Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • breaking news More Tory MPs ‘pondering defecting’ 'bl**dy hell, if they'll have her I should be a shoe in. I dont stand a chance as a Tory, but I might if I'm the labour candidate' .. is rumored to be heard again and again at the Torys favorite  subsidised bars of Westminster.   More Tory MPs ‘pondering defecting’ as Natalie Elphicke ‘sorry’ - live WWW.INDEPENDENT.CO.UK Labour frontbencher says other Conservatives wrestling with their futures and calls grow for Diane Abbott to be let back into party "Wes Streeting insisted his party would not take just any Tory MP" .. as he looked nervously looked over his shoulder      
    • You were given this PCN because you overstayed not because you went to Starbucks or MaccyDs from the other car park. I assume therefore that the parking time is only 30 minutes as you were recorded as being there for 38 minutes. Given that there is a Consideration time and a Grace period  as well as the time between their photographs of your car arriving and leaving one wonders why they gave you a ticket. Force of habit I suppose. Because they are on airport land which is governed by Bye Laws that supercede PoFA we do not usually look at their PCNs there because in none of them can the charge be transferred from the driver to the keeper  as would normally happen after 28 days if the charge is unpaid and the land is not subject to Byelaws. In your case as they have failed to specify the Parking period  which is the time car is spent actually parked in a parking space not the bit that they include which is driving from the entrance to the parking space and the other bit from the parking space to the exit. As that reduces the lawful time you were actually parked I would suggest that they have breached your GDPR.
    • I believe it to be, yes. no payment or acknowledgement of any debt to them since Feb 2018
    • Original credit agreement for them to prove the debt. Post 2 is the pro rota, I did this to the Original creditors sometime ago with offers of payment i got no reply, soon after the dca started sending me letters and phone calls. Thanks 
    • and another low spot for investment in Brexit UK (I dont give a monkeys about the bank) Coutts prepares to de-bank Britain At an event this week the bank’s chief investment officer Fahad Kamal said: “Currently, about 20 per cent of a standard balanced portfolio here is UK stocks, which is something of an anachronism. “It would be closer to three per cent or four per cent if it were more commensurate with the proportion of UK stocks in global stock markets. So this is a recalibration. The 332-year-old lender, which has King Charles as a client and, until recently, former UKIP leader Nigel Farage, will transfer £2 billion from British funds into overseas investments, reinforcing the “inexorable trend of outflows from the UK”, Charles Hall of investment bank Peel Hunt said. Coutts prepares to de-bank Britain WWW.THELONDONECONOMIC.COM "This is a large transfer of assets from the UK to global funds, which reinforces the inexorable trend of outflows from the UK."  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

i have a loan with Welcome - Extortionate APR.


Jamesx81x
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6098 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi

 

Does anyone know of any way you can challenge a companies APR and how high it has to be before it can be classed as extortionate?

 

I have a loan with Welcome and the APR stands at %60 and another with Provident and we all know about them.

 

People may say you knew the APR before entering these loans but when your in need and these are the only companies that can help then its too tempting.

 

I want to challenge these companies as i am paying off my loan and it never seems to be going down.

 

Any advice appreciated.

 

Thanks

IVA Entry Removed

Nationwide Default Removed

Nationwide Joint Account Default Removed

Natwest Default Removed

Blackhorse Car Finance Court Claim - Won

Link to post
Share on other sites

If you were aware of the APR when you signed the credit agreement - and you will have been if you read it properly then you do not have a leg to stand on.

I too have provident and welcome loans - they don't appear to go down quickly at first - just like a mortgage you pay off interest for the vast majority of th term and only in the latter stages start top really clear the debt. Best advice? bite the bullet and search for a reasonable APR consolidation loan.

You will still pay a lot to pay off the original loans - more than the original ammount you got but if you get a lower apr then long term you will save.

:eek:ABBEY

Data Protection Act request complied with within 40 Days and no £10 charge..

31/01/07 Prelim Letter sent with schedule of charges.

19/02/07 LBA Sent with schedule of charges

08/03/07 MCOL started

09/03/07 £160 GOGW payment into account

23/07/07 Court Date set for 10/10/07

02/08/07 CPR Part 18 Request Submitted

10/08/07 Stay requested by Abbey :mad:

20/08/07 Claim Stayed by District Judge :mad:

:eek:HSBC

02/02/07 S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) Letter sent

22/02/07 Statements received and again no £10 charge...."happy to provide at their cost"

26/02/07 Prelim Letter to be sent with schedule of charges.

12/03/07 LBA sent with schedule of charges

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just found this info on unfair terms hope it helps other people in same situation.

 

From 6 April 2007, if you take out a loan, or enter into any other type of credit agreement, you can make a complaint if you think any aspect of the agreement is unfair. For example, you might think your credit agreement is unfair because:

 

  • you have been charged interest at an exceptionally high rate
  • the creditor gave you wrong or misleading information, or didn't give you enough information when you were deciding whether to take out the loan
  • the creditor failed to make a proper assessment of whether the loan was suitable for you.

There are other reasons you might think your credit agreement is unfair.

 

 

You can make a complaint to the Financial Ombudsman Service. If the Ombudsman agrees that your credit agreement is unfair, they can order the creditor to pay you compensation and to put the matter right. The Ombudsman's decision is legally binding and can be enforced by a court.

IVA Entry Removed

Nationwide Default Removed

Nationwide Joint Account Default Removed

Natwest Default Removed

Blackhorse Car Finance Court Claim - Won

Link to post
Share on other sites

So James do ANY of these points apply ??

I woudln't class 60% as exceptionally high, look at Log Book Loans for extremely high rates.

Did they give you misleading information or an inproper assesment ???

 

Also these apply on loans taken out after April 2007, is this your loan ?

Be VERY careful whose advice you listen too

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yeah thanks for the clever reply.

 

It appys to the loan i have with Provident and will apply to alot of other people who have hight interest loans.

 

With regards to Welcome Finance:

Yes i was mis-sold PPI

Yes they mis-led me with their T&C

Think it costs £25 to ring me

Think it costs £20 to write to me

 

Oh and yes it was taken out after April 2007.

 

It was some info for people with unfair agreements who wondered what to do about them.

 

So how about wind your neck in??

IVA Entry Removed

Nationwide Default Removed

Nationwide Joint Account Default Removed

Natwest Default Removed

Blackhorse Car Finance Court Claim - Won

Link to post
Share on other sites

How about you be polite to people who are trying to give you genuine advice by asking questions pertinent to your situation? Or did you just come on here to be sycophantically agreed with, regardless of the actual legalities, hmm?

  • Haha 1

-----

Click the scales if I've been useful! :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Shouldnt ask in a clever manner then and wouldnt receive a clever answer!

 

Simple as that!

IVA Entry Removed

Nationwide Default Removed

Nationwide Joint Account Default Removed

Natwest Default Removed

Blackhorse Car Finance Court Claim - Won

Link to post
Share on other sites

James, I wasn't trying to be clever but point out a few things.

Now as I mentioned 60% ISN'T considered high, Log Book Loans TYPICAL rate is OVER 300% !!!. Now THAT is extreme.

 

The fact you think you where mis-sold PPI (for an undisclosed reason), and the high "admin" charges are a different matter altogether.

 

Challenging the high "admn" charges is easy, the PPI is another matter and more information would be needed for effective help.

 

As you seem to be in a combative frame of mind, I'm not really sure if it would be worth anyones while even advising you of the best course of action.

Be VERY careful whose advice you listen too

Link to post
Share on other sites

My apolgies.

 

Thought it was another sarcastic reply seem to be having a few of them lately!

 

:)

IVA Entry Removed

Nationwide Default Removed

Nationwide Joint Account Default Removed

Natwest Default Removed

Blackhorse Car Finance Court Claim - Won

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just found this info on unfair terms hope it helps other people in same situation.

 

From 6 April 2007, if you take out a loan, or enter into any other type of credit agreement, you can make a complaint if you think any aspect of the agreement is unfair. For example, you might think your credit agreement is unfair because:

  • you have been charged interest at an exceptionally high rate
  • the creditor gave you wrong or misleading information, or didn't give you enough information when you were deciding whether to take out the loan
  • the creditor failed to make a proper assessment of whether the loan was suitable for you.

There are other reasons you might think your credit agreement is unfair.

 

 

You can make a complaint to the Financial Ombudsman Service. If the Ombudsman agrees that your credit agreement is unfair, they can order the creditor to pay you compensation and to put the matter right. The Ombudsman's decision is legally binding and can be enforced by a court.

 

 

Hi James , Some very sound info there , Would you think the Financial ombudsman would be able to advise/help me regarding a loan contract I have with Log Book Loans ?? I was told that the Financial Ombudsman Service only deal with High Street banks and mortgage companys do you know if this is still true ???

 

I was never told that the APR was 375% but it was written on the loan contract but I was stupid enough not to notice it , however there is a part on the contract that says Log Book Loans cannot take the car without a court order !!they did take it without a court order so would that be enought to contact the Financial Ombudsman about or would I be waisting my time ??.

 

I was not made aware that the loan was any different from a normal loan I have had cars on HP before and never had any problems but my payments with Log Book Loans were almost up to date I hade payed them back more than double the amount I borrowed and they came and took my car without warning !! when I was out . Cheers Alex

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

 

They deal with all kinds of financial institutes thats where i got the info from. At the moment it only applies to agreements taken out after April 2007 but from April 2008 will apply to all agreements.

 

As the APR is on the agreement they can argue this with you. Then again you could say they didnt give you enough information or allowed you to read the agreement properly.

 

Did they credit check you or assess your bank statements to see your income and outgoings? If not you could argue that they didnt assess your suitability for a loan and whether that you would be comfortably afford repayments.

 

As for the car im sure they cant just take it without a court order but dont quote me on that. Best bet will be to go to your local Citizens Advice they will point you in the right direction.

 

Good luck!

IVA Entry Removed

Nationwide Default Removed

Nationwide Joint Account Default Removed

Natwest Default Removed

Blackhorse Car Finance Court Claim - Won

Link to post
Share on other sites

All depends on the type of arrangement. If HP, then yes, there's no problem they can reposess without going to court. If you've simply bought money from them to buy the car, then - if the loan is secured on the vehicle, again they can reposess this to mitigate their loss in case of non-payment. If the car forms no part of the deal, then they cannot take it without formal court action against you, and they treat it as an asset.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 5 weeks later...
I was never told that the APR was 375% but it was written on the loan contract but I was stupid enough not to notice it , however there is a part on the contract that says Log Book Loans cannot take the car without a court order !!

 

Sorry, old thread, but - where in your contract was this? I don't have it in mine, just lots about how they may seize it from anywhere and can break in if they wish!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • dx100uk changed the title to i have a loan with Welcome - Extortionate APR.
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...