Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Thanks.  I'll have a good look through in a moment. Meanwhile - what was the response from the pub?
    • I believe it's a new one Honeybee. I can't see if I previously posted it.
    • Hi. Is this a new parking event or have you posted about it before please? HB
    • Hi folks, The keeper received correspondence today from DCBL.  The keeper has received previous correspondence from (Possibly) Parking Eye and Debt Recovery Plus, all of which has been ignored with zero contact with either company. The keeper has moved house twice since the original PCN but has kept DVLA informed of every move and V5 updated accordingly. The driver recalls entering the car park but didn't see any signs indicating payment required. The drivers friend happened to be in the same car park a few days after original PCN was received. Friend is a truck driver and said there is a sign but at truck windscreen height. Driver was in a small vehicle and, due to being careful as to where they were driving, did not see the sign. Original paperwork has been lost while moving but keeper still has scans of paperwork from Debt Recovery Plus. Driver was on site for approximately one hour after a long drive and was resting. After having read previous cases on here, is it still safe to ignore? 1 Date of the infringement 15th September 2020   2 Date on the NTK [this must have been received within 14 days from the 'offence' date] Unsure    3 Date received A/A 4 Does the NTK mention schedule 4 of The Protections of Freedoms Act 2012? [Y/N?] A/A 5 Is there any photographic evidence of the event? Driver recalls there was a screenshot of the reg plate, but it wasn’t a very good one.  6 Have you appealed? [Y/N?] post up your appeal] No.   Have you had a response? [Y/N?] post it up A/A  7 Who is the parking company? Parking Eye?   8. Where exactly [carpark name and town] MFG ESSO Cobham Gravesend  DCBL 30:04:24 Redacted.pdf
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Criminal injury claim.. what is it?


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5932 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Can anyone point me in the right direction as to what this is exactly?

 

There is a reason behind my question, but dont really wanna go too much into it if its possible as the whole situation is still ongoing and Im not sure if its wise to talk about it at length?

 

Cheers!

Link to post
Share on other sites

SpiceBoy,

 

There is no right or wrong answer to this as direction would be given by the court. Suffice to say in the event of a motor incident, if proven guilty or with admission of guilt, then this would provide a strong case for legal action against the guilty party and/or his insurers. In the event that such a person was uninsured then the case for damages could be taken up with the MIB.

Without full details of the circumstances, further guidence cannot be given however I must stress that the above is my assumption only and suggest that you seek professional advice starting perhaps with CAB who will point you in the direction of a solicitor specialising in your circs.

  • Haha 1
:p :p If my advice as been of help, please give me a quick click on the scales to your right ;) ;) :)
Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for your reply Trojan....

 

The incident basically was that I was run over by the other party in their car and I was severely injured as a result (as most people would be after getting run over by a car lol)...

 

The other party was insured and has admitted guilt (they changed their plea just days before the court case was to be held and has since been sentenced) and I had filled out Criminal Injury forms a while before this....

 

What I was wondering is what will happen with it after the guilty party has been sentenced and how do I check up on what is happening with it?

 

Thanks!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Spiceboy,

 

Fourtunately (well not for you at the time !! ) the driver was insured which means the process will be relatively straight forward however may take some time.

I'm assuming that you have already been in contact with his insurers and or their solicitors and that a claim has been submited and the conviction effectively proves no contributory negligence on your behalf. Damages will be paid by his insurers.

I would not concern yourself with the driver, only deal with his insurers.

From what you say, you will be entitled to significant damages legitimately and strongly suggest employing the services of a solicitor. Do not approach one of these ambulance chasers that advertise "no win no fee" as they are effectively a sausage machine. Find a solicitor in your area who specialises in RTA claims. They may charge but with such a clear cut case, their charges will be claimed from the guilty person's insurers and will not affect the value of your claim.

Be prepared for a lehgthy battle over quantum as obviously the insurers will require medical reports etc and will no doubt try to minimise their payment but with a good solicitor, you'll get what you deserve.

Don't forget, as well as injury to yourself, you can claim for loss of earnings, loss of mobility, time spent by a carer (within reason) i.e. your wife/friend having to look after you - effectively any costs that you've had as a result of the accident, even the clothes you were wearing.

 

As I've said, don't use one of the ambulance chasers, get a proper specialist solicitor - they also will probably not charge you direct either and you'll get a better service.

 

I hope this helps. Any issues with the insurer concerned though, please shout as there are one or two claims specialists here also.

  • Haha 1
:p :p If my advice as been of help, please give me a quick click on the scales to your right ;) ;) :)
Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for your great reply Trojan :D

 

The accident happened in April 07 and I have been in constant contact with one of the best law firms in wales whom are kindly dealing with the case...

 

I have a claim with them and at this moment its at the stage where the investigation period has ended and his insurers haven't replied to a settlement offer and I think the next stage is to issue proceedings...

 

My medical exam has been done for a while and the projections were that I will make a full recovery by 12 months time as of November 07...

 

What Im confused about is.. I have signed forms with the police for a criminal injury claim with them I think? this is separate from my claim with my solicitors...

 

I think you can see my confusion? lol

 

Thanks again for your help :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

I see where you are coming from. Unfortunately I can't really comment on the claim via criminal injuries other than a general view in relation to the insurance claim but it may help unless a person with criminal law knowledge can qualify.

 

Anyway, my view would be that as you are making a valid claim against the negligent person's insurance then I doubt that the criminal injuries board would provide additional compensation. My understanding is that it is there to provide such compo where there is no other way of being reimbursed. Once they establish that you are claiming against the negligent person's motor insurance, I suspect they will close the claim.

 

If however the driver was uninsuredthere may be cause for claim however, where injury etc is caused as a result of a motor (RTA) incident then you would submit a claim to the MIB anyway.

 

I personally don't think therefore the CIB will entertain your claim. You will undoubtedly get a better payout from the insurers anyway. Also, depending upon what the guy was convicted of careless driving or dangerous driving will be a factor also.

 

Whilst I disagree, careless driving is viewed as a minor RTA offence which would not carry much weight, even dangerous driving these days you only get a slap on the wrist - unless you are eating a sandwich stationary at traffic lights :) . Yes - I'm a cynic but don't start me about lenient sentences for serious legitimate driving offences i.e no licence/insurance/manslaughter etc.

 

Sorry, just thought I'd add the rant there.

 

Anyway, trust that all works out well.

:p :p If my advice as been of help, please give me a quick click on the scales to your right ;) ;) :)
Link to post
Share on other sites

Spot the early bird lol...

 

Thanks for your reply....

 

If the CIB case has been closed due to me having a case with my solicitors then that is fine by me as Im not a greedy person by nature and all I want is what is due and not to 'get every penny that I can' like a leech...

 

After he changed his plea to guilty he was charged with dangerous driving and his sentence included a 1 year ban, community service and he has to take an extended test when his ban is up....

 

I dont think that his action were on purpose so I did feel somewhat bad that he had quite alot as punishment but I agree with you that the justice system is VERY unfair as I know of some drivers whom have done alot worse than just injure someone and had much less severe punishment and people whom have done alot less and had the book thrown at them...

 

Any and all Road Traffic Accidents should be viewed as extremely dangerous as the outcome can cost lives, no matter how small the cause is! So your rant is well justified :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...
Guest Claims Management Centre
Spiceboy,

 

As I've said, don't use one of the ambulance chasers, get a proper specialist solicitor - they also will probably not charge you direct either and you'll get a better service.

 

 

Trojan,

 

That statement is completely unfair, unfound and I wonder why you make it.

 

I guess that I am an "ambulance chaser" in your opinion but that term is literally impossible, wholly untrue and very derogatory.

 

Companies like mine provide a very valuable and extremely professional service giving help and assistance beyond what most people consider to be normal hours.

 

We do not charge clients, we do not put them in financial jeapardy and we do not take any money from their settlements, we do a lot of the hard work on behalf of highly qualified solicitors in providing pre-qualified injury claims whilst completing all of the mundane paperwork that many clients dislike doing themselves.

 

In my years of service i have stumbled across just as many unscrupulous, unqualified, unhelpful and useless 'specialist' solicitors who thought that they could cash in on the injury claim boom despite their complete ineptitude or inexperience, as I have come across your so called 'ambulance chasers'.

 

Be careful what you say because you clearly are not inexhaustably enlightened on every subject.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...