Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Ok, I don't necessarily want to re-open my old thread but I've seen a number of such threads with regards to CCJ's and want to ask a fairly general consensus on the subject.   My original  CCJ is 7 years old now and has had 2/3 owners for the debt over the years since with varying level of contact.  Up to last summer they had attempted a charging order on a shared mortgage I'm named on which I defended that action and tried to negotiate with them to the point they withdrew the charging order application pending negotiations which we never came to an agreement over.  However, after a number of communication I heard nothing back since last Autumn barring an annual generic statement early this year despite multiple messages to them since at the time.  So at a loss as to why the sudden loss of response from them.   Then something came through from this site at random yesterday whilst out that I can't find now with regards to CCJ's to read over again.  Now here is the thing, I get how CCJ's don't expire as such, but I've been reading through threads and Google since this morning and a little confused.  CCJ's don't expire but can be effectively statute barred after 6 years (when in my case was just before I last heard of the creditor) if they are neither enforced in that time or they apply to the court within the 6 years of issue to extend the CCJ and that after 6 years they can't really without great difficulty or explanation apply for a CCJ extension after of the original CCJ?.  Is this actually correct as I've read various sources on Google and threads that suggest there is something to this?.  
    • whats the court claimform for? return of goods order? please complete this:  
    • std DWF letter. typically £157 something. lots of them here already doesn't say WILL anything. read it properly dx  
    • Have you read our upload guide [click on the word] for advice on how to post up documents? Pdf files are best, jpegs won't be accepted. HB
    • Sunak's already had enough of travelling like the little people. Rishi Sunak flies back from Devon by helicopter after gushing about 'great' train travel - Mirror Online WWW.MIRROR.CO.UK Rishi Sunak told broadcasters: 'The train was great, I've been taking lots of pictures and videos' - but he skipped the 3-hour, £55 train home in favour of...  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

CDi Credit Management - fake N1 for vets bill


ukiainib
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3657 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

IMPORTANT INFORMATION

 

Readers of this of this thread may like to know that, CDi Credit Management had their Consumer Credit license revoked by the OFT in June 2007 after an initial 'minded to revoke' notice was issued in February 2006. They only kept the license on appeal in April 2008, although it was later renewed in September 2008.

 

If you feel that CDi Credit Management have given you a raw deal, then you should inform your local Trading Standards, who will pass the information to the OFT.

 

You can find your local Trading Standards via their website (http://www.tradingstandards.gov.uk/), by phoning Consumer Direct on 08454 04 05 06 or by looking in Yellow Pages.

 

CDi Credit Management's Consumer Credit License number is 0242467. You can find the details about their license and its history by doing a search on the OFT's public register - http://www2.crw.gov.uk/pr/Default.aspx

Edited by steven4064
Corrections from user mikeg58 included

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 74
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Hi all,

 

Just been reading your reviews on CDI, it looks like I'm another 'sucker'; to fall into there trap of cold calling our company offering credit managment.

 

I paid for there services Oct 08, and to date they have not recovered any debt. the last few months I have had no update etc etc.

 

I have wrote letters of complaints and now thinking of taking it further to recover my £500 plus VAT to use there services!!!

 

Can anyone help on my next move ??

 

Has anyone used Daniel Silver or any reports on them ???

I'm desperate to recover some outstanding debt but unsure of my next move but I know something I WILL NOT be renewing CDI

 

Anyones help would be much appreciated.

We have £20,000 in bad debts. I think you mean Daniels Silverman from Liverpool. They used to collect debts on a no win-no fee and we only paid the court fee plus an agent for the court hearing if we wanted one. Agent £150 say for an afternoon. Good, until they said judges dont want debt collectors agents in court, they want solicitors. This can cost around £1000 just for the afternoon.

We looked at other firms and came up with CDI who's fee is now £1250 plus vat, half payable up front. On top of our debts or £20000, the bank (LloydsTSB) have cost us about £50,000. CDI say 25% of their business is collecting from banks. Now I don't know what to do at all.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Wow; that is serious money. I use the on-line court service for all our debtors who are refusing or avoiding payment. I send a letter giving seven days notice that I am going to sue, wait ten days to be sure, then sue. There is no point issuing a summons if they have no money, but otherwise just issue on line and pay the fee. If they still don't pay I go on-line again and pay the fee for the bailiff. I keep in touch with the bailiff to keep them interested. If the debt is more than £600.00 I would use the High Court Enforcement Group based in Liverpool as they are professional, effective and charge no up front fees. Usually people pay after the seven day letter, occasionally only once the summons has been issued. DIY is a good cheap option. Credit checking prior to allowing credit is the most important piece of work to avoid bad debts in the first place.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Do it exactly as you would for a bank charges reclaim:

 

1. Write to them asking for your money back - tell them they have 14 days

 

2. If they do not, write again requesting it back. Head the letter "Letter Before Action", again give them 14 days but say that if they do not comply within the 14 days you will commence court proceedings without further correspondence.

 

3. If still no joy, start a claim in the County Court

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Wow; that is serious money. I use the on-line court service for all our debtors who are refusing or avoiding payment. I send a letter giving seven days notice that I am going to sue, wait ten days to be sure, then sue. There is no point issuing a summons if they have no money, but otherwise just issue on line and pay the fee. If they still don't pay I go on-line again and pay the fee for the bailiff. I keep in touch with the bailiff to keep them interested. If the debt is more than £600.00 I would use the High Court Enforcement Group based in Liverpool as they are professional, effective and charge no up front fees. Usually people pay after the seven day letter, occasionally only once the summons has been issued. DIY is a good cheap option. Credit checking prior to allowing credit is the most important piece of work to avoid bad debts in the first place.

 

Yes good points,although the considered pre action protocols is 28 days.

EOs are certainly worth considering because they have great benefits;

 

1.They dont just work 9-4 5 days a week they work 7

 

2.They do not give the debtor advanced notice of a visit (as is usually the case with County Court Bailiffs)

 

3.They will make multiple visits.

 

4.They do not need any Court Warrants to break into Commercial properties.

 

5.In some instances you will recover MORE than the warrant since they add additional fees.

 

The last time I had a quote it was for £85.00 and they wanted to act immediately but the Head office address on the warrant was wrong-so important to make sure that when asking for a warrant that the registered office goes on there.

Have a happy and prosperous 2013 by avoiiding Payday loans. If you are sent a private message directing you for advice or support with your issues to another website,this is your choice.Before you decide,consider the users here who have already offered help and support.

Advice offered by Martin3030 is not supported by any legal training or qualification.Members are advised to use the services of fully insured legal professionals when needed.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

CDI are a bunch of disney characters,they do not do work they say they will,and i think the only reason why they are still trading is once they loose there licence they apply in another persons name. I did some extensive research on them and found that they are not a ltd company they are a PARTNERSHIP and have several companies all to do with financial services etc registered to the same address in sunderland,there staff turn over is very high and when there staff leave they tell you that the person wasn't up to the job! How professional!! lol. More like the ex employee was sick of working for them as they have to lie to clients constantly. I now use ……. based in London as they are a huge organisation and much better, we also put the small ones in court online which has proved more successful than using debt collectors. We use …... for back info cos some debtors are hard to chase and as already mentioned on here its pointless putting someone in court if they have nothing cos a CCJ to some people is simply a trophy or another one added to there list. If you do a credit check on a company and they have several CCJ's and owe you money its then worth using a large company to do some digging n them,most people who avoid paying there bills slip up somewhere along the line. Somtimes its better to throw 15% of the debt towards a company and get say 85% back than nothing at all!

 

And just for the record CDI do use credit checking but they are illegally using creditsafe reports which you buy for your companies use,but they are not allowed to send them to there clients,and they know this thats why when you receive one it has creditsafe marked out in balck permanent marker,again how professional!! would you really want to put your debts which are worth alot to businesses in the hands of these people??.... my thinking is NO!

Link to post
Share on other sites

We have £20,000 in bad debts. I think you mean Daniels Silverman from Liverpool. They used to collect debts on a no win-no fee and we only paid the court fee plus an agent for the court hearing if we wanted one. Agent £150 say for an afternoon. Good, until they said judges dont want debt collectors agents in court, they want solicitors. This can cost around £1000 just for the afternoon.

We looked at other firms and came up with CDI who's fee is now £1250 plus vat, half payable up front. On top of our debts or £20000, the bank (LloydsTSB) have cost us about £50,000. CDI say 25% of their business is collecting from banks. Now I don't know what to do at all.

 

 

 

They say they will do alot of things and never do,you will regret going with them. We have one guy who owes us 10k and we've had to do digging to locate his assests to find the cheapest way of collecting our money cos its over 5k it has to go through higher channels of the court and this carries alot of expense,when we were with CDI we asked them to do a land registry search to see if they bloke owns his house in which we could go for a charging order if need be. They confirmed yes he does own the house,we thought what a great result,things started to go pear shaped with CDI soon after we signed up,so we decided to search all the info this company had given us and applied to the Land Registry ourselves only to have it confirmed by them that NO the bloke in question DID NOT own his house and it was rented from another couple,not only did they give us false information we then had to start the digging process all over agin. this has taken a lot of time up and we really did not need it wasting by CDI!

 

 

I Have just taken pleasure in viewing the website cdicreditmanagement dot net and wow! why didn't i think of that,its brilliant if you read it ,it simply mirrors everything we experienced with them and i'm sure alot of people would agree! Shame on CDI!!

Edited by fayec126
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

When I raised the points about licenses and why some other firm comes up when I searched them on Google.earth it stopped the phone calls dead. They wanted to charge us £1250 plus VAT which was reduced when I mentioned other peoples fees. Not heard a thing since.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...
Hello

 

Just to say I was also a client of CDi Credit Management

 

Long story short - my advice is DO NOT USE THEM.

 

I can go into details if anyone wants but stay clear of them

 

Thanks everyone on this forum. I nearly listened to their fairytales but something made me check them before I signed on the dotted line. They were just too pushy which always makes me think about why they need to be like that! They sent me stange scans of copies of legal documents. Their company history is scattered with companies dissolved etc even though they claim to have been in business for 20 years!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

do not touch CDI managent. I agree with what everbody else is saying. We have lost £500 plus V.A.T with them and have been fighting for it back for over 6 months. All they do is make excuses you very rarely get to speak to the same person more than once even though they supposedly allocate you with your own account manager. I think I had at least 6 account managers in 12 months none of them were any good. All these call backs from them every month with progress reports never materialise. I wish I had read these blogs before I paid my money

Link to post
Share on other sites

do not touch CDI managent. I agree with what everbody else is saying. We have lost £500 plus V.A.T with them and have been fighting for it back for over 6 months. All they do is make excuses you very rarely get to speak to the same person more than once even though they supposedly allocate you with your own account manager. I think I had at least 6 account managers in 12 months none of them were any good. All these call backs from them every month with progress reports never materialise. I wish I had read these blogs before I paid my money

 

 

I checked them out as well so did not lose any money. I have used Daniels Silverman (Liverpool)which were good until they changed the system. They used to collect the debts and if it needed to go to court they would do all the pre legal work within their remit at no charge and provide an Agent for the court hearing which we paid for (£150 about) but they now send eveything to solicitors which changes the way we collect debts. They changed the system half way through collecting our debts which left us high and dry. Caused a lot of trouble! I complained by had no response.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...
Hey all, i work for a debt recovery company in the sales and the amount of companies i have spoken with who are or have dealt with this company has nothing good to say about them at all. They are telling companies that they can recover Liqudated Debts etc which is a joke as if a company has gone down or bust sadly no-one can get money for this.

 

Its really frustrates me as the company i work for dont charge unless successful with no upfront fees or contract and its companies like CDI who tarnish the name of the good companies who can actually help.

 

Hey, I wish there was an easy way to collect a debt but I haven't found one yet. We have around £27000 in bad debts and I find there is no honesty any more where money is concerned. The law doesn't help either. It seems geared to people who have deep pockets and just won't pay up.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I had two debts last week at 6 weeks old for around two thousand pounds each. I sent my usual seven day threat letter and I have in my hands within three days a cheque for one at debt two thousand pounds and the other is being paid by two payments over ten days; they have been warned I will sue if both payments are not paid as agreed. It is my experience that people wait too long to go to court and often the company is in real trouble or gone under by the time you have done anything about it. You have to threaten court costs, interest and removal of goods (even if you can't do it). They don't want a summons and they don't want to spend on a solicitor. They almost invariably pay up within seven days and if they don't I give them ten days (poor post and that) then go on line and issue a summons. They have always paid imediately because they don't want a bad debt recorded against them as they still need to raise finance. Do not be afraid of the online court system. Have really good Terms and Conditions that are given right at the beginning with your quote and in everything you provide, invoice etc. The main thing is not to hang around, they don't believe you will spend money on a solicitor; so don't, do it yourself. Do your research, get your T & C's right, get your threat letter right, include interest as per the Late Payment Act and issue a summons without fear. Call their bluff and be ruthless with the tools available to you. It's always happening to us and they don't really care as they're either couldn't care less types or their business is in trouble so they're focussed on themselves; he who shouts loudest gets paid quickest. I have a huge amount of sympathy for struggling businesses, but ours is also struggling and my resposibility is to my staff and my business. This is my experience (30 yrs in business).

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Misty blaze. I don't know what industry you are in but our industry is much different. We have a sinario where there is nothing wrong with it until you give them the bill and it all kicks off from there.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Ibsys,

I'm not really sure what you are saying here. I send invoices and for those who have applied for a 30 day credit account, I wait thirty days, for those who are due to pay immediately on completion of works, I wait about five days then telephone them. I'm interested in what you are saying, could you expand a bit?

Link to post
Share on other sites

What I am saying is derogetory to you. What I mean is, to start, we are in the "construction/ heavy trades" joinery and fit. The range of work is for two types of customer, 1. Residential 2. Commercial. The commercial is divided into a. small builder b. large conglomerate and C. other type (non-trade).

 

Terms and conditions: where it states payment terms and dispute resolution (for smaller customers) say 14 or 30 days as the case may be and the large £200m turnover company on 30 days and JCT. We battle with the Construction Act in the trade and residentials who, for the minor part, just announce problems after they get the bill or reminder with no truth about it.

 

"If you don't raise a dispute more than 5 days before the bill falls due you have to pay it anyway." and "Under English law, we are allowed to be given reasonable time to investigate alleged defects and where they exist, be allowed to rectify those defects if they are found to be our fault. Otherwise we shall not be responsible for the cost of others to rectify alleged defects"

 

That said, it is very easy to get into as situation of "he said she said..." In the construction industry, legal proffesionals fall down because many parts of the industry work in a very different way and even when in court, an ordinary judge can't understand the issues. This is why we have TCCs with TCC judges who are specialist in the field, whence even a debt collector needs support in the earlier stages to collecting a debt.

 

I hope I have expanded the subject sufficiently but to say the construction industry is like no other.

Link to post
Share on other sites

What I am saying is derogetory to you. What I mean is, to start, we are in the "construction/ heavy trades" joinery and fit. The range of work is for two types of customer, 1. Residential 2. Commercial. The commercial is divided into a. small builder b. large conglomerate and C. other type (non-trade).

 

Terms and conditions: where it states payment terms and dispute resolution (for smaller customers) say 14 or 30 days as the case may be and the large £200m turnover company on 30 days and JCT. We battle with the Construction Act in the trade and residentials who, for the minor part, just announce problems after they get the bill or reminder with no truth about it.

 

"If you don't raise a dispute more than 5 days before the bill falls due you have to pay it anyway." and "Under English law, we are allowed to be given reasonable time to investigate alleged defects and where they exist, be allowed to rectify those defects if they are found to be our fault. Otherwise we shall not be responsible for the cost of others to rectify alleged defects"

 

That said, it is very easy to get into as situation of "he said she said..." In the construction industry, legal proffesionals fall down because many parts of the industry work in a very different way and even when in court, an ordinary judge can't understand the issues. This is why we have TCCs with TCC judges who are specialist in the field, whence even a debt collector needs support in the earlier stages to collecting a debt.

 

I hope I have expanded the subject sufficiently but to say the construction industry is like no other.

 

"What I am saying IS NOT derogetory to you..." is what the first line of the last post should say. Sorry for the error.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the correction, I was a bit miffed. Clearly you are right about the construction industry being a law unto itself. I've often thought that to protect small businesses the customer should have to place the payment for the agreed quote in a bank account that is controlled by a regulated specialist firm, a/ to prove they aren't ordering goods they can't pay for and b/ so that they cannot refuse to pay for spurious reasons. The Bankruptcy Association was set up by a man whose builder brother died after a second bankruptcy, caused by clients who didn't pay him. He believes the stress killed his brother and considers English law fails to protect the small business person. My point is that many people wait too long and and don't realise that with a bit of research they can do more to get their money without resorting to debt collectors and solicitors. We design, manufacture and install signs and some clients use us to finance their business instead of a bank! As I said though, this is only my experience.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Nearly got caught by this company today, fast and smooth talk was pretty good ! they were sending a courior to my house first thing monday morning to collect £400 and all the paper work to start procedings to persue my debter ! Errrm, smelt a rat, checked them out via o.f.t who gave me 1st class advice which directed me to this forum. I'm not saying they are a good or bad outfit, but there customers comments make interesting reading !but i think i have just saved myself a big headache !:)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 years later...
CCA Home Page :: CCA Search :: CCA Search Results :: Licence Details

 

Application / Licence Details

 

 

 

Licence Number:0242467

Licence Status:Current

 

Current Applicant / Licensee:

 

Business NameCompany Registration Number CDI Credit Management

 

Public Notices:

 

StageDateDocument LinkEvent NumberNotes Appeal to First Tier Tribunal Upheld21/04/2008

6 Appeal to First Tier Tribunal28/06/2007

6 Determined To Refuse DTR01/06/2007

6 Minded To Refuse MTR15/02/2006

6

 

Categories:

 

Credit brokerage Debt collecting Provision of credit information services, excluding credit repair

 

Right To Canvass Off Trade Premises:No

 

 

Trading Name(s) (Current):

 

C.D.I. Credit Management Commercial And Domestic Investigations

 

Trading Name(s) (Historic):

 

C.D.I. Credit Management

 

Issued Date: 07-Sep-1988

Date Maintenance Payment Due: 07-Sep-2018

 

 

Legal Formation:

 

Partnership

 

Current Individuals that run the organisation:

 

NamePosition Ian Geoffrey Williamson Paul Hughes Stephen Hall

 

Historic Individuals that run the organisation:

 

NamePosition Ian Geoffrey WilliamsonPARTNER Mr David NewtonPARTNER Mr Paul HughesPARTNER Stephen HallPARTNER Stephen HallPARTNER

 

Nature of Business:

 

Other

 

Current Address(es):

 

Address TypeAddress Correspondence3b, Colima Avenue, Sunderland Enterprise Park, SUNDERLAND, Tyne & Wear, SR5 3XB Principal Place Of Business3b, Colima Avenue, Sunderland Enterprise Park, SUNDERLAND, SR5 3XB, United Kingdom

 

Historic Address(es):

 

Address TypeAddress Correspondence3B, Colima Avenue, Sunderland Enterprise Park, SUNDERLAND, SR5 3XB Correspondence85, Briar Lea, Shiney Row, Houghton-Le-Spring, Tyne & Wear, DH4 4PX Correspondence9, The Esplanade, Sunderland, Tyne & Wear, SR2 7BQ Principal Place Of Business29, Villiers Street, Town Centre, Sunderland, Tyne & Wear, SR1 1EJ Principal Place Of Business9, The Esplanade, Sunderland, Tyne & Wear, SR2 7BQ

 

http://www2.crw.gov.uk/pr/default.aspx

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • dx100uk changed the title to CDi Credit Management - fake N1 for vets bill
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...