances after providing his details to Stefan Brown Alpha Tax Consultants (Clavering House) payment made to Eco Cooling Solutions.    Robson - scammed by Capital Allowances - 15/16 paid to Cryoblast 16/17 paid to Eco Cooling.    Myself - scammed by Allan Maxwell - MaxTax (other business Maxwell electronics) registered to Clavering House.   Cryoblast Solutions and Fast Tax - Alan O’Hara    Please note there are two Cryoblasts involved - Cryoblast limited (Paul Huggins and Clavering House) and Cryoblast Solutions Limited (Alan O’Hara also director of Fast Tax).    My return simply said “Cryoblast” another thing that should have been clarified as part of HMRC guidelines before paying out the claim.    Cryoblast limited was already suspected to be involved in fraudulent claims before my investment as Huntly had open assessments issued in November 2018.    Cryoblast Solutions, the same company director as Fast Tax where my money was sent was dissolved before my claims were submitted. 
    • On the d-day issue, * we know sunaks shameful self-interest preferring a hope at using lies for self-promotion over honoring our heroes, * we know Starmer demonstrated his statesmanship with other statesmen and women,  ** BUT where was Farage? Was he in a pub looking for self-promotion? .. Surely as a wannabe statesman - he should have spent a bit of his (someone elses?) cash attending the ceremonies? or wasn't he offered a seat near enough the front to interest him?   mind you .. "I said I wanted my county back. Well now I want my life back ... I am not a career politician... I won't be changing my mind again, I promise you" - Nigel Farage, stepping down from public life. 5 July 2016  
    • dont need them.   let the defendant play the terms game
    • I am reading the thread now and think although its probably very similar to my predicament,  I have no way of obtaining the terms anymore due to MyParcelDelivery having being dissolved and their website not being active now. I have nothing to quote from and they didn't send me a copy at the time of order, the website that I believe they reinvented themselves as P4D has terms I am looking at now but however similar they may be I wont be able to quote from them in this case. Thanks 
    • Thankyou for your reply jk2054 thats put my mind at ease regarding going forward, appreciate your help.   Thanks Bankfodder, I will look over that thread now. In regards to the further info: Item was a jacket, value £995.00 and was declared correctly Item was fully insured to the value and £995.00 declared correctly  Item was sent on 03/02/23 Thanks  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Welcome Finance


hayley
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5990 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi all

 

After reading all the terrible stories about Welcome Finance on here i had a look at my credit agreement but cant get my head around all the figures not too good at maths. I was wondering if someone could have a look over them for me please.

 

I bought a BMW for £7000, but put a £2000 deposit down so had £5000 on HP, I also purchased shortfall extra insurance which was £295. This is what the agreement says:

 

Amount of Credit for the goods £5000.00 (A)

Amount of credit for the insurances £295.00 (B)

Total amount of credit £5295.00 ©

 

Total amount payable for the goods (A + R + V) £10,619.52 (D)

Total amount payable for the insurances (N + W) £483.84 (E)

Total amount payable (D + E) £11,102.38 (F)

 

Cash price for goods £7000.00 (M)

Total cash price for insurances £295.00(N)

Total Cash Price £7295.00 (0)

 

Deposit cash £2000.00 (P)

Deposit P/X £0.00 (Q)

Total Deposit (P + Q) £2000.00 ®

 

Acceptance fee £195.00 (S)

Finance Charges for Goods £3324.52 (T)

Option fee £100.00 (U)

 

Charge for credit for goods (S + T + U) £3619.52 (V)

Charge for credit for insurances £188.84 (W)

Total Charge for credit (V + W) £3808.36 (X)

Rate of interest on credit per annum 16%

 

Duration of agreement 48 months payable by monthly payments of £187.57 APR 33.6%

 

Thanks in advance:)

 

Hayley

Link to post
Share on other sites

hear we go again

another welcome satisfied customer

may i ask when you took out the agreement

can you also post the agreement minus personel details using photo bucket

interesting as they are still adding acceptance fees

need to see agreement

Link to post
Share on other sites

pt,stephen, or curlyben wil be around shortly to have a look

consumer credit act has now changed as you are not given now the protection of the cca 1974, as this is a recent agreement after the change

to give you an idea of what welcome are like have a look at my thread

 

must say welcome seem to be learning now on there agreements

Link to post
Share on other sites

pt,stephen, or curlyben wil be around shortly to have a look

consumer credit act has now changed as you are not given now the protection of the cca 1974, as this is a recent agreement after the change

to give you an idea of what welcome are like have a look at my thread

 

must say welcome seem to be learning now on there agreements

 

Ok thanks, i have read through your post thats what made me wonder.

 

Good luck with it:)

Link to post
Share on other sites

as my agreement is under the cca 1974

i am not savy on the new cca

like i said some one will be around soon who is

 

dont want to give inacurate info

 

mind you your agreement does state regulated under the cca 1974

Link to post
Share on other sites

was this agreement taken out before march 30 2006

 

sorry

i see the agreement was sep 2006

pity

i will hand over to someone with info on new cca

 

 

I was wrong about the date apparantly it is brought into effect in stages there's still hope lol :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

thanks pt

great as usual

 

What does this mean? i also had a loan with Welcome in 2005 which is now settled should i post that agreement on here too because i had insurances with that also?

Link to post
Share on other sites

No dont have any problems at the moment just was curious to see if my agreement was all correct, i just wanted to see if the workings out were correct really because i keep thinking that they have charged me interest on £7000 not £5000 because it's so confusing (well for me anyway lol).

Link to post
Share on other sites

with my claim against welcome,

one of the things they do is front load insurances, acceptance fee, ppi etc, before calculating interest

this is unlawful, works like a mortage

if you want to go down this route you could get a sizable rebate.

be under no illusion, welcome will fight all the way

think about it first.

this is being decided in my case in court on the 5 feb

when i suceed , this will be a great lever to throw at welcome

Link to post
Share on other sites

You can easily work out the if interest charge is correct by doing the following.

 

Annual interest rate = 16%

Term of agreement = 4 years

Therefore total interest charge = 16% x 4 = 64% (or 0.64)

 

Total amount of credit = £5000 + £195 fee = £5195 x 0.64 = £3324.16 (which I know is 36p out but that is likely to be the roundings used in their software)

As for the £295 shortfall insurance, you can calculate this the same way and get to £188.80 (4p adrift from their figure).

 

You are not paying interest on the Option Fee because this will be payable at the end of the agreement and not the beginning, therefore you are not 'borrowing' it.

 

Hope that helps.;)

 

 

with my claim against welcome,

one of the things they do is front load insurances, acceptance fee, ppi etc, before calculating interest

this is unlawful, works like a mortage

Could you expand on this at all - i.e. what do you mean by 'front load'?

Link to post
Share on other sites

ime afraid i am not up on figures and extras

in my case acceptance fee was added before calculating interest

this is unlawful, ref wilson v fct

along with many more transgressions

ime sure some one will be along to tell you the verdict in your case ref acceptance fees etc

like i said, welcome seem to be getting there act togeather with there agreements

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...