Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hi everyone, Thanks for the responses. Just a few follow up questions in light of what's been said:   If I dont appeal to PPM, who can I appeal to?   Why should the PCN been attached to the windscreen? Is this written in law?   I assumed the document I had received was the NTK, if this is not the case, what does a NTK look like?   Regarding the compliance with the Protection of Freedoms Act, could the "period" of parking not be argued either way? The legislation doesnt state it must have a start/end time of parking, which I assumed an ANPR camera would pick up if it had one. Is 4 minutes not technically enough to show the vehicle was parked?    Thanks !
    • I see jenrick has stuck his head up with them, and I'm sure this wont faze their nasty rhetoric one wit-less UK growth since 2010 has been lacklustre and largely driven by immigration, says report UK growth since 2010 has been lacklustre and largely driven by immigration, says report | Economic growth (GDP) | The Guardian WWW.THEGUARDIAN.COM Resolution Foundation report suggests parties are dodging the economic challenges facing the country   Net migration is more than two and a half times the 2010 figure despite a string of Tory pledges to reduce it Immigration: how 14 years of Tory rule have changed Britain – in charts | General election 2024 | The Guardian WWW.THEGUARDIAN.COM Net migration is more than two and a half times the 2010 figure despite a string of Tory pledges to reduce it    
    • Will get them done asap My job changes week to week so at the time I didn’t know. 
    • You will probably get a couple more reminders followed by further demands fro unregulated debt collectors with even increasing amounts to pay. They are all designed to scare you into paying.  Don't. It's a scam site and they do not know who was driving and they know the keeper is not liable to pay the PCN. Also the shop was closed so they have no legitimate interest in keeping the car park clear. So to charge £100 is a penalty as there is no legitimate interest which means that the case would be thrown out if it went to Court.  Keep your money in your wallet and be prepared to ignore all their letters and threats. Doubtful they would go to Court since a lot more people would not pay when they heard  MET lost in Court. However they may just send you a Letter of Claim to test your resolve.  If yoy get one of those, come back to us and we will advise a snotty letter to send them.  You probably already have, but take a look through some of our past Met PCNs to see how they are doing.
    • Hello, been a while since I posted on here, really hoping for the same support an advice I received last time :-) Long, long story for us, but basically through bad choices, bad luck and bad advice ended up in an IVA in 2016. The accounts involved all defaulted, to be expected. In 2018, I got contacted by an 'independent advisor' advising me that I shouldn't be in an IVA, that it wasn't the solution for our circumstances and that they would guide us through the process of leaving the IVA and finding a better solution. I feel very stupid for taking this persons advice, and feel they prey on vulnerable people for their own financial gain (it ended with us paying our IVA monthly contribution to them)-long and short of it our IVA failed in 2018. At the same time the IVA failed we also had our shared ownership property voluntarily repossessed (to say this was an incredibly stressful time would be an understatement!) When we moved to our new (rented) property in August 2018, I was aware that creditors would start contacting us from the IVA failure. I got advice from another help website and started sending off SARs and CCAs request letters. I was advised not to bury my head and update our address etc and tackle each company as they came along. Initially there was quite a lot of correspondence, and I still get a daily missed call from PRA group (and the occasional letter from them), but not much else. However, yesterday i had a letter through from Lowell (and one from Capital One) advising that they had bought my debt and would like to speak with me regarding the account. There will be several.of these through our door i suspect, as we did have several accounts with Capital One. Capital One have written to us with regular statements over the last 5 years, and my last communication with them was to advise of of our new address (June 2019), I also note that all of these accounts received a small payment in Jan2019 (i'm assuming the funds from the failed IVA pot). Really sorry for the long long post, but just thought id give (some of) the background for context.... I guess my question at the moment is.....how do I respond to Lowell...do I wait for the inevitable other letters to arrive then deal with them all together or individually...? Do I send them a CCA?  Many thanks
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6165 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Lindy call the office they may not give you the info as they are numpties, if you dont get it then you can SAR them, cross that bridge when we get there. Mention that you need the info as you are in discussions with your MP!!!!

 

You most defiantely can

North West Norfolk Conservatives

 

Lindy you need to be as tough as you can be, PM if you want my telephone number

 

SFx

Link to post
Share on other sites

SF - Thanks so much. I'm on the phone to them on hold as I type. will pm you. When the letter says £1183.39 plus costs is the costs all the bailiff charges that they want to lump on top?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Have just spoken to Rossendales. They said that the case is closed and it is being returned to the council. I asked him how much they were trying to collect he said £650.60 and another one for £199.30 (I havent got a clue what this one is!) I asked about the charges and the first name of the bailiff for Herbie to check but he said that as it was closed I would have to write to them asking for that information. So where do I stand now with the bailiff charges?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Fantastic news when it has been handed back you no longer have to pay the charges - call teh LA in a fews day to confirm that it has been handed back and to sort out a repayment schedule. I am right in thinking that they never got a WPO, so dont worry about the bailiff, if he even calls you tell him to speak to his company as it has been handed back.

 

SFx

Link to post
Share on other sites

YOU OWE THE BAILIFF NOTHING!!! :) What I would do is write to Henry Bellingham and highlight this case to him, if you want me to proof read the letter I am more than happy. I personally dont think it is worth persuing him regarding the charges as you have not had a break down and you would need to SAR them and that costs £10.

 

Well done

 

SFx

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well Done Lindy 1984, that is a great result adn a smack in the eye for the bailiff:)

 

The bailiff will be too busy to call back if the Local Authority (LA) have taken it back over. There will be no need to look over your shoulder.

 

Get it all confirmed over the phone with the LA and then back it up in writing to be on the safe side. Get them to confirm also.

 

Then follow the advice about rebates etc.

 

Best Wishes:cool:

Link to post
Share on other sites

the diabled rebate is if its a partner or adult in house, not for a child will a disability, i have two disabled kids and still pay full rent and council tax because a carer/ diabled rebate does not cover your own children.

Link to post
Share on other sites

GCM - you are incorrect and I do not know as far as the OP's posters childs situation but if you have had to make addaptations or need extra room you can qualify for reduction on Council Tax, it is hard to get but it can apply to children.

 

SFx

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Hi all just an update. spoke to someone from recovery at my la to make a payment plan. I explained the reason that I didn't deal with the bailiff was his rediculous charges. She got really mad and said that the bailiffs are allowed to charge you a van fee EVERYTIME they visit your property, went on and on that the charges were faif and I should have paid them. Then she told me that she is a certified bailiff!! which explained her bad attitude!. Anyway, she wont let me make a payment plan, though she is sending me out a payment card at my request. She said I will have to wait for my court hearing for comittal to prison which she is proceeding with despite me saying that I wasn't avoiding paying it and wanted to get it paid as quick as possible. Do you think I will get sent to prison?!

Link to post
Share on other sites

did you get her name? i'd put a letter for complaint in, plus state that you explained you are not avoiding the debt, and that this woman said she would be sending you a payment card, i am sure that if you receive a payment card/plan from the council then this counteracts the 'pay up now' grillings from the bailiffs, and lets just say you do get a letter stating a court hearing, on the papers, you dispute the case because it is unfair for the council to send papers to court as you are waiting for payment card/plan from them, so how can you be in default if awaiting payment card? i wouldnt worry, basically if you do get a letter from court before the payment card, dispute it on the court letter (remeber to put the date and approx time of call, and how long the call lasted and what was said), send it back asap, that will give you some time as the courts have to send your reply of dispute back to the council. by then you should have received your payment card, and once you make a payment , it should stop any court proceedings, also, if it doesnt, KEEP THE LETTER THE PAYMENT CARD COMES WITH, AS IT WILL HAVE THE DATE ON IT, another proof for you to say that you were waiting for the payment card. forget the dcas , basically, once you get the payment card, the council have infact taken the debt back, so no charges, hehehehe

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi all just an update. spoke to someone from recovery at my la to make a payment plan. I explained the reason that I didn't deal with the bailiff was his rediculous charges. She got really mad and said that the bailiffs are allowed to charge you a van fee EVERYTIME they visit your property, went on and on that the charges were faif and I should have paid them. Then she told me that she is a certified bailiff!! which explained her bad attitude!. Anyway, she wont let me make a payment plan, though she is sending me out a payment card at my request. She said I will have to wait for my court hearing for comittal to prison which she is proceeding with despite me saying that I wasn't avoiding paying it and wanted to get it paid as quick as possible. Do you think I will get sent to prison?!

 

You need to contact the office again and ask to speak to the manager and make a formal complaint about the attitude of the person you spoke to.And then discuss why this person was so unprepared to deal with your case fairly.

 

It's amazing how things can hinge on who you speak to at the local authority. When I moved house in March 2006, I owed council tax on the new house for a 18 day period from the 13th to 31st March. I got the bill through for 2006/7 and also one for the short time in March. I rang up and asked if the 2 could be added together and a new payment plan issued and i was categorically told no. So I rang up again, spoke to someone else who said it would be no problem at all!! I had the new payment plan, incorporating the small amount for 2005/6, within 2 days.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...