Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • This is a ridiculous situation.  The lender has made so many stupid errors of judgement.  I refuse to bow down and willingly 'pay' for their mistakes.  I really want to put this behind me and move on.  I can't yet. 
    • Peter McCormack says he has secured a 15-year lease on the club's Bedford ground.View the full article
    • ae - i have no funds to appoint lawyers.   My point about most caggers getting lost is simply due to so many layers of legal issues that is bound to confuse.  
    • Lenders have a legal obligation to sell the property for the best price they can get. If they feel the offer is low they won't sell it, because it's likely the borrower will say the same.   Yes.  But every interested buyer was offering within a range - based on local market sales evidence.  Shelter site says a lender is not allowed to wait for the market to improve. Why serve a dilapidations notice? If it's in the terms of the lease to maintain the property to a good standard, then serve an S146 notice instead as it's a clear breach of the lease.   The dilapidations notice was a legal first step.  Freeholders have to give time to leaseholders to remedy.  Lender lawyers advised the property was going to be sold and the new buyer would undertake the work.  Their missive came shortly before contracts were given to buyer.  The buyer lawyer and freehold lawyers were then in contact.  The issue of dilapidations remedy was discussed..  But then lender reneged.  There was a few months where neither I nor freeholders were sure what was going on.  Then suddenly demolition works started.   Before one issues a s146 one has to issue a LBA.  That is eventually what happened. ...legal battle took 3y to resolve. Again, order them to revert it as they didn't have permission to do the works, or else serve an S146 notice for breach of the lease   A s146 was served.  It took 3y but the parties came to a settlement.   (They couldn't revert as they had ripped out irreplaceable historical features). The lease has already been extended once so they have no right to another extension. It seems pretty easy to just get the lawyer to say no and stick by those terms as the law is on your side there.  That's not the case   One can ask for another extension.  In this instance the freeholders eventually agreed with a proviso for the receiver not to serve another. You wouldn't vary a lease through a lease extension.  Correct.  But receiver lawyer was an idiot.   He made so many errors.  No idea why the receiver instructed him?  He used to work for lender lawyers. I belatedly discovered he was sacked for dishonesty and fined a huge sum by the sra  (though kept his licence).  He eventually joined another firm and the receiver bizarrely chose him to handle the extension.  Again he messed up - which is why the matter still hasn't been properly concluded.   In reality, its quite clear the lender/ receiver were just trying to overwhelm me (as trustee and leaseholder) with work (and costs) due to so many legal  issues.  Also they tried to twist things (as lawyers sometimes do).  They tried to create a situation where the freeholders would get a wasted costs order - the intent was to bankrupt the freeholders so they could grab the fh that way.   That didn't happen.  They are still trying though.  They owe the freeholders legal costs (s60) and are refusing to pay.  They are trying to get the freeholders to refer the matter to the tribunal - simply to incur more costs (the freeholders don't want and cant's afford to incur)  Enfranchisement isn't something that can be "voided", it's in the Leasehold Reform Act 1967 that leaseholders have the right to.... The property does not qualify under 67 Act.  Their notice was invalid and voided. B petition was struck out. So this is dealt with then.  That action was dealt with yes.   But they then issued a new claim out of a different random court - which I'm still dealing with alone.  This is where I have issues with my old lawyer. He failed to read important legal docs  (which I kept emailing and asking if he was dealing with) and  also didn't deal with something crucial I pointed out.  This lawyer had the lender in a corner and he did not act. Evidence shows lender and receiver strategy had been ....  Redact and scan said evidence up for others to look at?   I could.  But the evidence is clear cut.  Receiver email to lender and lender lawyer: "our strategy for many months  has been for ceo to get the property".  A lender is not allowed to influence the receivership.   They clearly were.  And the law firm were complicit.  The same firm representing the lender and the ceo in his personal capacity - conflict of interest?   I  also have evidence of the lender trying to pay a buyer to walk.  I was never supposed to know about this.  But I was given copies of messages from the receiver "I need to see you face to face, these things are best not put in writing".  No need to divulge all here.  But in hindsight it's clear the lender/ receiver tried - via 2 meetings - to get rid of this buyer (pay large £s) to clear the path for the ceo.   One thing I need to clarify - if a receiver tells a lender to do - or not to do - something should the lender comply? 
    • Why ask for advice if you think it's too complex for the forum members to understand? You'd be better engaging a lawyer. Make sure he has understood all the implications. Stick with his advice. If it doesn't conform to your preconceived opinion then pause and consider whether maybe he's right.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Wife stole all my money out of my account


sarsuma
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2542 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Over two years my wife has drained my bank account of £40k.

 

I'm a complete idiot, but did not even know I had internet banking,

my wife obviously set it up behind my back even supplying her phone number as my contact,

 

I always asked her to check my balance & trusted her

not realising she gambled all my money online using all my details & transferring money from my account to her own.

 

I've asked lloyds why they did not alert me looking at the transactions & they say they only send a text,

 

surely they have to be responsible in some way letting this happen,

 

but they tell me it's my own fault,

because my wife had my card & pin which she took from the post without me even knowing,

but my argument is she didn't need my pin for thousands of online transactions.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think you have to start doing some research to find out how she was able to go into your branch – or else deal with on the telephone and set up Internet banking on your account.

 

Also, have there been any other debts incurred in your name? Have you checked your credit file?

 

Are you still with your wife? Are you intending to call the police?

Link to post
Share on other sites

if this goes back several years

to get access to online banking

all you had to do was type in the number which they sent in a letter to the registered address at the time of account opening.

 

 

I activated a 2007 Lloyds business account internet access using a number I found in a letter from 2007 last year!

no checks whatsoever!

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think you have to start doing some research to find out how she was able to go into your branch – or else deal with on the telephone and set up Internet banking on your account.

 

Also, have there been any other debts incurred in your name? Have you checked your credit file?

 

Are you still with your wife? Are you intending to call the police?

 

She openly admitted to opening my post & setting up Internet banking,

she never had to go into a branch & if the bank did send a query apparently it was just a text message asking for confirmation to the transaction with a yes or no reply.

 

She's run mounds of debts in my name I'm only just starting to gather everything.

 

Not informed police yet, we've got a 3 year old...my wife is trying the Edited card!

Edited by Andyorch
edited
Link to post
Share on other sites

You are obviously and justifiably angry.

 

The Edited card as you put it is very emotional but may I suggest you at least take some notice.

 

Is your wife showing any remorse and willingness to get help?

 

First stop would be a visit to the GP.

 

Do you think there may be a link between the birth of your child and the spiral into gambling?

 

If you want to recover the money the police will have to be told I think but at the same time, do you want to save your marriage?

Any opinion I give is from personal experience .

Link to post
Share on other sites

You are obviously and justifiably angry.

 

The Edited card as you put it is very emotional but may I suggest you at least take some notice.

 

Is your wife showing any remorse and willingness to get help?

 

First stop would be a visit to the GP.

 

 

 

Do you think there may be a link between the birth of your child and the spiral into gambling?

 

If you want to recover the money the police will have to be told I think but at the same time, do you want to save your marriage?

 

No I my marriage is over because I've also found out now she is addicted to cocaine & I'm so worried for my child, but she won't let me take her with me, I don't know what to do

Link to post
Share on other sites

No I my marriage is over because I've also found out now she is addicted to cocaine & I'm so worried for my child, but she won't let me take her with me, I don't know what to do

 

As you are married you have parental responsibilities (and rights). Long gone are the days when the father has no rights.

 

Your wife sounds quite unwell to me, a gambling addict with a cocaine habit.

 

I still wouldn't discount her threats but you need to protect yourself and your daughter.

 

Do you have the ability to look after your daughter, by that I mean caring for her while you are at work etc.

Edited by fletch70

Any opinion I give is from personal experience .

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 months later...
Over two years my wife has drained my bank account of £40k.

 

I'm a complete idiot, but did not even know I had internet banking,

my wife obviously set it up behind my back even supplying her phone number as my contact,

 

I always asked her to check my balance & trusted her

not realising she gambled all my money online using all my details & transferring money from my account to her own.

 

I've asked lloyds why they did not alert me looking at the transactions & they say they only send a text,

 

surely they have to be responsible in some way letting this happen,

 

but they tell me it's my own fault,

because my wife had my card & pin which she took from the post without me even knowing,

but my argument is she didn't need my pin for thousands of online transactions.

 

Why should the bank have to accept any responsibility with this?

It's an awful and terrible thing to happen to you

but have you not opened a bank statement at all in the last 2 years?

 

 

It's your bank account,

if she set up online banking without you knowing

how could you ask her to check your balance for you?

 

 

If she took your card and PIN from the post without you knowing how could you use your card,

surely you would have your card in your possession?

Link to post
Share on other sites

it is fraud.

if/if not the op wishes to follow that criminal route is one for them to decide upon.

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...