Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Thank you very much for your letter in regard to the above mentioned shipment.  Due to the high volume of parcels coursing through the courier network each day, undergoing continuous processing and handling, certain packages may experience delays or even can get lost in the course of this journey. Please note that due to the time that has passed, this shipment has been declared as lost.  I have today processed the claim and made offers to the value of £75 as a goodwill gesture without prejudice. I do acknowledge that you have mentioned in your letter that the value was higher, however, you did not take out any protection to that amount. The protection for this shipment was £20 and we will not be increasing our goodwill offer any further.    Please log into your account online in order to accept our offer. Once accepted, our accounts department will process the claim accordingly. The claim payment will be processed and received within 7 working days.                                  In addition, a refund of the carriage fee will be processed as a separate payment and will be received within 3 working days.  If I can further assist, please feel free to contact me.   I have also just noticed that yesterday afternoon they sent me an email stating that "after my request" they have refunded the cost of shipping. I did not request the refund so will mention that in my letter as well.
    • Hi I had to leave Dubai back in 2011, during the financial crisis. And only now have I received a letter from IDRWW. Is this anything to worry about about as I have 2 years left until it’s been 15 years(statute barred in Dubai). Worried as just got a mortgage 2 years ago. Could they force me in to bankruptcy? Red lots of different threads on here. And unsure what true and what isn’t. 
    • Not that TOR will see this now he's thrown in the hand grenade. Rayner has plenty of female supporters on X, for a start. As for the council and HMRC, fair enough and I thought Rayner was already in touch with them. That's where it should be dealt with, not the police force. @tobyjugg2 Daniel Finkelstein thinks the same as you about tax. The Fiver theory. How the Fiver Theory explains this election campaign ARCHIVE.PH archived 28 May 2024 17:36:51 UTC  
    • Often with the Likes of Lowells/ Overdales that 'proof' doesn't stand up to scrutiny.   Think about it like a game of poker, they want to intimidate you into folding and giving up as soon as possible, and just get you to pay up and roll over, that is their business model, make you think your cards are rubbish. What they don't expect, and their business isn't set up for it, is for a defendant to find this place and to learn that they have an amazing set of cards to play. Overdales don't have an infinite number of lawyers, paralegals etc, and the time / money to spend on expensive court cases, that they are highly likely to lose, hence how hard they will try to get you to roll over.  Even to the extent of faking documents, which they need to do because the debts that they purchased were so cheap, in the first place. Nevertheless it works in most cases, most people chicken out, when they are so close to winning, and a holding defence is like slowly showing Overdales your first card, and a marker of intention that this could get tricky for them. In fact it may be,  although by no means guaranteed that it won't even go any further than that.  Even if it does, what they send you back will almost certainly have more holes than Swiss Cheese, and if with the help you receive here, you can identify those weaknesses and get the whole thing tossed in the bin.
    • So Rayner who is don’t forget still being investigated by the local council and HMRC  is now begging to save her seat Not a WOMAN in sight in this video other than Rayner  Farage is utterly correct this country’s values are non existent in her seat   Rayner Pleads With Muslim Voters as Pressure From Galloway Grows – Guido Fawkes ORDER-ORDER.COM Guido has obtained a leaked tape from inside a meeting between Angela Rayner and Muslim voters in Ashton-under-Lyne...  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Deesco Vs Barclays


deesco
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5980 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hiya,

 

Just confused about a couple of points I need to complete on the form.

 

1) In my original claims to the bank I did not include any interest.

I have read 'help links' for the N1 form but am still confused. As I have not included interest so far, do I just leave out the overdraft interest section in the 'Value' par tof the form, and just include the s.69 interest, at 8%?

 

2) Also, in the "Value' section -

 

"Plus interest pursuant to S.69 County Courts Act 1984 from date of issue to date of judgement/settlement at £xx.xx per day [(enter daily rate here - (CHARGES+OD interest)x 0.00022 = pence per day)] OR at such rate and for such periods as the court deems just."

 

As I have not included OD interest can I leave out the calulation section and just use the 'at such rate and for such periods...' section?

 

3) Finally, this section in the "Particulars of Claim' section -

 

c) The claimant claims interest under section 69 of the County Courts Act 1984 at the rate of 8% a year, from [date when the money became owed to you] to [the date you are issuing the claim] of £ [amount] and also interest at the same rate up to the date of judgment or earlier payment at a daily rate of [enter the daily rate of interest]

 

- What is the date when the money became owed? Is this the date at the beginning of the 6 years of claim? And I presume the date of issuing the claim is the date which I made the original claim to the bank.

- And again, I do not have the daily rate of interest, so do I just leave that bit out?

 

 

Sorry for being so stupid - never been very good with maths or money, which probably got me into this situation in the first place!!

 

Thanks

Anna

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi dessco

 

1) It is not mandatory to include overdraft interest especially if it's difficult to calculate and wouldn't be very much anyway. So yes, in this case, you just remove the line about overdarft interest.

 

2) In your claim this would be "Plus interest pursuant to S.69 County Courts Act 1984 from date of issue to date of judgement/settlement at £xx.xx per day [(enter daily rate here - CHARGES x 0.00022 = pence per day)] OR at such rate and for such periods as the court deems just.".

 

Say your charges are £427.50, you multiply this by 0.00022 = £0.09 and this is the figure you put in as your daily rate.

 

3) Put in the earliest charge incurred date shown on your Schedule of Charges. The date of issuing is the date when you actually file your claim with the court. The daily rate is the figure you arrived at in 2) eg £0.09.

 

It's not stupid deesco, so don't put yourself down.

 

Remember to take 3 copies of your claim and 3 copies of your Schedule of Charges down to the court. 1 copy is for the court to send onto Barclays, 1 is for them to keep on file and the ast one they will return to you through the post with a court stamp on it.

3 Active Claims:

Barclays Refund of Bank Charges (Sole account) - Applied to lift court ordered Stay

Barclays Refund of Bank Charges (Joint account) - Awaiting court date

Barclays Refund of Bank Charges (Joint account) Pre-6 yrs- LBA sent.

 

 

3 Wins :

Barclays t/a The Woolwich (Data Protection Act breach costs & compliance)

HSBC (on behalf of brother)

Settled Out of Court - £3,874.76

Alliance & Leicester (on behalf of friend)

Settled Out of Court - £723.41

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hiya

 

Have done Schedule of Charges for orignal letters to bank.

 

Unfortunately am working on a Mac which will not read the spreadsheets provided on this site, so am unable to use them.

 

I know this is going to sound unbelievably stupid, but how do I go about working out the 8% interest? Do I take the total charges for each of the 6 years I am claiming for and work out 8% of that then add them all together???

 

Told you am crap at this!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

 

So far:

 

Have received statements from Barclays and sent Prelim Letter, along with spreadsheet of charges (18th June 2007).

 

Received standard letter saying will get back to me in several years time.

 

Sent LBA letter with details of charges (3rd July 2007).

 

Received similar standard letter.

 

Am currently completing N1 form to print out and take down to Courts in person.

 

After having problems with completing it (see thread - Help with N1 form please!) am still a little confused, after reading other peoples threads on the process.

 

NB Am using MAc not PC so computer unable to read spreadsheets for charges etc).

 

Several q's:

 

1) (Stupidest Q) What is MCOL??

 

2) Will be taking 3 copies of N1 form and spreadsheet of charges (now including 8% interest) to the courts, along with Court Fee. It will be exactly the same charges as originally sent to Barclays but with 8% interest added - is this sufficient for charges details?

- Will the Courts automatically send a copy to Barclays or do I have to do this myself?

 

Just reading 'Confused V Barclays' and has confused me even more! IT states that 'after you filed MCOL, you should have sent an updated SOC bothe to MCOL and to the bank with a covering letter quoting your claim number. If you didn't, send them off now registered and you should be okay.'

- is this just the updated charges (ie with 8% interest?)

 

3) Is this all I need to do at this stage? Do I need to send anything off elsewhere??

 

 

Have been reading posts from before I started this whole claim, but am getting more and more confused now with all the talk of court bundles and AQ's etc etc. Will I be able to do this??!!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Tried icalculate - do no have the right application to use it apparently.

 

Tried Vampiress Spreadsheets but when logged in with Google 'We're sorry, but it looks like you're running a web browser that doesn't work with Google Docs & Spreadsheets yet.'

 

Am completely useless with computer so dont know what to do or use to remedy either of these probs!!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi deesco

 

1. MCOL = money claim online. As you are filling in N1 and going to your local court you do not need to worry about it.

 

2. You take 3 copies of N1 ond 3 copies of schedule of charges. The court will keep all 3 and forward copy to Barclays. You will also recieve a copy through post with official court seal.

 

3. Thats all you need to do at the moment.

 

Please keep to 1 thread. Don't start a new one with every question you have as it becomes confusing for those following your case. Good luck

 

Trucker

Link to post
Share on other sites

There's an online one here:

Bank Charges: Reclaim them, they're unlawful, get up to six years' money back...

But you can't save it so print out several copies. Plus you will need to enter the type of charge by hand afterwards in the blank left hand column.

 

Not ideal, but better than nothing.

Link to post
Share on other sites

2 threads merged

 

please keep to the one thread when asking questions or updating .This is in your own interest as you will get much more informed advice when people can see at a glance what you have done so far :-)

When you want to fool the world, tell the truth. :D

Advice & opinions of Janet-M are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Use your own judgment. Seek advice of a qualified insured professional if you have any

doubts.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Hi

 

Just received letter (as am sure most people have!) from Barclays outlining the start of the OFT case, and stating they are 'suspending the normal timetable for dealing with bank charges complaints'.

 

I took my N1 forms etc to Notts County Court yesterday, so obviously panicked (!). But have been reading thru the latest info on CAG and am continuing with timetable for claims. Just wanted to clarify a few points:

 

1) In original timetable, Barclays are supposed to respond to issuing a claim within 14 days - is this thru direct contact with me (ie a letter) or do they contact the court?

 

2) Is this 14 days from the day I handed in the claim (ie yesterday)?

 

3) With OFT case, if I do not hear anything do I still continue to next step?

 

4) Also, have been reading the Barclays Litigation Team posts today, and it seems lots of people are contacting the team direct, and having success with their claims. One post suggest that you should contact them when you have a court date. This may seem stupid, but what would you be asking them to do at this point? And is this the best idea?

 

Sorry to be so dim - I blame my pregnancy hormones which have taken half my brain away! Am just finding this whole process so confusing! And it seems people who are more pro-active - ie contacting the Litigation team, rather than just solidly following the step-by-step instructions by contacting Barclays by letter - are having more success.

 

Help!!

 

:o

Link to post
Share on other sites

The 14 days is from when the claim was deemed served by the court ... in my case that was 2 days after i took it to the court ... the Bank will give their response to the court you should get notification from them

 

Normally you will receive a notice of issue from the court which will give you the exact date that they have to defend or acknowledge the claim

 

I wouldnt bother contacting the Litigation Team at all now due to the OFT case they are not settling anymore prior to a hearing :(

 

Hope this helps

 

saint

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi deesco

 

Out of interest, which department, if any, at Barclays is issuing this letter (ie what dep't is signing at the end)? Quite a few others have had this letter so it appears to be the new automated response mailing from bank.

 

3) With OFT case, if I do not hear anything do I still continue to next step?

 

Just keep going in accordance with court notice that you'll receive. Once the claim is issued, the bank still have an obligation to stick to court procedural timetable ie Acknowledgement of Service, submission of Defence and complying with subsequent court instructions etc.

 

Hope you're enjoying being preggers! Ahh, I remember those days :)

3 Active Claims:

Barclays Refund of Bank Charges (Sole account) - Applied to lift court ordered Stay

Barclays Refund of Bank Charges (Joint account) - Awaiting court date

Barclays Refund of Bank Charges (Joint account) Pre-6 yrs- LBA sent.

 

 

3 Wins :

Barclays t/a The Woolwich (Data Protection Act breach costs & compliance)

HSBC (on behalf of brother)

Settled Out of Court - £3,874.76

Alliance & Leicester (on behalf of friend)

Settled Out of Court - £723.41

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hiya Welshcakes

 

The letter is signed by Neil Henderson, Director of Retail Bank Customer Relations, based in Leicester. Also enclosed is a leaflet they have produced called 'Unauthorised Overdraft Chargbes Court Action'.

 

Thanks for the advice.

 

Just finished work on Sat for Mat Leave - currently chilling whilst still possible!!

:cool:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Saintly - would CAG benefit from getting hold of one of these leaflets or at least an uploaded scan of it?

 

Deesco, whoo hoo, hope the sun comes out for you to get a little sunbathing time :)

3 Active Claims:

Barclays Refund of Bank Charges (Sole account) - Applied to lift court ordered Stay

Barclays Refund of Bank Charges (Joint account) - Awaiting court date

Barclays Refund of Bank Charges (Joint account) Pre-6 yrs- LBA sent.

 

 

3 Wins :

Barclays t/a The Woolwich (Data Protection Act breach costs & compliance)

HSBC (on behalf of brother)

Settled Out of Court - £3,874.76

Alliance & Leicester (on behalf of friend)

Settled Out of Court - £723.41

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 5 months later...

Hiya

 

Wonder if I could just get some info please!

 

I have not been doing anything with my claim since Sept 2007, as I had a baby, moved house and had post-natal depression. I am aware of the current legal situation with Barclays and other banks and know everything is currently frozen. I just wanted to clarify my position and check I shouldnt be doing anything else.

 

I got to the stage where I had filed a claim with the court and they sent me a notice of issue. I did not receive anything after that, but had received the leaflet from Barclays explaining about freezing all claims processes.

 

Hope someone can help!

 

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Deesco,

 

After you Filed at Court, Barclays should have Acknowledged your claim within 14 days and entered their Defence within 28 days. The Court should have at least let you know of the Acknowledgement but you may have to ask Court for a copy of bank's Defence.

 

It is THE COURT'S position to appply a Stay to your case and NOT the bank.

 

I suggest you contact the Court whilst it's all quiet and find out when bank Acknowledged and ask for a copy of the Defence.

 

Ask also for the details of any Directions given about the Stay on your case.

 

If the bank defended, I would have expected you to be sent an Allocation Questionnaire to complete and return, so you need to check on how your case is now.

 

Congratulations on your baby and I hope you are recovering yourself.

 

Slick

We could do with some help from you

                                                                PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

                                            Have we helped you ...?  Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

Please give something if you can. We all give our time free of charge but the site has bills to pay.

 

Thanks !:-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...