Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • You will probably get a couple more reminders followed by further demands fro unregulated debt collectors with even increasing amounts to pay. They are all designed to scare you into paying.  Don't. It's a scam site and they do not know who was driving and they know the keeper is not liable to pay the PCN. Also the shop was closed so they have no legitimate interest in keeping the car park clear. So to charge £100 is a penalty as there is no legitimate interest which means that the case would be thrown out if it went to Court.  Keep your money in your wallet and be prepared to ignore all their letters and threats. Doubtful they would go to Court since a lot more people would not pay when they heard  MET lost in Court. However they may just send you a Letter of Claim to test your resolve.  If yoy get one of those, come back to us and we will advise a snotty letter to send them.  You probably already have, but take a look through some of our past Met PCNs to see how they are doing.
    • Hello, been a while since I posted on here, really hoping for the same support an advice I received last time :-) Long, long story for us, but basically through bad choices, bad luck and bad advice ended up in an IVA in 2016. The accounts involved all defaulted, to be expected. In 2018, I got contacted by an 'independent advisor' advising me that I shouldn't be in an IVA, that it wasn't the solution for our circumstances and that they would guide us through the process of leaving the IVA and finding a better solution. I feel very stupid for taking this persons advice, and feel they prey on vulnerable people for their own financial gain (it ended with us paying our IVA monthly contribution to them)-long and short of it our IVA failed in 2018. At the same time the IVA failed we also had our shared ownership property voluntarily repossessed (to say this was an incredibly stressful time would be an understatement!) When we moved to our new (rented) property in August 2018, I was aware that creditors would start contacting us from the IVA failure. I got advice from another help website and started sending off SARs and CCAs request letters. I was advised not to bury my head and update our address etc and tackle each company as they came along. Initially there was quite a lot of correspondence, and I still get a daily missed call from PRA group (and the occasional letter from them), but not much else. However, yesterday i had a letter through from Lowell (and one from Capital One) advising that they had bought my debt and would like to speak with me regarding the account. There will be several.of these through our door i suspect, as we did have several accounts with Capital One. Capital One have written to us with regular statements over the last 5 years, and my last communication with them was to advise of of our new address (June 2019), I also note that all of these accounts received a small payment in Jan2019 (i'm assuming the funds from the failed IVA pot). Really sorry for the long long post, but just thought id give (some of) the background for context.... I guess my question at the moment is.....how do I respond to Lowell...do I wait for the inevitable other letters to arrive then deal with them all together or individually...? Do I send them a CCA?  Many thanks
    • hi all just got the reminder letter, I have attached it and also the 2nd side of the original 1st pcn (i just saw the edit above) Look forward to your advice Thanks   PCN final reminder.pdf pcn original side 2.pdf
    • The airline said it was offering to pay $10,000 to those who sustained minor injuries.View the full article
    • The Senate Finance Committee wants answers from BMW over its use of banned Chinese components by 21 June.View the full article
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

unpaid overtime or not ????


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6098 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

hi everyone,

 

i amwriting on behalf of someone else. she has been working fpo rthe same company for 5 years her hours were 8 am to 2 pm three days a week until recently they had a new manager whihc saud thjat in order to be paid fully she had to work and extra one hour and a half per hour to have her break of half hour. althought she had before only 15 minutes break the new manager increase it to 30 minutes without her knowledge nor change of contract. but her manager kept insisting that she cannot be paid for this extra as she is contracted foir 18 hours a week her argumenrt is that well i have been working the same hours under the old manager for 4 years and i signed a contract which show that i am not doing that.

her manager threaten her that if she leaves ( even thought by her rota she has finished her shift ) then she will consider that she walked out . is this legal change the contractual hurs without contracrt ? if she has to sign it can she refuse it as thgi swill overlap onto other commitment?

Link to post
Share on other sites

hi everyone,

 

i amwriting on behalf of someone else. she has been working fpo rthe same company for 5 years her hours were 8 am to 2 pm three days a week until recently they had a new manager whihc saud thjat in order to be paid fully she had to work and extra one hour and a half per hour to have her break of half hour. althought she had before only 15 minutes break the new manager increase it to 30 minutes without her knowledge nor change of contract. but her manager kept insisting that she cannot be paid for this extra as she is contracted foir 18 hours a week her argumenrt is that well i have been working the same hours under the old manager for 4 years and i signed a contract which show that i am not doing that.

her manager threaten her that if she leaves ( even thought by her rota she has finished her shift ) then she will consider that she walked out . is this legal change the contractual hurs without contracrt ? if she has to sign it can she refuse it as thgi swill overlap onto other commitment?

 

If I understand it correctly then this person currently works for 18 hours per week (3 x 6 hour shifts) and currently has a 15 minute break each day of 15 minutes. The new manager has said that if she wishes to have a break then she must extend her contracted hours to 19.5 hours and he will permit a 30 minute break each day?

 

The first point to make is that unless it is specified in her contract, then she is not legally entitled to the 15 minute paid break which she is currently taking. The law says that if the shift exceeds 6 hours only then is she entitled to a break of at least 20 minutes. If she is using a VDU then Health & Safety will recommend at least 5 minutes non screen time in every hour, but this is not a break entitlement and need only be doing other tasks rather than not actually working. It would appear that the new manager has got wise to the fact that your friend is taking a paid break to which she is not entitled and is trying to get the time back by extending the working day. For him to make the break unpaid is acceptable (although harsh and not particularly the actions of a caring employer) - he is after all paying for 6 hours 'work' per day, not 5 hours and 45 minutes. It would appear that he is trying to offset the impact of stopping the paid break by saying that if she agrees to make the time up, then he will actually allow her to take a 30 minute break rather than 15 minutes.

 

HOWEVER - in answer to the question as to whether he may do this in the way that you describe then in a word - No. Even if your friend's contract does not specify that she is permitted a break under the company's rules, then she may quite legitimately claim that it has become Custom and Practice that she takes such a break. In five years with the company, successive regimes have permitted her to take a 15 minute paid break. It has been accepted to the point where it has now become an implied term of the contract of employment. If the manager wishes to change this, then he would need to negotiate such a change, abiding by correct consultation and acceptable procedures. He cannot just change the rules overnight, nor can he discipline your friend for finishing work at her current finishing time. Any dismissal resulting from that course of action would almost certainly be unfair and there would be legitimate grounds to take action against the employer. There may also be grounds to claim discrimination if for example it could be proved that male colleagues enjoyed paid breaks for similar shifts which your friend is now being denied. For the employer it is a very dangerous route to go down without being absolutely spot on with procedure.

 

Best your friend read her contract front to back and see exactly what rules are in place for permitted rest breaks. After that record her grievance in writing that she is unhappy at the manager's attempt to fundamentally change her working hours without adequate consultation and negotiation. Explain that she has always been permitted this time in the past and cannot extend her working day due to other commitments. Put the ball in the employer's court to open a dialogue on the subject rather than for them to just change the rules as they see fit.

Any advice given is done so on the assumption that recipients will also take professional advice where appropriate.

 

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

DONATE HERE

 

If I have been helpful in any way - please feel free to click on the STAR to the left!

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

thankfro oyu rgelp i will pass on the message to her. however she did told to her managewr that she wasn't happy abotu that and she never asked about textending her break time for 30 minutes and was imposed on her. her contract inclde three shift of six hour per week excluding meal and refreshment break. however the manager allow himself t ophave cigareeter and refreshment break on top of his 30 minutes break /

 

anyway she was very upset yesterday as her employer want her to leave a he doesn't do staff motivation and tha raising an aggrievance is unprofessional. basicallly he was very dismissive and say that if it was up to him she won't have a break at all . although sher argued that it was the practice with the rpeviosu manager for the last five years. . anyway i suggest her thst might be construed as unfair dismiossal as t=her manger insulted her of maonkey that the shop is shxxe the staff are shxxxe and so forth .... what can she do now ?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi there, although the Working Time Directive states that 6 hours isthe maximum you can be expected to work without a break, it is unreasonable for an employer to forbid the natural breaks that would be necessary to provide a comfortable environment i.e. going to the toilet, making a drink etc. which could easily add up to 15 minutes or more in 6 hours. If your friend has enjoyed a 15 minute break for the past 5 years with her manager's consent then the employer will have to negotiate new terms and conditions to change the status quo. Do you know if there is a grievance procedure in place? depending on the exact nature of pressure by this new manager on her - it could also be classed as bullying.

Can you give more detail pls.

 

Ell-enn

Help us to keep on helping

Please consider making a donation, however small, if you have benefited from advice on the forums

 

 

This site is run solely on donations

 

My advice is based on my opinion and experience only. It is not to be taken as legal advice - if you are unsure you should seek professional help.

Link to post
Share on other sites

she made a complaint today to her boss butr she is waiting her decisions abourt if she want to leave. which i think is unfair dismissmal ?? the area manager only told her that if she want to go further then she will have to make a complaint in writing. that 's says a lot ? sorry she is very upset and crying i tried to conforrt her but it is very little i can do for her . any way thank you ..

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think she should make the complaint in writing, this will ensure that things are done according to procedure - it would be best to follow it through to a conclusion. There is nothing to stop her looking for another job while this is going on, but at least she will have made an effort to engage the managementin sorting out the problem - this would be useful if she decided to take it further at a later date.

Help us to keep on helping

Please consider making a donation, however small, if you have benefited from advice on the forums

 

 

This site is run solely on donations

 

My advice is based on my opinion and experience only. It is not to be taken as legal advice - if you are unsure you should seek professional help.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well she has to put it in writing, if you ever wish to take the matter to a tribunal, you have to show that you followed the Disputes Resolution Regulations and Employment Act 2002 to the end.

If my comments have been helpful please click my scales

Link to post
Share on other sites

hi again after a long week she told me that she made a complaint to her area manager their answer this was due to a misunderstanding. anyway she made a formal complaint by writing. however they agree for her to retrun her normal shift only for this week but with no break whataoever.... mmm. vwery caring however he told her that her hours will change next week and that her 18 hours per week wil not be set anymore and her shift will vary form day to day. so she finished her today she has no idea when she is working next week and was told that her management will ring her soemtimes this week end ? is this legal ? can she refused that ?

Link to post
Share on other sites

In her contract - where her hours of work are described - does it have a clause which says anything about the company reserving the right to alter her hours to meet the demands of the business?

Help us to keep on helping

Please consider making a donation, however small, if you have benefited from advice on the forums

 

 

This site is run solely on donations

 

My advice is based on my opinion and experience only. It is not to be taken as legal advice - if you are unsure you should seek professional help.

Link to post
Share on other sites

her contract stipule that her hours will change from time to time and if it does she will receive notice inadvance. she has no problem form time to ttime but what she said is that form now on her hours will vary each week but she has no idea where and when so she will now at the very last minutes . is this fair, especially that she has other engagement that she has to attend this was never an issue before when her hours changed she knew it at laest a week in advance now she just received phone call and must drop everytinhg in order to sastify the need of the business ?

 

this one issues hat she has with many others for example she can't have a break while others can ?

Link to post
Share on other sites

she is about ot resign due to the fact that she still does't know her hours for this week ... anyway has she has been there now for four years ( she started in 2003 ) then she will give one week and the rest will be made up of the 4 weeks holidays she hasn't took but she had already book can she do that? when her last working day will be ?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...