Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • If anybody has any advice here, it would be greatly appreciated, I already suffer with pre-existing disabilities & have struggled with this so far. 
    • so return of goods order etc etc read upload  scan pages to jpg, redact in mspaint. the convert to and merge to one mass PDF  read upload and use the online listed sites for all 3 stages. do you want to keep the car? i will guess this was a manual paper claimform direct from the co.court or was it org sent from salford bulk processing and has just got reaq ssigned?      
    • Speaking of the reformatory boys, here they are with all of their supporters, some of whom traveled with them from miles away, all carefully crammed together and photographed to look like there were more than about 80 .. rather like Farages last rally with even fewer people crammed around what looked like an ice cream van or mobile tea bar ... Although a number in the crowd apparently thought they were at a vintage car rally as they appeared to be chanting 'crank-her'. A vintage Bentley must be out of view.   Is this all there is? Its less than the Tory candidate. - shut up and smile while they get a camera angle that looks better
    • in order for us to help you we require the following information:- Which Court have you received the claim from ? Canterbury Name of the Claimant ? Moneybarn No 1   How many defendant's  joint or self ? One Date of issue –  29/05/24 Acknowledged by 14/06/24  Defence by 29/06/24  Particulars of Claim PARTICULARS OF CLAIM 1.  By a Conditional Sale Agreement in writing made on 25th August 2022. Between the Claimant and Defendant, the Claimant let to the Defendant on Conditional Sale. A Ford Ranger 3.2 TDCi (200 P S) 4x4 Wildtrack Double Cab Pickup 3200cc (Sep.2015) Registration No, ******* Chassis number ***************** (“The Vehicle”).  A copy of the agreement is attached  2.  The price of the goods was £15,995.00. The Initial Rental was £8500.00.  The total charge for credit was £3575.;17 And the balance of £11,070.17 was payable by 59 equal consecutive monthly instalments of £187 63. payable on the 25th of each month. 3.  The following were expressed conditions of the set agreement, Clause 8: Our Right to End this Agreement  8.1   Subject to sending you the notice as required by law, any of the following events will entitle us to end this Agreement: 8.1.2  You fail to pay the advance payment (if any) or any of the payments as specified on the front page of this agreement or any other sum payable under this Agreement. 8.1.3 If any of the information you have given us before entering into this Agreement or during the term of this Agreement was false 8.1.4 We consider, acting reasonably, that the goods may be in jeopardy or that our rights in the goods may otherwise be prejudiced. 8.1.5 If you die 8.1.6 If a bankruptcy petition is presented against you; if you petition for your own bankruptcy, or make a live arrangement with your creditors or call a meeting of them. 8. 1.7 If in Scotland, you become insolvent or sequestration or a receiver, judicial factor or trustee to be appointed over any of your estate, or effects or suffer an arrestment, charge attachment or other diligence to be issued or levied on any of your estate or effects or suffer any exercise, or threatened exercise of landlords hype hypothec 8.1.8 If you are a partnership, you are dissolved 8.1.9 If the goods are destroyed, lost, stolen and/or treated by the insurer as a total loss in response to an insurance claim. 8.1.10 If we reasonably believe any payment made to us in respect of this Agreement is a proceed of crime. 8.1.11 If steps are taken by us to terminate any other agreement which you have entered into with us. Clause 9.  Effect of Us Terminating Agreement 9.1 If this Agreement terminates under clause 8 the following will apply 9.1.1 Subject to the rights given to you by law, you will no longer be entitled to possession of the goods and must return them to us to an address as we may reasonably specify, (removing or commencing the removal of any cherished plates) together with a V5 registration certificate, both sets of keys and a service record book. If you are unable or unwilling to return the goods to us then we shall collect the goods and we'll charge you in accordance with clause 10.3 9.1.2 We will be entitled to immediate payment from you for all payments and all other sums do under this agreement at the date of termination 9.1.3 We will sell the goods or public sale at the earliest opportunity once the goods are in a reasonable condition which includes a return of the items listed in clause 7.1.4 9.1.4 We will be entitled to immediate payment from you of the rest of the Total Amount Payable under this agreement less: ( a) A rebate for early settlement ias required by law which will be calculated and notified to you at the time of payment (b) The proceeds of sale of the goods (if any) after deduction of all costs associated with finding you and/or the goods, recovery, refurbishment and repair. Insurance, storage, sale, agents fees, cherished plate removal, replacement keys, costs associated with obtaining service history for the goods and in relation to obtaining a duplicate V5 registration certificate 4, The following are particulars required by Civil Procedure Rules. Rule 7.9 as set out in 7.1 and 7.2 of the associated Practice Direction entitled Hire Purchase Claims:- a)     The agreement is dated 25 August 2022. And is between Moneybarn No1 Limited  and xxxxxxxxx under agreement  number xxxxxx. b)    The claimant was one of the original parties to the agreement. c)    The agreement is regulated under the Consumer Credit Act 1974. d)    The goods claimed Ford Ranger 3.2 TDCi ( 200 PS) 4x4 Wildtrack Double Cab Pickup 3200 cc (Sep2015} Registration No ^^^^^^^ Chassis number ***************** e)     The total price of the goods £19570 f)     The paid up sum £1206 5 g)    The unpaid balance of the total price £7505 (to include charges) h)    A default notice was sent to the defendant on 20th February 2024 by First class post i)      The date when the right to demand delivery of the goods accrued 14 March 2024 j)      The amount if any claimed as an alternative to delivery of the goods 7505 22 include charges 5.  At the date of service of the notice the instalments were £562.89 in arrears. 6. By reason of the Termination of the Agreement by the notice, defendant became liable to pay the sum of £7502 7. The date of maturity the agreement is 24th August 2027. 8. Further or alternative by reasons of  the Defendant breaches of the agreement by failing to pay the said instalments, the Defendant evinced an intention no longer to be bound by the Agreement and repudiated it by the said Notice the claimant accepted that repudiation 9. By reason of such repudiation the claimant has suffered loss and damage. Total amount payable £19570 Less sum paid or in arrears by the date of repudiation £12064 97 Balance £7505 (to include charges.) ( The claimant will give credit if necessary for the value of the vehicle if recovered.)  The claimant therefore claims 1.    An order for delivery up of the vehicle 2.    The MoneyClaim to be adjourned generally with liberty to restore,  Upon restoration of the MoneyClaim following return or loss of the vehicle. the Claimant will ensure the pre action protocol for debt claims is followed. 3.    Pursuant to s 90 (1)  of the Consumer Credit Act 1974. An order that the Claimant and/or its agents may enter any premises in which the vehicle is situated in order to recover the vehicle should it not be returned by the Defendant 4.    further or alternatively damages 5.    costs Statement of truth The Claimant believes that the facts stated in these Particulars of Claim are true. The Claimant understands that the proceedings for contempt of court may be brought against anyone who makes or causes to be made a false statement in the document for verified by statement of truth without an honest belief in its truth. I am duly Authorised by the Claimant to sign these Particulars of Claim signed Dated 17th of April 2024  What is the total value of the claim? 7502   Have you received prior notice of a claim being issued pursuant to paragraph 3 of the PAPDC (Pre Action Protocol) ? No   Never heard of this   Have you changed your address since the time at which the debt referred to in the claim was allegedly incurred? No   Did you inform the claimant of your change of address? n/a Is the claim for - a Bank Account (Overdraft) or credit card or loan or catalogue or mobile phone account? No   When did you enter into the original agreement before or after April 2007 ? After  Do you recall how you entered into the agreement...On line /In branch/By post ? In a garage  Is the debt showing on your credit reference files (Experian/Equifax /Etc...) ? Yes  Has the claim been issued by the original creditor or was the account assigned and it is the Debt purchaser who has issued the claim. Original Were you aware the account had been assigned – did you receive a Notice of Assignment? n/a   Did you receive a Default Notice from the original creditor? They said sent but nor received   Have you been receiving statutory notices headed “Notice of Sums in Arrears”  or " Notice of Arrears "– at least once a year ? None seen   Why did you cease payments? Still Paying,   What was the date of your last payment? Yesterday  31st May 2024   Was there a dispute with the original creditor that remains unresolved? No   Did you communicate any financial problems to the original creditor and make any attempt to enter into a debt management plan? Yes on 12 Feb 2024   What you need to do now.   Can't scan, will do via another means as you cant have jpg  
    • Now that is an interesting article which adds afew perspective that I hadn't thought significant - but on reflection of the perspectives offered ... Now Starmer is no Blair, however 'blairite he may be perceived, but the Tories aren't tories and aren't even remotely liberal   The fast 'unannounced and unexpected election call from sunack may well be explained by the opinion linked that he hoped reform would be unprepared and effectively call a chunk of Farages largely empty bluster - making him look even more of a prat, leave scope for attacks on shabby reform candidates and mimimise core vote losses to reform - while throwing the 'middle ground' (relative) tories TO THE DOGS - and with the added bonus of likely pacifying his missu' desire to jogg off to sunny cal tout suite somewhat   thumb in the air - I expect about 140ish tory seats, but can hope for under a hundred Reform - got to admit the outside possibility of 1, maybe 2 seats with about 8% of the vote - but unlikely. I think projections of over 10% of the vote for reform is nudged and paid for speculation - but possible with the expected massive drives from Russian, Chinese and far right social media bot and troll prods targeting the gullible.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

help with cabot, b/card and cca


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5901 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 68
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Hiya all. I need help.

 

Today recieved this letter from cabot financial.

 

Thank you for your letter which was recieved on 31/7/07

 

I regret that you have felt cause to complain to cabot financial and apologise for any incovenience that you may have suffered in relation to this matter. I am dissapointed that cabot has not been able to satisfy your concerns on previous occasions.

 

I understand you have requested further information relating to the above account.

 

The cabot financial group purchawd your account from b/card, the original lender, on or about 10 sept 2004. The cabot financial group, the asignee of your account , is entitled to collect the outstanding balance on your account and also to enforce the orignal terms of the credit agreement. Although cabot does not have an obligation under section 77 and/or 78 of the consumer credit act 1974 to supply this information, cabot will at all times assist customers in order to provide info. Cabot does rely on the original lender to provide info in order to assist with your enquires.

 

You have stated in your letter that we have failed to supply the documents you rquested. Howeve, cabot has previously sent you a copy of the credit agreement on 16/7/07. Neverthless please find enclosed a further copy of the credit agreement, which you signed and agreed with the oprignal lender. Please note that on the agreement your signature is supported by the statement, this is a credit agreement regulated by the consumer credit act 1974. Sign only if you want to be legally bound by its terms.

 

Furthermore please be advies that although the orignal copy may not be available b/card has supplied cabot with a copy of the orignal which you signed and satisfies all requirements of both b/card and cabot. Under section 78 of the consumer credit act 1974 it stes the creditor shall give the debtor a copy of the executed afreement (if any) and stresss the word if any. Cabot has been provided with a copy fo the agreemtn from b/card and therefore this satisfies all obligations of both parties. I can confirm the current outstanding balance is £ and i would respetfully recomment you contact our collections dept to discuss the available options in order to settle the above account

 

They have one again sent me a copy of the application form. In big bold letters at the tom is states application. Aboe where i have signed it there is a big block that has been blacked out. It has no terms and conditions. Not limits or interest rates and id say over half the application form you cant actually read anyway because its such a bad copy.

 

I dont really know what to do now.

 

Any help appreciated

 

 

karen

Link to post
Share on other sites

That sounds almost word-for-word the same as the letter they sent me (details here).

 

I've asked them to clarify whether they are relying on this document to prove that a debt exists. I've also raised complaints with the OFT and the FOS about their behaviour.

 

Does your application form look anything like the one I posted? I'm treating mine as unenforcable, and inviting Cabot to test this in Court if they're so confident that it's a valid agreement.

  • Barclays: WON!!! It took four months but was totally worth it!
  • Cabot: I'm still waiting for an enforcable agreement, more than a year after requesting it. Go on, Uncle Ken, take me to court if you dare. You know you want to!
  • Elephant.co.uk: VICTORY - they admitted there was no debt!
  • Ashbourne Management (gym membership): Finally got my default removed and out-of-court settlement; I'm not finished with them yet!

<--- If I've been helpful please remember the scales ;)

Link to post
Share on other sites

hiya thanks for the reply. Yes it does look very similiar although i do a very large section blacked out. I can see you have a part blanked out to.

 

So what would you suggest i do next?

 

Do i have to reply to cabot and if so any idea what to say.

 

thanks

 

karen

Link to post
Share on other sites

I would just write back and tell them that, as they have not supplied any other documentation in support of their claim that there is a debt, you regret that you are again unable to acknowledge that any debt is due to Cabot Financial (UK) Limited. Therefore you have no intention of complying with their request that you contact their collections department as you will not be paying them anything until such time as they are able to show that any alleged debt is enforcable.

 

Tell them that you do not believe that there is any prospect of them producing any valid documentation to support their claim, and that you will not be contacting them again if they feel unable to respond in a satisfactory manner to your complaint. Tell them that unless there is a successful outcome to this matter, (in that you wish them to write to tell you that they are ceasing all attempts to collect on the debt and will be destroying your data, and removing any adverse data from the CRA's) you can see no alternative but to refer the matter to the Financial Ombudsman Service, as well as the Information Commissioner's Office for an apparent breach of the Data Protection Act 1998. And to the Office of Fair Trading for their continued attempts to collect on an unenforcable debt. Tell them that you reserve the right to take court action as a last resort.

Link to post
Share on other sites

IS MY AGREEMENT ENFORCEABLE( Via section 127(3) CCA1974)

PRESCRIBED TERMS FOR THE PURPOSES OF SECTIONS 61(1)(0) AND 127(3) OF THE

CONSUMER CREDIT ACT 1974 Taken from sced.6(1983/1553) regulations

(If you just want to find out, skip the bits in between the stars it’s just some extra information)

 

**What do we mean by unenforceable?

In the Consumer Credit Act section 127 there is a provision for making an agreement unenforceable if it does not contain certain pieces of information.

Subsections 1,2,3,4 state which pieces of information these are, and everything mentioned there must be included within the body of the agreement, if one is missing the agreement is unenforceable.

 

How does unenforceable differ from enforceable with a court order only?

When an agreement is unenforceable it means that the court or the judge cannot make a ruling on it. The court cannot make it enforceable.

When an agreement is enforceable only by ruling of the court it means that the agreement can be stopped by the debtor but the court has the power to re-instate it and allow the credit to continue to enforce.**

 

The Prescribed Terms are these

 

A Amount of credit

A term stating the amount of credit

 

B Repayments

A term stating how the debtor is to discharge his obligations under the agreement to make the repayments, which may be expressed by reference to a combination of any of the following-

(a) Number of repayments;

(b) Amount of repayments;

© Frequency and timing of repayments;

(d) Dates of repayments;

(e) The manner in which any of the above may be determined; or in any other way, and any power of the creditor to vary what is payable.

 

C Rate of interest

A term stating the rate of interest to be applied to the credit issued under the agreement

D Credit limit

This may be a term or the manner in which it will be determined or that there is no credit limit.

--------------------------

 

Which of these applies to you depends on the type of agreement you have?

 

For a Running Account (credit card) agreement

 

BC and D Apply

 

For a Restricted Use Debtor Creditor Supplier

  • Where the dealer is the supplier and the creditor is the one providing the finance.
  • The money can only be used for the purpose it is given.
  • There is no interest on the purchase (the cash price is the same as the total price)
  • And there is no advance payment

A is applicable

 

For a fixed Sum Credit Agreement

A conventional credit agreement with none of the above restrictions

 

A and B apply

 

For a Hire Agreement

 

B is Applicable

 

This paper only covers section 127(3) of the Act agreements can also be unenforceable by contravention of sections 1 and4 this will be the subject of the next paper.

Please note that these Prescribed terms where not changed in any way by the 2004/1482 Ammendments although the form in which they appear on the agreement was. Subsection127(3) was repealed on the 6th of April 2007 so that unenforceability due to 127(3) will only apply to agreemens executed before that date.

user_online.gifreputation.gif vbrep_register("1005260") report.gif

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

A late addendum to this thread.

 

I was never quite sure what the term "if any" actually meant (copies of agreements). So I contacted the man who actually wrote the Consumer Credit Act 1974 and asked if he could explain what "if any" meant.

 

He said that that some of the terms of the "executed agreement" (defintion at the end of the Act) may not be in writing. They may be verbal (or implied?) terms. So there can't be written copy of a verbal agreement.

 

Upshot of that is that if you're dealing with a Bank/Credit Card Issuer/loan company then you can delete "if any" when reading ss77 etc as there won't be anything agreed verbally with that type of company as far as an executed agreement is concerned.

  • Haha 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Hiya just to update ive had nothing more from cabot. Im getting slightly worried though. I dont think its in there nature just to leave alone for any amount of time so i am expecting some nasty letter.

 

will let you know when it arrives

 

karen

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well I haven't heard from Cabot since April. So you never know.

HAVE YOU BEEN TREATED UNFAIRLY BY CREDITORS OR DCA's?

 

BEWARE OF CLAIMS MANAGEMENT COMPANIES OFFERING TO WRITE OFF YOUR DEBTS.

 

 

Please note opinions given by rory32 are offered informally as a lay-person in good faith based on personal experience. For legal advice, you must always consult a registered and insured lawyer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Got a long wait for the 7 years statute barred thingy.

That'll be the 6 years statute barred thingy Karen ;)

HAVE YOU BEEN TREATED UNFAIRLY BY CREDITORS OR DCA's?

 

BEWARE OF CLAIMS MANAGEMENT COMPANIES OFFERING TO WRITE OFF YOUR DEBTS.

 

 

Please note opinions given by rory32 are offered informally as a lay-person in good faith based on personal experience. For legal advice, you must always consult a registered and insured lawyer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I received a very similar letter from Cabot today!

 

They really are in cloud cockoo land......they now say that section 127(3) has been repealed, and not to rely upon this. Correct me if I'm wrong, does this not apply to agreements taken out since 6th April this year? They seem to think it applies to all agreements, irrespective of the age!

 

Comments please!

L/Woods B/Card/Cabot - Unenforceable CCA, SD Issued *WON+COSTS*

Capital One/Cabot - No CCA account irrecoverable.

Citi/DLC Hillesden - No CCA account irrecoverable

MBNA/Aegis - Unenforceable CCA

B/Card/HFO - Unenforceable CCA

Fashion World - No CCA account irrecoverable

TRUECALL IS A GODSEND!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

If they are putting this down in writing, they are seriously making a mistake. Just because it is missing from the CCA 2006, doesn't mean it doesn't apply to agreements regulated by the CCA 1974, which DOES include it.

 

So being kind to them, they are talking pish. Again.

Link to post
Share on other sites

They seem to think it applies to all agreements, irrespective of the age!

 

It's more likely that they would like you to think that and hope that you are not sufficiently informed. It would be nice to see this in writing if poss.

HAVE YOU BEEN TREATED UNFAIRLY BY CREDITORS OR DCA's?

 

BEWARE OF CLAIMS MANAGEMENT COMPANIES OFFERING TO WRITE OFF YOUR DEBTS.

 

 

Please note opinions given by rory32 are offered informally as a lay-person in good faith based on personal experience. For legal advice, you must always consult a registered and insured lawyer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

My scanner has decided to play up this morning, so have typed up the letter for you to have a look at:

 

 

Dear Windywoo,

 

Our response to you complaint.

 

I refer to your letter, which was received on the 5th December 2007.

 

Cabot has previously clarified the points raised in this letter and we believe your arguements are unfounded. However, please find below our further response to the points raised.

 

You have stated in your letter that Cabot has failed to provide you with a copy of the credit agreement. I would advise that Cabot has previously supplied you with a copy of the credit agreement, which you agreed and consented to with Barclaycard Littlewoods, which is sufficient. Furthermore, in consideration of your acceptance of the agreement, you received the availabilty of credit from BL by the way of a credit card, which you have utilised as clearly indicated by the account statements, which was also enclosed in previous correspondence. Notwithstanding, we

note your comments in relation to the legibilty and the prescribed terms.

 

With regards to your referral to section 127(3) of the Consumer Credit Act. I must respectfully advise you that this subsection of the Act has been repealed and therefore you cannot rely on this. Futhermore you have not suffered any prejudice, the agreement will be enforceable as you have used the funds available to you and failed to repy them as evidenced by the statements we have enclosed again.

In light of the above it is evident that the debt exists and that you are required to settle the outstanding balance with Cabot. Therfore I urge you to contact our collections department on blah blah within the next 7 days to arrange repayment on this account. Failure to do so will result in your account being escalated through our collections procedures.

 

I note that you consider taking further aciotn. Please be advised, that Cabot has at all times acted appropriately and in accordance will all laws, regulations, codes of practice and guidance applicable to this industry and any legal proceedings initiated against the CFG shall be vigorously defended and counterclaim shall be entered for the full oustanding balance.

 

I trust I have set out our position clearly.

 

Phew!

I will try and scan the original copy to my own thread later on!

L/Woods B/Card/Cabot - Unenforceable CCA, SD Issued *WON+COSTS*

Capital One/Cabot - No CCA account irrecoverable.

Citi/DLC Hillesden - No CCA account irrecoverable

MBNA/Aegis - Unenforceable CCA

B/Card/HFO - Unenforceable CCA

Fashion World - No CCA account irrecoverable

TRUECALL IS A GODSEND!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

As an aside, I see that Cabot now consider the Cabot Financial GROUP to be the owner of purchased debt. Quite how that happens is beyod my comprehension. Only one company buys debts, and as far as I'm concerned, that is Cabot Financial (UK) Limited, until I have evidence of assignment. How can a GROUP of companies buy debts? Hmm.

 

Anyway, I digress. Cabot are now breaking OFT rules yet again, by attempting to mislead on a point of law. Yes, the CCA 1974 has been supeceded but the CCA 2006. However, THAT act does not apply to agreements regulated by the CCA 1974.

 

Of course, if that is your honest interpretation Cabot, then you will obviously have no hesitation whatsoever in taking ME to court to try to enforce MY alleged debt.

 

Go on. Make my day. Put your money where your mouth is, and we'll see who's right.

 

I think this need a mention in my blog. Is that OK with you, WindyWoo?

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have seen Seahorse that Cabot Financial Group Limited have been buying debt. Their accounts show some interesting figures..and Directors! from Opera to Ventilation systems.. in other words hot air to sending us on a song and dance :D

Link to post
Share on other sites

As an aside, I see that Cabot now consider the Cabot Financial GROUP to be the owner of purchased debt. Quite how that happens is beyod my comprehension. Only one company buys debts, and as far as I'm concerned, that is Cabot Financial (UK) Limited, until I have evidence of assignment. How can a GROUP of companies buy debts? Hmm.

 

Anyway, I digress. Cabot are now breaking OFT rules yet again, by attempting to mislead on a point of law. Yes, the CCA 1974 has been supeceded but the CCA 2006. However, THAT act does not apply to agreements regulated by the CCA 1974.

 

Of course, if that is your honest interpretation Cabot, then you will obviously have no hesitation whatsoever in taking ME to court to try to enforce MY alleged debt.

 

Go on. Make my day. Put your money where your mouth is, and we'll see who's right.

 

I think this need a mention in my blog. Is that OK with you, WindyWoo?

 

 

Go for it Seahorse!!!:D

L/Woods B/Card/Cabot - Unenforceable CCA, SD Issued *WON+COSTS*

Capital One/Cabot - No CCA account irrecoverable.

Citi/DLC Hillesden - No CCA account irrecoverable

MBNA/Aegis - Unenforceable CCA

B/Card/HFO - Unenforceable CCA

Fashion World - No CCA account irrecoverable

TRUECALL IS A GODSEND!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

:lol: Very witty as always Sarah.

 

Seriously though, the letter that Cabot sent to the CSA in response to my complaint indicated that the GROUP were owners of my account.

 

Now correct me if I'm wrong, but if Cabot Financial (UK) Limited are NOT the owners of my alleged debt, and the Cabot Financial Group IS, how has that happened? Have they transferred it by assignment? And if so why have I not received a Notice of Assignment?

 

However, they are describing themselves in writing as the Cabot Financial Group, which appears to me to differ considerably from Cabot Financial Group LIMITED. Or am I simple being too pedantic?

 

It all sounds like they are trying a new dodge to confuse any potential court action.

Link to post
Share on other sites

No, no Seahorse, you know better than that of Cabot. We know the way they sell the name of Cabot. either, they refer to it in their letters as 'Cabot Financial' or occasionally 'Cabot Financial Group' or just plain 'Cabot'. Now you know better than most 'Cabot ' have about 16 odd companies they intermingle with so as to throw everyone off course. Easy to use the words 'Cabot Financial Group' when trying to infer you are dealing with a conglomerate and the transactions, somewhere down the line were carried out by one of those companies within. But the devil being in the detail with this bunch of *****sters is where and by whom the transactions were undertaken. In your case, they sound as though they are banding the ' whole group' as a generalism, but the purchase as you say undertaken in earlier days by either Kingshill No1 Ltd as it was known in darker days or Cabot Financial (UK)Ltd which it is called now.

 

I found out that one of their 16 companies is called Cabot Financial Group Limited and they have been purchasing debt rather than (UK)Ltd. Perhaps our Ken when he's watching might confirm that for us. :D

 

 

Sarah - You can't mess with the Cabot Fan Club

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...