Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • If that was the reason then that is good news. The whole reason that being able to charge £100 for breaching private car park rules is because the law Lords decided in a celebrated case that the rogues had a legitimate interest in keeping their car park spaces available for all motorists . {parking Eye v Beavis]. However when the business is closed then there is no legitimate interest in keeping spaces free so to charge £100 is a penalty. As such any Court would automatically throw out the case when the penalty charge is accepted.
    • gives them a feeling of grandeur. dx  
    • yep they can be a bit like the TV licencing lot. for 4yrs ive been getting a series of about 8-10 diff letters that just go round a loop. currently upto 61
    • thread tidied. new thread for the court claim is here  
    • new thread created for this claimform please post here now for anything to do with it now . pop up on the bulk court website detailed on the claimform. [if it is not working return after the w/end or the next day if week time] . When you select ‘Register’, you will be taken to a screen titled ‘Sign in using Government Gateway’. Choose ‘Create sign in details’ to register for the first time. You will be asked to provide your name, email address, set a password and a memorable recovery word. You will be emailed your Government Gateway 12-digit User ID. You should make a note of your memorable word, or password as these are not included in the email.  then log in to the bulk court Website .  select respond to a claim and select the start AOS box. .  then using the details required from the claimform . defend all leave jurisdiction unticked  you DO NOT file a defence at this time [BUT you MUST file a defence regardless by day 33 ] click thru to the end confirm and exit the website .. get a CCA Request running to the claimant . https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/332502-cca-request-consumer-credit-act-1974-updated-january-2015/ .. Leave the £1 PO unsigned and uncrossed . get a CPR  31:14  request running to the solicitors [if one is not listed send to the claimant] ... https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/332546-legal-cpr-3114-request-request-for-information-when-a-claim-has-been-issued/ . .use our other CPR letter if the claim is for an OD or Telecom Debt or Util debt]  https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/332546-legal-cpr-3114-request-request-for-information-when-a-claim-has-been-issued/ on BOTH type your name ONLY Do Not sign anything .do not ever use or give an email . you DO NOT await the return of ANY paperwork  you MUST file a defence regardless by day 33 from the date on the claimform [1 in the count] ..............  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

DOS v Barclays - Personal Account


Destinyofsouls
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6143 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi,

had a good look round the barclays threads can't find the above. The o/d fee is £5 per month as aginst the una o/d fee at £ 20

 

Is the first one reclaimable?

If not do I deduct £5 from the unauth o/d charge of £28?

I also had an o/d protectiopn of 1000 x £0.80 /100 = £8.00 per month. I don't remember asking for this, I assume it is legit though?

 

There is also ' unpaids out 1 @ £25. I assume this is a charge for unpaid chq/s/o d/d etc..?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 63
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Hi,

 

The o/d fee of £5 is part of your account so you have to pay that unfortunately. It is a charge for your overdraft facility. It is a separate charge though and will have been listed separately so you don't deduct anything from the others. Not sure about the protection but it sounds like another one that is part of a facility you have. Although you could probably cancel it if you wanted, although they will prob try and talk you out of it. I have never taken on this protection rubbish, I see it as just another way for them to take money from you.

 

As for all the others though, unauthorised overdraft, unpaids out and referrals are all claimable charges so definately include those.

 

Good luck

Laineybelle

  • Confused 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 5 months later...

Barclays have not responded at all. They offered £600 against £1050 in March. I rejected this and went on to file in court.

 

It is a directions hearing ( 10 mins) should I be worried at this stage|?

 

I seemd to thinkmthey paid up before this

Link to post
Share on other sites

Barclays have not responded at all. They offered £600 against £1050 in March. I rejected this and went on to file in court.

 

It is a directions hearing ( 10 mins) should I be worried at this stage|?

 

I seemd to thinkmthey paid up before this

 

No dont be worried this is std procedure, I would suggest that you try and contact the Lit Team [see my signature for link] tell them you are in court...dont let on it is only a directions hearing... ask if they are prepared to settle.

If they dont settle there and then but have agreed to do so, you can inform the judge of this tomorrow, he will then prob make a ruling there in favour of your claim.

if you cannot get hold of anyone before tomorrow simply mention it to the judge that you have repeatedly attempted to contact the defendant in order to attempt out of court settlement to prevent wasting his time..

.

http://www.findmadeleine.com/

http://news.sky.com/skynews/madeleine

 

If I dont reply to a direct question please feel free to PM me.

Link to post
Share on other sites

hi dar£n. Thanks for your reply. I have contacted them and they offered me £800. I refused and so she put me in touch with the lit team. They have said there will be representation there tomorrow.

 

I am seriously bricking now. What do I say/take/do?

Link to post
Share on other sites

hi dar£n. Thanks for your reply. I have contacted them and they offered me £800. I refused and so she put me in touch with the lit team. They have said there will be representation there tomorrow.

 

I am seriously bricking now. What do I say/take/do?

 

DO NOT PANIC,

The Lit team are a very nice bunch, see my thread there is an example of what to do and say.

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/barclays-bank/94602-barclays-litigation-team-good.html

.

http://www.findmadeleine.com/

http://news.sky.com/skynews/madeleine

 

If I dont reply to a direct question please feel free to PM me.

Link to post
Share on other sites

BTW this was my POC, do you think it's OK?

 

 

 

 

BETWEEN

 

Destiny - CLAIMANT

 

And

 

 

Barclies Plc - DEFENDANT

 

PARTICULARS OF CLAIM

 

 

 

 

1. The Claimant has an account, number xxxxxx, sort code xxxx, ("the Account") with the Defendant.

 

2. During the period in which the Account has been operating the Defendant has automatically debited numerous charges to the Account in respect of purported breaches of contract on the part of the Claimant and also charged interest on the charges once applied. The Claimant understands that the Defendant contends that the charges were debited in accordance with the terms of the contract between itself and the Claimant.

 

3. A list of the charges (“the Schedule”) applied is attached to these Particulars of Claim.

 

4. The Claimant contends that:

 

a) The charges debited to the Account are punitive in nature; are not genuine pre-estimates of costs incurred by the Defendant; exceed any alleged actual loss to the Defendant in respect of any breaches of contract on the part of the Claimant; and are not intended to represent or related to any alleged actual loss, but instead unduly enrich the Defendant which exercises the contractual term in respect of such charges with a view to profit.

 

b) The contractual provision that permits the Defendant to levy such charges is unenforceable by virtue of

i) the Unfair Terms In Consumer Contracts Regulations 1999 particularly but not limited to Regulations 5, 6 and 8 and Schedule 2, 1 e); and

ii); the Unfair Contract Terms Act 1977, particularly but not limited to sections 3 and 11 and Schedule 2 and;

iii) the common law and Case Law relating to liquidated damages and penalties in contracts.

 

c) To the extent that it is found that the Defendant’s charges are for the provision of banking services the Claimant contends that the price thereof is unreasonable pursuant to section 15 of the Supply of Goods and Services Act 1982.

 

6. Accordingly the Claimant claims:

 

a) the return of the amounts debited to the Claimant’s account in respect of charges in the sum of £1050.00 as per attached Schedule.

 

b) Court costs; £120.00

 

c) Interest pursuant to section 69 County Courts Act 1984 at 8% per annum of £129.41

 

d) Interest pursuant to section 69 County Courts Act 1984 at 8% per annum from the date of the claim until the date of judgement/settlement at a daily rate of £0.23

 

STATEMENT OF TRUTH

 

I believe that the contents of these particulars of claim are true

 

 

 

 

Full name: ___________________________________________

 

 

 

SIGNED______________________________________________(Claimant)

 

 

 

Date __________________

Link to post
Share on other sites

If so, what haoppens? what is said, did the bank turn up? if not, what happens then?

 

What do I need to take /say/do?

 

I have a hearing tomoz at 10.30 an starting to have a Diedre.

 

I could really do with some help out there please

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi - you must be worried that no one has got back to you - I understand. I'm not an expert in this at all - I struggled thro' the procedure for my son. Luckily I did settle for the full amount + 8% and did not go to court, just. Tho' it took nearly 2 weeks for the ££ to get paid. Now as I said, I'm no expert - but basically the charges are unlawful, if you look at the link where the chap lost against Lloyds a few months ago, this breaks down the reasons why he lost - unusually the judge questioned him. I could try and quote what some of it says but I don't want to give you incorrect info. Hopefully someone with much more knowledge will come back to you soon and give more guidance - but Barclays still may not show up. Mind you your claim is for much more than my sons (£800ish) - so be prepared. Good Luck - I hope it goes well

Link to post
Share on other sites

You'll find info on directions hearings here GOT A COURT DATE? A guide to the later stages

Can't find what you're looking for? Please have a look at Michael Browne's

A-Z Guide

*** PLEASE NOTE ***

I do not answer queries via PM. If you send me a PM, please include a link to your thread - any advice I am able to offer will be on your thread.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for your help stagey,

 

I am worried sick, in fact I feel as though I am going to be sick!!

I am really not the type of person for all this. I am leaving in 30 mins for court and I am no more confident than I was when I first started the claim.

I just haven't got a clue what to say, although I have read as much as I can on here, I still feel I don't know what to do.

 

I am a little disappointed there is no-one to give me support, especially at this time, but I understand there are thousands also needing help, and the helpers can't be everywehre. I hope the bank don't catch on that I'm too nervous and play on that.

 

Wish me luck, I'm going to need it.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Don't worry, this happened to my friend and their solicitor had a cheque waiting for them - nothing to be worried about, just be calm and confident.

 

BTW - Good luck

Disclaimer: Anything I write in these forums is my personal opinion and offered without prejudice. If in doubt, please seek independent legal advice.

 

*If what I have told you in this post has helped, please press the star at the bottom left and tell me!!*

 

My charges claims:

un1boy vs egg *SETTLED* | Un1boy vs LTSB-SETTLED | un1boy vs Black Horse-SETTLED | Un1boy v Smile *WON* | un1boy v HSBC - SETTLED! | Un1boy's HSBC CC - SETTLED! | Un1boy vs Co-Op *SETTLED* |un1boy vs Co-Op CC *SETTLED*

 

Default removals:

un1boy v Equifax - Default removal

un1boy vs Experian - Default removal

Link to post
Share on other sites

Remember, the judge will understand that you are not experienced at this,

just state the reason you are there.

 

the bank has applied what you feel to be penalty charges to your account for being overdrawn etc

its not the fact of being charged its the amount you were charges for doing so.

and would like the bank to show how they got to the amount of £20, 30 35 for each charge when it has been shown [the whistleblower tv program] that it only costs the bank £1.50 - £2.50 to apply the charge.

it is also stated that banks are not allowed to make a profit by applying penalty charges, which they clearly are.

you are there today to either request your money back shown in your SOC's

OR

the bank to clearly show and prove how they legally arrive at the amounts charged.

 

point out there are thousands being paid out daily

approx £15,000,000 on CAG alone.

 

 

good luck

.

http://www.findmadeleine.com/

http://news.sky.com/skynews/madeleine

 

If I dont reply to a direct question please feel free to PM me.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Destiny,

 

This is going to happen to me on 6th August (I'm certain as I am claiming nearly £6,400 and I have a directions hearing) so I wanted to wish you all the best - I hope it all goes well for you. What Dar£n has said seems to make perfect sense to me so good luck.

 

I'm going to keep an eye on this as I'm not far behind you.

 

GOOD LUCK,

 

KA

Prelim letter received by Barclays: 26/03/07

**************no reply***************

 

LBA received by Barclays: 10/04/07

**************no reply***************

 

N1 filed at court: 25/04/07

N1 received by Barclays: 04/05/07

Offer of £1,885.00: 04/05/07 (turned down)

Offer rejection received by B'clays: 08/05/07

Barclays Acknowledge Claim: 11/05/07

Barclays Defence Filed: 18/05/07

 

Directions Hearing Date Set: 06/08/07

Case Stayed Until Feb '08

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...