Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • It's better to keep advice on the open forum for everyone's benefit. Maybe you could post up the correspondence in a single pdf document and cover up your personal details, reference numbers and so on? HB
    • Hi on the notice of disqualification it lists the 2 speed offences and marks offence withdrawn? This is for both offences and then the other 2 is the MS90s which I’m fined for and the additional costs. R
    • Hi,    It has taken a while, but I have received an email from Auxillis -  hello, we are not dealing with this claim all we do is log accident for you isnurance - the claim has been passed to your underwriter markerstudy 0344 873 8183 as they are deal with fault cliams ion behalf of adrian flux. thankyou auxillis   I have made repeated attempts to phone Markerstudy in between working from home, struggling for energy and trying to find a cheap car so that I can keep my job (community support worker). Thankfully I have a supportive team and I am being given phone calls to make but it cant last too long. I had a severe migraine over the weekend and also have quite bad whiplash in my neck and back.    I found this in my insurance policy booklet -    Protection and Recovery If the insured vehicle cannot be driven following an incident leading to a valid claim under this section, we will pay: • the cost of its protection and removal to the nearest approved repairer, competent repairer or nearest place of safety; and • the cost of re-delivery after repairs to your home address; and • the cost of storage of the insured vehicle incurred with our written consent. If the insured vehicle is damaged beyond economical repair we will arrange for it to be stored safely at premises of our choosing. You should remove your personal belongings from the insured vehicle before it is collected from you. In the event of a claim being made under the policy we have the right to remove the insured vehicle to an alternative repairer, place of safety or make our own arrangments for re-delivery at any time in order to keep the cost of the claim to a minimum     I do about 20-25000 miles a year with the work I do, I have been getting quotes and putting that I have now have one accident and no no claims bonus and the cheap quotes from similar companies to markerstudy are more than double what i paid last year at 8-900 and aviva is offering 2600 which is simply out of my price range and more than the car i am looking at.  I am starting to wonder if it is even worth going ahead with the claim as i have no one to claim from. I have had no information from any of the enquiries I have made.  I have a full tank of vpower diesel in the car in the impound, i can strip it for parts and probably make what I will be offered by the insurance payout and get the money quicker.  As I have made contact and started the process can I back out, still keep my NCB and a claim free history? Also what happens with my injuries? I don't think there is any permanent damage but my dr refused to see me and just gave me a boat load of naproxen and codeine. What happens in the future if things don't get better and I cancelled this claim? Can you claim injuries off your own insurance because the other guy ran and you cant find him? I have tried to ask these questions off markerstudy but they keep me waiting for nearly an hour then end the call.    Thank you for your time and help.  It is really appreciated.  I am quite honestly on the floor, I have been really ill, in hospital, had nearly 6 months off work and only been back full time a few weeks and now this.  The fact the company you pay large sums of money to look after you in a time of need is also behaving criminally just makes you want to give up.    
    • Thanks for the response. Am I able to send you the documents I’ve received or can you message via instant message and I’ll send these? Reece
    • Regretfully it does. Have you actually seen any papers which show what you were charged with (rather than what you were convicted of)? It is unusual not to be “dual charged” but if you were not charged with both, you are where you are. If you had been charged with both offences and providing you were the driver at the time, you could, after performing your SD, have asked the prosecutor to drop the “Fail to Provide” (FtP) charges in exchange for a guilty plea to the speeding charges (you cannot be convicted of speeding unless you plead guilty as they have no evidence you were driving). You will have difficulty defending the FtP charges. In fact, it’s worse than that – you have no chance of successfully defending them at all because the reason you did not respond to the requests is because you did not receive them and that’s entirely your fault. No it’s not correct. Six months from 18/11/23 was 18/5/24 so, unless they were originally charged, the speeding offences are now “timed out.” There is one avenue left open to you. If you perform your SD you must serve it on the court which convicted you. You will then receive a date for a hearing to have the matters heard again. Your only chance of having the matters revert to speeding (and this is only providing you were the driver at the time of those offences) is to plead Not Guilty, attend court. When you get there you can ask the prosecutor (very nicely, explaining what a pillock you know you were for failing to update your  V5C) if (s)he is prepared to raise “out of time” speeding charges, to which you will offer to plead guilty if the FtP charges are dropped.   This is strictly speaking not lawful. Charges have to be raised within six months. Some prosecutors are willing to do it, others are not. But frankly it’s the only avenue open to you. There is a risk with this. I imagine you have been fined £660 (plus surcharge and costs) for each offence. The offence attracts a fine of 1.5 week’s net income and where the court has no information about the defendant’s means a default figure of £440pw is used.  If the prosecutor is not prepared to play ball you can revise your pleas to guilty. A sympathetic court should give you the full discount (one third) for your guilty pleas in these circumstances but they may reduce the discount somewhat. The prosecution may also ask for increased costs (£90 or thereabouts is the figure for a guilty plea). So it may cost you more if you have a decent income (I’ll let you do the sums). But MS90 is an endorsement code which gives insurers a fit of the vapours. One such endorsement will see your premiums double. Two of them will see many insurers refuse to quote you at all meaning you will have to approach "specialist" (aka extortionate) brokers. So you really want to exhaust every possibility of avoiding MS90s if you can. One warning: do not pay solicitors silly money to defend you. Making an SD before a solicitor should attract just a nominal sum (perhaps a tenner). That’s all you should pay for. You have no viable defence against the FtP charges and any solicitor suggesting you have is telling you porkies. The offer to do the deal is easily done by yourself and you can save the solicitor’s fees to put towards a few taxis and increased insurance premiums if you are unsuccessful. In the happy event you find out you were "dual charged", let me know and I'll tell you how to proceed. (Seems a bit odd hoping you were charged with four driving offences rather than two, but it's a funny old world!).    
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Parking Tickets


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6326 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi Bartonski,

 

Look back in this thread to posts 6 to 21, you should find the allowable sizes for yellow lines together with tolerances & references for the info given.

 

& dont forget the t bars at each end .....the line/s between the t bars must be unbroken, to the permitted size (with permitted variation/tolerance) and have the correct size t bar at each end.....most of the time it is just the t bars which do not extend far enough towards the pavement at least here on Anglesey.

 

hope it helps you,

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/parking-traffic-wardens/23765-no-t-bar-end.html#post188533

PUTTING IT IN WRITING & KEEPING COPIES IS A MUST FOR SUCCESS

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 216
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Greetings,

I recieved a ticket in March of this year, I refused to pay it ,

Because the charge notice is invalid, as it does not bear, a notice date, as required by law,

Therefore, According to the independent adjudicator this does not conform to the requirements of the Road Traffic Act 1991 66(3)©

 

Recently I have recieved a demand for £150.00, because I did not respond to 1 of 3 notices,

a notice to owner: a notice of rejection: or an adjudicators decision.

non of these have I ever seen or recieved, am I right in assuming that this is a new ploy to catch people off guard.

I spoke to someone at TfL when I recieved this demand, I told them I had never recieved any of these notices, they told me to wait for the next letter which should arrive in 14 days to appeal against this penalty charge, Is this correct? or am I being reeled in like a fish on a line.

 

I would like to know if anyone else has suffered this tactic?.

Link to post
Share on other sites

JonCris,

I spotted the information on the bottom of your post. I thought that you may have a thread going for your dealings with Abbey but i couldn't find it, I will look again at the Abbey section for your original thread. Thanks,

Link to post
Share on other sites

Read this and laughed - Im going through the EXACT same thing. Ticket received in March (Westminster) - whilst parked on private ground. Never received my letter where I can appeal against it. I've emailed them a few times, and got either no reply, or a standard letter, which does not address my letter at all. Had a letter from debt recovery people - ticket now up to £150 - I called them, and they said I had to get in touch with Westminster. Spoke to them today, they noted that I never received my letter, and I now have to wait for the next letter.

 

If I have to go to Court, I will, and I'll do them for a days wages too....bar stewards. Hopefully it wont get that far - I'll reply to the next letter, telling them that the ticket is invalid anyway....I'll take great pleasure in doing that :D

 

My God I love this forum!

 

 

Greetings,

I recieved a ticket in March of this year, I refused to pay it ,

Because the charge notice is invalid, as it does not bear, a notice date, as required by law,

Therefore, According to the independent adjudicator this does not conform to the requirements of the Road Traffic Act 1991 66(3)©

 

Recently I have recieved a demand for £150.00, because I did not respond to 1 of 3 notices,

a notice to owner: a notice of rejection: or an adjudicators decision.

non of these have I ever seen or recieved, am I right in assuming that this is a new ploy to catch people off guard.

I spoke to someone at TfL when I recieved this demand, I told them I had never recieved any of these notices, they told me to wait for the next letter which should arrive in 14 days to appeal against this penalty charge, Is this correct? or am I being reeled in like a fish on a line.

 

I would like to know if anyone else has suffered this tactic?.

Lets get started!

 

Halifax Current acount

 

23/08/2006 - Data Protection Act Request letter sent

15/09/2006 - Prelim letter sent - Claiming £843

28/09/2006 - Telephone offer of £500 :rolleyes: - declined

29/09/2006 - LBA sent

08/11/2006 - Courtclaim filed

 

 

Halifax VISA account

 

23/08/2006 - Data Protection Act Request letter sent

29/09/2006 - Prelim letter sent - Claiming £99

08/11/2006 - LBA sent

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have an interesting dilemma

 

I paid to park in a City Council Car Park where each hour parking costs £1.30

 

The machine that issues you with a parking ticket does not give change.

 

I only had 2 £1 coins on me... and used these.

 

Expecting to be back within or on the hour, I was annoyed that my exit after business in the Council Building was delayed due to an official council "do".

 

As I approached my car I noticed a warden finishing writing the ticket and affixing it to my car. I asked him if he could be lenient since I had paid £2 for 1hr and 15 mins stay. If you equate the "extra" I had paid it would that I had paid for an extra half hour of parking.

 

Paid £30 fine after appealing to common sense but was rejected.

 

Query is: Are they entitled to the extra money legally ie: Are they legally entitled to the 70p extra I paid?

srfrench :eek:

 

Fight incompetance, stupidity, greed and unfairness......There's no excuse and no place for it in society, unless they really are! :wink:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi there

 

has anyone considered getting this book:

"UK Driving Secrets Guide 2006" ?? {link removed 26/8 on advice of site helper :) apparently it IS sh#te! ;)}

not plugging it at all ...but wasnt 100% convinced. I guess it would spell out what it would otherwise take a few mins/hours trawling through various websites/forums...but for £28.

 

cheers

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi there

 

has anyone considered getting this book:

"UK Driving Secrets Guide 2006" ?? (Fight Speeding Ticket, Beat Driving Ticket, Cancel Parking ticket and fight traffic tickets UK driving secrets blue badge)

not plugging it at all ...but wasnt 100% convinced. I guess it would spell out what it would otherwise take a few mins/hours trawling through various websites/forums...but for £28.

 

cheers

 

You will get better advice from this forum and from PePiPoo: Helping the motorist to get justice who give it for free.

PUTTING IT IN WRITING & KEEPING COPIES IS A MUST FOR SUCCESS

Link to post
Share on other sites

Anyone heard of UK parking control LTD?

just got a fine through the post after parking in their car park (recently acquired i might add) in Upper Norwood, London - they said "..when you enter this private car park for any reason... you agreee to pay the sum of £95 (£75 if paid within 14 days)"

 

Left me FUMING!! :mad::mad::mad:

 

can they do this -are there different regulations for private firms? (who are obviously cowboys).

 

I mean the signs didnt exactly say sign on the dotted line for a cheque please!!! (and they werent as clear as they are making out).

anyway be interestd to hear from anyone who has had any similar dealings and what ur experience/advise was.

cheers

Link to post
Share on other sites

This firm is well known & are a bunch of bandits

 

The private firms are a law unto themselves & to the everlasting shame of the English courts (in Scotland they are banned) they very often are allowed to operate with impunity.

 

You MUST get some photos of their signs & their location (freehand draw a small map) & if they are not clearly sited as they claim then they their charges/conditions could be unenforcable

 

As has already been suggested go to this site they are great being devoted to helping the motorist http://www.pepipoo.com/ & are like this one free

Link to post
Share on other sites

probably but if they have issued on private property it adds gris to the mill

 

sorry for the delay in replying - been in Amsterdam, things are still a little hazy ;)

 

 

Its kind of dodgy, they say that although it is private grounds, it is next to the pavement, and so it must be railing-ed(is that a word?) off from the pavement, or it is still considered pavement......though the restaurant 2 doors down has tables outside, and no railings.....but I was overjoyed to see that my ticket hasnt got 'date of issue' on it, gives me a cast iron case now :D

Lets get started!

 

Halifax Current acount

 

23/08/2006 - Data Protection Act Request letter sent

15/09/2006 - Prelim letter sent - Claiming £843

28/09/2006 - Telephone offer of £500 :rolleyes: - declined

29/09/2006 - LBA sent

08/11/2006 - Courtclaim filed

 

 

Halifax VISA account

 

23/08/2006 - Data Protection Act Request letter sent

29/09/2006 - Prelim letter sent - Claiming £99

08/11/2006 - LBA sent

Link to post
Share on other sites

They are talking rubbish Private property is private property period. As usual they are trying to make it up as they go along.

 

I have a front garden without a fence but it's still my private front garden & property. If anyone goes on it they are guilty of tresspass

 

Even the adjudicator is going to laugh that one out of his appeal hearing. Just make sure you have photo's

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thats what I was thinking....Im just letting them keep upping the fine, ignoring my letters etc.

 

Photos? Yeah, got that well and truly covered. As luck would have it, Im a photographer, and this ticket was issued right outside the studio :D :D :D

Lets get started!

 

Halifax Current acount

 

23/08/2006 - Data Protection Act Request letter sent

15/09/2006 - Prelim letter sent - Claiming £843

28/09/2006 - Telephone offer of £500 :rolleyes: - declined

29/09/2006 - LBA sent

08/11/2006 - Courtclaim filed

 

 

Halifax VISA account

 

23/08/2006 - Data Protection Act Request letter sent

29/09/2006 - Prelim letter sent - Claiming £99

08/11/2006 - LBA sent

Link to post
Share on other sites

HELP

 

I parked my car in a layby in London N7 on Wednesday to go to a football match, there was no signs as far as I could see to say I couldn't park there (thats beside the point) when I came out I had a ticket but on looking closer the registration had been written wrong, I don't know if a camera was also used, should I pay or hang on and hope for the best. If I wait then I will have to pay the full £100 but if I pay before the 14 days is up it is only £50.

 

Thanks for any help anyone can give

 

Bruce

Link to post
Share on other sites

Bruce,

 

If they have written an incorrect registration number on the ticket then it is invalid and they will have no choice but to cancel it. Just in case Islington Council get funny about it, I would go back to where you parked it and see what signage is there and take photos, just as a back up plan.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Anyone heard of UK parking control LTD?

just got a fine through the post after parking in their car park (recently acquired i might add) in Upper Norwood, London - they said "..when you enter this private car park for any reason... you agreee to pay the sum of £95 (£75 if paid within 14 days)"

 

Left me FUMING!! :mad::mad::mad:

 

can they do this -are there different regulations for private firms? (who are obviously cowboys).

 

I mean the signs didnt exactly say sign on the dotted line for a cheque please!!! (and they werent as clear as they are making out).

anyway be interestd to hear from anyone who has had any similar dealings and what ur experience/advise was.

cheers

 

I overstayed in a Morrison's car park in Peckhan S London and received a fine of £40 if I paid within 14 days. I waited until I received a reminder then I wrote to the parking enforcement company (called parking eye). Stating that under constitutional law they are breaking the law by demanding money from me before any court conviction (bill of rights 1689) and any claim they had would be null and void as they had demanded monies from me.

 

As they had written to me twice I had to advise them of the terms and conditions of writing to me, which are thus:

 

I will accept two free letters but any third letter received; would trigger the acceptance of the fact that they would have to pay me an admin fee of £50 per letter, but the third letter would also be a free letter unless I received a fourth letter related to this matter. In which case I would have to charge for ALL four letters. I would invoice them and request payment within 7 days otherwise court action would follow on the 8th day. The terms are fair under the Unfair terms Act 1999 as this is for my time and expenses. Any fifth letter would trigger a harassment action under the 1997 Protection from Harassment Act, which I would be entitled to claim £5,000 in damages for mental anguish.

 

Funnily enough every time I get a ticket and a reminder, I NEVER receive a third letter, as they (parking agents/councils) are really concerned that I would go for it.:grin:

Link to post
Share on other sites

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6326 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...