Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • 05.05.24 Ever so sorry if I have entered this in the wrong part of this website.   My grandfather is in his 70's and retired.  He asked me to help him find a work pension that he was paying into when he was working. From 1967 - 1982 he worked for a Fabric Dying Company, Celanese, Spondon Derby UK. I have already used the GOV.uk Trace Pension Scheme. It listed a few pension companies : Akzo Nobel (CPS) Pension Scheme formerly Courtaulds Pension Scheme.  I do not fully understand how this works but I think this scheme is administer by a company called Willis Tower Watson. We have called this company, got through to the pension department submitted all my grandfather's details (D.O.B. , N.I. no. etc.) but that agent tells that they have no record of my grandfather and ask what is the name of the pension scheme. Here is the problem, his home was burgalled in 2005 and a briefcase which contained his legal documents was stolen. So he does not know who was the Pension Scheme company. I have a this phone number 01332 681 210 for Celanese but it just rings and never gets answered. So I am asking for help if anyone can tell us where we can try next. I am also hoping for a massive long shot that one of them members on this website, worked for or knows someone who worked for British Celanese Spondon Derby and could tell us of any pension company. Thanks for any help.
    • Well I sent them the letter of claim, the only responses so far was a few emails reopening the claims on the parcels where they asked for information such as proof of value (which I get) but other things like photos of the parcels, which I haven't got as I never took photos of them. It's been well over the 14 days since I sent the letter now anyway, so what do you think I should do now?
    • Know it has already been answered, but? Does not explain why JCI has registered a different default date when they get the information from the original creditor, Virgin
    • Since you were stopped at the time there is no requirement for the police give you anything there and then or to send you anything before they have decided how to deal with the offence.  They have three choices: Offer you a course Offer you a fixed penalty (£100 and three points) Prosecute you in court  The only option that has a formal time limit is (3). They must begin court proceedings within six months of the date of the alleged offence. Options (1) and (2) have no time limit but since the only alternative the police have if you decline those offers is (3) they will not usually offer a course beyond three months from the date of the offence and will not usually offer a fixed penalty beyond four months from that date. This is so as to allow time for the driver to accept and comply with their offer and to give them the time to go to option (3) if he declines or ignores it.  Unless there is a good reason to do otherwise, the action they take will usually be in accordance with the National Police Chiefs' Council's guidance on speeding enforcement. In a 40mph limit this is as follows Up to 45mph - no action. Between 46mph and 53mph - offer a course Between 54mph and 65mph - offer a fixed penalty Over 65mph - prosecution in court So you can see that 54mph should see you offered a fixed penalty. Three weeks is not overly long for a fixed penalty offer to arrive. As well as that, there has been Easter in that period which will have slowed things down a bit. However, I would suggest that if it gets to about two months from the offence date and you have still heard nohing, I would contact the ticket office for the area where you were stopped to see if anything has been sent to you. Of course this raises the danger that you might be "stirring the hornets' nest". But in all honesty, if the police have decided to take no action, you jogging their memory should not really influence them. The bigger danger, IMHO, is that your fixed penalty offer may have been sent but lost and if you do not respond it will lapse. This will see the police revert to option (3) above. Whilst there is a mechanism in these circumstances  to persuade the court to sentence you at the fixed penalty level (rather than in accordance with the normal guidelines which will see a harsher penalty), it relies on them believing you when you say you did not received an offer. In any case it is aggravation you could well do without so for the sake of a phone call, I'd enquire if it was me.  I think I've answered all your questions but if I can help further just let me know. Just a tip - if you are offered a fixed penalty be sure to submit your driving licence details as instructed. I've seen lots of instances where a driver has not done this. There will be no reminder and no second chance; your £100 will be refunded and the police will prosecute you through the courts.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Understanding my Pension Statement


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2704 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Good morning. Firstly, sorry about this post being crammed into one paragraph! I can't seem to edit it to how I'd like to present it.

 

I have a couple of questions as I'd like to be pre-armed with a tiny bit of knowledge before contacting the pension provider/financial adviser.

 

I have a pension plan with Zurich, which was formerly with Allied Dunbar, which I haven't contributed to for many years. Firstly, should I be concerned that a Financical Adviser company has written to me (last year) to inform me they have taken over from Zurich Assurance Ltd in handling my pension?

 

The statement is on Zurich letterhead with the new company's details on the right hand side. But, the main reason for the post is to just understand the basics of what the statement is telling me. It's showing two parts: EXCLUDING FORMER PROTECTED RIGHTS BENEFITS = Total Current Value of £6,301 FORMER PROTECTED RIGHTS BENEFITS ONLY = Total Current Value of £71,365

 

My questions are: Does my pension 'pot' literally consist of these two combined? When I reach the age of 55 next August will I be able to access the full amount? It's a small pot, therefore of course, I don't consider this is going to be providing me with a regular income at retirement - therefore the likelihood is that I'll take the 25% tax free amount and then go with one of the options available for the remaining.

 

Hope that makes sense and thanks in advance for any replies. Stuarto.

Edited by honeybee13
Paras.

Bank Charges:

First Direct: £250 settled at Prelim stage 3.4.07. :-)

Intelligent Finance: £798 settled at Prelim stage 1.6.07. :-)

Woolwich: £1178 settled at Prelim stage 20.7.07. :-)

 

PPI:

Barclaycard: £1103.67 settled at S.O.C. stage 2.8.11. :-)

Credit Card Charges:

Barclaycard: £926.38 settled at S.O.C. stage 4.8.11 :-)

 

Thanks CAG and all those who've helped me on the forums.

Link to post
Share on other sites

You need to raise any questions like these with Zurich and get the information in writing.

 

I think you need it from the horses mouth, rather than an online forum. If you don't understand a pension scheme, you need the company doing the pension admin to explain about your rights.

 

I thought the Government were going to stop people aged 55 or over withdrawing all of the available pension pot money. Again a reason for Zurich confirming your rights, if you wanted to access the funds next year.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

basically a pension is divided into 2 bits because you have opted out of the govt SERPS whilst it was active. What your pension is worth is the 2 amounts combined. Before you make any decisions on moving your money you need certain information such as what are the current management fees- the maximum under current rules is less than 1% but older schemes will have much higher fees so that can make it worthwhile moving the money elsewhere anyway. Secondly what is the cash in value as some schemes have a big penalty of what they like to call "market rate adjustment". Again, on newer schemes they just have a buy/sell price on the units in the scheme so it is easier to calculate what the real cash value is. The older scheme may take a massive slace for their supposed adjustment. It theoretically pays for the sudden selling of all of your shares held in trust at a loss but in reality they just take a massive cash slice to punish you. Thirdly you will want to know if you can take the whole sum as cash, a partial settlement to ease the tax liability and whether you can transfer part of it out to another scheme.

They may force you to see a financial advisor who will charge you £2k to do nothing useful if you actually want the cash.

Theoretically though you can take the whole lot as cash. You cannot take 25% of the pot tax free and leave the rest where it is, the tax free bit is a portion of the amount you take out of the scheme so if you withdraw £50k you get the first £12.5k tax free and the rest is treated as income for the tax year so will bump you into the higher tax bracket. Take out £20k and you get £5k tax free and then pay your normal tax rate on the remainder so 20% for most people

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...