Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Thank-you dx, What you have written is certainly helpful to my understanding. The only thing I would say, what I found to be most worrying and led me to start this discussion is, I believe the judge did not merely admonish the defendant in the case in question, but used that point to dismiss the case in the claimants favour. To me, and I don't have your experience or knowledge, that is somewhat troubling. Again, the caveat being that we don't know exactly what went on but I think we can infer the reason for the judgement. Thank-you for your feedback. EDIT: I guess that the case I refer to is only one case and it may never happen again and the strategy not to appeal is still the best strategy even in this event, but I really did find the outcome of that case, not only extremely annoying but also worrying. Let's hope other judges are not quite so narrow minded and don't get fixated on one particular issue as FTMDave alluded to.
    • Indians, traditionally known as avid savers, are now stashing away less money and borrowing more.View the full article
    • the claimant in their WS can refer to whatever previous CC judgements they like, as we do in our WS's, but CC judgements do not set a legal precedence. however, they do often refer to judgements like Bevis, those cases do created a precedence as they were court of appeal rulings. as for if the defendant, prior to the raising of a claim, dobbed themselves in as the driver in writing during any appeal to the PPC, i don't think we've seen one case whereby the claimant referred to such in their WS.. ?? but they certainly typically include said appeal letters in their exhibits. i certainly dont think it's a good idea to 'remind' them of such at the defence stage, even if the defendant did admit such in a written appeal. i would further go as far to say, that could be even more damaging to the whole case than a judge admonishing a defendant for not appealing to the PPC in the 1st place. it sort of blows the defendant out the water before the judge reads anything else. dx  
    • Hi LFI, Your knowledge in this area is greater than I could possibly hope to have and as such I appreciate your feedback. I'm not sure that I agree the reason why a barrister would say that, only to get new customers, I'm sure he must have had professional experience in this area that qualifies him to make that point. 🙂 In your point 1 you mention: 1] there is a real danger that some part of the appeal will point out that the person appealing [the keeper ] is also the driver. I understand the point you are making but I was referring to when the keeper is also the driver and admits it later and only in this circumstance, but I understand what you are saying. I take on board the issues you raise in point 2. Is it possible that a PPC (claimant) could refer back to the case above as proof that the motorist should have appealed, like they refer back to other cases? Thanks once again for the feedback.
    • Well barristers would say that in the hope that motorists would go to them for advice -obviously paid advice.  The problem with appealing is at least twofold. 1] there is a real danger that some part of the appeal will point out that the person appealing [the keeper ] is also the driver.  And in a lot of cases the last thing the keeper wants when they are also the driver is that the parking company knows that. It makes it so much easier for them as the majority  of Judges do not accept that the keeper and the driver are the same person for obvious reasons. Often they are not the same person especially when it is a family car where the husband, wife and children are all insured to drive the same car. On top of that  just about every person who has a valid insurance policy is able to drive another person's vehicle. So there are many possibilities and it should be up to the parking company to prove it to some extent.  Most parking company's do not accept appeals under virtually any circumstances. But insist that you carry on and appeal to their so called impartial jury who are often anything but impartial. By turning down that second appeal, many motorists pay up because they don't know enough about PoFA to argue with those decisions which brings us to the second problem. 2] the major parking companies are mostly unscrupulous, lying cheating scrotes. So when you appeal and your reasons look as if they would have merit in Court, they then go about  concocting a Witness Statement to debunk that challenge. We feel that by leaving what we think are the strongest arguments to our Member's Witness Statements, it leaves insufficient time to be thwarted with their lies etc. And when the motorists defence is good enough to win, it should win regardless of when it is first produced.   
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Parking Eye - Parking Charge Notice - Morrisons supermarket Peckham (London)


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4323 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi Guys,

 

I need some advice to deal with the above parking eye (PE) PCN letter. I was sent a letter with a picture of my car that I exceeded the time allowed by 32mins. I replied explaining there were long queues and a member to staff who was dealing with an item I was waiting to purchase was called to do something else and had to wait a long while for her to come back. I sent them copies of the receipts for the purchases I made whilst I was at the store. They came back saying my appeal was unsucessful. I did not meet the criteria stipulated by the landlord of the site. Without stating what the criteria was.

 

I replied asking them to provide me with the criteria stipulated by the landlord of the site for a successful appeal. I have just received a reply from PE repeating the same thing "... did not meet the criteria as stipulated by the landlord of the site for a successful appeal" They will not enter into any further correspondence with my specific appeal and action will be taken against me if the charge remains unpaid.

 

However they have not provided me with the landlord's criteria for a successful appeal in any of their letters. They appear to have ignored that. Without knowing with the criteria is how can I make a successful appeal!

 

Please advice what to do next!

 

 

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ignore all letters that you get....NEVER contact them again.

 

Its not a fine, just a speculative invoice.

 

Private parking company's have no authority to issue fines.

 

You will get scary letters with red ink and CAPITAL letters, just treat as toilet paper.

 

You can never make a successful appeal with a private parking company.

 

IGNORE THEM AND ALL DCA LETTERS THAT YOU GET.

Link to post
Share on other sites

ignore

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks, I will ignore. I thought as much, you cannot make a successful appeal hence the reason they have not provided me with the criteria for a successful appeal. All they are after is money. A friend was saying they clamp cars. I think I will avoid parking in their car park any time soon whilst they chase payment so they won't clamp my car. Is it legal for them to clamp cars?

Link to post
Share on other sites

no-one can clamp your car for a previously unpaid private parking speculative invoice - end off

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Very interesting that they refer to landlord's criteria.

I've never heard of this one before.

We'd be very interested to see a copy of the letter.

Any chance that you would scan a copy to us at our admin email address please. Put parkingeye in the subject line

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

I've had a few from Parking Eye at a Morrisons, here in Staffordshire.

 

In my case, I used the advice from this forum, and ignored 'em.

 

They sent two letters on each occasion, then went away - I went to Aldi!

 

Sam

All of these are on behalf of a friend.. Cabot - [There's no CCA!]

CapQuest - [There's no CCA!]

Barclays - Zinc, [There's no CCA!]

Robinson Way - Written off!

NatWest - Written off!

Link to post
Share on other sites

After appealing to Parking Eye about a similar problem in a Watford Carpark, I received the same letter: "The evidence you provided did not meet the criteria required as stipulated by the landlord of the site, for a successful appeal." I have tried appealling to the shop I was using but this also failed and I have today received the "FINAL NOTICE" demanding £90.00, or £120.00 if I don't pay within the week. This letter also mentions, further action, instructing our solicitors to secure immediate payment or the issuing of court proceedings. I have read several posts to ignore these demands but I am worried that as I wrote a letter of appeal, admitting the "offence", have I landed myself in it or should I still ignore anything else that comes my way. I'd be grateful for some input here!

 

Very interesting that they refer to landlord's criteria.

I've never heard of this one before.

We'd be very interested to see a copy of the letter.

Any chance that you would scan a copy to us at our admin email address please. Put parkingeye in the subject line

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ignore, no 'offence' has been committed.

 

Their letter has done what it was intended to do, scare you into paying.

 

Hi I'm allanmufc from allanmufc debt management, you parked in Watford Carpark and need to pay me £500, please pay me £500 in 7 days or the fee will be £7000 and we may instruct our solicitors to secure immediate payment or take Court action, please feel free to contact us to appeal.....would you pay me?? NO, you would tell me to got forth and multiply!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you for the advice and for making me laugh.

I am going to ignore the letter this time and steal myself against any further, threatening sounding letters. Have they ever been known to send debt collectors in person?

 

Ignore, no 'offence' has been committed.

 

Their letter has done what it was intended to do, scare you into paying.

 

Hi I'm allanmufc from allanmufc debt management, you parked in Watford Carpark and need to pay me £500, please pay me £500 in 7 days or the fee will be £7000 and we may instruct our solicitors to secure immediate payment or take Court action, please feel free to contact us to appeal.....would you pay me?? NO, you would tell me to got forth and multiply!

Link to post
Share on other sites

I cant post links yet, but go to Consumeractiongroup.co.uk

then to the transport forum

then to the section about private parking tickets

and you should find the stickie highlighted in yellow at the top about what to do if you have already written to the dark parking overlords

 

I don't know if the do or do not send their door step heavies around, but if they did tell them to Foxtrot Oscar, in the most polite/un-polite manner you want, the door step collectors or DCA have no more power to ask for money than me or your neighbour, they are not bailiffs, in order to send bailiffs they would have to take you to court first, win, then you not pay the court order, then go back to court to ask for the bailiffs to get involved.

 

You will get scary looking begging letter, some with CAPITAL letters and some in the scary RED ink, with key words like MAY, MIGHT, but never WILL.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I cant post links yet, but go to Consumeractiongroup.co.uk

then to the transport forum

then to the section about private land parking enforcment

and you should find the stickies highlighted in yellow at the top about what to do if you have already written to the dark parking overlords

 

I don't know if the do or do not send their door step heavies around, but if they did tell them to Foxtrot Oscar, in the most polite/un-polite manner you want, the door step collectors or DCA have no more power to ask for money than me or your neighbour, they are not bailiffs, in order to send bailiffs they would have to take you to court first, win, then you not pay the court order, then go back to court to ask for the bailiffs to get involved.

 

You will get scary looking begging letter, some with CAPITAL letters and some in the scary RED ink, with key words like MAY, MIGHT, but never WILL.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

My FINAL NOTICE requesting the sum of £120 if I didn't pay by 24 May is the last I heard from Parking Eye. I don't want to speak too soon but I am really glad that I logged on here for you help and advice. If they have dropped their pursuit of me, then I am all the better off for it...now, how do I donate to CAG? Thanks to all concerned!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Help us to keep on helping

Please consider making a donation, however small, if you have benefited from advice on the forums

 

 

This site is run solely on donations

 

My advice is based on my opinion and experience only. It is not to be taken as legal advice - if you are unsure you should seek professional help.

Link to post
Share on other sites

bottom right of every thread ...scroll down

 

bottom of every email alert you get too

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...