Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I would only rely on your solicitor in this regard. The other two should not have a view.   And, you are responsible for how the court perceive you. They only have your words and deeds to go on. Expecting them to magically see things your way is not a great tactic.
    • Yes, I don't think there is any downside to doing this. If they decline then you can say that in your witness statement
    • Ok! Do you still want me to work on that letter you discussed above in post #26?
    • Thank you for posting up the required details and well done for apparently not revealing the identity of the driver. I am assuming you are the keeper? The depth of ignorance of the parking companies is absolutely amazing. The Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 Schedule 4 is the law relating to private parking and allows those rogues to be able to transfer the charge from the driver [whose name they do not know] to the keeper after 28 days . This is dependent on them complying with the Act. So many of the don't and Alliance is no different. It would help if we could see what you appeal was and to post the back of the PCN as it is lacking so much of the wording necessary to make it compliant so that in your case only the driver is liable to pay the charge. And of course just entering the ANPR arrival times means that they have failed to specify the parking time which is a requirement..  Because the car park was so busy you had to drive around for quite a while before finally finding a place to park which is when the parking period may  actually begin. The poor dears at Alliance have not grasped that particular part of the legislation as yet. To be fair the Act has only been in place for 12 years so one must make allowances for their stupidity . We shouldn't really mock them- but it is fun. You weren't to know but the chances of winning an appeal against Alliance and the IPC is around 5%-and that is high for them. If they allow you to cancel they lose the chance of making money and they would have had a field day when you were there with so many people being caught overstaying because of the chaos in trying to find a parking space then trying to pay.  Your snotty letter could go something like this- Dear Cretins, Yes I mean you Alliance. After 12 years one would have thought that even you could produce a compliant PCN. Did you really think I would pay you a penny extra considering the time I wasted trying  to pay with  long queues at the parking machine, then trying to get a signal to call Just Park. On top of that you then had the cheek to ask for an additional £70 for what dubious unspecified pleasure? You must have made a killing that day charging all those motorists for overstaying because the queues to pay were do long and even walking to pay from the over flow parking fields takes time. And yes I did take photos of the non existent signs in the fields so please don't give me the usual rubbish about your signs being clearly visible. Oh yes that £70. Please tell me and the Court whether that charge included VAT and if it did, why am I being charged to pay your vat? I am sure the Judge would look carefully at that as well as the Inland Revenue. The truth is you had no reasonable cause to ask the DVLA for my data given the chaos at your car park and I believe that you therefore breached my GDPR...................... I expect others will give their views as well.          
    • opps this is going to get messy then if they don't refund. you should never keep util accounts in credit.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Private Parking Tickets - General discussion points


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4797 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 1.1k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

Hello and I want to start with a million thanks! I got a UKPC fine last week for £70, £40 if I paid within two weeks and I cried! Financially things are tight and it just seemed things were getting a bit better and then this landed on my windscreen! To make the blow harder, initially, (like a nutter) as I approached the car and saw it I thought, oh, lovely, somebodies left a christmas card on my windscreen! How wrong can you be! It was out of utter frustration I cried as I had really looked and hadn't seen any signs bar one in a bay which obviously I had avoided. The worst thing was that there were loads of spaces that I would have parked in had it been clear that I was not to park where I did. So I have worried and worried and, like another lady I read about, was about to post off a cheque for £40 and thought I'll just have a look on t'internet and lo and behold! I am sooooooooooooooo grateful for the information and advice. I have learnt and am empowered. I shall be sending my letter recorded delivery today suggesting that the company takes the issue up with the driver!

What a fantastic forum, I'll be on it for everything now!

Kind regards

Ziggywooo

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

Just Joined the group after getting a ticket from ukpc in plymouth.

I just want to thank you for your excellent template letters that i will use to fight them.

it seems the key is to hold your nerve against their bully boy tactics and they will give in.:)

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have recieved 4 letters to my home stating I was given 4 parking tickets on different days in october which I was not. I had no tickets on my car and these letters are the first I knew about them.

It was a car park outside a railway station and the company was ncp.

they are not going to believe i never had the tickets which i did not.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have a ticket from Securi-t.

 

I was going to do what some have suggested and ignore all of their letters, however I would much rather waste their time and money and I hope that if enough people did this these companies will go out of business.

 

What I was wondering was;

1) I believe they have broken the BPA code of practice in several ways:

by not including required information in the first letter, a leaflet stating 'reasonable cause for the request' and the DVLA complaints procedure.

The 'ticket' also doesn't mention the time that the vehicle was first seen, or it's make.

The first letter also only gave info on payment, it did not mention the challenge procedure as stated in the BPA code.

2)The PCN states that 'It is an offence for an unauthorised person to remove or interfere with this notice', and it states that I was 'Illegally parked'. I believe these points are illegal under the Harrassment act 1997?

 

Can anyone advise, should I mention these points in my second, or any, reply, or just stick with the templates?

 

Here's a link to the BPA Code, it states that personal visits from operators or debt collectors can NOT take place before formal court action!

Edited by baptiste
Link to post
Share on other sites

Thats great Ziggywooo I wouldnt mind parking tickets if they had reasonable fines as the money they lose is only £2 if your taking up a space so why should the fine be £70 or more thats just greed which I hate.
Hello there, I totally agree and having spent hours the other day looking at this site, I changed my mind about telling the UKPC to contact the driver since essentially I was the driver and didn't want to lie. I also want the opportunity to make your point about the exorbitant charge, bullying tactics, lack of contract and how dare they? How very dare they?! I am so furious that I really want to give them a gob full rather than deny it and I can do this in the full knowledge that they will not extort a penny out of me! So currently, I am composing a letter! Thanks for the support.
Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the advice Bernie.

I fired the confirmation of keeper letter off to NCP and they have come back with

"every person who enters into a contract with NCP for the parking of a vehicle at our sites, whether by purchasing a ticket or otherwise, does so on behalf off himself and all other persons having any proprietary, possessory or other financial material interest in the vehicle and its contents.

Please note that as a result of this, it is our intention to pursue the registered keepr/owner of the vehicle in the absence of driver specifics"

 

I've now sent them the substatiation of claim letter - I'll post their reply - this one could prove interesting!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the advice Bernie.

I fired the confirmation of keeper letter off to NCP

 

Why? Under what obligation?

 

and they have come back with

"every person who enters into a contract with NCP for the parking of a vehicle at our sites, whether by purchasing a ticket or otherwise, does so on behalf off himself and all other persons having any proprietary, possessory or other financial material interest in the vehicle and its contents.

Please note that as a result of this, it is our intention to pursue the registered keepr/owner of the vehicle in the absence of driver specifics":eek:

 

I would have just asked them to point you in the direction of the legal authority that they intend to rely on to bind a third party to a contract he/she knows nothing about. On second thoughts I wouldn't even bother replying to them!!!!!

 

I've now sent them the substatiation of claim letter - I'll post their reply - this one could prove interesting!

 

They will keep sending you letter after letter now thinking that you MAY actually pay.

regards

Please remember our troops, fighting and dying in our name. God protect them.

Link to post
Share on other sites

"every person who enters into a contract with NCP for the parking of a vehicle at our sites, whether by purchasing a ticket or otherwise, does so on behalf off himself and all other persons having any proprietary, possessory or other financial material interest in the vehicle and its contents. Please note that as a result of this, it is our intention to pursue the registered keepr/owner of the vehicle in the absence of driver specifics" thats a good laugh - they doomed to fail then.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello all,

 

Joined this site as I am in a similar predicament but there are certain circumstances that may make a difference. I'm going to follow the great advice on this thread and others but just wanted a little more clarification pertaining to my circumstances. Here is my story:

 

The PPC in question this time are National Clamps, they 'police' the private car parking in the housing complex I live in. Each resident has a numbered parking bay and is given a pass to display in their windshield; the pass is designed to loop around your rear-view mirror. Unfortunately due to cold weather the mirror fell off when the glue became frozen and hence the pass was sitting in the foot well of the passenger seat when the PCC came checking!

 

Now: As the bay is actually part of the property I rent, can I follow the advice of this thread? Or can I take the stance that the parking space 'belongs' to me (by proxy of renting it from the landlord as part of my flat) and hence they have no right to clamp a car in that bay as it is on my property. I have signed nothing on moving into the property in regards to following any car parking scheme.

 

It is my space and the car will continue to be parked there throughout following the process on this thread. Do you think it's worth claiming ignorance of the driver at the time?

 

Thanks in anticipation!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just a quick update on my case back in July (page 2 if anyone's interested!).

 

ParkingEye have not come back to me after my repsonse to CSS Collect so it's all good from my angle. Don't pay them a penny. I'm almost tempted to park there again without a ticket to go through all this again - kind of fun when you know the score. Thanks to the guys on here who put up all the great info and helped out with my numerous and tedious questions!

 

Incidentally, just got out of an Islington Council one too, slightly off topic but shows even they're not infallible.

 

Quick reply to your question eightballuk, I would personally argue that I owned the space (which I reckon you do if it's stipulated in your lease). Might help to speak to the managing agents first and argue the case through them. If you're only renting, give the landlord a call to check any parking arrangements in place.

 

Have you paid your fine and released the clamp yet?

 

If there are signs etc. in the car park it might make things slightly different but I'm sure the other guys on here will know more than me!

:-x DB :-x

Link to post
Share on other sites

I second Jason-B's thoughts!

 

Congrats DB, hopefully I get the same result. I'll follow your advice and try and contact the landlords (who are notorious for not being forthcoming with requests unless there's an issue with their rent).

 

I'm not going to contact the PPC but wait until I receive a letter then tell them unfortunately I did not park the car in the space (even though it's mine and the car still resides there!), and politely advise that the numbered space is technically private property anyway. Bit cheeky I know but they'll make you jump through hoops whatever I say.

 

My partners father got a ticket for stopping on double yellows within the complex and dutifully sent all the required information to the PPC to pay the PCN - They didn't even take the money or follow up at all so that's the kind of company I'll be dealing with I'm not too worried.

 

PS - apologies if I wasn't clear, they only ticketed the car - not clamped.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Guys

Firstly MANY THANKS a thousand times for having this information on the web, I would certainly be beside myself with rage without it! :)

 

I apologise if this regurgitates any previous information on there, but I am asking just to make sure nothing is different.

 

Last month, I was subjected to one of these private companies' tickets

with a ludicrous amount of £80 for parking without a permit. The company is VCS.

 

I followed initial advice and made no contact.

I have now received a notice from them asking for the usual inflated costs along with a whole heap of threatening text about court proceedings, and bailiffs.

 

it informs me I have lost my right to appeal, and interestingly requests confirmation of the driver on the back of the payslip.

 

On another point, there is no company number on the correspondence and the payment office is a P.O. Box.

 

My question is, do I just use the initial contact letter or do I have to incorporate paragraphs about driver confirmation?

 

Many thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

My question is, do I just use the initial contact letter or do I have to incorporate paragraphs about driver confirmation?

 

Many thanks

 

You don't "use" anything because your next and future actions should be DO NOTHING.

 

Don't write to them again, don't telephone them, and don't for one minute think you are engaged in any type of "appeals system". You are not!

 

There is no appeal and no way of them ever agreeing that you don't owe them millions of pounds and/or that you should hand your first 3 born children over to them for eternal slavery.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Crem

 

Thanks for your reply

as they have gone to the trouble of getting my details from the DVLA and written to me, should I not even respond confirming I am the keeper but asking them to take the matter up with the driver.

 

Otherwise they will just end up sending more letters and possibly people round

 

I wouldnt have thought staying silent would be successful.

 

cheers for the help

Link to post
Share on other sites

Staying silent is usually more successful than engaging with them. There are advocators for both methods in this forum so the choice is yours.

 

By replying though you are only confirming that they have established a link to a real person and that their many letters may eventually grind you down into paying.

 

If you ignore them, they have no idea who, if anyone, they have made contact with.

Edited by crem
Link to post
Share on other sites

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4797 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...