Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • S13 (2)The creditor may not exercise the right under paragraph 4 to recover from the keeper any unpaid parking charges specified in the notice to keeper if, within the period of 28 days beginning with the day after that on which that notice was given, the creditor is given— (a)a statement signed by or on behalf of the vehicle-hire firm to the effect that at the material time the vehicle was hired to a named person under a hire agreement; (b)a copy of the hire agreement; and (c)a copy of a statement of liability signed by the hirer under that hire agreement. As  Arval has complied with the above they cannot be pursued by EC----- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- S14 [1]   the creditor may recover those charges (so far as they remain unpaid) from the hirer. (2)The conditions are that— (a)the creditor has within the relevant period given the hirer a notice in accordance with sub-paragraph (5) (a “notice to hirer”), together with a copy of the documents mentioned in paragraph 13(2) and the notice to keeper; (b)a period of 21 days beginning with the day on which the notice to hirer was given has elapsed;  As ECP did not send copies of the documents to your company and they have given 28 days instead of 21 days they have failed to comply with  the Act so you and your Company are absolved from paying. That is not to say that they won't continue asking to be paid as they do not have the faintest idea how PoFA works. 
    • Euro have got a lot wrong and have failed to comply with the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 Schedule 4.  According to Section 13 after ECP have written to Arval they should then send a NTH to the Hirer  which they have done.This eliminates Arval from any further pursuit by ECP. When they wrote to your company they should have sent copies of everything that they asked Arval for. This is to prove that your company agree what happened on the day of the breach. If ECP then comply with the Act they are allowed to pursue the hirer. If they fail, to comply they cannot make the hirer pay. They can pursue until they are blue in the face but the Hirer is not lawfully required to pay them and if it went to Court ECP would lose. Your company could say who was driving but the only person that can be pursued is the Hirer, there does not appear to be an extension for a driver to be pursued. Even if there was, because ECP have failed miserably to comply with the Act  they still have no chance of winning in Court. Here are the relevant Hire sections from the Act below.
    • Thank-you FTMDave for your feedback. May I take this opportunity to say that after reading numerous threads to which you are a contributor, I have great admiration for you. You really do go above and beyond in your efforts to help other people. The time you put in to help, in particular with witness statements is incredible. I am also impressed by the way in which you will defer to others with more experience should there be a particular point that you are not 100% clear on and return with answers or advice that you have sought. I wish I had the ability to help others as you do. There is another forum expert that I must also thank for his time and patience answering my questions and allowing me to come to a “penny drops” moment on one particular issue. I believe he has helped me immensely to understand and to strengthen my own case. I shall not mention who it is here at the moment just in case he would rather I didn't but I greatly appreciate the time he took working through that issue with me. I spent 20+ years of working in an industry that rules and regulations had to be strictly adhered to, indeed, exams had to be taken in order that one had to become qualified in those rules and regulations in order to carry out the duties of the post. In a way, such things as PoFA 2012 are rules and regulations that are not completely alien to me. It has been very enjoyable for me to learn these regulations and the law surrounding them. I wish I had found this forum years ago. I admit that perhaps I had been too keen to express my opinions given that I am still in the learning process. After a suitable period in this industry I became Qualified to teach the rules and regulations and I always said to those I taught that there is no such thing as a stupid question. If opinions, theories and observations are put forward, discussion can take place and as long as the result is that the student is able to clearly see where they went wrong and got to that moment where the penny drops then that is a valuable learning experience. No matter how experienced one is, there is always something to learn and if I did not know the answer to a question, I would say, I don't know the answer to that question but I will go and find out what the answer is. In any posts I have made, I have stated, “unless I am wrong” or “as far as I can see” awaiting a response telling me what I got wrong, if it was wrong. If I am wrong I am only too happy to admit it and take it as a valuable learning experience. I take the point that perhaps I should not post on other peoples threads and I shall refrain from doing so going forward. 🤐 As alluded to, circumstances can change, FTMDave made the following point that it had been boasted that no Caggers, over two years, who had sent a PPC the wrong registration snotty letter, had even been taken to court, let alone lost a court hearing .... but now they have. I too used the word "seemed" because it is true, we haven't had all the details. After perusing this forum I believe certain advice changed here after the Beavis case, I could be wrong but that is what I seem to remember reading. Could it be that after winning the above case in question, a claimant could refer back to this case and claim that a defendant had not made use of the appeal process, therefore allowing the claimant to win? Again, in this instance only, I do not know what is to be gained by not making an appeal or concealing the identity of the driver, especially if it is later admitted that the defendant was the driver and was the one to input the incorrect VRN in error. So far no one has educated me as to the reason why. But, of course, when making an appeal, it should be worded carefully so that an error in the appeal process cannot be referred back to. I thought long and hard about whether or not to post here but I wanted to bring up this point for discussion. Yes, I admit I have limited knowledge, but does that mean I should have kept silent? After I posted that I moved away from this forum slightly to find other avenues to increase my knowledge. I bought a law book and am now following certain lawyers on Youtube in the hope of arming myself with enough ammunition to use in my own case. In one video titled “7 Reasons You Will LOSE Your Court Case (and how to avoid them)” by Black Belt Barrister I believe he makes my point by saying the following, and I quote: “If you ignore the complaint in the first instance and it does eventually end up in court then it's going to look bad that you didn't co-operate in the first place. The court is not going to look kindly on you simply ignoring the company and not, let's say, availing yourself of any kind of appeal opportunities, particularly if we are talking about parking charge notices and things like that.” This point makes me think that, it is not such a bizarre judgement in the end. Only in the case of having proof of payment and inputting an incorrect VRN .... could it be worthwhile making a carefully worded appeal in the first instance? .... If the appeal fails, depending on the reason, surely this could only help if it went to court? As always, any feedback gratefully received.
    • To which official body does one make a formal complaint about a LPA fixed charge receiver? Does one make a complaint first to the company employing the appointed individuals?    Or can one complain immediately to an official body, such as nara?    I've tried researching but there doesn't seem a very clear route on how to legally hold them to account for wrongful behaviour.  It seems frustratingly complicated because they are considered to be officers of the court and held in high esteem - and the borrower is deemed liable for their actions.  Yet what does the borrower do when disclosure shows clear evidence of wrong-doing? Does anyone have any pointers please?
    • Steam is still needed in many industries, but much of it is still made with fossil fuels.View the full article
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

UNFAIR TRADING REGULATIONS 2008 and BRIGHTHOUSE


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4347 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Oh dear... Poor, poor BrightHouse...

They're going to have to really clean up their act now...

The Consumer Protection from Unfair Trading Regulations 2008

There's a few nuggets in there that BrightHouse AIN'T gonna like! :cool:

I suggest you give it a good read!

Cheers

Lefty

If the left side of the brain controls your right, and the right side controls your left, then left-handed people are always in their right mind!

 

Please help to support this site with a small donation... every little helps...

 

CAG- The Nation's Weekly Info Store!

;)

Link to post
Share on other sites

I like this bit, too...

Aggressive commercial practices

 

7.—(1) A commercial practice is aggressive if, in its factual context, taking account of all of its features and circumstances—

(a) it significantly impairs or is likely significantly to impair the average consumer’s freedom of choice or conduct in relation to the product concerned through the use of harassment, coercion or undue influence; and

(b) it thereby causes or is likely to cause him to take a transactional decision he would not have taken otherwise.

(2) In determining whether a commercial practice uses harassment, coercion or undue influence account shall be taken of—

(a) its timing, location, nature or persistence;

(b) the use of threatening or abusive language or behaviour;

© the exploitation by the trader of any specific misfortune or circumstance of such gravity as to impair the consumer’s judgment, of which the trader is aware, to influence the consumer’s decision with regard to the product;

(d) any onerous or disproportionate non-contractual barrier imposed by the trader where a consumer wishes to exercise rights under the contract, including rights to terminate a contract or to switch to another product or another trader; and

(e) any threat to take any action which cannot legally be taken.

(3) In this regulation—

(a) “coercion” includes the use of physical force; and

(b) “undue influence” means exploiting a position of power in relation to the consumer so as to apply pressure, even without using or threatening to use physical force, in a way which significantly limits the consumer’s ability to make an informed decision.

I think an awful lot of this can be applied to the way BrightHouse sell Optional Service Cover and Damage Liability Cover...

Cheers

Lefty

If the left side of the brain controls your right, and the right side controls your left, then left-handed people are always in their right mind!

 

Please help to support this site with a small donation... every little helps...

 

CAG- The Nation's Weekly Info Store!

;)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Those are the bits I liked :) These are the bits of schedule 1 I liked

10. Presenting rights given to consumers in law as a distinctive feature of the trader’s offer.

 

25. Conducting personal visits to the consumer’s home ignoring the consumer’s request to leave or not to return, except in circumstances and to the extent justified to enforce a contractual obligation.

 

26. Making persistent and unwanted solicitations by telephone, fax, e-mail or other remote media except in circumstances and to the extent justified to enforce a contractual obligation.

 

27. Requiring a consumer who wishes to claim on an insurance policy to produce documents which could not reasonably be considered relevant as to whether the claim was valid, or failing systematically to respond to pertinent correspondence, in order to dissuade a consumer from exercising his contractual rights.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Just on reading Lefty's post, please do be careful when interpreting these regulations.

 

regulation 7 refers to context and all relevant circumstances. Paragraph one is double limbed. It is not merely that the consumer would make a transactional decision, but also that they have been harassed or coerced into making that decision (para 1(a)). And even deciding that, the circumstances include, location and timing and use of threatening behaviour.

 

If one is in a shop and a good sales patter is being given, it is unlikely that this will fall within the meaning of the legislation. It is more likely to refer to doorstep selling or a mock auction.

 

Now I am not defending Brighthouse here. But it seems, with respect, that CAG has placed so much emphasis on these new regulations that they are seen as a miracle cure to consumer ills. They are not.

Asides not doing much than was available already (except bits sch. 1), it is the ability to enforce the regulations that determines its effectiveness. And remember that these regs are for enforcement use - not for civil contract disputes as, e.g, SoGA is. the fact that an offence has been committed does not necessitate the contract being voidable.

Link to post
Share on other sites

we had a problem with brighthouse and their so called optional service cover when buying a washer from them, which we told them we did not want on at least 5 occasions, to which their rply was we will remove the said cover ? Mmmm. I saved every payment slip, and wrote down every transaction, when we reached the ammount that we had signed and agreed to pay for the washer(without the extra cover) we walked into brighthouse and made our final payment, to which they replied " but you still owe Z number of pounds, we explained that we had paid for the washer and that the money they were now asking for was the optional cover that we didn't want. I showed all my receipts, to which they were not too happy about, they then dissapeared into the back office and to our amazement they found the supposedly original contract which had a brand new tick darker than all the rest stating that we wanted extra cover. We left the shop and wrote a strong letter to brighthouse, sent with copies of all the slips and the contract , HA HA ! not heard anything since dont let brighthouse bully you which is what they seem to do to all their customers.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Report it. I insisted on a new contract for my mobile phone from P4U. They printed one off stating I had elected for insurance. A request to remove resulted in "oh its ok, we know - we just wont charge you" (yeah right). several protests ended in the production of paper specifically stating taht I did not want insurance, followed by a letter to head office and trading standards.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 months later...
I suggest that you start your own thread to get a better response.

 

In the right section too ;)

All my posts are made without prejudice and may not be reused or reproduced without my express permission (or the permission of the forums owners)!

 

17/10/2006 Recieve claim against me from lloyds TSB for £312.82

18/10/06 S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) sent

03/02/07 Claim allocated to small claims. Hearing set for 15/05/07. Lloyds ordered to file statement setting out how they calculate their charges

15/05/07 Lloyds do not attend. Judgement ordered for £192 approx, £3 travel costs and removal of default notice

29/05/07 4pm Lloyds deadline for payment of CCJ expires. Warrant of execution ready to go

19/06/07 Letter from court stating Lloyds have made a cheque payment to court

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 5 months later...
  • 2 months later...

I took out a tv with bright house last year I make all my payments on time yet they start hounding me five days proir to the payment date and they dont just call me they have rung my mum hundredsof times even though I told them not to ,my mum has severe ms which I told them and they still rung sometimes as early as 7 oclock in the morning they pester me constantly and are aggressive in manner and tone ,I had aphone call today as i answerd it someone was screaming down the phone at me saying that they had been calling me 24/7 and that i was ignoring there calls which i wasnt he told me that i constantly have excuses which is untrue and that if i didnt pay by tomorrow at 12 they were sending round the baliffs in the afternoon even more so he was ringing from his own mobile phone so my number would have been on his phone as he left the store i feel betrayed by brighthouse and need help i want all of the money i have paid till know back as i dont trust the company.

Link to post
Share on other sites

first of all calm down , they cant send balliffs , only a member of there staff, you can tell them to leave and if they dont call the police

 

have asked one of the members that know a lot about them to come on the thread for you "Clemma"

..

Link to post
Share on other sites

I took out a tv with bright house last year I make all my payments on time yet they start hounding me five days proir to the payment date and they dont just call me they have rung my mum hundredsof times even though I told them not to ,my mum has severe ms which I told them and they still rung sometimes as early as 7 oclock in the morning they pester me constantly and are aggressive in manner and tone ,I had aphone call today as i answerd it someone was screaming down the phone at me saying that they had been calling me 24/7 and that i was ignoring there calls which i wasnt he told me that i constantly have excuses which is untrue and that if i didnt pay by tomorrow at 12 they were sending round the baliffs in the afternoon even more so he was ringing from his own mobile phone so my number would have been on his phone as he left the store i feel betrayed by brighthouse and need help i want all of the money i have paid till know back as i dont trust the company.

 

You really need to start you own thread about this - but for now, let me reassure you that Brighthouse have NO rights to enter your home without a court order. I am going to need a little more information - how long have you had your goods etc., etc.

 

As for the phone calls, send them the following letter, by recorded delivery ASAP. You can also include the one about home visits as well. As soon as you start your own thread, send me a PM and I WILL come onto it and give you all the advice you need.

 

Letters:

 

-HARASSMENT WARNING-

 

WARNING;PROTECTION FROM HARASSMENT ACT 1997;

 

WARNING; COMMUNICATIONS ACT 2003, S127.

 

TELEPHONE NUMBER

Re: Harassment by telephone

 

 

ACCOUNT NUMBER: XXXXXXX

 

Dear Sir/Madam

 

I am writing in relation to the quantity and frequency of telephone calls that I have received from your company, which I deem to be personally harassing.

 

I have verbally requested that these stop, but I am still receiving calls.

 

I now require all further correspondence from your company to be made in writing only.

 

I am of the view that your continued harassment of me by telephone puts you in breach of Section 40 of the Administration of Justice Act 1970, and the Protection from Harassment Act 1997.

 

If you continue to harass me by telephone, you will also be in breach of the Communications Act (2003) s.127 and I will report you to OFCOM, Trading Standards and The Office of Fair Trading, meaning that you will be liable to a substantial fine.

 

Be advised that any further telephone calls from your company will be recorded.

 

Yours faithfully,

 

AND

 

Dear Sir/Madam

 

Account Ref xxxx

 

Please be advised that I will only communicate with you in writing.

 

Should it be your intention to arrange a “doorstep call”, please be advised that under OFT rules, you can only visit me at my home if you make an appointment and I have no wish to make an appointment with you.

 

There is only an implied license under English Common Law for people to be able to visit me on my property without express permission; the postman and people asking for directions etc (Armstrong v. Sheppard and Short Ltd [1959] 2 Q.B. per Lord Evershed M.R.). Therefore take note that I revoke license under Common Law for you, or your representatives to visit me at my property and if you do so, then you will be liable to damages for a tort of trespass and action will be taken, including but not limited to, police attendance.

 

Yours faithfully

 

Your local paperboy has more rights to be on your property than the goons from Brighthouse. If they turn up, keep a copy of this letter by the door, give it to them, then slam the door on them (using whatever words you feel appropriate). If they still will not leave, then call the police (not 999) and ask them to attend as you are being threatened and intimidated. They will take you seriously.

 

Ok, as for bailiffs - as kiptower stated, they are just store staff. Only a court can send bailiffs. Before that can happen Brighthouse have to obtain a CCJ against you, which you then fail to pay. HOWEVER, Brighthouse NEVER take anyone to court - I know of no cases. If they phone, hang up - if they persist, then you continue to hang up. DO NOT SPEAK TO THEM - as you can tell, the bully, intimidate and threaten you. Everything they say is rubbish - you must now do EVERYTHING in writing!

 

As for why you are making no payments - put this to them in writing too (also to Head Office) explaining the situation.

 

Hope some of this helps - if you need more advice, then like I said, start a new thread - HERE and send me a private message. Please, please remain calm.

 

Oh, and as for getting your money back - this won't happen. You have entered a Hire Purchase agreement, and the money you have paid so far has been for the hire of the goods.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 years later...

If this is not in the right place can it be moved? im not sure how to make a new thread?

 

i currently have several items with brighthouse with a weekly payment of£32 i recently got into arreas with them currently 6 weeks behind i have had the goods for around a year some of the items 2 years i would like to know where i stand, sometime ago not sure exactly how long ago roughly 9-12 months i renewed the contracts as i got into arreas before i was not told at the time of signing the agreements that the other ones i signed would become void ( 1/3payment protection and other things) i stupidly thought they were just helping me out, also i did not recieve copies of the new agreements but i still have copies of the old ones.i am not out to just not pay them at all i just cant afford to catch up on the arreas owed but if i offer to pay anything that is part payment they wont accept it also i get charged again if i only make a part payment i owe around £180 and i have £100 sat here that i can give them that they wont accept saying they will only take full payment of the arreas owed, i just cant afford this yet at least not for another few weeks until all my money has been sorted (partner was laid off) they are constantly ringing me and knocking at the door and im finding myself hiding in, i do not know what else to do, the men they send round are always rude and pushy asking to come in, i also had to have ago at them because they were discussing my account with my partner are they allowed to do this? i just need to know what right i have as a customer

 

thanks in advance :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...