Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Commercial Landlords are legally allowed to sue for early cancellation of the lease. You can only surrender your lease if your landlord agrees to your doing so. They are under no obligation even to consider your request and are entitled to refuse. You cannot use this as an excuse not to pay your rent. Your landlord is most likely to agree to your surrendering the lease if they want the property back in order to redevelop it, or if they wants to rent it to what they regards as a better tenant or at a higher rent. There are two types of surrender: Express surrender in writing. This is a written document which sets out the terms of the surrender. Implied surrender by conduct. (applies to your position) You can move out of the property you leased, simply hand your keys back and the lease will come to an end, but only if the landlord agrees to accept your surrender. Many tenants have thought they can simply post the keys through the landlord's letter box and the lease is ended. This is not true and without a document from the landlord, not only do you not know if the landlord has accepted the surrender, you also do not know on what basis they have accepted and could find they sue you for rent arrears, service charge arrears, damage to the property and compensation for your attempt to leave the property without the landlord's agreement. Unless you are absolutely certain that the landlord is agreeable to your departure, you should not attempt to imply a surrender by relying on your and the landlord's conduct.  
    • I had to deal with these last year worst DCA I have ever dealt with. Just wait for the constant threats of CCJ and how you'll lose in court and how they won't do medication and they want the judge to question you with a load of "BIG" words to boot with the letter. My case was struck out in the end, stupidity on their part as I admitted to owing the debt in the end going through the court process was just a formality as they wouldn't let it drop despite me admitting the debt regardless. They didn't send the last part of the court paper work in so it ended up being struck out
    • Well, that's it then. Clear proof of the rubbish cameras. Clear proof of double dipping. G24 won't be getting a penny. Belt & braces, I would write to the address LFI has found, include the evidence of double dipping, and ask Fraser Group to call their dogs off.
    • LOL. after sending Perch capital a CCA request with a stapled £1 PO attached (x2) Their lapdog Legal team TM Legal have sent me two letters today saying "due to a recent payment on the account, your account is open to legal/enforcement action" so i guess they have tried to apply that payment to the account to run the statue bar along. dirty tactics lol.
    • I have initiated the breathing space so ill wait. from re reading everything this what i understand BS gives me 60 days break from the creditors during these 60 days they may contact me and will most likely default I need to wait until after a default notice to see whether the OC will keep the debt or sell it off If kept by the OC then i should attempt a plan or pay some token payment? If sold to DCA then don't pay and after 6 years it will leave my credit report once the DN is registered with a date. DCA may start a CCJ but unlikely, if they do come back here. last question, do you know roughly how long this will all take? in terms of defaults/default notice, potential CCJ? Would you say I have 12 months plus from when the BS ends?
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

LBA from Optima Leagal Services*WON* DISCONTINUED BY CONSENT*****


Viano
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5359 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi Viano,

 

I should have been more specific.

What I meant was, has the other card been defaulted and if so who is chasing you (if at all)?

 

Newborn

Beaten:

RBS: £4,500

AMEX: £4,200

Barclaycard Visa: £12,100

Barclaycard M/Card: £12,600

(Including the numerous DCAs they have set on me.)

PPI reclaims (into my bank account): £25,000

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 430
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Hi Newborn,

 

If it has been defaulted I can't find it, that is to say I have papers all over the place, and it hasn't come to light yet. And, nobody at the moment that's why I'm a bit coy - you will understand.

 

Viano

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hope this helps Viano...

 

CCA RULES FOR PRESCRIBED TERMS

CONSUMER CREDIT ACT

8.2 What if prescribed terms are missing or incorrect?

 

s127(3) provides that the court may not make an enforcement order unless a document containing all the prescribed terms of the agreement was signed by the debtor – see Q1.21.

 

If therefore any of the prescribed terms is missing, or incorrect, the agreement is not enforceable against the debtor, and the court is precluded from making an enforcement order.

 

 

8.3 What are the prescribed terms?

 

The prescribed terms specified in Sch 6 are as follows:

 

* amount of credit – see Q8.

 

* credit limit – see Q8.5

* repayments – see Q8.9.

* rate of interest – see Q8.6

 

Sch 6 was not amended by the 2004 Regulations.

They need to keep documents such as a copy of the agreement for 6 years after the closure of the account to comply with money laundering legislation.

IS MY AGREEMENT ENFORCEABLE( Via section 127(3) CCA1974)

PRESCRIBED TERMS FOR THE PURPOSES OF SECTIONS 61(1)(0) AND 127(3) OF THE

CONSUMER CREDIT ACT 1974 Taken from sced.6(1983/1553) regulations

(If you just want to find out, skip the bits in between the stars it’s just some extra information)

 

**What do we mean by unenforceable?

In the Consumer Credit Act section 127 there is a provision for making an agreement unenforceable if it does not contain certain pieces of information.

Subsections 1,2,3,4 state which pieces of information these are, and everything mentioned there must be included within the body of the agreement, if one is missing the agreement is unenforceable.

 

How does unenforceable differ from enforceable with a court order only?

When an agreement is unenforceable it means that the court or the judge cannot make a ruling on it. The court cannot make it enforceable.

When an agreement is enforceable only by ruling of the court it means that the agreement can be stopped by the debtor but the court has the power to re-instate it and allow the credit to continue to enforce.**

 

The Pescribed Terms are these

 

A Amount of credit

A term stating the amount of credit

 

B Repayments

A term stating how the debtor is to discharge his obligations under the agreement to make the repayments, which may be expressed by reference to a combination of any of the following-

(a) Number of repayments;

(b) Amount of repayments;

© Frequency and timing of repayments;

(d) Dates of repayments;

(e) The manner in which any of the above may be determined; or in any other way, and any power of the creditor to vary what is payable.

 

C Rate of interest

A term stating the rate of interest to be applied to the credit issued under the agreement

D Credit limit

This may be a term or the manner in which it will be determined or that there is no credit limit.

--------------------------

 

Which of these applies to you depends on the type of agreement you have?

 

For a Running Account (credit card) agreement

 

BC and D Apply

 

For a Restricted Use Debtor Creditor Supplier

  • Where the dealer is the supplier and the creditor is the one providing the finance.
  • The money can only be used for the purpose it is given.
  • There is no interest on the purchase (the cash price is the same as the total price)
  • And there is no advance payment

A is applicable

 

For a fixed Sum Credit Agreement

A conventional credit agreement with none of the above restrictions

 

A and B apply

 

For a Hire Agreement

 

B is Applicable

 

This paper only covers section 127(3) of the Act agreements can also be unenforceable by contravention of sections 1 and4 this will be the subject of the next paper.

Please note that these Prescribed terms where not changed in any way by the 2004/1482 Ammendments although the form in which they appear on the agreement was. Subsection127(3) was repealed on the 6th of April 2007 so that unenforceability due to 127(3) will only apply to agreemens executed before that date.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Copied from the CCA 1974.

 

What the agreement must contain

 

1 A heading in one of the following forms of words shown prominently on the first

page:

 

Hire-Purchase Agreement regulated by the Consumer Credit Act 1974

or

Conditional Sale Agreement regulated by the Consumer Credit Act 1974

or, in any other case,

 

Credit Agreement regulated by the Consumer Credit Act 1974.

 

Where the document embodies an agreement, of which at least one part is a credit

agreement not regulated by the Act, the word ‘partly’ must be inserted before

‘regulated’ in the heading – unless the regulated and unregulated parts of the

agreement can be clearly seen to be separate.

 

2 The name and a postal address of both trader and customer.

 

3 A description (in enough detail to identify it) of any security to be provided by the

customer and a description of its subject matter. The description must be in the

main agreement but the full terms can be in a separate document referred to in

the main agreement.

 

4 Details of any default charges which the customer or a relative of his is required to

pay if he breaches the agreement.

 

5 Certain financial and related particulars (see below).

 

6 Statements of certain forms of protection and remedies provided for the customer

by the Act (see pages 12–14).

 

7 A signature box (see Appendix 2).

 

 

Point to note

In the case of regulated agreements (principal agreements) which contain the option of credit

protection insurance or other contracts relating to a guarantee of goods (subsidiary agreements)

the heading, statement of protection and remedies available to debtors under the Act, and

signature box applicable to the principal agreement may be used where these are different from

those which would be applicable to the subsidiary agreement.

 

Financial and related particulars

 

The following information must be shown together as a whole and not interspersed with

any other information, apart from cross-references to terms of the agreement and subtotals

of the total amounts.

 

 

1 In the case of agreements for fixed-sum credit where the money must be spent on

specified goods, land or services, a list or description of the items, together with

their cash price. Where there is more than one list or description of the items to be

bought with the credit, the cash price of each must be shown, together with the

total cash price. For instance: ‘mahogany dining room suite, six chairs and one

table, £1,500; colour TV £298; total cash price £1,798’. Where there is more than

one list or description, the cash prices and descriptions can be shown in a

schedule to the agreement, provided that the agreement itself refers to the

schedule and states the total cash price.

 

Points to note

The cash price is the price at which the seller would be prepared to sell to a buyer for cash.

It excludes any credit charges and is net of any discount offered to the customer.

‘Specified goods’ etc means goods agreed upon before the agreement is made. Thus these

are specified goods for a hire-purchase agreement but not, for example, for a trading check.

 

2 The amount and nature of any advance payment. This includes a deposit, any

amount allowed in part exchange, and any other payment the customer has to

make before being provided with credit or before entering into the agreement.

 

3 The amount of credit to be provided under a fixed-sum agreement (for example, a

cash loan) or particulars of the credit limit under a running-account agreement (for

example, a credit card).

The credit limit can be expressed as:

a a sum of money, or

b a statement that the trader will, under the agreement, periodically determine

the credit limit and notify the customer, or

c a sum of money together with a statement that the trader may, under the

agreement, periodically vary the credit limit and notify the customer, or

d if (a) (b) or © above are not appropriate either a statement indicating how the

credit limit will be determined and notified to the customer or a statement that

there is no credit limit.

Point to note

Under a fixed-sum agreement where the credit must be spent on specified goods, land or

services, the amount of credit will be the total cash price less any advance payments. If

there are no advance payments, nor any charges for credit under such an agreement, the

amount of credit (which will be the same as the total cash price) need not be shown.

 

4 The total charge for credit and the total amount payable by the customer in the case

of most fixed-sum agreements. The exceptions are given in the ‘points to note’

below. Charges payable by the customer that form part of the total charge for credit

are explained in the booklet Credit charges and APR (see page 35). The total

amount payable is the sum of the amount of credit provided under the agreement,

the total charge for credit and any advance payments. If either the total charge for

credit or the total amount payable cannot be precisely calculated, an estimate can

be shown – provided that this and any assumptions made in the estimate are stated.

 

Points to note

Point 4 does not apply to fixed-sum agreements where:

$ the credit must be spent on specified goods or services, and

$ the total amount payable is not more than the total cash price (that is, there are no

credit charges).

Nor does it apply to fixed-sum agreements under which the timing and/or amounts of

repayments of credit are not specified, or the total amount payable can vary according to

any formula specified in the agreement (including the level of any index, for example the

house price index), or the amount or rate of any credit charge can vary (whether in

accordance with the level of an index, for example, bank base rate or otherwise). In these

cases, the details of interest and other charges to be shown are the same as those required

for running-account agreements.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Chaps,

 

It's for my Disclosure by List. I'm putting everything including the kitchen sink.

 

It -the list- has to be there by 4pm 15th April 2007!.

 

Viano

Link to post
Share on other sites

ah you dont have to actually send them the documents, just the list on which you are disclosing them

 

they should do the same, and that will allow you to look over their list and ask them to disclose any documents that you require to view

Link to post
Share on other sites

GdGd.

 

That will look gd in front of a judge when you show u have done your reasearch.

 

Have Fun.

OFT debt collection guidance

 

Please remember the only stupid question is the one you dont ask so dont worry about asking the stupid questions.

 

Essex girl in pc world looking 4 curtains 4 her pc,the assistant says u dont need curtains 4 a computer!!Essex girl says,''HELLOOO!! i,ve got WINDOWS!!'.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Paul,

 

Yes I understood that, all I am trying to do is make them think I know what I'm doing!

 

The list will be in the post in the morning.

 

Viano

No worries mate, thats why i looked in just to check everything was ok:-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just wait till tomorrow.

 

Phone the courts to see if they recieved it and ask about having the case thrown out as they have not complied with directions.

 

I was told it would cost £75.00 for my friends case but that may be different for you. Also as what forms u would need to fill out. Also you may want to ask what a reasonable amount of time is for u to have to wait after the deadline expires.

 

Some courts are leanant and say the next day and others say you can apply as soon as it deafults.

 

 

 

have them all ready to go.

OFT debt collection guidance

 

Please remember the only stupid question is the one you dont ask so dont worry about asking the stupid questions.

 

Essex girl in pc world looking 4 curtains 4 her pc,the assistant says u dont need curtains 4 a computer!!Essex girl says,''HELLOOO!! i,ve got WINDOWS!!'.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Update on the Disclosure List.

The oppositions list didn't arrive today so I 'phoned the court, they (the telephonist) didn't seem perturbed, I was asked to write to the court and tell them. I was told the Judge would take this into account at the trial!

 

My letter was delivered to the court by hand.

 

I wonder what would have happened had my list been late?

 

Viano

Link to post
Share on other sites

You'd have been hung, drawn and quartered... obviously.

 

It's appalling what the Courts let these firms get away with. It seems, to me at least, that the Courts are in contempt of themselves sometimes!

The REAL Axis of evil: Banks, Credit Card Companies & Credit Reference Agencies.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I would ring back tomorrow and speak to them again.

 

It is not allowed to be one rule for you and another for them. If that person does not give what u think is a satasfactory answer then demand to speak to the courts manager and demand to know wjat is being done about this.

 

Just writing to the courts is not good enough. If it was an unless order then it should be that unless u do this we will do this.

OFT debt collection guidance

 

Please remember the only stupid question is the one you dont ask so dont worry about asking the stupid questions.

 

Essex girl in pc world looking 4 curtains 4 her pc,the assistant says u dont need curtains 4 a computer!!Essex girl says,''HELLOOO!! i,ve got WINDOWS!!'.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I would ring back tomorrow and speak to them again.

 

It is not allowed to be one rule for you and another for them. If that person does not give what u think is a satasfactory answer then demand to speak to the courts manager and demand to know wjat is being done about this.

 

Just writing to the courts is not good enough. If it was an unless order then it should be that unless u do this we will do this.

 

To be honest the directions were not made as "unless orders" so its not unusual for such matters to be referred to a judge . there was nothing setting out that they would be struck out.in fact they were pretty much standard disclosure directions so nothing allowing a strike out

 

so a letter drafted to the court would be the way to go on this matter, drawn to the attention of District Judge XXXXXXX

 

thats my thoughts

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok i thought they could be made as unless orders but i must be wrong.

OFT debt collection guidance

 

Please remember the only stupid question is the one you dont ask so dont worry about asking the stupid questions.

 

Essex girl in pc world looking 4 curtains 4 her pc,the assistant says u dont need curtains 4 a computer!!Essex girl says,''HELLOOO!! i,ve got WINDOWS!!'.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Chrissi,

 

the order was posted here http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/legal-issues/119668-lba-optima-leagal-services-10.html#post1451736

 

thats how i knew it wasnt an unless order;)

 

you certainly can under certain conditions get a judge to make an order in the form of an unless order but it wasnt the case here

Link to post
Share on other sites

ok but i thing i may be mixing the directions orders up tho as it maybe possible.

 

I may be mixing it up with a CPR disclosure.

 

Paul i need to speak to u urgently about a case in court on friday. Is there a way i can contact u i need some advise re a judges decision.

OFT debt collection guidance

 

Please remember the only stupid question is the one you dont ask so dont worry about asking the stupid questions.

 

Essex girl in pc world looking 4 curtains 4 her pc,the assistant says u dont need curtains 4 a computer!!Essex girl says,''HELLOOO!! i,ve got WINDOWS!!'.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Would I be right in saying that the collection companies do all they can to bambozal people at the legal stage , in the hope the defendant will mess up ? There by , failure to supply the correct details is over looked .

The legal frame work , words used etc, are a huge hurdle for the layman to understand . Given the fact legal representation is beyond the person in debt, it results in cases being lost for the lack of true knowledge of the system ?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Would I be right in saying that the collection companies do all they can to bambozal people at the legal stage , in the hope the defendant will mess up ? There by , failure to supply the correct details is over looked .

The legal frame work , words used etc, are a huge hurdle for the layman to understand . Given the fact legal representation is beyond the person in debt, it results in cases being lost for the lack of true knowledge of the system ?

 

Absolutely right :)

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Uploading documents to CAG ** Instructions **

Looking for a draft letter? Use the CAG Library

Dealing with Customer Service Departments? - read the CAG Guide first

1: Making a PPI claim ? - Q & A's and spreadsheets for single premium policy - HERE

2: Take back control of your finances - Debt Diaries

3: Feel Bullied by Creditors or Debt Collectors? Read Here

4: Staying Calm About Debt  Read Here

5: Forum rules - These have been updated - Please Read

BCOBS

1: How can BCOBS protect you from your Banks unfair treatment

2: Does your Bank play fair - You can force your Bank to play Fair with you

3: Banking Conduct of Business Regulations - The Hidden Rules

4: BCOBS and Unfair Treatment - Common Examples of Banks Behaving Badly

5: Fair Treatment for Credit Card Holders and Borrowers - COBS

Advice & opinions given by citizenb are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

PLEASE DO NOT ASK ME TO GIVE ADVICE BY PM - IF YOU PROVIDE A LINK TO YOUR THREAD THEN I WILL BE HAPPY TO OFFER ADVICE THERE:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Would I be right in saying that the collection companies do all they can to bambozal people at the legal stage , in the hope the defendant will mess up ? There by , failure to supply the correct details is over looked .

The legal frame work , words used etc, are a huge hurdle for the layman to understand . Given the fact legal representation is beyond the person in debt, it results in cases being lost for the lack of true knowledge of the system ?

 

 

I agree but then that is what CAG is here for.

 

We help ppl with the debts and help ppl with court action. Some ppl say we condone debt avoidance but we encourgage sorting the debts out and in the correct order.

OFT debt collection guidance

 

Please remember the only stupid question is the one you dont ask so dont worry about asking the stupid questions.

 

Essex girl in pc world looking 4 curtains 4 her pc,the assistant says u dont need curtains 4 a computer!!Essex girl says,''HELLOOO!! i,ve got WINDOWS!!'.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...