Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Wrong as usual Jugg    Did Michael Cohen Commit Perjury In The Trump Trial? WWW.ZEROHEDGE.COM ZeroHedge - On a long enough timeline, the survival rate for everyone drops to zero Michael Cohen. He still has one day of cross examination ahead of him on Thursday. With the government resting after Cohen’s cross examination, I believe that an honest judge would have no alternative but to grant a motion for a directed verdict and end the case before it goes to the jury. Judge Juan Merchan will now have to give the full measure of his commitment to the rule of law. Given the failure to support the elements of any crime or even to establish the falsity of recording payments as legal expenses, this trial seemed to stumble through the motions of a trial. Michael Cohen was only the final proof of a raw political exercise. For critics, some of Cohen’s answers appear clearly false or misleading. Like their star witness, the prosecutors have shown that they simply do not take the law very seriously when there is an advantage to be taken.
    • So to sum up. 1.  You & your friend did the right thing on 28 December and are in the right legally. 2.  You are in the early stages of the threatening letter cycle.  We've seen these letters quite literally over 10,000 times.  For the moment your friend has nothing to worry about. 3.  No-one will turn up at your friend's door. 4.  If months down the line this got to court, you would win.  It's blatant disability discrimination.  Some time back I looked through the results of Excel v Caggers court cases, well we won 85% of the time, and you would be 100& certain to win. But this is the bit that you won't like ... 5.  Excel don't care that they are legally in the wrong.  They want your money.  They will go on and on with their letters hoping you'll give in. 6.  They are also the most litigious of the private parking companies and it's perfectly possible, months hence, that they will take your friend to court.  You have to be prepared for this.  They would lose.  But they don't care about the losses since, sadly, presumably so many people are afraid of court and so give in and pay.  7.  We will of course support you all the way!
    • Hi, Just updating that I'll be submitting the SJPN shortly this evening electronically.
    • Fraudsters copy the details of firms we authorise to try and convince people that their firm is genuine. Find out why you shouldn’t deal with this clone firm.View the full article
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

provident loan/wiseman debt collectors


conradsfate
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5654 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi

Peter once checked my provident agreement and came up with the following if it helps. I've contacted him again as I've just received a claim form from northampton. Will let you know what response I have from Peter.

 

The agreement is on page 356 of CCA thread

 

Re: Re Provident-(post 7117)

Quote:

Originally Posted by taurus66

Hi

I have onny glanced so far ut i see no interest ratewhich is of course a prescribed terms.

Also the apr is incorrect according to my calculations it should be 181%.

This could be construed as predudicial to the debtor in that the correct information was not supplied in order to make an informed choice and render the agreement unenforceable under 127(1)

I also take the point about the extortionate credit bargain.May i ask what the status of the account is currently.

PM me if you like

 

Best regards

Peter

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

My partner recieved a letter yesterday from them advertising the interest rate at 183.2%.

OFT debt collection guidance

 

Please remember the only stupid question is the one you dont ask so dont worry about asking the stupid questions.

 

Essex girl in pc world looking 4 curtains 4 her pc,the assistant says u dont need curtains 4 a computer!!Essex girl says,''HELLOOO!! i,ve got WINDOWS!!'.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

 

Did the agent witness the signature herself? Looks that way and they did the same with me.

 

They are supposed to take it back to head office to be approved and witnessed by the area manager but alot of them seem to witness it themselves.

 

Something to bring up maybe?

 

Good Luck

IVA Entry Removed

Nationwide Default Removed

Nationwide Joint Account Default Removed

Natwest Default Removed

Blackhorse Car Finance Court Claim - Won

Link to post
Share on other sites

It sound like a good idea.

 

They will not issue legal procedings as they will have to much to answer. Especially when tou explian to the court they failed to send an gent round and they failed to send you anything to help you pay them back the money and the argument over the interest rate.

 

Chrissi

OFT debt collection guidance

 

Please remember the only stupid question is the one you dont ask so dont worry about asking the stupid questions.

 

Essex girl in pc world looking 4 curtains 4 her pc,the assistant says u dont need curtains 4 a computer!!Essex girl says,''HELLOOO!! i,ve got WINDOWS!!'.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

had a reply from letter i sent.

guess what they have sent me another expenduture and income letter with notice of intend action across the top and asking for payment by the 16th jan/08 or they are going to take court action.

they are on about balifs and county couirt fees. aarrgghhhh. help

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just send the letter again.

 

See what you get and tell them they have 7 days from recipt to reply to your letter.

 

Chrissi

OFT debt collection guidance

 

Please remember the only stupid question is the one you dont ask so dont worry about asking the stupid questions.

 

Essex girl in pc world looking 4 curtains 4 her pc,the assistant says u dont need curtains 4 a computer!!Essex girl says,''HELLOOO!! i,ve got WINDOWS!!'.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 6 months later...

an update on these,

 

they ignored all my letters and i eventually made a standing order with my bank to them and i have been paying provident a steady £5.00 a month.

so i'm slowly paying it back for i don't know how long...

i asked them if they could reduce the amount as i'm on income support - they said no.

some one did mention about the apr being wrong as i think this would be my only option but could any one help me on that as that's why i'm repaying them as i don't know anything about apr...

 

help!

Link to post
Share on other sites

You are in control of the standing order. Then u can change the amount to whatever you feel is within your means.

 

Write to them advising that due to the high living costs you are going to have to reduce the amount to something which you can afford.

 

If you want to talk about the apr then u need to speak to PT2537 about that as i am no good with apr either.

 

If you need any help with the letter then let me know.

 

Chrissi

OFT debt collection guidance

 

Please remember the only stupid question is the one you dont ask so dont worry about asking the stupid questions.

 

Essex girl in pc world looking 4 curtains 4 her pc,the assistant says u dont need curtains 4 a computer!!Essex girl says,''HELLOOO!! i,ve got WINDOWS!!'.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 months later...

Just to warn all of you ... these 'legal' loan sharks are now reporting their loans to us to the Credit Reference Agencies!

I'm spitting blood about this!

Even though I've not missed any payments and my account with them is up-to-date this flippin door step loan will remain on my CR for 6 flippin years.

What 'legit' lender will lend to me now!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...
Just to warn all of you ... these 'legal' loan sharks are now reporting their loans to us to the Credit Reference Agencies!

I'm spitting blood about this!

Even though I've not missed any payments and my account with them is up-to-date this flippin door step loan will remain on my CR for 6 flippin years.

What 'legit' lender will lend to me now!

 

Sorry to be so thick, but I thought all loans you take out are put on your credit files.

 

What would be the problem for someone like Provident appearing on your credit file. Is it a big black mark? I ask because I may need to borrow £500 from Provident asap.

 

Tezzaa

Link to post
Share on other sites

Provident are like a black mark. They are for the subprime really.

 

Not all loans appaired on your CRA in fact non of mine have so if Provvy were to mark anything it would be from 2004/5 so they can then remove it as it would be incorect info.

OFT debt collection guidance

 

Please remember the only stupid question is the one you dont ask so dont worry about asking the stupid questions.

 

Essex girl in pc world looking 4 curtains 4 her pc,the assistant says u dont need curtains 4 a computer!!Essex girl says,''HELLOOO!! i,ve got WINDOWS!!'.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...