Leaderboard
Popular Content
Showing content with the highest reputation on 28/02/24 in all areas
-
This morning my daughter Finally received a letter from the courts and the claim has been struck out due to the failure of the claimant not paying the trial fee. MCOL still not updated though! thankyou all so much again for your help and expertise on getting us this far we could not have done this without you. Small victory for Students A donation will be on the way !! Rob2 points
-
Many of the parking companies use their ANPR cameras as the parking period when obviously their times bear little relevance to the actual time that a motorist is parked in a parking spot which is what the parking period should be. You have already told them the problems you had on the day and still they are sticking to their arrival and departure times as the yardstick. [You have to understand that their lack of intelligence and greed in not understanding the word parking is pretty prevalent among the parking fraternity.]. The new Private parking Code of Practice which should be in force later this year states quite clearly that the pa1 point
-
Ok, if i go through the complaints thing on the Information Commissions Office it says this... We expect individuals to seek a full and final response from an organisation before complaining to us. You must chase the organisation if you have not received a response. If you have not done this and you submit a complaint, we will not be able to take it forward. So given this I will email and ask for a final response with a copy of the original SAR, then they cannot say I skipped this step.1 point
-
Just been notified by HM Courts that EVRI have been given a further 14 days to respond to my MCO. Rgds, J1 point
-
Great. It will be very entertaining to see the reaction. Now are you in the mood for starting a small claim on the basis of their data protection breach – the failure to respond to the subject access request? You please wait months – and this should be much simpler and much lower risk in terms of cost outlay. I would suggest that if you are up for it that you get ready to issue a claim for £100 for distress for failure to respond to your subject access request. They would be really stupid to defend it and in fact they would even be stupid to allow it to go through as a claim – but you need to be ready. The cost of issuing t1 point
-
OK so letter to 1) Jonathan Hall 2) finance company 3) car dealership All have 4 enclosures to include: particulars of claim Claim judgement Application and proposed defence My reply emailed to Jonathan Hall *All will be sent tomorrow recorded..... And then a separate letter to SRA above also to be sent recorded.1 point
-
Make sure you DO NOT appeal!1 point
-
You haven't answered my question as to where you have been for the last month. I notice that you have suddenly popped up again on Facebook. You seem to be asking for help there. You also now say that you have a consultant solicitor who has given you certain advice. Presumably you are paying that person some money. You are asking for help here. We are very happy to help and we are probably about the most aggressive source of help that you will find – but simply because we don't charge you money, you don't seem to take us very seriously. We are volunteers. We do everything free of charge. We are happy to help you but we don't want yo1 point
-
Thank you very much for the welcome and for correcting the location of my thread. For PCN's received through the post [ANPR camera capture] (must be received within 14 days from the Incident) 1 Date of the infringement 20 December 2023 2 Date on the NTK [this must have been received within 14 days from the 'offence' date] 25 January 2024 [scan up BOTH SIDES as ONE PDF- follow the upload guide] please LEAVE IN LOCATION AND ALL DATES/TIMES/£'s 3 Date received we were away on holiday so only saw this on Feb 19th. 4 Does the NTK mention schedule 4 of The Protections of Freedoms Act 2012? [Y/N?] no 5 Is th1 point
-
Yep apparently 40% increase in bills they are lobbying for - should be frozen or reduced1 point
-
Are you still claiming Tax Credits / Universal Credit? They will likely take a small monthly amount off , if you are1 point
-
I was honest from the start, then he just asked when the childcare ended. he filled some details in and didn't really ask anything else, just told me I would receive info on my overpayment. A lot less questioned than I was gearing up for1 point
-
OK, unless there are objections, tomorrow invest in two 2nd class stamps, get two free Certificates of Posting from the post office, and send this to G24 and to BW Legal. It won't stop them sending daft letters but it should resolve the address issue. Dear Rachael & Sean, Re: PCN no.XXXXX thanks for your "Final Demand". Scar-ey! Er - not. Firstly, let's deal with the matter of my address. I live at XXXXX, Scotland. That is the address the DVLA gave your client. In the past I have had problems with dishonest private parking companies sending letters for me to fictitious addresses to try to get a backdoor CCJ.1 point
-
He's not thankfully, just unlikely that its come in the last few days. I did think that, though it seemed from what he said that it was one of their clauses for refund... i.e. - you can have your money back and we'll collect the car but you can't talk about it to anyone, need to pay us £250 until the car is returned (god knows what for) and not drive the car or we'll charge you £100 per mile (the car hasn't moved since returning from the garage), oh and I think there was a confidentiality piece too. Absolute jokers, verging on an NDA. Clearly they have people scouring sites like this and other social medi0 points
Latest
Our Picks
Reclaim the right Ltd
reg.05783665
reg. office:-
262 Uxbridge Road, Hatch End
England
HA5 4HS
The Consumer Action Group
×
- Create New...
IPS spam blocked by CleanTalk.