Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Lolerz - I don't understand you.  Rebuked you?   No. I simply replied to your orange comments with legal facts as I know them.  I've already worked through the s42 and s146 issues - over the last 3-4y - and these issues are (mostly) resolved legally.  In terms of posting evidence.  Sure I can post some.  But my most recent questions have been a) how can I enforce a sale before trial?  And b) how can I make a complaint and/or a claim v receiver? (E.g. to which body do I complain?).  At the mo I'm asking for some helpful pointers on those specific questions??  I'm not asking for help with how to prove or present evidence. Fwiw - all evidence for trial has been disclosed (although additions are poss). The lender sent me like 10,000 emails and docs.  There's also 000s of emails, docs, photos, videos, recordings and texts that relate to freeholders/ me.   I read, filed and categorised everything for ease of future reference.  Witness statements and evidence were prepared for trial in the 42 and 146 matters. (now joined with current claim to save duplication).  I've lived the process before.  My current statement and linked evidence has taken like 6 months to draft/ write - to ensure I can succinctly prove my defence and counterclaim points.   Whether I can convince a judge at trial w/o lawyer / barrister is debatable 🙄   But I've prepared.  And continue to try better prepare - which is why I visit this site (and clinics).  This is NOT my business or expertise at all.  I'm just trying.  Not that anyone should ever have to justify why they need help if they ask politely! 
    • Thanks for the other info will also take a look at that.
    • It doesn't use the word reconstructed in the cover letter.  Although, I have just noticed on the cover letter they have asked me to complete a financial statement and offer a repayment within the next 10 days, or they will continue to follow court directions.  They sent a separate letter on the same day advising me they will be continuing with their claim ?  They have done the same for both claims.  Is it worth just doing that - doing the financial breakdown and offering a x amount.    
    • hahah except I can't locate the courier to frighten them with it hahaha   
    • Dx100uk according to the ICO office, who I spoke to at some length earlier today after getting the email from the court, Equita are the data controller if they have instructed the contracted EA. The ICO have noted the case, and stated very clearly that the court has the higher standing in terms of dealing with, and punishing either party if they fail to adhere to the district judges order and any action they take will not be criminal.    but they also stated very clearly that with what I’ve told them, and on the basis of accepting what I’ve told them as gospel (which it is with written confirmation from both the courts and the police) then there is some major red flags being raised on both sides with them blaming each other.    they’ve advised me to essentially keep my powder dry until there is a charging decision and an outcome from the seperate proceedings with the EAC2 complaint, and then come back to them with the case and they will be in a stronger position to act against Equita and the EA as there will be established facts and evidence that have already been laid before a court.     
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Council tax meeting - help needed


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4811 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hello

I am in a terrible mess with lots of debts but the most pressing and difficult one is 700 i owe to CT. Its from 2007 and since then i have managed to keep up with the payments.

Its been to the baliffs and has now returned to the council. They requested i told them where i worked and i refused to do - i cant have an attachment of earnings. Now they want to have a face to face meeting before court. I dont know what i am going to say. thought about saying i am not in work at present and my adult children pay the bills. I am terrified!

Link to post
Share on other sites

You must be in receipt of some benefit, they will take it from that.

 

This meeting will be to decide if you are a can't pay or won't pay. If the latter, then they can take you back to court for a custodial sentence.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks

\i am not on benefits at all.I work but cant afford to pay it off all at once and they have already refused my payment of 30 a month. Do you think if i make an increased offer they will accept this?

Link to post
Share on other sites

If they have asked for your employers details you are legally obliged to supply them, you run the risk of being classed as a wilful non-payer as Conniff has already said. You also need to remember that there is no law that states you have to deal with or speak to a Bailiff and you have done well so far to have your account handed back to the Council. As you say the Council are refusing your payment plan but you can force their hand by paying direct in the meantime by using the Council Website or automated phone service. If you do this you must ensure you pay a regular amount on a regular basis ie £10 every Thursday for example. This then proves you are willing to pay and may give the Council a problem should they take you back to Court for a Committal Hearing.

 

PT

Please consider making a small donation to help keep this site running

 

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok thanks for the reply.

 

I have a meeting with them on the 16th.Maybe i can stall them for a couple of weeks and in the meantime make regular weekly payments.

 

What i mess i have got into....

Link to post
Share on other sites

What i mess i have got into....

These things happen and the reason you got like this is of no interest, you have admitted it and that is the first step to becoming solvent.

 

The very first thing you must do is to make a full budget sheet showing all your income and all your expenditure. The two columns must tally so you have to include things that are classed as luxuries like say Sky or Gym membership. Make sure you have this with you when you go to the meeting.

 

Councils like to be able to close the book at the end of the financial year, but they have a lot of discretion in the collection of arrears and it is not law that they 'have' to collect it within the financial year.

This brings us to the second but probably the most important point, at the end of next month you will be receiving your bill for the 2011/2012 financial year and that has to be paid as well as the arrears. If you fail to meet any of those payments, they will apply for another liability order so increasing the amount you owe and the whole cycle of bailiffs etc starts over again.

 

As Tom has said, it is a legal requirement to fill in the AOE order and your failure to do this is probably what has prompted the meeting. The order can take at most 17% from your wages and a maximum of two orders can be made. Your employer must deduct the amount and pay it directly to the council or he can be prosecuted for not doing so. He is also allowed to take £1 for himself for admin charges.

 

Why not make this the year you get your life back. If both of your sons are working then they and you must be realisitic at what they contribute and that shouldn't be less than £100 per month 'each' and they are still getting off very lightly. If they were to move out, they would be looking at a minimum of £600 per month and only then if they could find really cheap accommodation. Confide in them and tell them, it's either that or you will be evicted and could be imprisoned, make them understand the gravity of the situation.

 

Next start on any creditors you may have and tell them the same. Deduct a living amount from your income and then share the rest amongst them. If it's only £5 per month, then inform them of the same thing you have your sons and tell them that you have no option but to reduce the payment to xx until things get better.

 

If you are a single mum/dad and your children are under 18 or still in education you can apply for the single persons discount of CT.

 

Whatever you do, make your council tax and rent/mortgage/water the number one priority and always pay them first and on time.

Link to post
Share on other sites

One other thing to bear in mind is that if the Council do seek a Committal Hearing they will pass the costs of that on to you - this can be as much as an extra £240, it is in your interest to try and sort something before it goes that far.

 

PT

Please consider making a small donation to help keep this site running

 

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Keep in mind also that should they apply for an AOE, they have to do this through the court and you can attend this hearing if you want and also if the situation shows that taking 17% from your wages will stop you being able to pay other bills, then you can appeal against the order being made.

 

Once the Liability Order has been granted then the council can issue an AOE without having to go back to the court - there will be no further court hearing regarding the AOE and no appeal to the court can stop it , only the council have the power to decide on the AOE.

 

Techincally the OP hasn't committed an offence if the employer details haven't been requested in writing under regualtion 36 of the council tax (administration and enforcement) regs 1992.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for that SS, I have amended my post.

 

You can get it through the courts by not filling it in and returning it if they wish to pursue it that way.

 

You can also appeal to the magistrates court if you are aggrieved by the order or the terms of the order.

 

The regulations may include provision that a person may appeal to a magistrates’ court if he is aggrieved by the making or the terms of an attachment of earnings order
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

If you have offered a payment and are prepared to pay that , they have no right to refuse the payment offered..They are trying to pull a fast one on you..tell them that the offer for £30 per calendar month still stands, there is not a great deal they can do about it in law.! You have not at any time refused to pay the alleged debt so they are dishonouring you by refusing to accept payment on your terms, thus in Law are voiding any contract you might have had with them.! In effect what they are doing is deciding a contract on a unilateral level, and we all know one sided contracts don't exist in Law..

A contract is a legally enforceable agreement between two or more parties with mutual obligations.

ʎɐqǝ uo pɹɐoqʎǝʞ ɐ ʎnq ı ǝɯıʇ ʇsɐן ǝɥʇ sı sıɥʇ

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...