Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • This is a ridiculous situation.  The lender has made so many stupid errors of judgement.  I refuse to bow down and willingly 'pay' for their mistakes.  I really want to put this behind me and move on.  I can't yet. 
    • Peter McCormack says he has secured a 15-year lease on the club's Bedford ground.View the full article
    • ae - i have no funds to appoint lawyers.   My point about most caggers getting lost is simply due to so many layers of legal issues that is bound to confuse.  
    • Lenders have a legal obligation to sell the property for the best price they can get. If they feel the offer is low they won't sell it, because it's likely the borrower will say the same.   Yes.  But every interested buyer was offering within a range - based on local market sales evidence.  Shelter site says a lender is not allowed to wait for the market to improve. Why serve a dilapidations notice? If it's in the terms of the lease to maintain the property to a good standard, then serve an S146 notice instead as it's a clear breach of the lease.   The dilapidations notice was a legal first step.  Freeholders have to give time to leaseholders to remedy.  Lender lawyers advised the property was going to be sold and the new buyer would undertake the work.  Their missive came shortly before contracts were given to buyer.  The buyer lawyer and freehold lawyers were then in contact.  The issue of dilapidations remedy was discussed..  But then lender reneged.  There was a few months where neither I nor freeholders were sure what was going on.  Then suddenly demolition works started.   Before one issues a s146 one has to issue a LBA.  That is eventually what happened. ...legal battle took 3y to resolve. Again, order them to revert it as they didn't have permission to do the works, or else serve an S146 notice for breach of the lease   A s146 was served.  It took 3y but the parties came to a settlement.   (They couldn't revert as they had ripped out irreplaceable historical features). The lease has already been extended once so they have no right to another extension. It seems pretty easy to just get the lawyer to say no and stick by those terms as the law is on your side there.  That's not the case   One can ask for another extension.  In this instance the freeholders eventually agreed with a proviso for the receiver not to serve another. You wouldn't vary a lease through a lease extension.  Correct.  But receiver lawyer was an idiot.   He made so many errors.  No idea why the receiver instructed him?  He used to work for lender lawyers. I belatedly discovered he was sacked for dishonesty and fined a huge sum by the sra  (though kept his licence).  He eventually joined another firm and the receiver bizarrely chose him to handle the extension.  Again he messed up - which is why the matter still hasn't been properly concluded.   In reality, its quite clear the lender/ receiver were just trying to overwhelm me (as trustee and leaseholder) with work (and costs) due to so many legal  issues.  Also they tried to twist things (as lawyers sometimes do).  They tried to create a situation where the freeholders would get a wasted costs order - the intent was to bankrupt the freeholders so they could grab the fh that way.   That didn't happen.  They are still trying though.  They owe the freeholders legal costs (s60) and are refusing to pay.  They are trying to get the freeholders to refer the matter to the tribunal - simply to incur more costs (the freeholders don't want and cant's afford to incur)  Enfranchisement isn't something that can be "voided", it's in the Leasehold Reform Act 1967 that leaseholders have the right to.... The property does not qualify under 67 Act.  Their notice was invalid and voided. B petition was struck out. So this is dealt with then.  That action was dealt with yes.   But they then issued a new claim out of a different random court - which I'm still dealing with alone.  This is where I have issues with my old lawyer. He failed to read important legal docs  (which I kept emailing and asking if he was dealing with) and  also didn't deal with something crucial I pointed out.  This lawyer had the lender in a corner and he did not act. Evidence shows lender and receiver strategy had been ....  Redact and scan said evidence up for others to look at?   I could.  But the evidence is clear cut.  Receiver email to lender and lender lawyer: "our strategy for many months  has been for ceo to get the property".  A lender is not allowed to influence the receivership.   They clearly were.  And the law firm were complicit.  The same firm representing the lender and the ceo in his personal capacity - conflict of interest?   I  also have evidence of the lender trying to pay a buyer to walk.  I was never supposed to know about this.  But I was given copies of messages from the receiver "I need to see you face to face, these things are best not put in writing".  No need to divulge all here.  But in hindsight it's clear the lender/ receiver tried - via 2 meetings - to get rid of this buyer (pay large £s) to clear the path for the ceo.   One thing I need to clarify - if a receiver tells a lender to do - or not to do - something should the lender comply? 
    • Why ask for advice if you think it's too complex for the forum members to understand? You'd be better engaging a lawyer. Make sure he has understood all the implications. Stick with his advice. If it doesn't conform to your preconceived opinion then pause and consider whether maybe he's right.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

ATOS Medical for DLA


izzy1969
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4587 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi Guys,

 

I'm a nervous wreck. I have read so many horror stories about going for the atos medical for DLA. I have arthritis/damaged knee replacement (failed op) and I have my medical this coming Monday at 1pm. Thing is, i'm not nervous about going i'm nervous about them twisting everything I say into a complete opposit of what I mean. You know the usual...can't walk...can't sit for long...can't dress, wash etc.

 

I am still in full time work and i refuse to give it up ( I work in education and the staff wont let me walk anywhere and have moved the earth for me etc) but travelling there in the car now is so difficult as I'm sat in one position for too long. Also, it's costing me a fortune in aids to help me live and travel. Incontience blankets....pads...medication...special tights...the list is endless and it's costing nearly a third of my wage every month.

 

I know that I have to accept the inevitable as time goes on and will have to go part time and then give it up, but i'm hanging in there as long as I can with the help of the school...all I need now is help with mobility and Maybe I can stay longer? Anyway...wish me luck and I hope with all of you out there that you find the kindness that I found among my collegues.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Am I right in reading this -

I have arthritis/damaged knee replacement (failed op)?

 

And that you are claiming that you need help with mobility and care due to the increased costs of aids?

 

For a start you would have to prove and have it backed up with evidence that you 'either cannot walk or are virtually unable to walk' which is the criteria for mobility. As you can imagine, this is a very severe test and generally means that you cannot walk more than 25 metres, in a slow walk before such severe discomfort sets in that makes it impossible to progress any further.

 

As regards care, I am trying to work out in my mind how you are going to be able to justify to the assessor that due to the complaint you have with your knee, that you require the level of care needed either on a daily basis, nightly basis or both.

 

I know of someone who has basically lost the use of both legs due to Periphal Vascular Disease, has a heart condition that causes breathlessness, and has a digestive problem that requires the use of regular amounts of Morphine due to constant daily pain, not being able to move, bend, twist, turn or kneel who has been refused any DLA twice now. This is despite a considerable amount of evidence from all of his consultants being sent in.

 

I wish you the very best of luck.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Was there any need for that, tara?

 

OP - good luck. Ensure that you don't do anything you don't normally do and that all aids / medication are where they should be. (mobility aids near you, medication maybe in the kitchen cupboard / bedside if you take them before bed or when you get up, etc) They do assess you from the moment you get up to answer the door.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Was there any need for that, tara?

 

OP - good luck. Ensure that you don't do anything you don't normally do and that all aids / medication are where they should be. (mobility aids near you, medication maybe in the kitchen cupboard / bedside if you take them before bed or when you get up, etc) They do assess you from the moment you get up to answer the door.

 

I think my comments were fair.

 

For someone that says that they only have a problem with a damaged knee, the comments about mobility are very valid. What I quoted was what the DWP will be expecting the OP to prove to the assessor.

 

As regards my comments about care, unless I am missing something, I can't see where the care element would come in - not to the extent that the OP will have to prove it to the assessor.

My wife has arthritis in most joints of her body, including both hips and kness, yet she is not able to claim DLA/AA for it.

 

My comments about somebody I know that has lost the use of both legs amongst other serious conditions has tried twice to claim DLA but failed. I look at the OP and the examples I know of.

 

Finally, the OP WILL have to prove her needs (mobility & care) that have been caused by the knee problem by having supporting evidence from the GP certainly and maybe an OT, Consultant, Pain Clinic etc.

Link to post
Share on other sites

For someone that says that they only have a problem with a damaged knee,

 

The OP mentions stuff about continence pads - don't know anyone who only has serious knee issues who has continence issues as a result...

 

My comments about somebody I know that has lost the use of both legs amongst other serious conditions has tried twice to claim DLA but failed.

 

The fault probably lies with the claimant. DLA isn't based on the name / type of disability either - it's the care and /or mobility needs.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The OP mentions stuff about continence pads - don't know anyone who only has serious knee issues who has continence issues as a result...

 

 

 

The fault probably lies with the claimant. DLA isn't based on the name / type of disability either - it's the care and /or mobility needs.

 

Yes I too noticed that at the start but the OP made no mention of anything other than her knee:

I have arthritis/damaged knee replacement (failed op) and I....
, so I assumed it was something that she wasn't having problems with.

 

That is always the stock answer isn't it?

 

I was pointing out that there are many people with conditions and care/mobility needs that far exceed the OP in question - with what she has claimed she has - that cannot get DLA.

Do I presume that you think it fair that those with less needs are awarded DLA and those with more aren't?

 

It was an example of what is actually happening with DLA/AA claims at the moment. No doubt years ago it was easier to obtain.

To say that the reason why some do get and some don't is down to the claimant is not fair. Most people try very hard to complete the forms honestly and get nowhere.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Do I presume that you think it fair that those with less needs are awarded DLA and those with more aren't?

 

If you read the OP's post again, you would see that they wrote:

can't walk...can't sit for long...can't dress, wash etc.
Link to post
Share on other sites

Obviously Tara you need an explanation into every single detail about my health as to where's and whyfors. But If i had have done this it would be a book long...the can't walk sit etc is due to my knee/arthritis (hips, knees, ankles, shoulders, right side of nech, fingers and wrists) As for the incontinence this is a seperate issue which I didnt think on a supposedly caring community website I would have to name all my illnessess which I wont. I was only replying to bieng nervous about going to the damn medical thios coming Monday and wished id never bothered.

 

Thank you for your support and help. I wont be posting on here again. I only wish that another newbie postie doesn't get the same greeting and support as me.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello Izzy. I'm really sorry you've had a hard time and don't really understand why myself.

 

Leemack has a sticky on this forum about Atos 'medicals'. I think it's worth having a read about how to answer the questions so you don't fall into any trap. I hope you find it helpful.

 

HB x

Illegitimi non carborundum

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Izzy.

I have a bad hip and knee.

I was awarded DLA on my first application without a medical.

I have had 3 lots of surgery but no knee replacement as I am too young at 48

I go to a pain clinic and am on strong pain killers and anti depressants.

I did send a lot of consultants letters with my application, just the ones they send you after an appointment, and letters from the pain clinic detailing my symptoms.

I think it depends on what your G.P says too, did you ask for a copy of his report from the DWP after they turned you down?

It seems that you need a paper trail to prove your illness as they wont just take your word for it even if your G.P is on your side.

They seem to think that our G.P's are not worthy of diagnosing us for the DWP.

I hope you succeed and good luck. You can always claim again if you fail.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...