Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • S13 (2)The creditor may not exercise the right under paragraph 4 to recover from the keeper any unpaid parking charges specified in the notice to keeper if, within the period of 28 days beginning with the day after that on which that notice was given, the creditor is given— (a)a statement signed by or on behalf of the vehicle-hire firm to the effect that at the material time the vehicle was hired to a named person under a hire agreement; (b)a copy of the hire agreement; and (c)a copy of a statement of liability signed by the hirer under that hire agreement. As  Arval has complied with the above they cannot be pursued by EC----- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- S14 [1]   the creditor may recover those charges (so far as they remain unpaid) from the hirer. (2)The conditions are that— (a)the creditor has within the relevant period given the hirer a notice in accordance with sub-paragraph (5) (a “notice to hirer”), together with a copy of the documents mentioned in paragraph 13(2) and the notice to keeper; (b)a period of 21 days beginning with the day on which the notice to hirer was given has elapsed;  As ECP did not send copies of the documents to your company and they have given 28 days instead of 21 days they have failed to comply with  the Act so you and your Company are absolved from paying. That is not to say that they won't continue asking to be paid as they do not have the faintest idea how PoFA works. 
    • Euro have got a lot wrong and have failed to comply with the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 Schedule 4.  According to Section 13 after ECP have written to Arval they should then send a NTH to the Hirer  which they have done.This eliminates Arval from any further pursuit by ECP. When they wrote to your company they should have sent copies of everything that they asked Arval for. This is to prove that your company agree what happened on the day of the breach. If ECP then comply with the Act they are allowed to pursue the hirer. If they fail, to comply they cannot make the hirer pay. They can pursue until they are blue in the face but the Hirer is not lawfully required to pay them and if it went to Court ECP would lose. Your company could say who was driving but the only person that can be pursued is the Hirer, there does not appear to be an extension for a driver to be pursued. Even if there was, because ECP have failed miserably to comply with the Act  they still have no chance of winning in Court. Here are the relevant Hire sections from the Act below.
    • Thank-you FTMDave for your feedback. May I take this opportunity to say that after reading numerous threads to which you are a contributor, I have great admiration for you. You really do go above and beyond in your efforts to help other people. The time you put in to help, in particular with witness statements is incredible. I am also impressed by the way in which you will defer to others with more experience should there be a particular point that you are not 100% clear on and return with answers or advice that you have sought. I wish I had the ability to help others as you do. There is another forum expert that I must also thank for his time and patience answering my questions and allowing me to come to a “penny drops” moment on one particular issue. I believe he has helped me immensely to understand and to strengthen my own case. I shall not mention who it is here at the moment just in case he would rather I didn't but I greatly appreciate the time he took working through that issue with me. I spent 20+ years of working in an industry that rules and regulations had to be strictly adhered to, indeed, exams had to be taken in order that one had to become qualified in those rules and regulations in order to carry out the duties of the post. In a way, such things as PoFA 2012 are rules and regulations that are not completely alien to me. It has been very enjoyable for me to learn these regulations and the law surrounding them. I wish I had found this forum years ago. I admit that perhaps I had been too keen to express my opinions given that I am still in the learning process. After a suitable period in this industry I became Qualified to teach the rules and regulations and I always said to those I taught that there is no such thing as a stupid question. If opinions, theories and observations are put forward, discussion can take place and as long as the result is that the student is able to clearly see where they went wrong and got to that moment where the penny drops then that is a valuable learning experience. No matter how experienced one is, there is always something to learn and if I did not know the answer to a question, I would say, I don't know the answer to that question but I will go and find out what the answer is. In any posts I have made, I have stated, “unless I am wrong” or “as far as I can see” awaiting a response telling me what I got wrong, if it was wrong. If I am wrong I am only too happy to admit it and take it as a valuable learning experience. I take the point that perhaps I should not post on other peoples threads and I shall refrain from doing so going forward. 🤐 As alluded to, circumstances can change, FTMDave made the following point that it had been boasted that no Caggers, over two years, who had sent a PPC the wrong registration snotty letter, had even been taken to court, let alone lost a court hearing .... but now they have. I too used the word "seemed" because it is true, we haven't had all the details. After perusing this forum I believe certain advice changed here after the Beavis case, I could be wrong but that is what I seem to remember reading. Could it be that after winning the above case in question, a claimant could refer back to this case and claim that a defendant had not made use of the appeal process, therefore allowing the claimant to win? Again, in this instance only, I do not know what is to be gained by not making an appeal or concealing the identity of the driver, especially if it is later admitted that the defendant was the driver and was the one to input the incorrect VRN in error. So far no one has educated me as to the reason why. But, of course, when making an appeal, it should be worded carefully so that an error in the appeal process cannot be referred back to. I thought long and hard about whether or not to post here but I wanted to bring up this point for discussion. Yes, I admit I have limited knowledge, but does that mean I should have kept silent? After I posted that I moved away from this forum slightly to find other avenues to increase my knowledge. I bought a law book and am now following certain lawyers on Youtube in the hope of arming myself with enough ammunition to use in my own case. In one video titled “7 Reasons You Will LOSE Your Court Case (and how to avoid them)” by Black Belt Barrister I believe he makes my point by saying the following, and I quote: “If you ignore the complaint in the first instance and it does eventually end up in court then it's going to look bad that you didn't co-operate in the first place. The court is not going to look kindly on you simply ignoring the company and not, let's say, availing yourself of any kind of appeal opportunities, particularly if we are talking about parking charge notices and things like that.” This point makes me think that, it is not such a bizarre judgement in the end. Only in the case of having proof of payment and inputting an incorrect VRN .... could it be worthwhile making a carefully worded appeal in the first instance? .... If the appeal fails, depending on the reason, surely this could only help if it went to court? As always, any feedback gratefully received.
    • To which official body does one make a formal complaint about a LPA fixed charge receiver? Does one make a complaint first to the company employing the appointed individuals?    Or can one complain immediately to an official body, such as nara?    I've tried researching but there doesn't seem a very clear route on how to legally hold them to account for wrongful behaviour.  It seems frustratingly complicated because they are considered to be officers of the court and held in high esteem - and the borrower is deemed liable for their actions.  Yet what does the borrower do when disclosure shows clear evidence of wrong-doing? Does anyone have any pointers please?
    • Steam is still needed in many industries, but much of it is still made with fossil fuels.View the full article
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Hoist/cohen claimform - barclaycard debt


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2472 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi,

 

I was issued with court papers over an outstanding barclaycard debt last week.

 

 

the last company that i had a repayment plan with was MKDP, and the payments were live until last may, but they stopped for some reason.

 

 

The account was then taken over by Hoist, managed by Howard Cohen/Robinson Way.

 

 

I spoke with Hoist, who said I had to deal with Robinson Way, as they had no legal capabilities inhouse.

I spoke to RW and informed them that i still had an outstanding query regarding the amount of interest charged compared to the contractual figure when the account was opened. The said they would look into it, and put the account on hold until then.

 

I asked for a photocopy of the original account opening document,

but RW said it would not be possible due to the age of the account,

pre-2007, and I would have to have a "true copy".

 

can someone give me some advice as to what to do about the court filing in the meantime?

RW saying they had put things on hold, does that include the court filing?

Link to post
Share on other sites

please complete this form:

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?419198-You-have-received-a-Claim-What-you-need-to-do.-**UPDATED-2016**

 

and no its not on hold and you must act

and STOP ringing powerless DCA'sand their co-horts, thy are NOT BAILIFFS

 

get that link done please

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Name of the Claimant ? HOIST PORTFOLIO HOLDING 2 LIMITED

 

Date of issue – 03 JUL 2017

 

What is the claim for – the reason they have issued the claim?

 

 

1. THIS CLAIM IS FOR THE SUM OF £3832.59 IN RESPECT OF MONIES OWING UNDER AN AGREEMENT WITH THE ACCOUNT NO. ------------ PURSUANT TO THE CONSUMER CREDIT ACT 1974. THE DEBT WAS LEGALLY ASSIGNED TO MKDP LLP (EX BARCLAYCARD) TO THE CLAIMANT AND NOTICE HAS BEEN SERVED.

2. THE DEFENDANT HAS FAILED TO MAKE CONTRACTUAL PAYMENTS UNDER THE TERMS OF THE AGREEMENT.

A DEFAULT NOTICE HAS BEEN SERVED UPON THE DEFENDANT PURSUANT TO S.87(1) CCA.

 

What is the value of the claim? £3832.59 PLUS COSTS £265

 

Is the claim for - a Bank Account (Overdraft) or credit card or loan or catalogue or mobile phone account? CREDIT CARD

 

When did you enter into the original agreement before or after 2007? 3/11/1986

 

Has the claim been issued by the original creditor or was the account assigned and it is the Debt purchaser who has issued the claim. DEBT PURCHASER - HOIST

 

Were you aware the account had been assigned – did you receive a Notice of Assignment? NOT AS FAR AS I AM AWARE ASSIGNED 29/9/2015

 

Did you receive a Default Notice from the original creditor? NO - ISSUED 2011

Have you been receiving statutory notices headed “Notice of Default sums” – at least once a year ? NO

 

Why did you cease payments? I DIDN'T KNOW PAYMENTS HAD STOPPED, BECAUSE IT WAS A STANDING ORDER, ONCE IT'S MISSED IT CANCELS AUTOMATICALLY.

What was the date of your last payment? 6/5/2016

 

Was there a dispute with the original creditor that remains unresolved? YES - I HAD REPEATEDLY ASKED FOR A PHOTOCOPY OF MY ACCOUNT OPENING APPLICATION, AS THE INTEREST CHARGED SEEMED TO BE DIFFERENT TO WHAT IT SHOULD HAVE BEEN

 

Did you communicate any financial problems to the original creditor and make any attempt to enter into a debt management planicon? YES - WAS ON A PLAN, THEN THEY SOLD IT TO MKDP

Link to post
Share on other sites

pop up on the MCOL website detailed on the claimform.

.

register as an individual

note the long gateway number given

then log in

.

select respond to a claim and select the AOS box.

.

then using the details required from the claimform

.

defend all

leave jurisdiction unticked.

click thru to the end

confirm and exit MCOL.

.

get a CCA Request running to the claimant

leave the £1PO blank and uncrossed

.

get a CPR 31:14 request running to the solicitors

.

don't sign anything

.

 

 

 

should be an easy win

they'll never get an enforceable CCA for a 1986 card.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

they're saying that a "true copy" is sufficient regardless of when it was opened? it's just a generic document with no individual details about me at all.

 

Well they would...there not going to tell you they are desperate and clutching at straws on a 31 year old agreement:wink:

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

k, so in terms of the account, why isn't it enforceable? i appreciate it's a very, very old account, but for them to issue a court claim must mean they are confident about winning based on following their process and issuing it correctly?

Link to post
Share on other sites

k, so in terms of the account, why isn't it enforceable? i appreciate it's a very, very old account, but for them to issue a court claim must mean they are confident about winning based on following their process and issuing it correctly?

 

Not really.......99.9% of claims go undefended and the claimant attains a default Judgment...you found CAG...we can go into the ins and outs of why the reconstituted version of the agreement is unenforceable later.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

that's why you NEVER talk to a fleecing DCA

 

 

they'll tell you anything to get money out of you.

they ARE NOT BAILLIFFS and should be totally ignored unless as you have received a claimform.

 

 

get all of post 4 actioned

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

as already outlines you ask for ONE blank uncroosed £1 po.

 

 

why not print your letters ready to go save 2 trips to the post office

 

 

when you bet the PO

pop it in the CCA envelope

seal it

and then get both CCA / CPR posted and get proof of posting.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

so everything's ready to go off today.

 

as i've never done this before, and having read the back of the claim form, it says that if judgement is entered against me, further costs and interest could be applied to the original amount, which would increase the amount considerably based on the age of the account. Is this a possible outcome based on other members' experiences?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Not in your case the amount is not over 5K and the claimant has failed to claim interest in its particulars...so the amount stated on the claim form is the total fixed amount if you lose...subject to any applications from either party or additional hearings.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

thanks andy, all new so apologies if I come across as a bit thick lol.....

 

as I've been on a payment plan previously, won't they say that I've admitted to owing the money, regardless of whether the agreement is enforceable? your colleague said to get the docs off, and my defence would be covered afterwards, it would help if I knew what the approach is going to be....

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thousands of examples of defences to view here......

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/forumdisplay.php?190-Legal-Successes

 

Simply find a similar thread ...same type of debt...same claimant...same agreement age.

 

Regards

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

well I can't file my defence online, as it won't recognise the claim or the password, and I can't get through to the phone number listed, which judging by the comments online isn't a surprise, so will have to send by post!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Why are you trying to file a defence ? Do you mean acknowledge service ?

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

thanks andy, but as you said, thousands of examples, and a bit daunting quite frankly. I have seen that various site members have given specific advice to people, which obviously makes it easier to make sure the advice is correct on the day I need it (potentially)

 

just found out that the date my account actually defaulted was 1/1/2011 so does that mean that my defence is that it's statute barred, and that's all I need to say, even though I was on a payment plan, and the last payment 6/5/16?

Link to post
Share on other sites

thanks andy, but as you said, thousands of examples, and a bit daunting quite frankly. I have seen that various site members have given specific advice to people, which obviously makes it easier to make sure the advice is correct on the day I need it (potentially)

 

As this is a self help forum...we will guide you.....but you do have to put a little leg work in also.

 

just found out that the date my account actually defaulted was 1/1/2011 so does that mean that my defence is that it's statute barred, and that's all I need to say, even though I was on a payment plan, and the last payment 6/5/16?

 

No...because you have made payments since 1/1/2011 therefore extending the limitations period.This requires a full holding defence which puts the claimant to strict proof....as per the above examples.

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

so I've looked at some examples, and it seems that there's no need to argue whether a default is correct, or deed of assignment, as if they have a record, then it's deemed acceptable in court. so is my only defence the fact that the "true copy" has my current address on it, some 26 years after opening the account, but no other personally identifiable information?

Link to post
Share on other sites

they've not returned any paperwork...they intend to rely upon have they?

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

so I've looked at some examples, and it seems that there's no need to argue whether a default is correct, or deed of assignment, as if they have a record, then it's deemed acceptable in court. so is my only defence the fact that the "true copy" has my current address on it, some 26 years after opening the account, but no other personally identifiable information?

 

The examples you have looked at are holding defences...which put them to strict proof on all of the above.....an initial defence does not contain any arguments to anything...simply puts them to strict proof to disclose....if they do then you argue within your witness statement...if it gets to that stage.....99% dont and discontinue.

 

I think you dont quite get the process yet.

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

hi dx, cpr and cca only gone off today, but no paperwork provided by them so far. they have admitted that they have not sent me any info since taking over the account in 2015 regarding my pre-existing complaint.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...