Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • S13 (2)The creditor may not exercise the right under paragraph 4 to recover from the keeper any unpaid parking charges specified in the notice to keeper if, within the period of 28 days beginning with the day after that on which that notice was given, the creditor is given— (a)a statement signed by or on behalf of the vehicle-hire firm to the effect that at the material time the vehicle was hired to a named person under a hire agreement; (b)a copy of the hire agreement; and (c)a copy of a statement of liability signed by the hirer under that hire agreement. As  Arval has complied with the above they cannot be pursued by EC----- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- S14 [1]   the creditor may recover those charges (so far as they remain unpaid) from the hirer. (2)The conditions are that— (a)the creditor has within the relevant period given the hirer a notice in accordance with sub-paragraph (5) (a “notice to hirer”), together with a copy of the documents mentioned in paragraph 13(2) and the notice to keeper; (b)a period of 21 days beginning with the day on which the notice to hirer was given has elapsed;  As ECP did not send copies of the documents to your company and they have given 28 days instead of 21 days they have failed to comply with  the Act so you and your Company are absolved from paying. That is not to say that they won't continue asking to be paid as they do not have the faintest idea how PoFA works. 
    • Euro have got a lot wrong and have failed to comply with the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 Schedule 4.  According to Section 13 after ECP have written to Arval they should then send a NTH to the Hirer  which they have done.This eliminates Arval from any further pursuit by ECP. When they wrote to your company they should have sent copies of everything that they asked Arval for. This is to prove that your company agree what happened on the day of the breach. If ECP then comply with the Act they are allowed to pursue the hirer. If they fail, to comply they cannot make the hirer pay. They can pursue until they are blue in the face but the Hirer is not lawfully required to pay them and if it went to Court ECP would lose. Your company could say who was driving but the only person that can be pursued is the Hirer, there does not appear to be an extension for a driver to be pursued. Even if there was, because ECP have failed miserably to comply with the Act  they still have no chance of winning in Court. Here are the relevant Hire sections from the Act below.
    • Thank-you FTMDave for your feedback. May I take this opportunity to say that after reading numerous threads to which you are a contributor, I have great admiration for you. You really do go above and beyond in your efforts to help other people. The time you put in to help, in particular with witness statements is incredible. I am also impressed by the way in which you will defer to others with more experience should there be a particular point that you are not 100% clear on and return with answers or advice that you have sought. I wish I had the ability to help others as you do. There is another forum expert that I must also thank for his time and patience answering my questions and allowing me to come to a “penny drops” moment on one particular issue. I believe he has helped me immensely to understand and to strengthen my own case. I shall not mention who it is here at the moment just in case he would rather I didn't but I greatly appreciate the time he took working through that issue with me. I spent 20+ years of working in an industry that rules and regulations had to be strictly adhered to, indeed, exams had to be taken in order that one had to become qualified in those rules and regulations in order to carry out the duties of the post. In a way, such things as PoFA 2012 are rules and regulations that are not completely alien to me. It has been very enjoyable for me to learn these regulations and the law surrounding them. I wish I had found this forum years ago. I admit that perhaps I had been too keen to express my opinions given that I am still in the learning process. After a suitable period in this industry I became Qualified to teach the rules and regulations and I always said to those I taught that there is no such thing as a stupid question. If opinions, theories and observations are put forward, discussion can take place and as long as the result is that the student is able to clearly see where they went wrong and got to that moment where the penny drops then that is a valuable learning experience. No matter how experienced one is, there is always something to learn and if I did not know the answer to a question, I would say, I don't know the answer to that question but I will go and find out what the answer is. In any posts I have made, I have stated, “unless I am wrong” or “as far as I can see” awaiting a response telling me what I got wrong, if it was wrong. If I am wrong I am only too happy to admit it and take it as a valuable learning experience. I take the point that perhaps I should not post on other peoples threads and I shall refrain from doing so going forward. 🤐 As alluded to, circumstances can change, FTMDave made the following point that it had been boasted that no Caggers, over two years, who had sent a PPC the wrong registration snotty letter, had even been taken to court, let alone lost a court hearing .... but now they have. I too used the word "seemed" because it is true, we haven't had all the details. After perusing this forum I believe certain advice changed here after the Beavis case, I could be wrong but that is what I seem to remember reading. Could it be that after winning the above case in question, a claimant could refer back to this case and claim that a defendant had not made use of the appeal process, therefore allowing the claimant to win? Again, in this instance only, I do not know what is to be gained by not making an appeal or concealing the identity of the driver, especially if it is later admitted that the defendant was the driver and was the one to input the incorrect VRN in error. So far no one has educated me as to the reason why. But, of course, when making an appeal, it should be worded carefully so that an error in the appeal process cannot be referred back to. I thought long and hard about whether or not to post here but I wanted to bring up this point for discussion. Yes, I admit I have limited knowledge, but does that mean I should have kept silent? After I posted that I moved away from this forum slightly to find other avenues to increase my knowledge. I bought a law book and am now following certain lawyers on Youtube in the hope of arming myself with enough ammunition to use in my own case. In one video titled “7 Reasons You Will LOSE Your Court Case (and how to avoid them)” by Black Belt Barrister I believe he makes my point by saying the following, and I quote: “If you ignore the complaint in the first instance and it does eventually end up in court then it's going to look bad that you didn't co-operate in the first place. The court is not going to look kindly on you simply ignoring the company and not, let's say, availing yourself of any kind of appeal opportunities, particularly if we are talking about parking charge notices and things like that.” This point makes me think that, it is not such a bizarre judgement in the end. Only in the case of having proof of payment and inputting an incorrect VRN .... could it be worthwhile making a carefully worded appeal in the first instance? .... If the appeal fails, depending on the reason, surely this could only help if it went to court? As always, any feedback gratefully received.
    • To which official body does one make a formal complaint about a LPA fixed charge receiver? Does one make a complaint first to the company employing the appointed individuals?    Or can one complain immediately to an official body, such as nara?    I've tried researching but there doesn't seem a very clear route on how to legally hold them to account for wrongful behaviour.  It seems frustratingly complicated because they are considered to be officers of the court and held in high esteem - and the borrower is deemed liable for their actions.  Yet what does the borrower do when disclosure shows clear evidence of wrong-doing? Does anyone have any pointers please?
    • Steam is still needed in many industries, but much of it is still made with fossil fuels.View the full article
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

I failed my atos medical


cbbc
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4511 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi,

I failed my atos medical with 6 points even though I was on crutches, have been awarded DLA and have been awarded industrial injuries as being 28% disabled in the same office the week before. There wasnt a lot of point being awarded this though because they take it straight out of you ESA money.

My report said I could walk unaided, I was using a crutch. I could squat, I didnt, and because I did not get up during the interview then I was capable of sitting for long periods even though I am due a hip operation and further knee surgery. The doctor said I had a meniscus tear in my knee when they are not allowed to diagnose people and he was totaly wrong, thats a relatively minor injury. When I had the op on my knee I had extensive long term damage but my atos medical was before all of my hospital treatment.

I appealed the decision in October and complained about everything and got £25 compensation because my M.P wrote to them on my behalf, they wouldnt change their minds though even though atos admitted wrongly diagnosing me. I wrote to every single M.P to do with benefits on both sides even the P.M but did not get one reply.

What job could I do? If I fail the appeal am I allowed to sign on at the job centre when I am signed off by my G.P.

I am sick and tired off this, I had my accident in Jan 09, was let go by my employer( even though I got the injury at work) because I was not capable of returning to work in August 09 and I am still thinking about this every day in March 10. I have no date for my tribunal yet.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi cbbc, this sounds tough for you, although as Kelcou says, getting six points is a result, most people receive a grand total of zero!

 

I'm posting this so you have a reply, but rather than hijacking this thread, I think you should have another thread of your own, separate from your mortgage interest one. That way you'll get advice that's relevant to you personally.

 

I'll ask the site team to help.

 

But to address the problem. Are you sure it was a doctor you saw and not a 'health professional'? I'm amazed about the meniscus tear comment - I thought it needed an MRI scan or x-ray?

 

When you say you appealed the decision, was this to the DWP's Decision Maker?

 

If I'm right about that, the next step would normally be a tribunal, as you say. The process isn't quick, but in my experience it's fair. [i won, anyway.] Closer to the time, we'll help you put a case together, but be sure to keep all the paperwork, especially anything from the hospital or medical people.

 

I understand you feel sore about Atos - a lot of us do, but I'm not sure anyone has successfully challenged Atos themselves. Guys?

 

Have you had the appeal pack from the DWP? One of the most important things to have is a copy of your Atos assessment and from what you say, it sounds as if you may have seen it. Mine had so many errors I lost count! Go through the assessment with highlighter pen or pencil, etc, and mark all the answers that you consider are wrong. When you see the tribunal, they will take your word for your condition and will clearly see that you have crutches, if you still do, unlike the Atos person. Diplomatic blindness? But of course letters from your GP and other doctors will back up what you say.

 

I don't feel able to comment on the rest of your post, but someone will be along soon, I expect.

 

My best, HB

Illegitimi non carborundum

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi cbbc and welcome.

I'm so sorry you had such a bad time with ATOS. Unsurprisingly, however, I'm not surprised. I'm convinced you could turn up as just a head on a cushion and they'd still pass you off as fully fit!

Two points to note. I really think we should stop referring to these appointments as 'medicals'. They're not. It's an assessment as to what work a senile doctor or a failed nurse thinks you can do. But even then I can't blame ATOS. They are just the donkeys gathering the data the DWP has instructed them to gather in a manner shaped and controlled by them. That's why so many fail. [i dream of the glory of scoring 6 points! ;) ].

ATOS don't pass you or fail you. That foul and evil duty falls on the shoulders of the DWP Decision Makers. And the stench of sulphur coming out of their offices must be pretty bad by now. I guess the main criteria in taking up a job as a DWP Decision Maker has to be the complete surrender of your conscience. I really really don't know how those people can sleep at night knowing the misery and deprivation they are causing to tens of thousands of people.

I do hope you've done the sensible thing and appealed. As for any tribunal that'll take time. I've been waiting almost 9 months so far and still no date. But I can't blame the tribunal service for that. They are completely swamped and struggling in a sea of malicious decisions. So you'll have to be patient I'm afraid.

Best wishes.

Rae.

Edited by RaeUK
No offence meant to the ordinary DWPers who help here...
Link to post
Share on other sites

When walking with the crutches do you place both feet on the floor or do you "swing through"? If the latter then this is not "walking" and therefore you should, in theory, score 15 points for the walking descriptor

Link to post
Share on other sites

That's a good point, Paul.

 

cbbc, I meant to say earlier that you can find the Work Capability Assessment system and points online, via the DWP website. Or some of the charity websites have the details too. If you compare that with your Atos assessment [not medical, Rae ;)] you can argue about why it's wrong.

 

We added up how many points we thought I should have scored, which was well above what Atos thought. You should be able to work out your own score using the real answers, not what the computer arrived at. The tribunal agreed with us.

Illegitimi non carborundum

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for making me laugh everyone. I probably hopped into the room as I was on crutches and only have one bad leg.

I have appealed and am waiting to got to the tribunal. I've just sent them all of my specialists letters and a covering letter.

I will keep everyone informed. Good luck to all of you too.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just out of intrest

 

Would the atos medical take into account cbbc DLA claim,depending on what component of DLA cbbc gets ?

 

 

MARTIN

Please use the quote system, So everyone will know what your referring too, thank you ...

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Little wonder that people have renamed the Atos medical, "The Lourdes Cure" - whereby the lame, infirm and terminally sick, leave "miraculously cured? ".

I'm not a qualified welfare rights adviser, but I'm planning on becoming one. I'm no substitute for more competent advice from trained CAB and welfare rights workers - [URL="http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/benefits-tax-credits-minimum/127741-benefits-advice.html"]see this post[/URL] by Joa, great advice and links! I've been running a Crisis Loan campaign and help since Jan 2007 . See my annotations c/o "theyworkforyou". I'm also currently interested by the recent DWP Medical Services reform and the effect this is having on valid claims, seriously - someone needs to be keeping a suicide count.

Link to post
Share on other sites

cbbc - if you failed the DWP ATOS quack assessment, don't worry!

 

Their entire rationale is based on speed and output; check out the approved quack on the GMC site to verify whether they are registered!

 

Also make sure you get a copy (unless you made a copy already) of the booklet questionnaire that you filled in before your assessment.

 

Compare that with the assessment score and computer / robotic answers given by ATOS.

 

You can also request that your Appeal is heard at home (I believe).

 

Did you ask for a REVIEW? before the APPEAL?

 

Good luck!

Edited by Mr Silver
Typos!
Link to post
Share on other sites

Most people would believe that for such an important procedure they are examined by a qualified Doctor - WRONG! In fact the regulations have been amended and allow "Health Care Professionals" to conduct the exam. Hummm, Imagine someone presenting with a complex set of mental health disorders being examined by a Chiropractor.

I'm not a qualified welfare rights adviser, but I'm planning on becoming one. I'm no substitute for more competent advice from trained CAB and welfare rights workers - [URL="http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/benefits-tax-credits-minimum/127741-benefits-advice.html"]see this post[/URL] by Joa, great advice and links! I've been running a Crisis Loan campaign and help since Jan 2007 . See my annotations c/o "theyworkforyou". I'm also currently interested by the recent DWP Medical Services reform and the effect this is having on valid claims, seriously - someone needs to be keeping a suicide count.

Link to post
Share on other sites

cbbc and other CAGgers who have been to an ATOS ESA assessment.

 

I recently received an e-mail from a Disabilty Benefits group with a contact name/ tel and e-mail address for a BBC journalist who is making a TV doc for the BBC about ATOS and their DWP assessments for ESA.

 

If you want the details I'll post them on this thread if the Site CAG Site team OK it?

 

Mr Silver

Link to post
Share on other sites

cbbc and other CAGgers who have been to an ATOS ESA assessment.

 

I recently received an e-mail from a Disabilty Benefits group with a contact name/ tel and e-mail address for a BBC journalist who is making a TV doc for the BBC about ATOS and their DWP assessments for ESA.

 

If you want the details I'll post them on this thread if the Site CAG Site team OK it?

 

Mr Silver

 

 

Yes Please!:-D

My advice is based on my opinion and my experience. It is not to be taken as legal advice as I am not legally qualified

If my advice has been helpful, please take a moment to click on the scales

on the bottom left hand side of my profile :p

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello Mr Silver. There's also the Atos thread on this forum, started by F_DCAs, I think that's the right spelling.

 

That way, cbbc gets his/her own answers, it's a general thread for all the people who feel jaded, or worse, about Atos. Good luck cbbc.

Illegitimi non carborundum

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

There's also this, with the relevant contact details :-

 

BBC - Ouch! (disability) - Messageboard Disability Q&A - Atos are a complete Joke!

 

I should also point out that he's interested in on-camera interviews.

 

I've already stated I'm going to be asking around mental health charities within my local area to see if they have anyone there who may have had dealings with Atos and be interested in being interviewed about their experience with them.

 

Essentially, I'll be leaving brief details with each one explaining how to get in touch with the journalist in question if they're interested.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi, You wont believe it. I went to my industrial injuries medical today and it was the same 'doctor' who I had complained about because of my terrible ATOS medical in September. I was so embarassed.

He didnt let on that he recognised me. He behaved as if we had not met before. Perhaps he sees so many people that he actually didnt recognise me. I hope so.

He was very nice and kind and it will be so interesting to see what he says about my condition for a different benefit and not for ATOS.

This medical and interview are not as long and the questions only last a few minutes.

If the result is good then it will be something to take with me to tribunal.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi, I asked for an appeal but had not realised untill DWP rang and asked me on a monday if I had any new info as my claim was due to be reconsidered soon.

I sent all new medical info on the tuesday and on the thursday I got a letter turning me down again.

I complained and said that there was no way they had taken my new info into consideration as they would not have recieved it by the time I was turned down again ( we all know tha they dont deal with post on the same day) But they said that they had and that was that.

I complained that I had not asked for reconsideration as I had the right to go straight to appeal but was told that every one goes to reconsideration which in my opinion was just time wasting and against the rules of their own web site.

After that they lost one of my doctors notes 'in the post' so I have to record them now.

I have been told by a lady at the job centre that nearly evey one who has their decision looked at again ends up going to tribunal.

I feel helpless and angry and as if I am hitting my head against a brick wall.

I really would be worthy of an oscar if I could get my doctor to sign me off for 14 months when there was nothing wrong with me.

I have already had my 6 pathways to work interviews and my adviser said it was a box ticking excercise as she could not place me in work.

Her face was a picture when I told her I had failed my ATOS medical.

I am able to look into things and complain and prepare my case but for some one who is not able or cannot read or write very well or has no family to turn to this process must be more of a nightmare

These vunerable people are being discriminated against because our government has to claw some money back .

If I won the lottery I would emigrate tomorrow.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Honey bee. I would have run off if I could still run. The results of an industrial injuries medical always ome back within the week so I will let you know what happens.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Fingers crossed, cbbc.

I hope he was professional enough not to let any former complaints colour his judgement.

My Pathways Adviser was the same when I told her I'd failed my ATOS box ticking excercise.

Best wishes and good luck.

Rae.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Stay strong cbbc, I know how wearing it is. I also worry about people who are less well informed and have no-one to help them. When we were giong through this, I kept saying it to my husband.

 

Maybe that's why I was meant to find the CAG site.

 

My best, HB

Illegitimi non carborundum

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

Can anyone tell me what happens if I win the day at the tribunal and am allowed ESA.

I know that I will not need medical notes any more but I bet they dont leave people alone.

I have already had my pathways to work interviews.

For industrial injuries benefit I have to have a medical every 6 months, is it the same for ESA. I hope not.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...