Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • no i meant the email from parcel2go which email address did they send it from and who signed it off (whos name is at the bottom)
    • I understand confusion with this thread.  I tried to keep threads separate because there have been so many angles.    But a team member merged them all.  This is why it's hard to keep track. This forum exists to help little people fight injustice - however big or small.  Im here to try get a decent resolution. Not to give in to the ' big boys'. My "matter' became complicated 'matters' simply because a lender refused to sell a property. What can I say?  I'll try in a nutshell to give an overview: There's a long lease property. I originally bought it short lease with a s.146 on it from original freeholder.  I had no concerns. So lender should have been able to sell a well-maintained lovely long lease property.  The property was great. The issue is not the property.  Economy, sdlt increases, elections, brexit, covid, interest hikes etc didn't help.  The issue is simple - the lender wanted to keep it.    Before repo I offered to clear my loan.  I was a bit short and lender refused.  They said (recorded) they thought the property was worth much more and they were happy to keep accruing interest (in their benefit) until it reached a point where they felt they could repo and still easily quickly sell to get their £s back.  This was a mistake.  The market was (and is) tough.   2y later the lender ceo bid the same sum to buy the property for himself. He'd rejected higher offers in the intervening period whilst accruing interest. I had the property under offer to a fantastic niche buyer but lender rushed to repo and buyer got spooked and walked.  It had taken a long time to find such a lucrative buyer.  A sale which would have resulted in £s and another asset for me. Post repo lender had 1 offer immediately.  But dragged out the process for >1y - allegedly trying to get other offers. But disclosure shows there was only one valid buyer. Lender appointed receiver (after 4 months) - simply to try acquire the freehold.  He used his powers as receiver to use me, as leaseholder, to serve notice on freeholders.  Legally that failed. Meanwhile lender failed to secure property - and squatters got in (3 times).  And they failed to maintain it.  So freeholders served a dilapidations notice (external) - on me as leaseholder (cc-ed to lender).   (That's how it works legally) I don't own the freehold.  But I am a trustee and have to do right by the freeholders.  This is where matters got/ get complicated.  And probably lose most caggers.   Lawyers got involved for the freeholders to firstly void the receiver enfranchisement notice. Secondly, to serve the dilapidations notice.  The lack of maintenance was in breach of lease and had to be served to protect fh asset. The lender did no repairs. They said a buyer would undertake them. Which was probably correct. If they had sold. After 1y lender finally agreed to sell to the 1st offeror and contracts went with lawyers.  Within 1 month lender reneged.  Lender tried to suggest buyer walked. Evidence shows he/ his lawyers continued trying to exchange (cash) for 4 months.  Evidence shows lender and receiver strategy had been to renege and for ceo to take control.   I still think that's their plan. Lender then stupidly chose to pretty much bulldoze the property.  Other stuff was going on in the background. After repo I was in touch by phone and email and lender knew post got to me.   Despite this, after about 10 months (before and then during covid), they deliberately sent SDs and eventually a B petition to an incorrect address and an obscure small court.  They never served me properly.  (In hindsight I understand they hoped to get a backdoor B - so they could keep the property that way.)  Eventually the random court told them to email me by way of service.  At this point their ruse to make me B failed.  I got a lawyer (friend paid). The B petition was struck out. They’d failed to include the property as an asset. They were in breach of insolvency rules. Simultaneously the receiver again appointed lawyers to act on my behalf as leaseholder. This time to serve notice on the freeholders for a lease extension.  He had hoped to try and vary the strict lease. Evidence shows the already long length of lease wasn't an issue.  The lender obviously hoped to get round their lack of permission to do works (which they were already doing) by hoping to remove the strict clauses that prevent leaseholder doing alterations.   The extension created a new legal angle for me to deal with.  I had to act as trustee for freeholders against me as leaseholder/ the receiver.  Inconsistencies and incompetence by receiver lawyers dragged this out 3y.  It still isn't properly resolved.  Meanwhile - going back to the the works the lender undertook. The works were consciously in breach of lease.  The lender hadn't remedied the breaches listed in the dilapidations notice.  They destroyed the property.  The trustees compiled all evidence.  The freeholders lawyers then served a forfeiture notice. This notice started a different legal battle. I was acting for the freeholders against what the lender had done on my behalf as leaseholder.  This legal battle took 3y to resolve. The simple exit would have been for lender to sell. A simple agreement to remedy the breaches and recompense the freeholders in compensation - and there's have been clean title to sell.  That option was proposed to them.   This happened by way of mediation for all parties 2y ago.  A resolution option was put forward and in principle agreed.  But immediately after the lender lawyers failed to engage.  A hard lesson to learn - mediation cannot be referred to in court. It's considered w/o prejudice. The steps they took have made no difference to their ability to sell the property.  Almost 3y since they finished works they still haven't sold. ** ** I followed up some leads myself.  A qualified cash buyer offered me a substantial sum.  The lender and receiver both refused it.   I found another offer in disclosure.  6 months later someone had apparently offered a substantial sum via an agent.  The receiver again rejected it.  The problem of course was that the agent had inflated the market price to get the business. But no-one was or is ever going to offer their list price.  Yet the receiver wanted/wants to hold out for the list price.  Which means 1y later not only has it not sold - disclosure shows few viewings and zero interest.  It's transparently over-priced.  And tarnished. For those asking why I don't give up - I couldn't/ can't.  Firstly I have fiduciary duties as a trustee. Secondly, legal advice indicates I (as leaseholder) could succeed with a large compensation claim v the lender.  Also - I started a claim v my old lawyer and the firm immediately reimbursed some £s. That was encouraging.  And a sign to continue.  So I'm going for compensation.  I had finance in place (via friend) to do a deal and take the property back off the lender - and that lawyer messed up bad.   He should have done a deal.  Instead further years have been wasted.   Maybe I only get back my lost savings - but that will be a result.   If I can add some kind of complaint/ claim v the receiver's conscious impropriety I will do so.   I have been left with nothing - so fighting for something is worth it. The lender wants to talk re a form of settlement.  Similar to my proposal 2y ago.  I have a pretty clear idea of what that means to me.  This is exactly why I do not give up.  And why I continue to ask for snippets of advice/ pointers on cag.  
    • It was all my own work based on my previous emails to P2G which Bank has seen.
    • I was referring to #415 where you wrote "I was forced to try to sell - and couldn't." . And nearer the start in #79 .. "I couldn't sell.  I had an incredibly valuable asset. Huge equity.  But the interest accrued / the property market suffered and I couldn't find a buyer even at a level just to clear the debt." In #194 you said you'd tried to sell for four years.  The reason for these points is that a lot of the claims against for example your surveyor, solicitor, broker, the lender and now the receiver are mainly founded in a belief that they should have been able to do something but did not. Things that might seem self evident to you but not necessarily to others. Pressing these claims may well need a bit more hard evidence, rather than an appeal to common sense. Can you show evidence of similar properties, with similar freehold issues, selling readily? And solid reasons why the lender should have been able to sell when you couldn't.
    • You can use a family's address.   The only caveat is for the final hearing you'd need to be there in person   HOWEVER i'd expect them to pay if its only £200 because costs of attending will be higher than that
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

CWD raised an SD - UAE bank in my case is First Gulf Bank


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2001 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I recently saw a similar question asked on another help site about UAE debt being enforceable in the UK

 

I have seen numerous posts from people on various debt help forums about people being taken to court in the UK by Coyle White Devine on behalf of UAE banks for UAE debts.

 

The post and answer can be accessed by searching on the website as I can't post the url here.

 

The bottom line is that these debts now seem to be enforceable in the UK because of some sort of understanding signed between the UK courts and courts in the UAE.

 

It seems that most people who are being chased are being advised by small solicitors to negotiate a settlement with CWD as no one seems certain of being able to fight and win any of these cases.

 

I wondered whether it would be worth contacting the press such as the Daily Mail to see if they are interested in running a story about people being pursued, some of which genuinely had to flee the UAE with outstanding debts due to redundancies in the financial crisis rather than risk being imprisoned in the UAE becuase of the draconian laws about non payment of debts there

 

The DM often run stories about negative things happening in the UAE so may be interested in people's struggles.

If it was raised in the national press it might heap some shame on the likes of CWD who are chasing these people and encourage someone in the legal industry to pick up the baton and help people fight these cases.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

 

It's great to hear that lawyers at some of the magic circle firms are saying that the UAE debts are not legally enforceable in the UK

 

but that doesn't change the fact that people are being pursued in the UK for their UAE debts by Coyle White Devine and the courts are finding in CWD's favour.

 

I have had correspondence with people through the website and they have had statutory demands issued against property in the UK over these debts and the judges are saying that a debt is a debt and is enforceable here.

 

Unfortunately the small firm lawyers that people are having to consult with because these cases are going to court are not confident of winning and due to the potential costs are advising people to negotiate a settlement or payment plan with CWD and the UAE creditors.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Hi all, I too am keen to find out if anyone has any updates on their situation with CWD as it seems to have gone quiet on this and other forums.

 

Does anyone know if it would be possible to get a group together of those people being targeted by CWD and appoint a solictor to represent all of them.

 

Like a class action I suppose?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Hi All

 

I have been speaking with a solicitor about CWD and these cases so hopefully this information will help some people on here.

He advises that what they are doing is wrong and that legally they have no case to pursue these debts through UK law.

It's only the bully boy tactics and the fact that people have not been able to defend themselves with a solicitor that they have been getting these judgments.

 

Ask CWD to provide details of the proof of assignment in any agreement that provides the legal basis on which they can seek judgment in the UK on UAE debt. They will tell you that there has been no assignment of liability which means they can't issue proceedings in the UK because the debt can't be assigned.

 

He says the debts are not enforceable.

People keep referring to the memorandum signed between the UAE & UK in 2013 but this is not something that is binding in UK or Common law.

A reciprocal agreement is not something written in to UK law.

 

Ask them what Act or Statute that is written in case law states that UAE debt is en forcible in the UK.

Ask them to provide the case/quote

including full citation and paragraph number

 

Tell them that you will attend any County Court hearing in Northampton and seek to have any judgement that they apply for against you to be set aside.

Defend yourself and file a defence saying that it is outside the jurisdiction of the Court.

Any agreement must say it is binding in the UK.

Judgments are not enforceable from the UAE in the UK.

It needs to be governed by UK law.

 

CWD will tell you that the UAE credit agreement states that the terms and conditions are governed by the laws of the UAE.

You and we submit to the non exclusive jurisdiction of the civil courts of the UAE.

Such proceedings shall not restrict our rights to bring proceedings against you in any other jurisdiction.

 

They can't have it both ways, it's either UAE or not.

The UK courts do not have jurisdiction for UAE agreements.

 

You need to say that the Court has no jurisdiction to hear the case.

The terms state it is dealt with in accordance with UAE law.

A UK Court does not have jurisdiction to hear UAE law cases.

Edited by citizenB
removed email and request for caggers to make contact.
Link to post
Share on other sites

Caszar, I have edited an email and request for CAG members to make contact, out of your post above.

 

It is CAG's policy to discuss everything on the open forum.

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Uploading documents to CAG ** Instructions **

Looking for a draft letter? Use the CAG Library

Dealing with Customer Service Departments? - read the CAG Guide first

1: Making a PPI claim ? - Q & A's and spreadsheets for single premium policy - HERE

2: Take back control of your finances - Debt Diaries

3: Feel Bullied by Creditors or Debt Collectors? Read Here

4: Staying Calm About Debt  Read Here

5: Forum rules - These have been updated - Please Read

BCOBS

1: How can BCOBS protect you from your Banks unfair treatment

2: Does your Bank play fair - You can force your Bank to play Fair with you

3: Banking Conduct of Business Regulations - The Hidden Rules

4: BCOBS and Unfair Treatment - Common Examples of Banks Behaving Badly

5: Fair Treatment for Credit Card Holders and Borrowers - COBS

Advice & opinions given by citizenb are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

PLEASE DO NOT ASK ME TO GIVE ADVICE BY PM - IF YOU PROVIDE A LINK TO YOUR THREAD THEN I WILL BE HAPPY TO OFFER ADVICE THERE:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Defend yourself and file a defence saying that it is outside the jurisdiction of the Court.
Just for your information, people need to be very careful with this. There is a technical trap here. Generally, filing a Defence is deemed to be an acceptance that the English courts have jurisdiction over the dispute. Contesting jurisdiction must be done through the acknowledgement of service - the procedure for contesting jurisdiction is set out in Part 11 of the CPR (http://www.justice.gov.uk/courts/procedure-rules/civil/rules/part11).

 

 

The UK courts do sometimes hear cases involving issues of foreign law.

 

 

If an issue of foreign law arises,

it is resolved by using expert evidence

(in the same way that you might get an accounting expert to help resolve an accounting issue).

 

 

It does happen and is not impossible,

although the difficulty of it is a good reason for saying that the English court should not exercise jurisdiction in a foreign law case - known in the profession as a 'forum non conveniens' argument.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

absolutely spot on the mark steampowered.

And,any expert evidence that the creditor wants to use in a Uk court,

which they have to pay for,

you have to agree to the expert being in court too,from my understanding.

 

 

And lets face it,

although an expert has to swear an oath,

would you trust them not to be swayed in favour of a large fee paying bank relating to that banks countrys laws?I wouldnt!!!!

 

A reminder also,

i have stated this before, but, to assist solicitors in peoples defence, there is the foreign limitations act, and others, and, as the bank is a foreign company, if a court case arises, ask your solicitor to apply for an application for security costs, so by, the bank would have to put money upfront to cover any legal fees should they lose their case, would they want to do do that, i doubt it very much!

 

One more thing i would argue for ,and that is a genuine approved certified copy of the cca agreement ,loan etc ,translated from arabic to english and checked via a judge and stamped from a UAE court, and original terms and conditions, as, we all know, banks change their terms and conditions a lot these days, whos to say now the UAE banks are cottoning on they might get money back somehow theyve updated their terms and conditions to cover a non exclusive jurisdiction, lets face it, UAE banks are a million years behind everybody else!!!

 

Another issue id challenge is why have the UAE banks left it so long to start chasing people for debts, to gain as much money as possible????

 

Tracing people in the UK and elsewhere has been around for years, they have no valid arguments as to why theyve left it for years..

 

Dont ever give up the fight people, always get a solicitor if you can ,dont ignore letters, try and find a solicitor who understands jurisdiction and the processes if possible.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Caszar

 

I honestly think you should start a new thread so we can give you best advice for your own situation,

rather than you clinging to the hope that dalesford's will be the same. Follow steampowered's instructions in the post above yours. We really do need to know *your* history in order to help.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 11 months later...

Which county court dealt with that case ?

Just interested whether they apply to a London central court or nearest to where debtor is resident.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Which court ?

And did you defend this action ?

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Seems very unfair that UK courts are getting involved, when i expect it would not be easy for a UK based creditor to take a Dubai based debtor to court in Dubai.

 

It won't be easy to get any politicians involved, as they will say it is up to the courts to decide on these matters using existing UK law and rules that exist.

 

The advice must be for anyone pursued for debts, that they must make requests for all documentation regarding the debts and raise any disputes, when they are first contacted. If the Solicitors acting for the Foreign Bank provide evidence of the debt, the finance agreement includes terms which allow enforcement in a UK court and there are no dispute issues, then it might be sensible to negotiate repayment based on affordability.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 years later...

they cant issue an SD they aren't the debt owners

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 5 months later...

thread closed to stop newbie bumping

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2001 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...