Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hi, I have the Sims 4 on Macbook. Over the last year I have paid for multiple add on packs spending a lot of money on them. I bought them all in good faith as my Mac met all the minimum requirements to play them. I have been playing happily for about a year and bought my latest pack just over a week ago. The games were all working fine yesterday. Then suddenly today EA released a new app to launch the games and this new app requires a MAC OS that my computer cannot use. Now suddenly none of my games are accessible and I am unable to play anything. They did not warn us about this change in requirements and if I had known they would be doing this I wouldn't have bought all these add ons as they are now all totally unusable. The games themselves have not changed, only their app to launch them and I can't afford to buy a brand new mac just to play. So my question is how can they change the minimum requirements after I have paid for a game? I agreed to pay for them based on the fact my mac met their requirements and was not informed when purchasing that this would be an issue in the future. I understand new games (like Sims 5 which is to be released next year) might not be compatible but this is a 10yr old game that they have suddenly made inaccessible due to their new launch app. Does anybody know if I can do anything or anyway to get a partial refund from them? Thanks   Here are their T&C... I can't find anything in there about them being able to do this so not sure what to do https://tos.ea.com/legalapp/WEBTERMS/US/en/PC/
    • OK. Thank you all for the input.  I'll ignore their letters of demand but NEVER ignore a letter of claim. I'm bracing myself for the stress as their demands £££ goes up and the case gets sent to debt collectors. 
    • OK.  It was worth a try. Their case is still pants and they have broken their own Code of Practice numerous times.
    • @BankFodder sorry for the delay and thank you for the lengthy reply. Yes, I agree. It's a small business and the guy is very very decent. I know someone else said my priority shouldn't be worrying whether he gets shafted but I'm not here to try and screw him over because I feel like if someone behaves decently and gets exploited, they might not behave so kindly in the future. I know DX mentioned he thinks I've caused the issue by leaving multiple instructions, but I have already explained why and both instructions were to leave it with a neighbour and there was nothing advising the driver to abandon the parcel on my doorstep. I don't think leaving it there could be considered a safe place.  I am still waiting on the retailer to respond. Ultimately, I wanted to know how he would proceed if DPD's response isn't favourable. I am certainly not looking to cause any problems. I just want my laptop. I will read the other posts for sure. I've been a bit preoccupied with family stuff. I have nothing in writing from DPD as I phoned them, but they did advise it should be the retailer that liaises with them. I tried contacting the driver straight after deliver via Whatsapp, as that's an option, but it said I couldn't send him a message and I have kept that log. We all know who took the parcel on our street, because that person has a history of parcel theft, but I don't have a doorbell camera or cctv. Police are refusing to intervene, despite the fact that I, along with several other people, spotted another's neighbour's parcel in said "suspect's" car and confronted her to get the parcel back. If the police had acted sooner, I might have had a better chance of getting the parcel back, but I suspect the laptop has long been sold on.  When the retailer responds, I will send him the link to this thread. Hopefully, he will benefit from the information on here as well.
    • @dx100uk none of the instructions advised them to leave the parcel on my door step and without such instructions., I'm struggling to see why they think it's ok to just dump it there.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Evo02 V Lloyds TSB


Evo02
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6151 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I have sent off the DPA letter along with the £10 fee.

 

I recieved a summarised version of statments today. Just listing all charges that have been imposed on the account.

 

They said they will provide me with a full set of statments if I want which will take up to 40days.

 

Is what they have provided good enough?

 

Also it says that I have recieved for example a Charge with description "Unpaid D/D" for £280.00DR. This was long ago so I can not remember it. Is this a £280 fee which I can claim back or is this the amount that bounced?

 

Regards Evo02

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well its says:

 

DATE ______TYPE __DESCRIPTION ______CR/DR___ SHEET NO.

01/11/2005 _CHG ___UNPAID D/D _______280.00DR ____55

01/11/2005 _FEE ___ACCOUNT CHARGE __10.00DR _____55

 

Surely they aint put a £280 bank charge on. Surely thats the amount the Direct Debit was and the bank charge is the £10. But then £10 does not seem like enough?

 

Regards Evo02

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Evo...

 

Are you sure it's a £280.00 charge for an unpaid d/d... or is this the unpaid d/d amount and the charge is followed later???

 

If it is... it's worth claiming for that by itself!!! :D

 

Also, try and push for the actual copy statements. If you read through this thread, it will enlighten you as to why!!!....

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/lloyds-bank/92638-mciavelli-lloyds-tsb.html

 

Best of luck. :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

 

I had the same thing; I am fairly certain this will be several DD's returned on the same day; the best way to find out is take a single returned DD to find out what they were charging at the time and then divide the £280

 

Best of luck

If you think this post has been of help, please click on my SCALES on the left - thanks :-) :-x

 

Peter Anderson

Me Vs Morgan Stanley - WON £490

Me V's LTSB - Private & Bus Acc - £18.8k (since Oct1997)

inc: S.69 Interest (and growing daily) -;)

Please remember to DONATE when you have WON

Link to post
Share on other sites

Oooo.... crossed threads!!

 

I think to clarify this Evo, you need to look at the whole list and see if there is a pattern... ie: charge/fee, charge/fee, etc.

 

I know that LTSB did charge a £10 penalty, as I had plenty myself!!! However, mine were dated 1999-2001. I had a good year in 2005 and avoided any penalties at all!!! :)

 

Also, as I already had all my statements, I didn't get a list of charges, so I can't refer back to them!!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

 

I had pages of charges sent to me instead of full statements, but they were fine. Anything that says CHG is definitely the charge for the missed direct debits, when they return more than one they tend to lump it together in the same month. It's funny as they say they don't charge more than £90 in a month I think? (correct me if I'm wrong guys). Just one of my charges was detailed at £370 in one month, about 10 returned direct debits (oops), but they only sent me one letter as well!

Fzrkitten

Link to post
Share on other sites

So are you saying that that the figures I have got for £280, £190, £90 and the rest are the lumped together bank charges?

 

But they have all got a fee below each of these charges around £10???????????????

Link to post
Share on other sites

any has anyone got a definative answer as to wheter I should ask for the full statements or are the list charges provided good enough?

 

They have taken my £10 so it will not cost me any more, but they have said it will take some time?

 

Cheers Evo

Link to post
Share on other sites

The account charge - have you got a platinum / select account something like that? That will be the monthly fee they charge you for having a specific account and is NOT claimable.

 

The charges, yes, are lumped together so the £280 will be for numerous failed DD's in that month.

Please note that I am not a legal expert and all advice given is without prejudice and is purely my opinion only.

 

** Nationwide - £1821.15-PAID IN FULL - Aug 06 **

** Halifax Mortgage -£390 - PAID IN FULL - Nov 06 **

Lloyds TSB - MCOL issued 09/03/07 - £2953 + costs - ON HOLD....

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Evo...

 

Did you read through the thread I linked to above??

 

This chap got his charges through as a list (like you) and only realised that he needs the original statements now. He has a court date and is panicking to get hold of copy statements before the hearing.

 

Also, they will have the definative answer to your "is it or is it not a charge" problem!!!! Two birds with one SAR!!!!!! :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...