Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Post #415 you said you were unable to sell it yourself. Earlier I believe you said there had been expressions of interest, but only if the buyer could acquire the freehold title. I wonder if the situation with the existing freeholders is such that the property is really unattractive, in ways possibly not obvious to someone who also has an interest in and acts for the freeholders.
    • i dont think the reason why the defendant lost the case means anything at all in that case. it was a classic judge lottery example.
    • Hello, I will try to outline everything clearly. I am a British citizen and I live in Luxembourg (I think this may be relevant for potential claims). I hired a car from Heathrow in March for a 3-day visit to family in the UK. I was "upgraded" to an EV (Polestar 2). I had a 250-mile journey to my family's address. Upon attempting to charge the vehicle, there was a red error message on the dashboard, saying "Charging error". I attempted to charge at roughly 10 different locations and got the same error message. Sometimes there was also an error message on the charging station screen. The Hertz 0800 assistance/breakdown number provided on the set of keys did not work with non-UK mobiles. I googled and found a bunch of other numbers, none of which were normal geographical ones, and none of which worked from my Luxembourg mobile. It was getting late and I was very short on charge. Also, there was no USB socket in the car, so my phone ran out of battery, so I was unable to look for further help online. It became clear that I would not reach my destination (rural Devon), so I had no choice but to find a roadside hotel in Exeter and then go to the nearest Hertz branch the following day on my remaining 10 miles of charge. Of course, as soon as the Hertz employee in Exeter plugged it into their own charger, the charging worked immediately. I have driven EVs before, I know how to charge them, and it definitely did not work at about 10 different chargers between London and Exeter. I took photos on each occasion. Luckily they had another vehicle available and transferred me onto it. It was an identical Polestar 2 to the original car. 2 minutes down the road, to test it, I went to a charger and it worked immediately. I also charged with zero issues at 2 other chargers before returning the vehicle. I think this shows that it was a charging fault with the first car and not my inability to do it properly. I wrote to Hertz, sending the hotel, dinner, breakfast and hotel parking receipt and asking for a refund of these expenses caused by the charging failure in the original car. They replied saying they "could not issue a refund" and they issued me with a voucher for 50 US dollars to use within the next year. Obviously I have no real proof that the charging didn't work. My guess is they will say that the photos don't prove that I was charging correctly, just that it shows an error message and a picture of a charger plugged into a car, without being able to see the detail. Could you advise whether I have a case to go further? I am not after a refund or compensation, I just want my £200 back that I had to spend on expenses. I think I have two possibilities (or maybe one - see below). It looks like the UK is still part of the European Consumer Centre scheme:  File a complaint with ECC Luxembourg | ECC-Net digital forms ECCWEBFORMS.EU   Would this be a good point to start from? Alternatively, the gov.uk money claims service. But the big caveat is you need a "postal address in the UK". In practice, do I have to have my primary residence in the UK, or can I use e.g. a family member's address, presumably just as an address for service, where they can forward me any relevant mail? Do they check that the claimant genuinely lives in the UK? "Postal address" is not the same as "Residence" - anyone can get a postal address in the UK without living there. But I don't want to cheat the system or have a claim denied because of it. TIA for any help!  
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Paying Largo/Robinson way /Arrow Global old citi loan debt


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3427 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Does anyone know if Largo and Robinson Way are linked at all?

 

I had a loan with Citi Fininacial, and Arrow Global purchased it in 2012.

 

 

They immediately assigned Largo to collect and I've been on a payment plan of £1 a month ever since.

 

I today received my annual statement from Arrow

however it states no payments have been made since May.

 

 

Payments have continued to be made via standing order,

however I have noted that since June amounts of £1 have been returned by a Robinson Way to my bank account.

 

Im not 100% sure it is the "Largo payments" being returned

 

 

however as I have a number of £1 standing orders that go out on the same day.

 

Does anyone know if these are linked,

 

 

or if not who Robinson Way are linked to,

 

 

as I pay 7 dca's monthly but none one of them is Robinson Way.

 

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

This is a quote from 2012.........

 

Robinson Way Limited has sold Chase Solutions, the field services division of the company, in a deal that protects the jobs of 20 employees.

 

Chase Solutions, which manages a nationwide field force of over 600 agents, has been acquired by Winterhill Largo plc, the asset valuation and recovery specialist and financial outsourcing group, for an undisclosed sum.

Any advice I give is honest and in good faith.:)

If in doubt, you should seek the opinion of a Qualified Professional.

If you can, please donate to this site.

Help keep it up and active, helping people like you.

If you no longer require help, please do what you can to help others

RIP: Rooster-UK - MARTIN3030 - cerberusalert

Link to post
Share on other sites

which is now part of hoist portfolio holding 2 or HPH2

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I hope you've sent all the dca's you are paying a CCA request?

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

oh and nothing to do with arrows

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I hope you've sent all the dca's you are paying a CCA request?

 

 

dx

 

Yeah, the ones I'm paying have all sent back signed credit agreements, however they have been getting paid for 2/3 years now, so may well be worth sending another batch of cca requests

Link to post
Share on other sites

no real point as long as we checked them all

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

Hi guys - quick update

 

I sent Largo a letter on 02/11 outlining the detail in my opening post and asking whats going on.

Never received a reply,

 

 

then sent a CCA request on 11/11 and again not received a reply to that either.

 

 

This makes me wonder if they/arrow still have the info, as the original debt is about 8 years old.

 

I'd appreciate some advice as not sure where to go next,

as its clear from my statement that Arrow Global have not received my payment for a number of months.

 

 

To be frank I have no clue what my balance should be as I've routed through my papwork and cannot find the original agreement.

 

 

I've made a number of varying payments over the lifeline of the debt depeding upon my circumstances at the time,

and have just completely lost track of the balance as its been chased by various people.

Link to post
Share on other sites

what addrres for largo did you use?

 

 

and who do they state was their client?

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

me thinks you should stop paying them

 

 

you've been had

 

 

and are being had blind.

 

 

they'll soon write

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

me thinks you should stop paying them

 

you've been had

 

and are being had blind.

 

they'll soon write

 

dx

 

They arent getting payment as such anymore as they are returning them.

 

Its not Largo that bother me that much,

just a bit worried Arrow Global might just issue on me or something out of the blue.

 

 

Not sure what they know of my dispute,

as all their statements etc just say to contact Largo with queries,

which I have tried to do but not got replies.

 

 

My thinking is that it may just appear to Arrow that payments simply stopped in May.

Link to post
Share on other sites

good you should have done this YEARS ago.

 

 

arrows are their client

 

 

so send the CCA request to arrows.

 

 

remember

DONT sign anything

print your name on the CCA

leave the PO BLANK.

 

 

there are very very few CITI debts

where anyone can come up with a signed agreement

let alone the CORRECT T&C for when you took the card out.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Hi Guys - Quick update:

 

Sent the CCA request to Arrow and have had a response.

 

They have returned my £1 PO, along with a letter which at the top states

 

 

"Assigned by Phoenix Recoveries".

 

 

The letter states all collection activity is suspended,

and that they will process my request from the originating creditor.

(Not sure if they mean Phoenix or Citi).

 

Not sure if this is good or bad as my understanding was

that Arrow own the debt and have assigned it to Largo.

 

 

I' guess i'll have to wait and see what the paperwork throws up if i get any further response.

Link to post
Share on other sites

That means they dont have the CCA, so instead of admitting it, theyll likely sell the debt on again. Either that or they have done their old trick of buying the debt and not getting the paperwork.

 

Just think of how many thousands of people they catch out that dont even know what a CCA is.

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

if phoenix are involved that smells

they only ever deal in dodgy debts.

 

dca chasing a debt for another DCA sold to them from another DCA....urm..

 

 

and its a CITI debt

 

 

not a chance in hell they'll ever get the CCA

 

 

that's why they have sold it on and on

to bury the fact its CITI.

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

if phoenix are involved that smells

they only ever deal in dodgy debts.

 

dca chasing a debt for another DCA sold to them from another DCA....urm..

 

 

and its a CITI debt

 

 

not a chance in hell they'll ever get the CCA

 

 

that's why they have sold it on and on

to bury the fact its CITI.

 

 

dx

 

How do you mean dodgy dx?

Link to post
Share on other sites

unenforceable, full of reclaimable charges, or likely they do not have the correct paperwork for it.

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

go read a few CITI threads

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...