Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hello, firstly thank you for reading this. I know no one wants a long winded back story. So I’ll be breif. I entered a local store to buy some paint (which I did pay for) I am honestly not a bad person or a theif.   Didn’t have a basket or trolly as was on my lunch break. Whilst picking up the three tubs of paint placed some masking tape in my pocket (it was hanging out of so I had every intention to pay) just didn’t have a hand free. Paid for my goods (forgot about the £4.39 masking tape) I’ve got so much going on and im not well at all (like I say no one cares I get that) also have autism so wasn’t thinking particularly like others do maybe (who knows my minds going around and around) I left the store after paying, was pulled back in by security. Asked for the tape which I gave immediately  shook up. Gave them my ID and details. I was given some paper and told to expect a large fine in the post for their time and the tape and sent on my way. my questions are: I hardly ever go out without support so the ban I guess I can’t go there now for anything (their loss) - ok but is my photo going to be all over with my name? how much am I expecting in the post as a fine? I have sent them cash in the post recorded signed for delivery to arrive tomorrow (incident happened today) for my error. Their Address was on the bit of paper. i have read two posts on this page but they were from many many years ago so I hoped for updated advise please? 
    • V important you read lots of BMW threads too !  
    • So should I send them a new SAR and put my date of birth on it? Or do I need to send them some proof? Driving license? 
    • Thanks so much for your help!! I've emailed them, and when they reply saying they can't do it I'll reply and state my rights. I'm so glad I found this forum, and will read all of the posts I can find and help guides available for the future. Really can't thank you enough.
    • utter BS, doesn't matter you signed it. pers i'd be writing as per the other threads here rejecting the car as not as described under CRA etc and be done with it. as its a debit card you could also do a full chargeback within 120 days to your bank and simply dump the car back to BMW. 100's of like threads to read here. get your ducks inline. make sure you know what you are doing and off you go. dont take any BS from BMW, no matter what you sign it does NOT remove your consumer rights. p'haps it might be on the off chance you are a good manager , a quick phonecall tomorrow saying you dont want it because (no bla bla fitted) it might be resolved in 5 mins..i will guess to date you not tried
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

CL finance issue court claim after 6 days? on disputed account


mak71
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5374 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Well today i have just received my first ever court claim:eek:

Thought when the day finally came i might start to panic, but im nice and calm and ready to fight this all the way:D

 

Basically ge money credit card

sent for cca while still with original creditor,, they sent back front page of application form,which stated terms and conditions overleaf, but they never sent the overleaf page, just the front page.

After many times of asking for a copy of the back overleaf page a lady admitted to me on the phone they dont any longer have the original copy, just a computer stored front page one,

So account was placed into dispute,

A few months later reveived a DN, (bit iffy as no date specified ,just 21 days from receipt as the date to rectify)

 

The out of the blue today a court claim from CL finance,according to the poc,it was assigned to them just 6 days before the date on the court form,(the didnt mess about did they)

The poc says they have sent me an assignment notice, but ive received nothing at all from cl finance:confused:

 

Anyway, can someone please confirm for me,

 

1, I have 14 days to put in an aknowledgement of service( is that technically 19 allowing for service?)the date of issue was 30th March

 

2 Should i aknowledge now or wait until nearer the time limit,is there any advantage of doing now or waiting till right on the time limit,

 

3, Do i simply have 28 days from court claim issue date to file my defence regrdless of if i aknowlege now or right on the deadline,

 

And lastly when should i send the cpr disclosure letter?

Should i send it directly to CL finance or Howard Cohen solicitors?

 

thanks

Mak

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 134
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Hi, welcome to the club:)

 

1 yes

2. you may as well do it now if you are going to defend all

3 33 days from the date on the claim, if you acknowledge in time

 

Send it to cohens..i sent it to both..made no difference, they just flatly refused to comply

Please note i have no legal training any advice i give comes from my own experience and from what i have learned on this site

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have seen several different cpr letter templates,is cpr 31.14, the sticky one in legal section the best one,if not

can someone please copy and paste or send me in the right direction of the latest most upto date one,

Thanks

Mak

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Mac

 

Your in safe hands with Creditcardmug and other Caggers on your case.

Yes, the CPR. 31.14 ok to use, thats the one i sent to them.

Good luck with your fight, the plonkers probably get it all wrong before it goes to Court.

 

Gaz

Link to post
Share on other sites

Im in exactly the same boat as you, so will follow this thread with interest! I sent CPR 31 to Howard Cohen today, can't wait to see what I get back!

 

Good luck to you, its my first court papers as well, and I was actually quite scared - until I came here!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Im in exactly the same boat as you, so will follow this thread with interest! I sent CPR 31 to Howard Cohen today, can't wait to see what I get back!

 

Good luck to you, its my first court papers as well, and I was actually quite scared - until I came here!

 

 

Genelover not a lot sent my CPR 31.14 to Cohen on the 12th March, still not had a reply from them as of yet.

 

Gaz

Link to post
Share on other sites

GE have committed a breach of guidelines/law selling on an account that is lawfully in dispute.

 

The failure of the OC to provide a CCA in fulfilment of you lawful request means that the account is unenforceable until they do. (Never from the sounds of it)

 

Do the claim, defend the entire amount. Submit a holding defence along lines of account sold whilst in dispute with OC over failure to comply CCA etc. State no documentation received as claimant has only had account six days proper defence to follow pending receipt of documentation requested under CPR etc. etc.

 

Contact GR with a WTF? letter. Inform OC you are reporting to OFT and Trading Standards.

 

Contact the DCa with a WTF? letter:- account in dispute with OC send them any proof you have they would be foolish not to drop it after you have made them aware it was in dispute with OC. Inform DCA you are reporting to OFT and Trading Standards.

 

Report to OFT / phone consumerdirect through the cd website

 

CL finance are in breach of CPR and pre court protocols.

 

 

My god GE are as desperate for cash as amex at the moment. :eek:

  • Haha 1

You have the right to food money.

If you don't mind a little investigation, humiliation, and if you cross your fingers rehabilitation..............

Link to post
Share on other sites

GE have committed a breach of guidelines/law selling on an account that is lawfully in dispute.

 

The failure of the OC to provide a CCA in fulfilment of you lawful request means that the account is unenforceable until they do. (Never from the sounds of it)

 

Do the claim, defend the entire amount. Submit a holding defence along lines of account sold whilst in dispute with OC over failure to comply CCA etc. State no documentation received as claimant has only had account six days proper defence to follow pending receipt of documentation requested under CPR etc. etc.

 

Contact GR with a WTF? letter. Inform OC you are reporting to OFT and Trading Standards.

 

Contact the DCa with a WTF? letter:- account in dispute with OC send them any proof you have they would be foolish not to drop it after you have made them aware it was in dispute with OC. Inform DCA you are reporting to OFT and Trading Standards.

 

Report to OFT / phone consumerdirect through the cd website

 

CL finance are in breach of CPR and pre court protocols.

 

 

My god GE are as desperate for cash as amex at the moment. :eek:

 

 

Thanks,will get letters sent off to Ge and Cl finance

will also log complaints with the appropriate authorities

 

sounds like it could be a whole lot of fun with cl finance,

 

Mak

Edited by mak71
Link to post
Share on other sites

Notice of assignment from cl finance just been delivered in the post,

 

Is there a strict prescribed format it has to be in,?

if so can someone please suppy a link to to somewhere which gives details of what a letter of assignment must contain.

 

Thanks

Mak

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Mak

 

I received the same claim form from CL finance re G E MONEY yesterday same date on claim form and received NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT today from cohens, G E MONEY are ment to send the NOA the one i received from cohens looks like a joke to me, and yes 6 days to issue proceedings desperate or what!

 

I also have the same DN as you 21 days to remedy creditcardmug among others think its invalid, thats good enough for me.

 

Have you got a thread going on this, i mean have you posted up a CCA or T&C's?

 

GG

Link to post
Share on other sites

Heres the letter, have they broken any rules?

this is all ive had ,as you can see says assigned 25th march ,letter sent to me 27th,(got the envelope its one of those uk mail ones)and then says they have submitted a court claim same day,27th March?

 

scan0003.jpg

Link to post
Share on other sites

Wheres the one from GE CAP then?

 

Its no good them pronouncing the have bought it, without the other party saying they have sold it!

Please note i have no legal training any advice i give comes from my own experience and from what i have learned on this site

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Mak

 

What was the date of your Default Notice issued to you, and the remedy date of the default.

 

Gaz

 

DN, was issued 17/11.2008

with 21 days from receipt of this notice given as the date to rectify:confused:

 

Creditcardmug,ive had no correspondence from GE saying they have sold the debt:idea:

 

Mak

Link to post
Share on other sites

DN, was issued 17/11.2008

with 21 days from receipt of this notice given as the date to rectify:confused:

 

Creditcardmug,ive had no correspondence from GE saying they have sold the debt:idea:

 

Mak

 

Did the DN give an actual DATE to remedy by?

 

Dont worry too much about the NOAs yet, you can insist on the deed and NOAs to be produced at the hearing, later on

Please note i have no legal training any advice i give comes from my own experience and from what i have learned on this site

Link to post
Share on other sites

Did the DN give an actual DATE to remedy by?

 

 

No, doesnt give a specific date, just 21 days from receipt of this notice,

 

could they sqeeze out of it ,as 21 days would be deemed enough even if they had posted it 2nd class

or is it cast in stone that they have to specify an actual date,Ive read alot about default notices etc, but still not sure if they can get away with a simple within 21 days of this notice,?

 

Also can they start court action so quick,or am i supposed to get a LBA letter first,?

 

Mak

Link to post
Share on other sites

Wheres the one from GE CAP then?

 

Its no good them pronouncing the have bought it, without the other party saying they have sold it!

 

That's because CL haven't yet gotten round to making up the NoA from GE - maybe their John Bull printing kit is broken.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Strictly speaking an LBA isn't necessary, but it means they haven't followed CPR, so a judge would look unfavourably on their actions - I doubt they'd get costs as a result, whatever happened.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...