Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • What do you guys think the chances are for her?   She followed the law, they didnt, then they engage in deception, would the judge take kindly to being lied to by these clowns? If we have a case then we should proceed and not allow these blatant dishonest cheaters to succeed 
    • I have looked at the car park and it is quite clearly marked that it is  pay to park  and advising that there are cameras installed so kind of difficult to dispute that. On the other hand it doesn't appear to state at the entrance what the charge is for breaching their rules. However they do have a load of writing in the two notices under the entrance sign which it would help if you could photograph legible copies of them. Also legible photos of the signs inside the car park as well as legible photos of the payment signs. I say legible because the wording of their signs is very important as to whether they have formed a contract with motorists. For example the entrance sign itself doe not offer a contract because it states the T&Cs are inside the car park. But the the two signs below may change that situation which is why we would like to see them. I have looked at their Notice to Keeper which is pretty close to what it should say apart from one item. Under the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 Schedule 4 Section 9 [2]a] the PCN should specify the period of parking. It doesn't. It does show the ANPR times but that includes driving from the entrance to the parking spot and then from the parking place to the exit. I know that this is a small car park but the Act is quite clear that the parking period must be specified. That failure means that the keeper is no longer responsible for the charge, only the driver is now liable to pay. Should this ever go to Court , Judges do not accept that the driver and the keeper are the same person so ECP will have their work cut out deciding who was driving. As long as they do not know, it will be difficult for them to win in Court which is one reason why we advise not to appeal since the appeal can lead to them finding out at times that the driver  and the keeper were the same person. You will get loads of threats from ECP and their sixth rate debt collectors and solicitors. They will also keep quoting ever higher amounts owed. Do not worry, the maximum. they can charge is the amount on the sign. Anything over that is unlawful. You can safely ignore the drivel from the Drips but come back to us should you receive a Letter of Claim. That will be the Snotty letter time.
    • please stop using @username - sends unnecessary alerts to people. everyone that's posted on your thread inc you gets an automatic email alert when someone else posts.  
    • he Fraser group own Robin park in Wigan. The CEO's email  is  [email protected]
    • Yes, it was, but in practice we've found time after time that judges will not rule against PPCs solely on the lack of PP.  They should - but they don't.  We include illegal signage in WSs, but more as a tactic to show the PPC up as spvis rather than in the hope that the judge will act on that one point alone. But sue them for what?  They haven't really done much apart from sending you stupid letters. Breach of GDPR?  It could be argued they knew you had Supremacy of Contact but it's a a long shot. Trespass to your vehicle?  I know someone on the Parking Prankster blog did that but it's one case out of thousands. Surely best to defy them and put the onus on them to sue you.  Make them carry the risk.  And if they finally do - smash them. If you want, I suppose you could have a laugh at the MA's expense.  Tell them about the criminality they have endorsed and give them 24 hours to have your tickets cancelled and have the signs removed - otherwise you will contact the council to start enforcement for breach of planning permission.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
        • Thanks
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Offering full and finals to creditors


tagal
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6145 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi, wonder anyone knowledgeable can offer some advise.

 

We have been in a DMP with Payplan for 6 months but having a bit of a rough time with creditors one is going for a C.O other is threatning. This has made me ill and I can't really cope this way.

 

So we have applied to remortage which is at the moment going through. We owe 71,000 and are able to borrow 50,000 and we will be paying the same out as we are paying now with old mortgage and payments to Payplan. So we wish to clear our debts and start again.

 

I understood that it would be possible to offer F&F to creditors which would be in our case 70%. Payplan seem to tell us that this won't be enough for F&F and they would need to offer whole amount. Or they could offer short settlement of 75-85%, but we only have 70%. I don't really understand this atall. I thought I had read that we could offer F&F for less than whole amount, and creditors may accept.

 

So should we go this alone and contact creditors and offer them all 70%, what if, say 5 out of the 10 accept. Do we pay them and then re-negoitiate with others. We need to clear the total debt. I understand you should do this through a third party and we hope that Payplan may be able to help us, if not we will have to do it ourselves I guess. But would appreciate some advise.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry, one more thing. A bank is one of our creditors whom we are paying a monthly amount through Payplan. I don't think we should offer to settle the debt yet as the account is in dispute and is being looked at by the Ombudsman to claim back charges which would completely clear debt. Payplan say we have to treat them the same as other creditors which I understand. But they owe me 10 times the amount I owe them, so seems unfair we have to offer to clear debt when a refund of charges would clear it. What do you think. Thanks X

Link to post
Share on other sites

We have been in a DMP with Payplan for 6 months but having a bit of a rough time with creditors one is going for a C.O other is threatning. This has made me ill and I can't really cope this way.

have you challenged the creditors and their agreements via sending them a CCA request, do this urgently. Has anyone obtained a CCJ against you yet?

So we have applied to remortage which is at the moment going through. We owe 71,000 and are able to borrow 50,000 and we will be paying the same out as we are paying now with old mortgage and payments to Payplan. So we wish to clear our debts and start again.

You're not starting again, you will be turning unsecured debt until secured debt, this means if you get into problems again you will be at risk of losing your property. Also you will be paying interest on the loan, how long is it over?

I understood that it would be possible to offer F&F to creditors which would be in our case 70%. Payplan seem to tell us that this won't be enough for F&F and they would need to offer whole amount. Or they could offer short settlement of 75-85%, but we only have 70%. I don't really understand this atall. I thought I had read that we could offer F&F for less than whole amount, and creditors may accept.

go in at a low amount, say 50% you can alway increase it, some may accept the lower amount, are the creditors the original lenders or have they been passed to debt collection agencies?

 

So should we go this alone and contact creditors and offer them all 70%, what if, say 5 out of the 10 accept. Do we pay them and then re-negoitiate with others. We need to clear the total debt. I understand you should do this through a third party and we hope that Payplan may be able to help us, if not we will have to do it ourselves I guess. But would appreciate some advise.

 

settling some of them would reduce your overall debt level. have a look at this fact-sheet for a bit more help

 

National Debtline England & Wales | Debt Advice | Factsheet 24 Full And Final Settlement Offers

Link to post
Share on other sites

We did exactly what you're thinking of doing a few years ago and got ourselves into a world of crap when the interest rates started going up and we ended up selling the house (at a small loss) and moving back into rented accomodation. What I recommend is that you start reading up and start sending out the CCA letters as well as SAR's to all of your (alleged) creditors - find out if any of the others owe you back illegal charges (mortgage companies, loan companies, credit card companies, etc) and then look to see if they actually hold valid Credit Agreements for the debt.

 

If you are not too far down the line already, I would very strongly advise against converting unsecured debt into secured debt! I know I speak from experience and if I'd known about the CAG when I did it I would be in a much better situation today as a result.

 

As for offering full and finals to the creditors - make sure they can PROVE that you owe the debt first!

Link to post
Share on other sites

I would advise that you go down the CCA route before making full and final settlements. How low were the payments you have been making over the last 6 months? Were you making reduced payments before the DMP?

 

I agree that you should make a low offer as full and final. However, if you have been on reduced payments for some time (and they are significantly reduced payments) I would suggest an initial offer of full and final of around 10% and let them work you up to between 20 & 30%. This way they feel they have got a better deal than they actually have.

 

Are the debts in joint names or in individual names?

HAVE YOU BEEN TREATED UNFAIRLY BY CREDITORS OR DCA's?

 

BEWARE OF CLAIMS MANAGEMENT COMPANIES OFFERING TO WRITE OFF YOUR DEBTS.

 

 

Please note opinions given by rory32 are offered informally as a lay-person in good faith based on personal experience. For legal advice, you must always consult a registered and insured lawyer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I just wish I'd taken it myself - only now starting to slowly dig myself out of a hole and sent of some SAR's and a claim for bank charges in the last few weeks. I will be blitzing my entire creditor estate (and believe me, there are a lot!) over the next few weeks/months :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

good luck

you have a talented team here helping you already.

 

i cannot concur more strongly with this point about changing unsecured loans in secured ones............DON'T DO IT!.

 

another point to bear-in-mind is that there is no such thing as a full & final settlement in uk credit law.

 

it still keeps the marker on your CRA there for 6yrs as it is typically tagged as 'settled' which in many eyes is as good as a default.

 

i would attach strict conditions to any F&F you make. i'e ALL ref to the debt be totally removed from CRA files & neither the original debtor nor any subsidury can ever claim the [still] outstanding balance.

 

there is somewhere on here [debt collectors forum?] a set of letter templates, in this are several pleading letters asking that the debt be written off. try that first.

 

any how

 

good luck

 

dx100uk

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I just wish I'd taken it myself - only now starting to slowly dig myself out of a hole and sent of some S.A.R - (Subject Access Request)'s and a claim for bank charges in the last few weeks. I will be blitzing my entire creditor estate (and believe me, there are a lot!) over the next few weeks/months :)

 

Good for you alexteh ;), i've a funny feeling that you'll be finding a lot of charges to claim back in the coming months and bringing that horrible big nasty figure down somewhat!

 

Now that you seem to have got to grips with the S.A.R - (Subject Access Request), here's the CCA request letter;

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/general-debt/20758-creditors-dcas-letter-templates.html#post162367

Amend to suit your personal and creditor details etc and send by first class signed for along with a £1 postal order. Once you have a delivery date from Royal Mail Tracking they have 12 working days from the day after delivery to supply a copy of the original agreement after which a default occurs and the account cannot be enforced in or out of Court, after a calendar month in default a summary criminal offence is committed which is reportable to Trading Standards.

 

Trading Standards are a great reference to have to hand, you can find your local office here;

Trading Standards Central - Trading Standards and Consumer Protection information for the UK

 

Also, if I may say, as no-one has. If Payplan isn't working for you. Have you looked at the Consumer Credit Counselling Service (CCCS) ?

CCCS - Free Debt Advice from the UK's Leading Debt Charity

 

Good luck & best wishes! You're in the right place now!! thumbsup.gif

 

Regards, Dave.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...