Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • So as I stated, I posted my letter off but over 2 weeks later I've had a visit from one of their reps. I didn't indulge him in any conversation, and I just stated that any such debts are statute-barred and closed the door on him. I was hoping they'd take notice of the letter. Where do I go from here? Thanks
    • I apologise if I was being unclear. Where it currently stands is that they will have it repair, placing scaffolding in our garden for 5 days. They have moved fast, but we will still have to postpone our contractors, meaning, we won't necessarily have the work done in time for the wedding and therefore will incur additional expenses for either a marquee or a wedding venue. They are vehemently against having any kind of liability in any regard but continue repeating that they are legally entitled to use our garden for their repairs (I believe this is true unless the work can be carried out using a cherry picker). The neighbour seems either indifferent or oblivious to the fact they can't reach all of the side of the roof from the space where they can place the scaffolding. They have asked their roofer of choice about using a cherry picker but the roofer has said it wasn't possible. It's not clear whether the roofer doesn't want to use a cherry picker or whether there is an issue with it. They have told us it is a problem that we are installing a gazebo as it will prevent them to access their roof from our garden in the future?!?  
    • Couldn't agree more, really wanted a true ruling on this just for the knowledge but pretty sure the Judge made some decisions today that he didn't need to?.. maybe they all go this way on the day? We hear back so few post court dates I'm not sure. Each Judge has some level of discretion. Their sol was another Junior not even working at their Firm, so couldn't speak directly for them! that was fortunate I think because if she would have rejected in court better, she might have  been able to force ruling, we are at that point!, everybody there!!, Judge basically said openly that he can see everything for Judgement!!!  but she just said "I can speak to the claimant and find out!" - creating the opportunity for me to accept. I really think the Judge did me a favor today by saying it without saying it. Knowing the rep for the sol couldn't really speak to the idea in the moment. Been to court twice in a fortnight, on both occasions heard 4 times with others and both of my claims, the clerk mention to one or both parties "Letting the Judge know if you want to have a quick chat with each other"! So, it appears there's an expectation of the court that there is one last attempt at settling before going through the door. So, not a Sol tactic, just Court process!. Judge was not happy we hadn't tried to settle outside! We couldn't because she went to the loo and the Judge called us in 10 minutes early! - another reason to stand down to allow that conv to happen. Stars aligned there for me I think. But yeh, if the sol themselves, or someone who can make decisions on the case were in court, I would have received a Judgement against today I think. She was an 'advocate'.. if I recall her intro to me correctly.. So verbal arguments can throw spanners in Court because Plinks dogs outsource their work and send a Junior advocate.
    • that was a good saving on an £8k debt dx
    • Find out how the UK general elections works, how to register to vote, and what to do on voting day.View the full article
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Photoman V's British Gas


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5889 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Okay all,

 

New to this particular forum (but not this site, having recently won a claim against LTSB.... and I've also remembered to make a decent donation to site....so Thanks Guys) !!:)

 

Anyway:

I have a major issue regards British Gas, arising from their gross negligence regards assignment of meter readings (which I have an admission of), which basically meant that I was overbilled on my gas for nearly 2 years !!

Once the problem was discovered (by myself, I add, and so I do wonder just how long it would have continued had I not discovered it), I did actually recieve a refund.

 

However, as a result of my discovery (it all came down to the wrong meters being billed to the wrong address'), then it also meant that the poor recently bereaved lady in another flat was then sent a backdated bill for over £800 !!!!

 

I tried to argue her case and get some mercy from BG for her.... but all to no avail, and unfortunately even Energywatch could not get a result. So, she has since then had to pay very excessive rates on her gas keycard for over a year in order to attempt to clear this debt (as well as her ongoing use).

 

Straight after the affair, in disgust, I switched suppliers, I supplied BG with a final reading, and never looked back. Unfortunately, the same option was not open to my neighbour, who was obliged to pay this large debt back. She complied, because after her bereavement she could not face a battle, and despite my offers to help, I needed her co-operation to take up the fight.

 

Anyway, TODAY..... nearly 12 months after the event..... I recieved a "final bill" from BG ???

 

This is extremely peculiar, firstly, because at the time of my refund, the payment was calculated to account for any actual gas used, based upon readings, upto the point I switched, and also the readings it now contains seem to have no relation to any of those taken since ??

 

Anyway, this bill means, they have rattled my cage once too often !! :mad:

 

Also, the lady in the other flat now feels stronger and willing to co-operate in any actions.

 

I am determined to make them pay for their behaviour !!

 

I am now planning to seek;

 

1/ A full refund to my neighbour, of all the money since paid by her.

Our case is, that as a pensioner, she was a careful and frugal lady,who during the period of the reading errors had dilligently paid monthly sums through a payment scheme to BG, in good faith that she was keeping on top of matters. In fact... she even recieved refunds !

Had she known that her consumption was so much higher than that which she was paying for, she would have modified it. BG should have correctly read the meters during the relevent period, and billed accordingly and properly, to the correct recipients.

 

2/ Damages (Liquidated, aggravated and exemplary) and/or compensation for my neighbour. The matter arose at a very sensitive time for her, due to a bereavement, and was a great worry. It has also caused her considerable financial hardship since, made her very worried about her gas usage (resulting in physical discomfort over the winter), and could also be attributed as a cause of her current stress related illness.

 

3/ Damages (liquidated, aggravated and exemplary), and/or compensation for myself, on the contention that during the time I myself was being overbilled, I was under considerable financial hardship, and as a result I even suffered a relapse of a stress related illness. Also, dealing with this matter has been a great burden.

 

4/ Interest. For myself on the contention that they retained excessive amounts of my money for a long period, so gained from having them. For my neighbour on the contention that the money they have since taken from her they should not have been entitled to, and so have since additionally gained from reciept of them.

 

I need some advice on how to progress here?

 

Is this a battle I could/should manage independently, or should we seek legal advice? (not a nowin/nofee, I am talking law society accredited etc, and if the case, any idea how I could source such)

 

Is the procedure similar to SCT against Banks, or as it includes an element of damages, is it a different area of law?

This will influence my decision as to whether to go this alone or through solicitors.

 

Anybody with similar experiences?

 

Would really appreciate any advice on this before proceeding. I would also need to some guidance with the POC's, witness statements etc. Some aspects I suspect would be similar to Bank cases, but others not, so where could I find case law, statutes etc?

 

Anyway, there you all go.

 

Regards

 

Photoamn

All opinions and advice I offer are purely my own, and are offered without any liability. If unsure seek the help of a licensed professional

...just because something's in print doesn't mean its true.... just look at you Banks T&C's for example !

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Photoman. Suggest you look at what I've just added to Martin3030's thread @British Gas'.

 

Apart from all the other help you should be offered I would definitely send details to Tony Hetherington.

 

Sorry I can't scan his article as I don't have the equipment.

 

Good luck.

 

Van

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 8 months later...
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...