thats jci for you, just a bunch of incompetents. dx

IMHO i would not call it harassment at all but help and you are overtly worrying and jumping to conclusions that are not there at all. accept it and all the help you can poss ever get, it can't hurt you nor your wife at all. they are most certainly are not going to nor can come with demands/threats that is done and the house is a smelly mess etc etc etc. they will provide help to sort any issues i cant see why you are worried...

STD BS from overdales. next letter will be a copy of their N180 claiming they've filed their DQ already, when MCOL and the court havent even sent them out yet! all pat of their std intimidation and harassment tactics. on better than avg paypal EU cases here they either let it get stayed or discontinue just before they have to waste more money and pay the hearing fee or file their WS, IF the claim gets that far... dx

its an online hearing almost guaranteed you can rep him. he need not know anything about it. the IAS assessors report was uploaded here by you long ago. dx

already answered dx

again a quick google search states Appeal a DVLA fine - GOV.UK (www.gov.uk) i would not be appealing mind. it's only a summary charge which they rarely do court on and pass out the powerless DCA's whom are not bailiffs they have 6mts. see where they go. as you've sorn'd it will probably be nulled. dx

There are a number of reasons why you may not have been issued a notice in the post within 14 days. If you were stopped by the police it may have been given verbally. In the case of speeding offences, the police may issue you with a conditional offer of a fixed penalty of 3 points and £100.00 fine by post or an offer of a speed awareness course. If the offence is considered too serious for a speed awareness course or fixed penalty you may be charged with an offence which normally occurs by way of the issue of a Single Justice Procedure Notice. If the vehicle within which the alleged offence took place was registered to another person or company there is technically no need for a notice to be issued to the driver. After the police have obtained details of the nominated the driver, they will normally send the notice to them, although there are no time limits within which they must do so (provided that the notice was received within 14 days by the registered keeper of the vehicle). In such circumstances, a person may receive a notice several months after the alleged offence too place but still be prosecuted. A Guide to a Notice of Intended Prosecution | Motoring Offence Lawyers the above copy n paste link has purely been copy n pasted here to inform you of the regs, which you could have done yourself by, as this is, a google search......... we do not ever recommend using such offered webservices! dont dx

all DYL's are subject to a TRO. looking at this newish, ever increasing as old ind units have gotten removed, estate, there are only lines on one side, on the other there is a parking lane with traffic calming through which you mention. i seriously doubt your mate has any clue what he is talking about.!! its not a private housing assoc estate. so its a public council owned road. no construction co can just decide to draw their graffiti on a road. the DYLs are certainly there pre 2016 even before his home was built. now ive had a quick look to see if the main access to royal park road has signs. there is no royle park road even on your map but there is a royal barn road which leads to where you are parked royal road has a restriction sign on the pole by the fence of the electric substation jnc with gipsy lane there does not appear to be one leading in from the other end - tesco petrol station

worthy to not forget Just to let you know this bunch Kensington have been fined £1.225m by the financial regulator for treating borrowers who were in arrears unfairly. Claim those charges back plus the interest and tell them not to add any more to the account. There are a few news stories here you can get the info for a letter to send to them. http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/business/8615870.stm

wonder what happened? dx

you made it very confusing, though i doubt any of it was ever read by the delivery franchise for DPD. your saving grace might well be you didn't select your own address (though if you are all the same postcode..??) and neither mentioned a safe space other than another neighbour. but with the actual delivery address on the parcel, it appears the driver had a choice of 3 addresses, all under the same post code with differing house numbers. so chose the label one but left it on your doorstep. play it carefully and along with the photo and the retailers requirement you should be ok. dx

WS? defence. twill be exactly the same as our sb letter . dx

wont ever happen the seller didnt lose it. looks like a total mess upon how you wanted this delivered and i can see DPD contesting this. stating neighbour and no door number, then putting that in the free text below and also giving the option of a safe space, when you didnt have one and your door opens to the road ...is all a bit confusing and could be your undoing. of course DPD should not have left it on a doorstep, but neither are they responsible for the actions of thieves. but i just have my doubts dx

ignore wrong thread dx

if you have YOUR bank statements totalling who you paid and when regarding this debt.... and you have proof that unlawful fees/sums have been added to the sum adjudged in court from the HFC SD that you've now paid.... i would be putting all that evidence together and demanding cabot refund said figure in 14 days else you'll raise a court claim...but don't bluff. dx