Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Please see my comments on your post in red
    • Thanks for your reply, I have another 3 weeks before the notice ends. I'm also concerned because the property has detoriated since I've been here due to mould, damp and rusting (which I've never seen in a property before) rusty hinges and other damage to the front door caused by damp and mould, I'm concerned they could try and charge me for damages? As long as you've documented and reported this previously you'll have a right to challenge any costs. There was no inventory when I moved in, I also didn't have to pay a deposit. Do an inventory when you move out as proof of the property's condition as you leave it. I've also been told that if I leave before a possession order is given I would be deemed intentionally homeless, is this true? If you leave, yes. However, Your local council has a legal obligation to ensure you won't be left homeless as soon as you get the notice. As stated before, you don't have to leave when the notice expires if you haven't got somewhere else to go. Just keep paying your rent as normal. Your tenancy doesn't legally end until a possession warrant is executed against you or you leave and hand the keys back. My daughter doesn't live with me, I'd likely have medical priority as I have health issues and I'm on pip etc. Contact the council and make them aware then.      
    • extension? you mean enforcement. after 6yrs its very rare for a judge to allow enforcement. it wont have been sold on, just passed around the various differing trading names the claimant uses.    
    • You believe you have cast iron evidence. However, all they’d have to do to oppose a request for summary judgment is to say “we will be putting forward our own evidence and the evidence from both parties needs to be heard and assessed by a judge” : the bar for summary judgment is set quite high! You believe they don't have evidence but that on its own doesn't mean they wouldn't try! so, its a high risk strategy that leaves you on the hook for their costs if it doesn't work. Let the usual process play out.
    • Ok, I don't necessarily want to re-open my old thread but I've seen a number of such threads with regards to CCJ's and want to ask a fairly general consensus on the subject. My original CCJ is 7 years old now and has had 2/3 owners for the debt over the years since with varying level of contact.  Up to last summer they had attempted a charging order on a shared mortgage I'm named on which I defended that action and tried to negotiate with them to the point they withdrew the charging order application pending negotiations which we never came to an agreement over.  However, after a number of communication I heard nothing back since last Autumn barring an annual generic statement early this year despite multiple messages to them since at the time.  at a loss as to why the sudden loss of response from them. Then something came through from this site at random yesterday whilst out that I can't find now with regards to CCJ's to read over again.  Now here is the thing, I get how CCJ's don't expire as such, but I've been reading through threads and Google since this morning and a little confused.  CCJ's don't expire but can be effectively statute barred after 6 years (when in my case was just before I last heard of the creditor) if they are neither enforced in that time or they apply to the court within the 6 years of issue to extend the CCJ and that after 6 years they can't really without great difficulty or explanation apply for a CCJ extension after of the original CCJ?.  Is this actually correct as I've read various sources on Google and threads that suggest there is something to this?.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

British Credit Trust forged my signature


cavey01uk
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5730 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi, BCT (British Credit Trust) have been trying to get a return of good order against me for my car finance for the past several months, but the Judge has adjourned the case 3 times up to now pending a claim on my PPI policy. :|

Anyway, yesterday whilst making sure all my paperwork was all in order, I discovered that on my original HP agreement and a top up loan, there was only my signature there. On copies of the agreements that BCT had sent to me about a months after I bought my car, they had added their signature to the agreements and when I looked at my signature, there appeared to be something odd about it. It's only by chance that I spotted this irregularity, what a very lucky find it appears to be.

I then scanned it into my computer and enlarged it to A4 size, to my amazement the signature is clearly different from how I sign mine, the way some of the letters have been formed look completely different and even more amazingly they had been signed with a different coloured pen. :-x

As soon as I've finished here I'm going to telephone the police and report the crime and get some advice from Consumer Direct.

I believe that I have good grounds to ask the Judge to dismiss BCT's claim for the return of our car, as the agreement should be voided. :grin:

Link to post
Share on other sites

If you are sure you didnt sign these documents and can prove the signatures are forged then definately report it to the police. To be fair the average uniform cop may not want to know so if you find any reluctance ask to speak with a CID officer

Link to post
Share on other sites

If you are sure you didnt sign these documents and can prove the signatures are forged then definately report it to the police. To be fair the average uniform cop may not want to know so if you find any reluctance ask to speak with a CID officer

 

Tried that but they don't seem very helpful, I have talked to a solicitor, Consumer Direct (who seem to be the most helpful, but not enough to help me out)

Link to post
Share on other sites

i had they same thing with a finance company well known to the forum.

i got a forensic graphologist to do a report, cost £250

but well worth it

just playing a waiting game now

 

Hi, how long ago did you have the report done, what were the circumstances, and what stage are you at now? I'm in court on the 9th of next month to fight to keep my car. :eek:

Link to post
Share on other sites

I then scanned it into my computer and enlarged it to A4 size, to my amazement the signature is clearly different from how I sign mine, the way some of the letters have been formed look completely different and even more amazingly they had been signed with a different coloured pen. :-x

....

I believe that I have good grounds to ask the Judge to dismiss BCT's claim for the return of our car, as the agreement should be voided. :grin:

 

If you admit you signed the credit agreement you have at home, then why wouldn't the court enforce the agreement you admit you signed?

i will be off site for the next month or so. if you have any problems, feel free to report the post so a moderator can help you.

 

I am not a qualified or practicing lawyer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

You need to report a crime. Get a crime number. It will get acted on then. Did you get past the desk office (civilian?) or was this on the telephone (civilian?).

 

I eventually got hold of CID, they told me it was a civil matter, so they couldn't help. :eek:

Link to post
Share on other sites

It isn't - trust me. Ring up the main number of your police force. Ask to speak to the Chief Superintendent in charge of complaints. (They will be located at the force's main HQ). Tell them that you wish to make a complaint. When you're through that section ask to speak to a Chief Inspector or Inspector as you wish to make a complaint against the Force's refusal to investigate an allegation of fraud. Also say that you would like your complaint referring to the Police Authority's Complaints Committee. They will ask a few questions and things should start to move...:)

Link to post
Share on other sites

It isn't - trust me. Ring up the main number of your police force. Ask to speak to the Chief Superintendent in charge of complaints. (They will be located at the force's main HQ). Tell them that you wish to make a complaint. When you're through that section ask to speak to a Chief Inspector or Inspector as you wish to make a complaint against the Force's refusal to investigate an allegation of fraud. Also say that you would like your complaint referring to the Police Authority's Complaints Committee. They will ask a few questions and things should start to move...:)

 

Thanks for that suggestion, I'll give it a try tomorrow. :grin:

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

Just to keep every body posted.

 

I have written to BCT and received a reply dismissing my accusation, to which I replied to this by writing to them again, pointing out my complaint and that they must have misunderstood what I meant. It's now nearly 2 months since I last wrote to BCT, and up to now, I've not received a reply.

 

I also wrote to Carcraft, they replied stating that they couldn't do anything as it’s a Police matter.

 

I have today, contacted the Chief Superintendent at my local Police Force's HQ, to which I have finally received a reply, stating that they are going to look into this.

 

I were in court a couple of weeks ago, the strangest thing happened, no one turned up to represent BCT, so the judge threw it out.

 

It's been suggested to me, that there may be a breach of the Consumer Credit Act, due to the fact that the signatures have been forged in order to get the agreement through.

 

Can anyone offer any advice as to what I should when this comes to the next stage?

 

Thanks in advance, Dean. :confused:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Personally, I would also bring the matter to trading standards attention.

i will be off site for the next month or so. if you have any problems, feel free to report the post so a moderator can help you.

 

I am not a qualified or practicing lawyer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I suspect that fraudulent completion of applications is rife.

 

OH needs to change from her current sports car to something more practical for her new business. Yesterday we went to look at cars at one of NI's biggest main dealers, with the intention of getting an idea of what might be possible and then building it into the business plan. So keen was one salesperson that she offered various discounts and goodies if OH would agree the deal immediately. We pointed out that we were not in a position to do that, largely because OH's business hasn't started yet so she has no income. "Don't worry about that", said the girl, "we can still put it through for you." I asked how, and she told me that she'd use a figure that she knew would get finance approval, because 'they never check'. We walked away.

 

It struck me though, that many people might fall for this sort of thing, perhaps inflating earnings figures if not just inventing them. Of course, if it all goes wrong, it's the applicant who gets the fallout, not the salesperson.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I suspect that fraudulent completion of applications is rife.

 

OH needs to change from her current sports car to something more practical for her new business. Yesterday we went to look at cars at one of NI's biggest main dealers, with the intention of getting an idea of what might be possible and then building it into the business plan. So keen was one salesperson that she offered various discounts and goodies if OH would agree the deal immediately. We pointed out that we were not in a position to do that, largely because OH's business hasn't started yet so she has no income. "Don't worry about that", said the girl, "we can still put it through for you." I asked how, and she told me that she'd use a figure that she knew would get finance approval, because 'they never check'. We walked away.

 

It struck me though, that many people might fall for this sort of thing, perhaps inflating earnings figures if not just inventing them. Of course, if it all goes wrong, it's the applicant who gets the fallout, not the salesperson.

Obviously I try to buy cars in all the wrong places. They type my details into the computer

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

THE COMPUTER SAYS NO:o

Link to post
Share on other sites

A breach of the Consumer credit act is not the only offence - in fact I'd say that was trivial compared to other offences...

 

There is the Forgery and Counterfeiting Act 1981 - look at the bit about instruments

 

There is also the Fraud Act 2006. Several offences there.

 

If they tried to present that dodgy agreement to a court then there is the offence of perverting the cause of justice.

 

I think you won't hear any more from BCT.

Link to post
Share on other sites

A breach of the Consumer credit act is not the only offence - in fact I'd say that was trivial compared to other offences...

 

There is the Forgery and Counterfeiting Act 1981 - look at the bit about instruments

 

There is also the Fraud Act 2006. Several offences there.

 

If they tried to present that dodgy agreement to a court then there is the offence of perverting the cause of justice.

 

I think you won't hear any more from BCT.

Im 100% sure the OP wont here any more from BCT if the signature is forged. However it would be a shame if they were to escape the sword of justice. Lets hope a peeler with a terrier like attitude sees this complaint through to a Court Case against BCT

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 7 months later...

My wife & I have recently had a terrible experience with a cowboy builder in the Birmingham area. He walked off a kitchen refit job claiming payment of 3 invoices - 1 for an unfinished job, 2 where we didn't agree the price. He left a number of jobs unstarted for which we had all signed estimates.

 

It went to Court, & we thought it would be straightforward as all the evidence was in our favour. However 6 days before the Hearing he produced loads of forged documents - letters that were never sent, a "Terms of Commencement" including payment terms we had never agreed with a copy of my signature on it, estimates with copies of my signature added & much more. The signatures appear to have been copied & pasted from letters I sent rather than being direct forgeries (I think).

 

The Judge bought his story hook line & sinker & ruled in his favour on all counts! He basically has a licence to extort any amount of money from anyone he likes. What can you do about a clever crook like that?! We're looking at an Appeal but don't have our hopes up, also it could be expensive.

 

We thought we could prove the forgeries by looking at his original documents at the Hearing, but his excuse for not being able to produce the originals was claiming that I only gave him photocopies. We think he's done this before.

 

 

i got a forensic graphologist to do a report, cost £250 but well worth it

 

postggj do you have their details? They may be able to help.

 

Any other advice would be gratefully received

 

I'd love to be able to name "my Enemy" but for legal reasons I probably can't.

 

"Art is an Enemy" - Roger Taylor

Edited by Paul Hewson
correcting html

"Art is an Enemy" - Roger Taylor

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...