Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • In answer to your questions yes even though it wasn't called that, it was the NTK. Had it been a windscreen ticket you would not have received the NTK until 28 days had elapsed. In earlier times if the warden was present then a windscreen ticket would have been issued. It nows seems that the DVLA and the Courts don't see a problem  with not issuing a ticket when a warden is on site. A period of parking must mean that ther e has to be a start time and a finish time in order for it to be considered a period. A single time does not constitute a period. I am not sure what you mean by saying it could be taken either way.  All they have mentioned is  the incident time which is insufficient. There are times on the photos about one minute apart which do not qualify as the parking period because they are not on the PCN itself. The reason I asked if the were any more photos is that you should be allowed 5 minutes Consideration period for you to read the signs and decide whether you want to accept them and you do that by staying longer than 5 minutes. if  more  do not have photos of your staying there for more than 5 minutes they are stuffed. You cannot say that you left within the 5 minute period if you didn't , but you can ask them, should it get to Court , to provide strict proof that you stayed longer than the statutory time. If they can't do that, case over.
    • I recently bought some trainers from Sports Direct and was unhappy with them and their extortionate delivery and return postage charges. I tweeted about being unhappy, and received a reply from someone claiming to be from Sports Direct asking me to send my order number and email address by pm, so a claim could be raised. Which I (stupidly) did. The account used Sports Direct's name and branding, and a blue tick.  The following day I received a call from "Sports Direct Customer Service", and with a Kenyan number. They asked for details of the issue, and then sent me an email with a request to install an app called Remitly. They provided me with a password to access the app then I saw that it had been setup for me to transfer £100, and I was asked to enter my credit card number so they could "refund" me. I told them I was uncomfortable with this (to say the least), and was just told to ring them back when I did feel comfortable doing it. Ain't never gonna happen.  I just checked my X account, and the account that sent the message asking for my details is gone. I feel like a complete idiot falling for what was a clear scam. But at least I realised before any real damage was done. if you make a complaint about a company on social media, and you get a reply from someone claiming to be from that company and asking for personal details, tread very carefully.   
    • The good news is that their PCN does not comply with the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012  Schedule 4.. First under Section 9 (2)The notice must— (a)specify the vehicle, the relevant land on which it was parked and the period of parking to which the notice relates; (b)inform the keeper that the driver is required to pay parking charges in respect of the specified period of parking and that the parking charges have not been paid in full; The PCN does not specify the parking period. AS you rightly say the ANPR times do not include driving to the parking space and then from there back to the exit. And once you include getting children in and out of cars especially if seat belts are involved the time spent parked can be a fair bit less than the ANPR times but still probably nowhere near the time you spent. But that doesn't matter -it's the fact that they failed to comply. Also they failed to ask the keeper to pay the charge.  Their failure means that they cannot now transfer the charge from the diver to the keeper . Only the driver is now liable. As long as UKPA do not know who was driving it will be difficult for them to win in Court as the Courts do not accept that the driver and the keeper are the same person. Particularly as anyone can drive any car if they have the correct insurance. It might be able to get more reasons to contest the PCN if you could get some photos of the signs. both at the entrance and inside the car park. the photos need to be legible and if there are signs that say different things from others that would also be a help.
    • Farage rails and whines about not being allowed on the BBC ... ... but pulls out at the last minute of a BBC Panorama interview special. It was denied it was anything to do with his candidates being outed as misogynists and Putin apologists, or that farage was afraid Nick Robinson might throw some difficult questions at him ... despite farages recent practice at quickly cowering in fear.   It was claimed 'it wasn't in Nigels diary'     Nigel Farage pulls out of BBC interview at last minute amid Hitler row WWW.INDEPENDENT.CO.UK ‘Panorama’ special postponed as Reform UK party faces row over candidate who claimed UK would have been ‘better off’ if it had...   Waaahhhh
    • i'd say put lowells to strict proof of where the payment came from. cant hurt to send SB letter, even if proved not. at least they get your correct address. they'd have to link the old IVA times scale to a payment  these IVA F&F pots (if thats where it came from) most mugs dont even know they are not only taking most of your payments on fees but also creaming money off to supposedly offer F&F's.  funny when the IVA fails or is complete these sums of money in F&F pots never get given back or even mentions... these IVA firm directors esp with regard to knightsbridge and creditfix were fined and struck off more times than Paul Burdell of Link Fame and still managed to continue to scam people.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
        • Thanks
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Please Help CCA request turn down


spore33
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6073 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I'm suprised that the police haven't been in touch with you regarding the 'stolen' cheque! If not, you really should report it yourself, if only to cover yourself in case of any future unpaid tickets. Have you been in touch with your insurance company with regards to the car being stolen (assuming it was insured)?

Link to post
Share on other sites

well if they cheque was stolen then from what i understand you defo are not responsible for the charges or the money being paid back. I thing you need to go to the police and speak to a solicitor.

OFT debt collection guidance

 

Please remember the only stupid question is the one you dont ask so dont worry about asking the stupid questions.

 

Essex girl in pc world looking 4 curtains 4 her pc,the assistant says u dont need curtains 4 a computer!!Essex girl says,''HELLOOO!! i,ve got WINDOWS!!'.

Link to post
Share on other sites

something still feels wrong about this to me.

 

The cheque was stolen and the police not involved. I dont claim to know everything but that to me sounds wrong.

 

I assumed that if the bank thought there was some type of fraudlant activity they would have got the police involved straight away.

 

My advice to u is change banks as they dont sound like a good bank.

 

What bank is it so i know to stay well clear of them.

OFT debt collection guidance

 

Please remember the only stupid question is the one you dont ask so dont worry about asking the stupid questions.

 

Essex girl in pc world looking 4 curtains 4 her pc,the assistant says u dont need curtains 4 a computer!!Essex girl says,''HELLOOO!! i,ve got WINDOWS!!'.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Im not even so much worry about the money being pay back or not bc is over a year now I just want to move on,what is making me going mad is when I request for the CCA, the bank told me they are not obliged to send me a copy bc there were history of fraud.

 

As pt2537 said (theres no section in the consumer credit act which says " a creditor may with reasonable cause refuse a request under section 77 or 78") that is what im standing on at the moment.Im waiting for pt2537 or any one else in the forum to draft me a letter to send to those thieves

Link to post
Share on other sites

can i be a real pain, and ask if possible, could you post a copy of the letter they sent you in response to your cca request.

 

if not could you type it up, that way we can compose a reply tailored to the letter they sent you

 

obviously removing all personal details first

 

Regards

paul

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Paul for your advice I have been trying to attached the copy of the letter but I don't know how to,that is why im just writing what is on the letter.

 

I confirm that as your account is now registered as fraud, we are not obliged to provide you with a copy of the agreement requested under the Consumer Credit Act 1974 section 77-78.

 

Please find enclosed Postal Order for £1.00

 

Yours sincerely

 

sarah smith

senior payment Advisor

HFC Bank limited

Link to post
Share on other sites

Banks and other financial institutions often don't involve the police when they are defrauded, because they do not wish their (rather over-inflated) reputations to suffer. In any case, they aren't the victim - their customer is.

 

I worked for a company that lost tens of thousands because of a fairly complicated [problem] involving insurance sales and company fraud. We went to the police, and in the course of the investigation evidence was found to suggest that one of the credit card merchant services had lost almost £3m; the company were aware of it, but did not wish to co-operate with the investigation because they were desperate to keep the facts about how easily and how often the [problematic] had taken their money out of the media.

 

In Spore's case, I'd be inclined to remind the bank that there is no lawful excuse for failing to comply with his request, and then call their bluff with the fraud thing by asking them to confirm the name and station of the police officer dealing with the matter.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Dear Mrs/Ms Smith

 

Re ACC NO xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

 

Thank you for your letter dated xx/xx/2007 the contents of which are duly noted.

 

I draw your attention to the fact that the Consumer Credit Act 1974 provides that a consumer may request under section 77 or 78 a copy of the executed credit agreement for their account providing payment of the statutory fee of one pound is made

 

On the xx/xx/2007 i wrote to your company requesting that you provide a true copy of the credit agreement for the account numbered above pursuant to the Consumer Credit Act 1974. I find no provision within the Act for a creditor to refuse to comply with a statutory request from a debtor, therefore i draw your attention to the fact that my request was recieved by you on xx/xx/2007 and you have/had til xx/xx/2007 to comply. Im sure you will be aware that should a creditor fail to comply with a statutory request under the provisions of 78(1) Consumer Credit Act 1974 within 12 working days as laid down in Consumer Credit (Prescribed Periods for Giving Information) Regulations 1983 (SI 1983/1569) the debt enters default and s78(6) Consumer Credit Act 1974 states

6) If the creditor under an agreement fails to comply with subsection (1)—

 

(a) he is not entitled, while the default continues, to enforce the agreement;

 

and

 

 

(b) if the default continues for one month he commits an offence

 

 

therefore i respectfully request that you supply me the documentation that i requested. i enclose the one pound fee you returned.

 

should you refuse to comply i will make a formal complaint to Trading Standards requesting the take enforcement action against you

 

Should this account enter into default / also while this account is in default (edit to suit) i will not be making any further payments until you comply

 

please supply the requested information in 7 or 14 days

 

 

I look forward to your reply

 

 

edit to suit, it should make them take notice. i have been extremely busy today so i have not had a chance to proof read this so i would read it through and amend the bits you find that need it

 

i hope this helps,

 

regards

paul

Link to post
Share on other sites

If they are saying that your account is now registered "as fraud" and they are not obliged to provide you with a copy of the CCA (which IMO is bowlarks), then equally, you should not be obliged to make any payments on an account that the allege to be fraudulent. They can't have it both ways.... :cool:

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...