Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • It is essential that you find out where the car is.  It is also essential to find out whether what you signed was an authorisation What precisely it was that you authorised.  I expect it was an authorisation and it certainly is going to be a big problem that you didn't read what you signed.  However you must find out and you must do it as quickly as possible.  If necessary start telephoning people but read our customer services guide first.  But then render everything in writing  
    • There are 19 documents received from SARS request, spread out over 2 messages too big to put all on one. I have also received the Notification of allocation to the small claims track hearing for beginning nov 2024 SAR Info provided 150124 by Dcblegal-11.pdf SAR Info provided 150124 by Dcblegal-12.pdf SAR Info provided 150124 by Dcblegal-13.pdf SAR Info provided 150124 by Dcblegal-14.pdf SAR Info provided 150124 by Dcblegal-15.pdf SAR Info provided 150124 by Dcblegal-16.pdf
    • 050124 DcbLegal-1_1.pdf 050124 DcbLegal-2_1.pdf 121223 DCbLegal_1.pdf SAR Info provided 150124 by Dcblegal-1.pdf SAR Info provided 150124 by Dcblegal-2.pdf SAR Info provided 150124 by Dcblegal-3.pdf SAR Info provided 150124 by Dcblegal-4.pdf SAR Info provided 150124 by Dcblegal-5.pdf SAR Info provided 150124 by Dcblegal-6.pdf SAR Info provided 150124 by Dcblegal-7.pdf SAR Info provided 150124 by Dcblegal-8.pdf SAR Info provided 150124 by Dcblegal-9.pdf SAR Info provided 150124 by Dcblegal-10.pdf
    • From the Law Gazette. Paula Vennells had faith in her lawyers - and threw them under the bus. Post Office Inquiry: Paula Vennells trusted her lawyers and then threw them under the bus | Law Gazette WWW.LAWGAZETTE.CO.UK If we are to believe the former chief executive, she was simply too trusting of her general counsel.  
    • Thank you dx. Not very nice reading, but I have learnt a bit, I will need to go over some of them again later.  Something I picked up from those posts are Auxillis use of tick boxes and electronic signatures.   I need to find out what the tow truck driver made me sign for.  He put the car on the trailer and locked it down, then got a phone in a big protective case out and just handed it to me. I didn't even think what I was signing, I presumed it was related to the condition of the car on retrieval from the ditch and their collection and assumption of responsibility for the insurance company.    unclebulgaria67, I struggle to easily write concise, to the point posts.  I thought that my initial post was already too long and wordy so tried to keep it brief and to the point. I didn't write every moment of the accident the way I told the police or insurers because most of it would be a waste of your time as my innocence is not my concern. The other party fled the scene.  My immediate concern is my car being taken without consent, stored where it will accrue charges, get treated in any manner of ways because they assume its getting written off and dont need to look after it and then possibly taken to a car auction site where I will have to pay additional fees to get it back if it is declared a write off. I am also in increasing amounts of pain in my lower back and neck and ever increasing sense of injustice and foreboding.    I do not see how my original post could go 50/50 personally, but I am reading my words with the images I have in my head, so have taken your warning on board and will make sure I don't mess up on any other documents.    So as far as I know someone from Vizion who have been hired by Auxillis is going to assess my vehicle at some point in the future.  The form I filled in for Vizion said that an approved assessor would attend my house to assess if the car is worthy of being repaired.  My car is not at my house, why the discrepancy? I agree that it is likely that they are not going to want to repair my car, I think it is worth it, I know what I have done to keep it sound, but market value and the astronomical cost of repairs...  Which is why I am worried that my car has been pulled in to a scam against my consent. How much is it going to cost me to get it back when it could be sitting on my drive.  It is just being used to charge someone storage, then will go to copart and they will charge someone storage, then they will charge me a release fee and I will have to find a way to get it back to my house which will cost more money.  All when I repeatedly requested that the car be taken off the truck when it was outside my house.    I have advised Auxillis that I repeatedly requested my car be taken off the tow truck outside my house and was not listened to.  I stated that I was left feeling that my car had been taken without my consent and was not provided a valid reason for them keeping the car.  I want to know where my car is, why it is there and would like it brought back to my house to await their assessor who already thinks the car is at my house.  Sorry bankfodder i forgot to ask who authorised it, but i will ask. 
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
        • Thanks
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Please help - list of common failures


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5350 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi all,

 

We all know that all companies cock up - some more than most.

 

I am trying to collate the most common cockups.

 

Please add to this sticky, preferably in a one line statement, the cockups that you have experienced over the years.

 

e.g.

 

DVLA ignored SORN declaration and I was fined.

Company XXX refused to refund me when good were faulty from outset.

 

etc....

 

All will become apparent soon....

 

Thank you.

If you feel that we have helped you, or you would like to help keep this web site running so that others can continue to get their money back, please click the donate button at the top of the forum.

Advice & opinions of Dave, The Bank Action Group and The Consumer Action Group are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability.

Use your own judgment. Seek advice of a qualified insured professional if you have any doubts.

 

------------

 

 

Add me as your friend on FaceBook - I need all the friends I can get :-(

 

http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=577405151

 

------------

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 months later...

offering you a term and contract at a price on the phone. Only for this ot be wrong. They then deny what they have said on the phone. Your word against theres? Wheres the law?, will the law support you? You get the bill after the 14 day call of period so thats another thing the tell you.

 

ive been a customer of 3 for a few years and have not previously xperienced this.

 

Many thanks

stephen

 

ps, suppsoe you cn call that misleading customers on the phone and trying to claim more money than your expecting.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

AON has not sent me an insurance certifiacte for my car after 7 months!

 

AvRabbit has not refunded my money on return of an unsuitable item.

 

BT 'restricted' my phone line while debt was in dispute. Then charged me £10 reconnection fee.

 

IR are confused over whether I should be filing returns. I have a letter saying I no longer have to file a return (despite my doing so anyway) followed by a threat of dire consequences if I don't...

 

CAG offered to help with harrassment, then didn't respond to my postings or emails... :confused:

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

IR - I had 2 letters yesterday, 1 saying I have not sent in my tax return for 2001/2002 and the other a bill for £3000 for that year.

 

I rang them to ask why they had taken six years to write to me, when it was them who lost it in the first place. now I have to fill in another for that year but I no longer have records for that period - Totally useless b*&^%$£ds

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 months later...
  • 5 months later...
  • 2 months later...

Virgin Media failed to connect me onto phone line, still sent me a bill for the £30 connection fee!

Complained using their own complaints email system, all 16 complaints ignored.

Sent three letters 14 days apart, 1st to customer service department, no reply, 2nd to customer service manager, no reply, third to MD of customers services department, no reply.

Currently in the hands of CISAS to investigate.

Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 9 months later...

B.T. Automated Texts and Phone Calls

 

Over a 6-7 month period, BT kept sending automated texts and phone calls about 'non-payment of our last bill'- up to 4 or 5 times every day, and sometimes starting on the actual day we received our monthly phone bill by post.

 

What was most annoying was that we received these texts and phone calls, anything up to 2 1/2 weeks before the 'Payment is due by xxxx' date shown on the actual bill.

 

Despite making 2 Formal Complaints in writing to the Correspondence Centre at BT, Durham, and demanding that they respond in writing to these, BT ignored everything and didn't even acknowledge receiving the Complaints.

 

As we have NEVER been in arrears with any of our monthly bills, in the many years we have been with BT, eventually I had to complain to 'Otelo' who accepted we had a valid Complaint.

 

Currently 'Otelo' has been investigating our Complaint for 8 weeks, but they say BT has been 'difficult' in responding to their enquiries.

 

'Otelo' tells me that they intend to ask for compensation on my behalf.

 

I will keep you all informed as to the final outcome.

 

BT - "It's good to talk......" ???? :lol::lol::lol:

 

Border Collie of Scotland.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm surprised at this, as I have no idea what the compensation would be for. I complained about BT supposedly printing/posting bills that took 2 weeks to arrive - as you found, these annoying calls coming even before the bills arrived. There is no mechanism to opt out (I asked). In the end, I left BT.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Kwik Fit insurance keep sending my renewal notice with only 1 years no claims when it should be 2. They even tell me on the phone that its 2 years and on the new schedule from them it says 2yrs, But the part that says this is proof of your no claims if you opt to go with another insurer it only says 1 yrs.. Arrrrrrrrrrrrrgh

The views expressed on this website are mine alone and don't reflect the views of my employer!

Link to post
Share on other sites

A lot of people seem to be having problems with dongles/mobile internet not working as expected - they're signing up to contracts and being stuck with them because of the small print.

 

Which makes you ask yourself, 'Why?'

 

They can BUY the dongle and get servce on PAYG totry out and assess for £40 or so, giving them the opportunity to verify it does what it is supposed to do.... yet they would rather get the dongle 'free' and commit themselves for 18 months or two years.

 

Madness, utter madness.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Which makes you ask yourself, 'Why?'

 

They can BUY the dongle and get servce on PAYG totry out and assess for £40 or so, giving them the opportunity to verify it does what it is supposed to do.... yet they would rather get the dongle 'free' and commit themselves for 18 months or two years.

 

Madness, utter madness.

Even a PAYG I'd buy online to return it if not satisfactory!

If in doubt, contact a qualified insured legal professional (or my wife... she knows EVERYTHING)

 

Or send a cheque or postal order payable to Reclaim the Right Ltd.

to

923 Finchley Road London NW11 7PE

 

 

Click here if you fancy an email address that shows you mean business! (only £6 and that will really help CAG)

 

If you can't donate, please use the Internet Search boxes on the CAG pages - these will generate a small but regular income for the site

 

Please also consider using the

C.A.G. Toolbar

Link to post
Share on other sites

I (personally) never commit myself if I can help it. My mobile PAYG ('cos I only use about a fiver a month) Missus is a £10 Sim only. Broadband and home phone are both in contract, and at the end of the min term I'll be leaving for Sky (as the kids are harassing for the TV and the broadband comes at a very cheep price!) so will get locked into another minimum term there I guess :/

 

I can almost understand the attraction of a mobile contract where you get a shiny new phone, but a dongle? I don't see why anyone would commit themselves.

If in doubt, contact a qualified insured legal professional (or my wife... she knows EVERYTHING)

 

Or send a cheque or postal order payable to Reclaim the Right Ltd.

to

923 Finchley Road London NW11 7PE

 

 

Click here if you fancy an email address that shows you mean business! (only £6 and that will really help CAG)

 

If you can't donate, please use the Internet Search boxes on the CAG pages - these will generate a small but regular income for the site

 

Please also consider using the

C.A.G. Toolbar

Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted by 'Buzby'

I'm surprised at this, as I have no idea what the compensation would be for. I complained about BT supposedly printing/posting bills that took 2 weeks to arrive - as you found, these annoying calls coming even before the bills arrived. There is no mechanism to opt out (I asked). In the end, I left BT.

 

"Otelo" have sent me a provisional decision, upholding my Complaint, and suggesting that I accept an apology plus £100 Compensation from BT, to cover "my out-of-pocket expenses involved with making my complaint, an estimated 4 hours involved with trying to get BT to resolve my Complaint over the 6-7 month period"

 

PLUS formal directive advice to BT to ensure monthly bills are received by customers at least 12 days prior to the 'Payment Due by..' date shown on the bill, and that BT's computer system is adjusted to make sure no automated texts or phone calls are sent out until at least 5 days have elapsed since the red "Reminder" late payment bill has been sent.

 

By the way, BT has admitted in their Response to "Otelo" that every customer's computer account stored on their main system, HAS a check box which can be ticked by Supervisors in order that the customer does not receive any automated texts or phone calls in respect of late payments.

 

Apparently, my customer account had a glitch that meant that although every time I phoned BT to complain, and the advisor ticked this box, as soon as the window was closed by the advisor, the ticked box cleared itself... Hhmmm...yeah, right !!

 

This is the "Otelo" rule that allows compensation to be made -

 

When the Ombudsman makes a decision which requires your company to do something to put things right for you, your company will abide by this decision. We may ask your company to offer you:

A product, service or some practical action that will benefit you

An apology or explanation

Up to £5000.00 including VAT.

The Ombudsman may also make a recommendation to your company that they change their policies or procedures. If, after investigation, we decide that your company is not at fault, we will clearly explain our reasons for this in writing.

 

Will keep you informed,

 

Border Collie of Scotland.

Edited by bordercollie
Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanx Buzby,

 

New Executive Complaints Contact details for B.T.

 

Everyone might like to know of a change to the contact details thread for BT Executive Complaints.

 

I did try to P.M. Martin3030 direct, so he could change the 'sticky topic' thread himself, but his private messages Inbox isn't accepting new PM's until he empties it! perhaps he will read this post and change it himself.

 

All emails for John Williams, CEO Executive, are now being dealt with the person listed below, a Mr Pip Nicholls.

 

Pip Nicholls (Mr)

Assistant to the Chairman

& Chief Executive

( 01277 326107/ 0800 023 2067

* [email protected]

Fax 01925 712 853

*[email protected]

+ PP8, BT Contact Centre, 110 Europa Boulevard, Warrington WA5 7FZ

 

He seemed quite helpful with my contact with him, although he does take a few days to get back to you. ;)

 

Border Collie of Scotland

Link to post
Share on other sites

Which makes you ask yourself, 'Why?'

 

They can BUY the dongle and get servce on PAYG totry out and assess for £40 or so, giving them the opportunity to verify it does what it is supposed to do.... yet they would rather get the dongle 'free' and commit themselves for 18 months or two years.

 

Madness, utter madness.

 

Totally agree with you and I wouldn't do it. I do have a dongle but on PAYG and the signal is brilliant but I wouldn't sign up in case it changed in the future. But a lot do without doing any research whatsoever and from what I've seen it seems to be people who either don't know anything at all about the internet or youngsters who manage to talk their parents into it.

 

And I know that T Mobile for one are giving them "free" laptops which is probably the big attraction for a lot of people.

Edited by Jan4a
added a bit
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...