Jump to content

Leaderboard

Popular Content

Showing content with the highest reputation on 28/02/24 in all areas

  1. This morning my daughter Finally received a letter from the courts and the claim has been struck out due to the failure of the claimant not paying the trial fee. MCOL still not updated though! thankyou all so much again for your help and expertise on getting us this far we could not have done this without you. Small victory for Students A donation will be on the way !! Rob
    2 points
  2. Many of the parking companies use their ANPR cameras as the parking period when obviously their times bear little relevance to the actual time that a motorist is parked in a parking spot which is what the parking period should be. You have already told them the problems you had on the day and still they are sticking to their arrival and departure times as the yardstick. [You have to understand that their lack of intelligence and greed in not understanding the word parking is pretty prevalent among the parking fraternity.]. The new Private parking Code of Practice which should be in force later this year states quite clearly that the pa
    1 point
  3. Much appreciated Andyorch & Lolerz. Will get it sent off. Spending the next few evenings reading up on defences and will try to get a 1st draft completed by Sunday evening. Really appreciate your help and guidance. 1Penny
    1 point
  4. Ok, if i go through the complaints thing on the Information Commissions Office it says this... We expect individuals to seek a full and final response from an organisation before complaining to us. You must chase the organisation if you have not received a response. If you have not done this and you submit a complaint, we will not be able to take it forward. So given this I will email and ask for a final response with a copy of the original SAR, then they cannot say I skipped this step.
    1 point
  5. Just been notified by HM Courts that EVRI have been given a further 14 days to respond to my MCO. Rgds, J
    1 point
  6. Great. It will be very entertaining to see the reaction. Now are you in the mood for starting a small claim on the basis of their data protection breach – the failure to respond to the subject access request? You please wait months – and this should be much simpler and much lower risk in terms of cost outlay. I would suggest that if you are up for it that you get ready to issue a claim for £100 for distress for failure to respond to your subject access request. They would be really stupid to defend it and in fact they would even be stupid to allow it to go through as a claim – but you need to be ready. The cost of issuing t
    1 point
  7. OK so letter to 1) Jonathan Hall 2) finance company 3) car dealership All have 4 enclosures to include: particulars of claim Claim judgement Application and proposed defence My reply emailed to Jonathan Hall *All will be sent tomorrow recorded..... And then a separate letter to SRA above also to be sent recorded.
    1 point
  8. We need to see the letter. Yes they monitor the site and the Facebook complaints page. We are scrupulously honest in what we do so we aren't at all worried. Get the letter and post it up here. Please don't delay. There is nothing else we can say until we see it at first hand
    1 point
  9. You haven't answered my question as to where you have been for the last month. I notice that you have suddenly popped up again on Facebook. You seem to be asking for help there. You also now say that you have a consultant solicitor who has given you certain advice. Presumably you are paying that person some money. You are asking for help here. We are very happy to help and we are probably about the most aggressive source of help that you will find – but simply because we don't charge you money, you don't seem to take us very seriously. We are volunteers. We do everything free of charge. We are happy to help you but we don't want yo
    1 point
  10. Thank you very much for the welcome and for correcting the location of my thread. For PCN's received through the post [ANPR camera capture] (must be received within 14 days from the Incident) 1 Date of the infringement 20 December 2023 2 Date on the NTK [this must have been received within 14 days from the 'offence' date] 25 January 2024 [scan up BOTH SIDES as ONE PDF- follow the upload guide] please LEAVE IN LOCATION AND ALL DATES/TIMES/£'s 3 Date received we were away on holiday so only saw this on Feb 19th. 4 Does the NTK mention schedule 4 of The Protections of Freedoms Act 2012? [Y/N?] no 5 Is th
    1 point
  11. place before the court. I mean you should send the email to enquriies and to listings. listings is like a "back office" email but they reply far far faster
    1 point
  12. 1 point
  13. Would be an idea to upload the whole letter. I think @BankFodder will have quite a bit to say about this!
    1 point
  14. Yep apparently 40% increase in bills they are lobbying for - should be frozen or reduced
    1 point
  15. Are you still claiming Tax Credits / Universal Credit? They will likely take a small monthly amount off , if you are
    1 point
  16. I was honest from the start, then he just asked when the childcare ended. he filled some details in and didn't really ask anything else, just told me I would receive info on my overpayment. A lot less questioned than I was gearing up for
    1 point
  17. OK, unless there are objections, tomorrow invest in two 2nd class stamps, get two free Certificates of Posting from the post office, and send this to G24 and to BW Legal. It won't stop them sending daft letters but it should resolve the address issue. Dear Rachael & Sean, Re: PCN no.XXXXX thanks for your "Final Demand". Scar-ey! Er - not. Firstly, let's deal with the matter of my address. I live at XXXXX, Scotland. That is the address the DVLA gave your client. In the past I have had problems with dishonest private parking companies sending letters for me to fictitious addresses to try to get a backdoor CCJ.
    1 point
  18. The defence form is online. Yes he is involves in it I just came on here to get some advice for him as he is dyslexic and not great with wording or spelling things so thought it would be easier for me to help him.
    1 point
  19. He's not thankfully, just unlikely that its come in the last few days. I did think that, though it seemed from what he said that it was one of their clauses for refund... i.e. - you can have your money back and we'll collect the car but you can't talk about it to anyone, need to pay us £250 until the car is returned (god knows what for) and not drive the car or we'll charge you £100 per mile (the car hasn't moved since returning from the garage), oh and I think there was a confidentiality piece too. Absolute jokers, verging on an NDA. Clearly they have people scouring sites like this and other social medi
    0 points
×
×
  • Create New...