Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Thank you very much for your letter in regard to the above mentioned shipment.  Due to the high volume of parcels coursing through the courier network each day, undergoing continuous processing and handling, certain packages may experience delays or even can get lost in the course of this journey. Please note that due to the time that has passed, this shipment has been declared as lost.  I have today processed the claim and made offers to the value of £75 as a goodwill gesture without prejudice. I do acknowledge that you have mentioned in your letter that the value was higher, however, you did not take out any protection to that amount. The protection for this shipment was £20 and we will not be increasing our goodwill offer any further.    Please log into your account online in order to accept our offer. Once accepted, our accounts department will process the claim accordingly. The claim payment will be processed and received within 7 working days.                                  In addition, a refund of the carriage fee will be processed as a separate payment and will be received within 3 working days.  If I can further assist, please feel free to contact me.   I have also just noticed that yesterday afternoon they sent me an email stating that "after my request" they have refunded the cost of shipping. I did not request the refund so will mention that in my letter as well.
    • Hi I had to leave Dubai back in 2011, during the financial crisis. And only now have I received a letter from IDRWW. Is this anything to worry about about as I have 2 years left until it’s been 15 years(statute barred in Dubai). Worried as just got a mortgage 2 years ago. Could they force me in to bankruptcy? Red lots of different threads on here. And unsure what true and what isn’t. 
    • Not that TOR will see this now he's thrown in the hand grenade. Rayner has plenty of female supporters on X, for a start. As for the council and HMRC, fair enough and I thought Rayner was already in touch with them. That's where it should be dealt with, not the police force. @tobyjugg2 Daniel Finkelstein thinks the same as you about tax. The Fiver theory. How the Fiver Theory explains this election campaign ARCHIVE.PH archived 28 May 2024 17:36:51 UTC  
    • Often with the Likes of Lowells/ Overdales that 'proof' doesn't stand up to scrutiny.   Think about it like a game of poker, they want to intimidate you into folding and giving up as soon as possible, and just get you to pay up and roll over, that is their business model, make you think your cards are rubbish. What they don't expect, and their business isn't set up for it, is for a defendant to find this place and to learn that they have an amazing set of cards to play. Overdales don't have an infinite number of lawyers, paralegals etc, and the time / money to spend on expensive court cases, that they are highly likely to lose, hence how hard they will try to get you to roll over.  Even to the extent of faking documents, which they need to do because the debts that they purchased were so cheap, in the first place. Nevertheless it works in most cases, most people chicken out, when they are so close to winning, and a holding defence is like slowly showing Overdales your first card, and a marker of intention that this could get tricky for them. In fact it may be,  although by no means guaranteed that it won't even go any further than that.  Even if it does, what they send you back will almost certainly have more holes than Swiss Cheese, and if with the help you receive here, you can identify those weaknesses and get the whole thing tossed in the bin.
    • So Rayner who is don’t forget still being investigated by the local council and HMRC  is now begging to save her seat Not a WOMAN in sight in this video other than Rayner  Farage is utterly correct this country’s values are non existent in her seat   Rayner Pleads With Muslim Voters as Pressure From Galloway Grows – Guido Fawkes ORDER-ORDER.COM Guido has obtained a leaked tape from inside a meeting between Angela Rayner and Muslim voters in Ashton-under-Lyne...  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

HFO/Turnbull/Rutherfords Claimform - Citi Credit Card DEbt


popeye1
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5967 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 86
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

A case management hearing is not a trial, it attempts to set out directions for the hearing, and deal with questions such as if their case is clear or not.

i will be off site for the next month or so. if you have any problems, feel free to report the post so a moderator can help you.

 

I am not a qualified or practicing lawyer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...
  • 3 weeks later...

Hey Popeye1

 

ive found your thread, took me a while to get here so sorry for the delay,

 

ok if its ok with you i will post up a full response in the morning as in very tired and about to hit the sack

 

suffice to say, dont worry a case management conference will not be the final hearing, its purely to issue directions and to discuss how the case will be managed and address any points which require clarification so please try not to worry.

 

as i said i will post a full reply in the morning when im refreshed

 

Kind regards

paul

Link to post
Share on other sites

Alrighty then,

 

ok,

 

ive had a read through you thread briefly, and im afraid i have some questions

 

 

firstly , i note you have had an Allocation Questionairre from the court, now im assuming it was an N149.

 

when you submitted the AQ, did you ask for any directions?

 

Also, have you been supplied a copy of the credit agreement they are relying upon in the case? either by way oif a CCA request or CPR request or anyother means

 

also, have you had a default notice? or a copy of it

 

and have you had a copy of the Notice of Assignment? or a copy of the Deed of Assignment?

 

 

when i get a reply to the questions i will be in a much better position to advise you further

 

my guess is that the hearing will be to give directions as to what documents the judge considers required to be produced for hearing

 

this is why im asking these questions as we need to be prepared when you go in, to ask the judge to consider ordering disclosure

 

can i also ask who the claimant is in this case and what was the debt for.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok

 

I did have a AQ but i failed to to keep a copy ,it was sent back to the court.

 

Turn/ruth/sols have sent a copy of their AQ [No is N150].

Amount claimed on AQ is differant from amount on court claim form,.[not a lot though].

I am not sure what ,any directions, means so i dont think i asked for any if that makes any sense.

 

I sent CPR letter the one asking for ,a true copy ,any docs you seek to rely in court and copies of assignment plus a CCA request letter, all sent to solicitors address on court claim form, recordered and tracked, electronic proof of delivery.

I have received no paperwork at all

I sent copys of letters to the courts

 

The court claim came out of the blue, unless we missed a letter they have not given us any warning this was going to happen

HFO SERVICES LIMITED collects on behalf of HFO CAPITAL LTD who are the assignee. HFO SERVICES LTD are the claimants. city card is oc

Link to post
Share on other sites

ok well thats good,

 

thanks for letting me know,

 

 

what i mean by directions are for example youve asked the judge to order the claimant disclose all documents they intend to rely upon etc

 

 

 

In the ************* County Court

Claim number **********

 

 

 

 

Between

************* - Claimant

and

 

xxxxxxxxxx - Defendant

 

 

 

Draft Order for Directions

The Claimant shall within 14 days of service of this order send to the Defendant and to the Court:

  • Copies of the Credit Agreement and any documents referred to within it which complies with the consumer Credit Act 1974 and all subsequent regulations
  • Default Notice compliant with s87 (1) Consumer Credit Act 1974 andConsumer Credit (Enforcement, Default and Termination Notices) Regulations 1983 (SI 1983/1561) as amended,
  • Document, contract or deed of assignment
  • Notice of assignment, with proof of service of the same compliant with s196 of the Law of Property Act 1925.
  • Copies of any statement or other document relied upon

If the Claimant fails to comply with this order, the claim will be struck out without further order.

 

The Defendant shall within 14 days thereafter file and serve the following

  • An amended defence sufficiently particularised in response to the documents supplied by the claimant

If the Defendant fails to comply with this order, the Defence will be struck out without further order.

 

 

 

these are the type of direction i normally send with an allocation questionairee

 

not to worry,

 

give me a little time and i will put together some pointers for you

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Popeye,

 

the difference is basically a credit card is exactley that credit, however a charge card is one where a balance in full is paid off at teh end of each month therefore no credit is provided in essence within the meaning of credit under the CCA

Link to post
Share on other sites

ok, im going to put together a skeleton arguement which you can hand the judge and the other side at the hearing

 

 

'i would also suggest that we hand the judge a draft order for directions too but leave that with me

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hey Popeye,

 

dont try to remember it!!!!!

 

you will end up confusing yourself. my suggestion was that i put together a skeleton arguement outlining for the judge the issues that are relevent and that need addressing

 

that way you can read a simplified outline of the relevent facts

 

 

ive drafted this Skeleton arguement which i would take to the court with you along with the directions which i posted earlier, i would take 3 copies of each so that you can offer one copy to the judge and one to the other side,

 

i think it outlines the case and the issues which are causing the troubles for the judge, so he will see what is needed and what must be ordered

please have a good read through, if you find something which doesnt make sense then ASK cause the trouble i have is that i was looking at this case remotely, i dont have all the facts or info like you do

 

regards

paul

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

i think it looks brillant well done thank you very much,ill keep reading through it but it seems ok to me

 

CPR 16 refers to a/b/c/d/e/f or that no information was forth coming

Do i mention about differant amounts on Court claim and their A/Q Sorry if their stupid questions,

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello,

 

its something you could add,

 

the purpose of what ive drawn up is to help you to set out the issues that are causing the troubles for the judge, and in doing so it will help the judge to issue the correct directions which are basically orders as to who must do what and by what time etc

 

that is where you should use the directions in post 80, print it out and hand a copy to the judge at the hearing

 

and ask if hes in agreement to order those directions as they will bring a quick resolution to the matter

 

regards

'paul

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Done the case man conference,not to bad ,had a circuit jidge as lots of illness about. Other side never turned up.It was held in a court room,bit surprised but managed to keep calm.Showed him pt2537 skelton ,never asked any ackward questions and end result got to send papers to court and other side with a ,statement of truth, and all sides given 21 days to comply so now allocated to small claims track.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Statement of truth.

 

The claiment served upon me aClaim form Issue date ***

 

The claiment failed to abide by the pre action protocol in that no notice of legal actoin or adequate information to investigate the claim was provided by the claiment

 

No particulars of the written agreement a copyof which forms the basis of this action haas not been forth coming

No copy of the purported contract of assignment,default notice and notice of assignment.

 

A copy of the default notice served under 87[1]CCAct1974 that entitles a creditor to proceed with Any action including legal action has not been attached to the claim form.

 

The defendant served upon the Claimants solicitors by recorded delivery a letter dated the *** requesting clarification and disclosure under the civil procedure rules, this letter has not been acknowledged and no information been disclosed.

 

the Claimant was sent a letter on the *** by recorded delivery requesting a true copy of the purported Credit agreement and statement of account detailing the principal ,charges and in respect of the claim and has the Claimant has failed to supply within the time limit prescribed by law and in fact at this time not at all.

Any thoughts would be wellcome

 

Ihave to send s /of truth and all documents to claiment and courts in aset No of days. any help would be good thanks

 

I have to send all docs soon, please if anyone has time to look it over many thanks

 

Had a letter from solicitors asking me to save cost &time and come to a settlement ,sent them a letter thanking them but i still need documents, please if anyone has time check my last post to make sure ive got it right.This is my first case but others are already heading my way

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...