Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • China green-lights mass production of autonomous flying taxis — with commercial flights set for 2025 | Live Science WWW.LIVESCIENCE.COM The EHang EH216-S autonomous flying taxi is the first eVTOL ready for mass production and could lead the way for flying cars around...  
    • Lolerz - I don't understand you.  Rebuked you?   No. I simply replied to your orange comments with legal facts as I know them.  I've already worked through the s42 and s146 issues - over the last 3-4y - and these issues are (mostly) resolved legally.  In terms of posting evidence.  Sure I can post some.  But my most recent questions have been a) how can I enforce a sale before trial?  And b) how can I make a complaint and/or a claim v receiver? (E.g. to which body do I complain?).  At the mo I'm asking for some helpful pointers on those specific questions??  I'm not asking for help with how to prove or present evidence. Fwiw - all evidence for trial has been disclosed (although additions are poss). The lender sent me like 10,000 emails and docs.  There's also 000s of emails, docs, photos, videos, recordings and texts that relate to freeholders/ me.   I read, filed and categorised everything for ease of future reference.  Witness statements and evidence were prepared for trial in the 42 and 146 matters. (now joined with current claim to save duplication).  I've lived the process before.  My current statement and linked evidence has taken like 6 months to draft/ write - to ensure I can succinctly prove my defence and counterclaim points.   Whether I can convince a judge at trial w/o lawyer / barrister is debatable 🙄   But I've prepared.  And continue to try better prepare - which is why I visit this site (and clinics).  This is NOT my business or expertise at all.  I'm just trying.  Not that anyone should ever have to justify why they need help if they ask politely! 
    • Thanks for the other info will also take a look at that.
    • It doesn't use the word reconstructed in the cover letter.  Although, I have just noticed on the cover letter they have asked me to complete a financial statement and offer a repayment within the next 10 days, or they will continue to follow court directions.  They sent a separate letter on the same day advising me they will be continuing with their claim ?  They have done the same for both claims.  Is it worth just doing that - doing the financial breakdown and offering a x amount.    
    • hahah except I can't locate the courier to frighten them with it hahaha   
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Disclosure list


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2183 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

help

i have done a disclosure list without filling in the n265 form.

now the other side are saying i haven't adhered to the judges ruling.

 

can my case be thrown out.

can they ask for my evidence to be struck out or even strike out all the case.

 

the other side are still requesting the documents.

 

what impact can all this have on my case.

Edited by dx100uk
spacing
Link to post
Share on other sites

When was the filing deadline, when is the next hearing (and is it a CMC or the hearing for judgment)?.

What track has the case been allocated to? I assume it isn't small claims, given there is a disclosure list.

Are you claimant or defendant?. Do you have a solicitor, or are you self-represented?

 

If the other side are still requesting documents - supply them ....... you get some lattitude if you are self-represented, but you are still expected to comply with disclosure, and that includes any document (and document is construed widely, so e.g. photos can be documents, and so on, it doesn't have to be on paper) including any that support the other side's case, or undermine your's......

 

Also, why is your Caps Lock stuck?.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The Filing deadline was for the 18th April 2018.

I provided my list by that date but not the 265 form.

It is a multi track case.

 

I doing this for someone else as a representative but I am not a solicitor.

They are the claimants.

The next stage is to request documents by the 2nd MAY 2018 which has been done on both sides.

We have now 14 days to comply.

Could leaving out the actual n265 form impact on this case.

Link to post
Share on other sites

On what basis are you their “representative”?

Are they under 18, or lacking capacity?

 

There are limited circumstances in which someone not a party to a case can represent someone else, and for a multi-track case : it is a bit brave, not only because of the cost implications if they lose.

 

Have you informed the court you are acting as a lay representative / McKenzie Friend? Are you receiving any remuneration?

https://www.judiciary.gov.uk/wp-content/uploads/JCO/Documents/judicial-college/ETBB_LiP+_finalised_.pdf

Link to post
Share on other sites

I would echo these statements of unease about you acting as representative here.

 

Your failure to use the Court form could be impactful on the case, depending on whether the other side suffer any prejudice. What did the Court Order say word for word as to disclosure? Were all the documents in the possession of your friend/client/associate on that list?

 

In conjunction with the actual list of documents the N265 Court Form contains a Disclosure Statement. This is just as important, and it requires the person completing the form to sign a statement of truth attesting that they have carried out reasonable and proportionate searches for all relevant documents. Arguably, without this signed statement the list is meaningless...

 

As has been said the potential pitfalls of a multi track case are the adverse cost consequences that can follow from things like not complying with a Court Order.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The Filing deadline was for the 18th April 2018.

I provided my list by that date but not the 265 form.

It is a multi track case.

 

I doing this for someone else as a representative but I am not a solicitor.

They are the claimants.

The next stage is to request documents by the 2nd MAY 2018 which has been done on both sides.

We have now 14 days to comply.

Could leaving out the actual n265 form impact on this case.

 

 

You are not a solicitor. You cannot be doing this and acting for your friend in this way.

 

What you are doing is a reserved legal activity under the Legal Services Act 2007 and therfore unlawful.

 

You are not qualified and therefore make mistakes like this.

 

You may get lucky but if the other side applies to strike the claim out you could be in trouble.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...