Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • The lawsuits allege the companies preyed upon "vulnerable" young men like the 18-year-old Uvalde gunman.View the full article
    • Hi, despite saying you would post it up we have not seen the WS or EVRis WS. Please can you post them up.
    • Hi, Sorry its taken me so long to get round to this, i've been pretty busy today. Anyway, just a couple of things based on your observations.   Evri have not seen/read my WS (sent by post and by email) as they would have recognised the claim value is over £1000 as it includes court fees, trial fees, postage costs and interests, and there is a complete breakdown of the different costs and evidence. I'd say theres a 1% chance they read it , but in any case it won't change what they write. They refer to the claim amount that you claimed in your claim form originally, which will likely be in the same as the defence. They use a simple standard copy and paste format for WX and I've never seen it include any amount other than on the claim form but this is immaterial because it makes no difference to whether evri be liable and if so to what value which is the matter in dispute. However, I have a thinking that EVRi staff are under lots of pressure, they seem to be working up to and beyond 7pm even on fridays, and this is quite unusual so they likely save time by just copying and pasting certain lines of their defence to form their WX.   Evri accepts the parcel is lost after it entered their delivery network - again, this is in my WS and is not an issue in dispute. This is just one of their copy paste lines that they always use.   Evri mentions the £25 and £4.82 paid by Packlink - Again, had they read the WS, they would have realised this is not an issue in dispute. They probably haven't read your WS but did you account for this in your claim form?   Furthermore to the eBay Powered By Packlink T&Cs that Evri is referring to, Clauses 3b and c of the T&Cs states:  (b)   Packlink is a package dispatch search engine that acts as an intermediary between its Users and Transport Agencies. Through the Website, Users can check the prices that different Transport Agencies offer for shipments and contract with the Transport Agency that best suits their needs on-line. (c)  Each User shall then enter into its own contract with the chosen Transport Agency. Packlink does not have any control over, and disclaims all liability that may arise in contracts between a User and a Transport Agency This supports the view that once a user (i.e, myself) selects a transport agency (i.e Evri) that best suits the user's needs, the user (i.e, myself) enters into a contract with the chosen transport agency (i.e, myself). Therefore, under the T&Cs, there is a contract between myself and Evri.   This is correct but you have gone into this claim as trying to claim as a third party. I would say that you need to pick which fight you wan't to make. Either you pick the fight that you contracted directly with EVRi therefore you can apply the CRA OR you pick the fight that you are claiming as a third party contract to a contract between packlink and EVRi. Personally, I would go with the argument that you contracted directly with evri because the terms and conditions are pretty clear that the contract is formed with EVRi and so if the judge accepts this you are just applying your CR under CRA 2015, of which there has only been 2 judges I have seen who have failed to accept the argument of the CRA.   Evri cites their pre-existing agreement with Packlink and that I cannot enforce 3rd party rights under the 1999 Act. Evri has not provided a copy of this contract, and furthermore, my point above explains that the T&Cs clearly explains I have entered into a contract when i chose Evri to deliver my parcel.    This is fine, but again I would say that you should focus on claiming under the contract you have with EVRi as you entered into a direct contract with them according to packlink, as this gives less opportunites for the judge to get things wrong, also I think this is a much better legal position because you can apply your CR to it, if you dealt with a third party claim you would likely need to rely on business contract rights.   As explained in my WS, i am the non-gratuitous beneficiary as my payment for Evri's delivery service through Packlink is the sole reason for the principal contract coming into existence. I wouldn't focus this as your argument. I did think about this earlier and I think the sole focus of your claim should be that you contracted with evri and any term within their T&Cs that limits their liability is a breach of CRA. If you try to argue that the payment to packlink is the sole reason for the contract coming in between EVRI and packlink then you are essentially going against yourself since on one hand you are (And should be) arguing that you contracted directly with EVRi, but on the other hand by arguing about funding the contract between packlink and evri you are then saying that the contract is between packlink and evri not you and evri.  I think you should focus your argument that the contract is between you and evri as the packlink T&C's say.   Clearly Evri have not read by WS as the above is all clearly explained in there.   I doubt they have too, but I think their witness statement more than anything is an attempt to sort of confuse things. They reference various parts of the T&Cs within their WS and I've left some more general points on their WS below although I do think  point 3b as you have mentioned is very important because it says "Users can check the prices that different Transport Agencies offer for shipments and contract with the Transport Agency that best suits their needs on-line." which I would argue means that you contract directly with the agency. For points 9 and 10 focus on term 3c of the contract  points 15-18 are the same as points 18-21 of the defence if you look at it (as i said above its just a copy paste exercise) point 21 term 3c again point 23 is interesting - it says they are responsible for organising it but doesnt say anything about a contract  More generally for 24-29 it seems they are essentially saying you agreed to packlinks terms which means you can't have a contract with EVRI. This isnt true, you have simply agreed to the terms that expressly say your contract is formed with the ttransport agency (EVRi). They also reference that packlinks obligations are £25 but again this doesn't limit evris obligations, there is nothing that says that the transport agency isnt liable for more, it just says that packlinks limitation is set. for what its worth point 31 has no applicability because the contract hasn't been produced.   but overall I think its most important to focus on terms 3b and 3c of the contract and apply your rights as a consumer and not as a third party and use the third party as a backup   
    • Ms Vennells gave testimony over three days, watched by those affected by the Post Office scandal.View the full article
    • Punters are likely not getting the full amount of alcohol they are paying for, a new study suggests.View the full article
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Doorstepped by "Barclaycard"


posieflump
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6045 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

First of all, a quick and belated "hello" to everybody. Although this is my first post, I've been a regular visitor to these forums for several months now and have found plenty of very helpful information within.

 

Now down to business. The buzzer to my flat went this lunchtime. I answered it through the intercom, and a man asked to speak to me by name. I asked who it was, and he was initially reticent to answer. I told him he wouldn't get in unless he told me in what regard he was calling. He said he was from Barclaycard.

 

I didn't let him in, and told him quite clearly I wouldn't do so, but we had a short chat over the intercom before he left.

 

 

I lost my job a while back and, hoping to slam the brakes on before the train derailed, wrote to all of my creditors in March - more than a couple of months before any one of them went into arrears - to explain the situation. Surprisingly, my MBNA Abbey credit card were the most helpful, not only telling me their requirements, but also suggesting I contact the Consumer Credit Counselling Service (which I already had). Never had any trouble with MBNA.

 

Egg were stroppy, and it took some considerable time to get them to agree to the terms of my Debt Management Plan.

 

Most stubborn of all, however, have been Barclaycard / Mercers. They call me three times a day, every day, despite my requesting all contact in writing. I simply let the answerphone pick their calls up. However, I didn't actually expect somebody to call at my door, despite it having been threatened in the past.

 

So, as part of this lengthy introductory message, I'd like to say "thanks" to you in this forum. The visit shook me up a bit, even though I stood my ground and he left in peace. It was then that I decided to actually join the forum, as it was my first port of call after the visit. It was very reassuring re-reading information which I admittedly knew (such as that they have no right of access), but nevertheless I paranoidly worried about.

 

I've decided to write to Mercer's. Here is my letter, which will no doubt be ignored. You may recognise some of it - bits were shamelessly lifted from here. Again, a big thanks. This site is a great resource.

 

 

Dear Mercers,

 

I write to you following a visit from one of your operatives this lunchtime, to whom I refused access. Please be advised that I am onlyprepared to communicate with you in writing. OFT rules and regulations clearly state that you can only visit me at my home if you make an appointment and I have no wish to make an appointment with you. There is only an implied license under English Common Law for people to be able to visit me on my property without express permission: the postman and people asking for directions etc (Armstrong v. Sheppard and Short Ltd [1959] 2 Q.B. per Lord Evershed M.R.).

 

 

Therefore take note that I revoke license under Common Law for you, or your representatives, to visit me at my property and if you persist in sending doorstep callers to my home, you will be reported for harassment and be liable for damages for a tort of trespass. You would also be liable for conspiring in a tort of trespass by acting in defiance of my instructions and sending someone to visit me nevertheless.

 

 

Should it be necessary, I will obtain an injunction.

 

Furthermore, I am taking steps to have incoming calls barred from your number, as well as those from withheld numbers.

 

As I have explained numerous times, I am currently unemployed and searching for work. I am therefore unable to meet the payments on my Barclaycard account, an account which I have otherwise kept in good order for many years. I wrote to Barclaycard with regard to this matter on 9 March, 14 April, and 23 May, the first two occasions being before the account went into arrears. Each of these letters was summarily ignored by Barclaycard.

 

I am currently on a Debt Management Plan with the Consumer Credit Counselling Service. The majority of my creditors have accepted the offers made under the terms of the plan; Barclaycard have not.

 

However, under the Plan, I pay Barclaycard £10.14 a month, a sum which they have received since the Plan started in July. I can not afford to pay more at this present time.

 

You are welcome to contact CCCS with regard to this debt. My client number is *******. Their contact details are as follows:

 

Consumer Credit Counselling Service,

Wade House,

Merrion Centre,

Leeds LS2 8NG

 

Telephone 0845 272 5400

 

I enclose a copy of my personal budget sheet, as drawn up with CCCS, for your files.

 

Yours sincerely,

 

..............

 

EDIT: P.S. My apologies - I appear to have posted this in the wrong section. If a moderator could move it to the Debt section, I'd be very grateful.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 53
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

I know Mercers are Barclaycard but you should also write to B'card and remind them that they are responsible for the actions of their debt collectors (as agents) and any complaint about their behaviour to the statutory authorities will include them as well.

 

Tell Mercers, unless you've already sent the letter, that any further calls will result in you telling the caller to go away and if he refuses the police will be called. Trespass is not a criminal offence but harrassment is. Have the police station number close to hand - its not 999, more likely to be an 0845 number as it is not an emergency

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for your comments, ODC and NailPost. I've already posted the letter, but I'll bear the extra comments in mind the next time I('m bound to have to) write to them.

 

Strangely, I received a letter from ScotCall last week, memorably described on here by somebody as "the paramilitary wing of Barclaycard", threatening a visit. I say strangely because the man firstly identified himself as being from Barclaycard, then Mercers. My suspicions at the ScotCall letter were first aroused as the second paragraph, telling me to contact Mercers immediately, directly contradicted the first, in which ScotCall claimed to have taken over management of the debt.

Link to post
Share on other sites

However, under the Plan, I pay Barclaycard £10.14 a month, a sum which they have received since the Plan started in July. I can not afford to pay more at this present time.

 

Who came up with this figure? If you are unemployed this is too high. £1 a month is more realistic.

HAVE YOU BEEN TREATED UNFAIRLY BY CREDITORS OR DCA's?

 

BEWARE OF CLAIMS MANAGEMENT COMPANIES OFFERING TO WRITE OFF YOUR DEBTS.

 

 

Please note opinions given by rory32 are offered informally as a lay-person in good faith based on personal experience. For legal advice, you must always consult a registered and insured lawyer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Posie, you must be one of very few people here that has actually been doorstepped by a DCA. Given that you have done all the right things by arranging a DMP I can't understand why they've singled you out for a visit. It certainly takes harassment to a new level. Well done for not letting them in and sending the letter. We are all behind you all the way.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the further replies. Rory - I pay £10.14 a month through my Debt Management Plan as agreed with CCCS. I'm happy to do this and entered into the agreement willingly. And the majority of my creditors are happy with the terms of the Plan, with one exception...

 

ODC and Dakota - The bloke who called mentioned something about Mercers having trouble getting in touch with me. I told him I'd told THEM I wouldn't talk on the phone, but I had written several times, and he said, "that must be it." I made a regretfully barbed comment about Liverpudlians being unable to read and write before he left.

 

Again, if it hadn't been for what I'd read previously on this site, I'd have probably let him in.

Link to post
Share on other sites

You could also write to Barclaycard, Mercers and Scotcall, asking each of them for a copy of their complaints procedure. xx

Reminding them that as original creditor they are liable for the actions of people collecting on their behalf

Link to post
Share on other sites

If you are happy for the answerphone to take the calls and you've written to them that's fine. If you think you might want to make an official complaint about harassment it's a good idea to keep a record of all phone calls and personal visits. My view is that for somebody who has a DMP this behaviour is totally unacceptable. You may want to make a complaint via your local trading standards and also the OFT. You could also involve the FOS after you have followed the complaints procedure of the companies concerned. An FOS complaint costs the companies £400 in fees,he he.

Link to post
Share on other sites

You can also write to any of these people and insist that you have any communication in writing.

 

You can write stating that under the Communications Act 2003 you are entitled not to be harassed on the telephone and that all further communications be in writing. So, from now on you will report them to the police if you receive any further calls. There is a letter in the Templates Library which covers this, but what I have said above will suffice.

 

You have a right to privacy and the law is firmly on your side. It will stop the incessant phone calls dead.

Link to post
Share on other sites

It should but most of the companies mentioned will ignore your requests esp Mercers. Delfi has a huge thread on their constant phone calls. Its getting someone to actuall take legal action on the harrassment that is the problem. Apparently it has to be an official body and most seem reluctant

Link to post
Share on other sites

This might help re. complaints. It's the quick guide by the Financial Ombudsman for businesses, but it's very relevant for all of us. This guide must be followed by businesses - state your intention to complain, request their complaints procedure, and they have to pay serious attention. As Dakota says, this is the Financial Ombudsman Service we're talking about. Let them all know just how unacceptable this behaviour is - and as ODC also says, the original creditor is ultimately responsible for the actions of these gooks!

Helping you resolve complaints (PDF)

We will not be intimidated.

'The pen is mightier than the sword'.

Petition to Outlaw Debt Sale and Purchase

- can't read/post much as eye strain's v.bad.

VIVA CAG!!! :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

You could also write to Barclaycard, Mercers and Scotcall, asking each of them for a copy of their complaints procedure. xx

Reminding them that as original creditor they are liable for the actions of people collecting on their behalf

 

That's certainly something to bear in mind. Thanks for the tips.

 

 

If you are happy for the answerphone to take the calls and you've written to them that's fine.

 

The only annoying thing about it is that they don't leave a message about 95% of the time. Then again, it's probably an automated dialler.

 

 

My view is that for somebody who has a DMP this behaviour is totally unacceptable.

 

My view is that for somebody who wrote to them AND called them, following their own suggested procedures, requesting help several weeks before the account went into arrears, and THEN felt obliged to take out a DMP as the only option BECAUSE he couldn't get them to listen, they deserve a good slapping!

 

 

An FOS complaint costs the companies £400 in fees,he he.

 

Is that regardless of outcome, or only if the company is found guilty? If the former, bring it on!

 

 

You can also write to any of these people and insist that you have any communication in writing.

 

Yep - I have a folder full of such letters. No effect.

 

 

You can write stating that under the Communications Act 2003 you are entitled not to be harassed on the telephone and that all further communications be in writing. So, from now on you will report them to the police if you receive any further calls. There is a letter in the Templates Library which covers this, but what I have said above will suffice.

 

You have a right to privacy and the law is firmly on your side. It will stop the incessant phone calls dead.

 

I went over the above verbally with the bloke who called yesterday. It may be a coincidence, or a computer error, but I haven't had their (annoyingly regular) mid-afternoon, 6.30pm or 8.30am calls since. Funny, that. Perhaps he actually listened?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Follow-up: I received a letter from Mercers in today's post. The standard "you have 7 days to pay in full or else" letter. It's the sixth identical letter they've sent me in three months, as well as two telling me they were passing the debt on to another firm (which also turned out to be Barclaycard pretending to be somebody else).

 

There should be an adjective here, but I don't want to be banned after only 8 posts for using bad language!

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm late to this thread but as others have said you're doing exactly the right thing. Keep your cool, keep everything in writing, and keep detailed logs of all their calls whether attempted or successful.

 

You can beat the bullies :D

  • Haha 1

  • Barclays: WON!!! It took four months but was totally worth it!
  • Cabot: I'm still waiting for an enforcable agreement, more than a year after requesting it. Go on, Uncle Ken, take me to court if you dare. You know you want to!
  • Elephant.co.uk: VICTORY - they admitted there was no debt!
  • Ashbourne Management (gym membership): Finally got my default removed and out-of-court settlement; I'm not finished with them yet!

<--- If I've been helpful please remember the scales ;)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...