Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • What do you guys think the chances are for her?   She followed the law, they didnt, then they engage in deception, would the judge take kindly to being lied to by these clowns? If we have a case then we should proceed and not allow these blatant dishonest cheaters to succeed 
    • I have looked at the car park and it is quite clearly marked that it is  pay to park  and advising that there are cameras installed so kind of difficult to dispute that. On the other hand it doesn't appear to state at the entrance what the charge is for breaching their rules. However they do have a load of writing in the two notices under the entrance sign which it would help if you could photograph legible copies of them. Also legible photos of the signs inside the car park as well as legible photos of the payment signs. I say legible because the wording of their signs is very important as to whether they have formed a contract with motorists. For example the entrance sign itself doe not offer a contract because it states the T&Cs are inside the car park. But the the two signs below may change that situation which is why we would like to see them. I have looked at their Notice to Keeper which is pretty close to what it should say apart from one item. Under the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 Schedule 4 Section 9 [2]a] the PCN should specify the period of parking. It doesn't. It does show the ANPR times but that includes driving from the entrance to the parking spot and then from the parking place to the exit. I know that this is a small car park but the Act is quite clear that the parking period must be specified. That failure means that the keeper is no longer responsible for the charge, only the driver is now liable to pay. Should this ever go to Court , Judges do not accept that the driver and the keeper are the same person so ECP will have their work cut out deciding who was driving. As long as they do not know, it will be difficult for them to win in Court which is one reason why we advise not to appeal since the appeal can lead to them finding out at times that the driver  and the keeper were the same person. You will get loads of threats from ECP and their sixth rate debt collectors and solicitors. They will also keep quoting ever higher amounts owed. Do not worry, the maximum. they can charge is the amount on the sign. Anything over that is unlawful. You can safely ignore the drivel from the Drips but come back to us should you receive a Letter of Claim. That will be the Snotty letter time.
    • please stop using @username - sends unnecessary alerts to people. everyone that's posted on your thread inc you gets an automatic email alert when someone else posts.  
    • he Fraser group own Robin park in Wigan. The CEO's email  is  [email protected]
    • Yes, it was, but in practice we've found time after time that judges will not rule against PPCs solely on the lack of PP.  They should - but they don't.  We include illegal signage in WSs, but more as a tactic to show the PPC up as spvis rather than in the hope that the judge will act on that one point alone. But sue them for what?  They haven't really done much apart from sending you stupid letters. Breach of GDPR?  It could be argued they knew you had Supremacy of Contact but it's a a long shot. Trespass to your vehicle?  I know someone on the Parking Prankster blog did that but it's one case out of thousands. Surely best to defy them and put the onus on them to sue you.  Make them carry the risk.  And if they finally do - smash them. If you want, I suppose you could have a laugh at the MA's expense.  Tell them about the criminality they have endorsed and give them 24 hours to have your tickets cancelled and have the signs removed - otherwise you will contact the council to start enforcement for breach of planning permission.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
        • Thanks
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Insurance cancelled without telling me


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5889 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi All

new to this forum but seems great.

I have a problem with car insurance, sorry in advance if this thread is a little long, but I want to see if I can take the company to court.

1. We called company for insurance, they accepted everything by phone.

2. They took the initial payment out of the bank account

3. I am happily insured , or so I thought.

4. I get pulled over for police stop.

5. they say I am not insured.

6. Car impounded (tears) girlfriend is pregnant etc etc.

7. I didn't have the money to pay to get car out of impound, so took the option of having it crushed.

8. found out that insurance company had paid money back into bank account.

9. I contacted them, they said they had tried to inform me that insurance was not valid, but the phone numbers I gave were incorrect.

10, My dad advised me to get down to the office to find out what went on, but play it cool, ( He had seen this site, so it was good advise)

11. I politely asked for a copy of my policy as I was due in court for failure to produce insurance, the young clerk obliged and I got a printout showing a policy number AND the correct phone details, ( so the manager I spoke to lied).

12. I get to court, show my insurance and I walk a free man, (Should have been driving a free man you say).

Finally, I have been writing to the company asking them to refund me the cost of my car and bus fares etc. because it was their error ( I haven't told them that I have the printout.)

They are refusing point blank, and have finally issued their final letter with the statement that I can take this up with the ombudsman.

I issued an SAR, they say they have no further info, (But I still have the printout with my phone numbers that they say they wrongly entered)

 

So now what do I do?

Should I just apply to court, or should I give them 1 more chance but also drop a hint that I have this printout and will start court proceedings if they are unwilling to come to terms with their error.

 

Please any advise?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Personally I would go via the Ombudsman 1st. You have the final notification letter, and the Insurance Company are bound by the decision - you are not. Explain to the Ombudsman everything you have told me.

 

On another note, the SAR - They have advised that they have nothing further to give. Have you received a letter of cancellation?

 

If not then they do not have a leg to stand on....

Abbey - owed £3260 - Paid up.

 

Barclays owed £2500 - Paid up.

 

Halifax, Mint & Egg - next on the hit list

 

Dont click on the scales - I'm quite proud of my little red dot! - As the little red dot has gone - click away!!!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest Aviva Support

Hi bazaar

I'd agree with craigwalton, the Ombudsman are there to regulate insurers and this sort of thing needs to be looked into, take it to them first.

 

Good Luck

Becca

Link to post
Share on other sites

Right, I had to go back to my IF2 booklet for this, and:

 

"The contract of Insurance comes into effect once the Insurer has accepted the insurance proposal, terms have been agreed and the premium has been paid, or agreed to have been paid."

 

As they have issued a quote, you have accepted it, and paid an instalment (at least) then you have been under cover... Unless you made a misleading statement in your proposal and they have voided the policy.

 

This means that they have to give you notice that they intend to cancel the policy, not just refund the money...

 

Definately go see the Ombudsman!!!

Abbey - owed £3260 - Paid up.

 

Barclays owed £2500 - Paid up.

 

Halifax, Mint & Egg - next on the hit list

 

Dont click on the scales - I'm quite proud of my little red dot! - As the little red dot has gone - click away!!!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

OK Thanks Craig, They said they tried to contact me, but theyd put in the wrong details over the phone, they had 3 numbers which can prove on the printout I received. ( They still do not know I have this ),

The money left our account to pay for the first installment. 3 or 4 days later they put the money back in. They didnt send a letter otherwise I would have received a copy after I issued an SAR to them. I'm out about £1500 because of the loss of car, and having to go to court, they blamed us for not checking our bank account, which is really annoying. Is the ombudsman going to be able to tell them to refund money for my car?? I'm not too

sure, so whats my chances of taking them to court and sueing?

any advise?

Link to post
Share on other sites

It seems to me you have a good argument for Court action. But whether you can sue and use the FOS I dont know. I would prefer to do both at the same time. I am planning to sue my insurers today. I believe a summons would assist the insurers to settle before a hearing, until then they are happy to hope you are bluffing.

Its WAR

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 months later...

Sorry been away for a while working so no chance to sort this out,

I contacted the FOS they now say they may still investigate even though 6 months have only just passed. ( I should kick myself). I have been asked to send them a covering letter as to why I didnt deal with this sooner. Truth is this is for my son, and he didnt have a clue and was waiting for me, so any advise?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

OK How does this look?

Not too over the top I hope.

Comments welcome

 

Request for payment for loss.

 

Dear Sir/Madam,

POLICY NUMBER: xxxxxx

 

 

 

Further to my letter Dated XXXXXXXX as sent to your local offices at XXXXXXXXXXX

I am extremely disappointed that you have submitted your final response to this matter.

However, I am glad that you have stated that you have supplied all relevant data after my Subject Access Request dated XXXXXXXX.

 

 

I have in my possession a print out copy of the policy which was indeed issued and also, which allowed me to avoid prosecution from not having said insurance.

I also have a letter from your XXXXXXXXXXX quite clearly stating that the policy was never issued AND that you had tried to “contact me but had been given the wrong contact details”.

 

 

I advise you that this is completely false, because the printout I have clearly shows the correct contact details for me, I.E telephone numbers AND address.

Quite why XXXXXXXXXXXX would blatantly issue false information in their letter to me, only your senior management could possibly explain to me.

 

 

As shown in your lack of documentation, you have also failed to send out a letter of cancellation which is required by law "The contract of Insurance comes into effect once the Insurer has accepted the insurance proposal, terms have been agreed and the premium has been paid, or agreed to have been paid."

 

As you have issued a quote, I have accepted it, and paid an installment (at least) then I would have been under cover...

 

This means that you would have to give me notice that you intended to cancel the policy, not just refund the money...

 

 

So I believe you can see your predicament.

 

 

I have attached a copy of my original demands for you to browse over again and for you to reflect on what could have happened in this case.

 

 

 

My targets to resolve this matter

As previously stated, I hope that we can enter into a sincere dialogue about this matter and I am writing this letter to you on the assumption that you will prefer to do this rather than be involved in any legal proceedings which would obviously incur additional costs for yourselves.

 

I am willing to give you a further 14 days for you to reflect and to reply to me accepting, unconditionally, my request in principle and letting me know a date by which I will receive payment.

 

If you dispute that I am entitled to payment, I request that you forward within the above mentioned time scale, a copy of the Terms and Conditions that were in force at the time my account was opened, and any subsequent amendments to those Terms and Conditions. These are requested under CPR Pre-Action Protocol 4.6©, and failure to provide them will be brought to the attention of the court, should it be necessary to commence a county court action.

 

If you do not respond, or you do not respond positively, within this time period, I will exercise my right to seek judgement in court. I believe that these targets are more than sufficient for a large company such as yours with dedicated staff and departments.

 

I may also be reporting you to the relevant FSA departments for their investigations into this matter.

 

 

 

 

Yours faithfully,

 

 

 

 

 

[name]

 

 

..

Link to post
Share on other sites

Add the words NOTICE BEFORE ACTION at the top of the letter. Tell them you are issuing the summons in (your town) county court on day, and date. Say 14 days time without further notice unless payment of xxxxx is received. At which point you will feel obliged also to report to the FSA.

 

Otherwise you will only be delaying things further. Dont ask for sincere dialogue, ask for your demands.

Its WAR

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...