Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I thought the LibDems were going to table a motion of no confidence? I haven't heard anything about it for a couple of days.
    • Sorry for late reply dx been away and appreciate your replies. Yes he has paid the original borrowed amount off but obviously interest on top in which is owed and offer to write off. I know it is only a small amount owing but I didn't know whether to attempt to pursue with reclaim of previous paid amount plus interest. Or just to accept their offer and have removed from Credit File.
    • breaking news More Tory MPs ‘pondering defecting’ 'bl**dy hell, if they'll have her I should be a shoe in. I dont stand a chance as a Tory, but I might if I'm the labour candidate' .. is rumored to be heard again and again at the Torys favorite  subsidised bars of Westminster.   More Tory MPs ‘pondering defecting’ as Natalie Elphicke ‘sorry’ - live WWW.INDEPENDENT.CO.UK Labour frontbencher says other Conservatives wrestling with their futures and calls grow for Diane Abbott to be let back into party "Wes Streeting insisted his party would not take just any Tory MP" .. as he looked nervously looked over his shoulder   We may be looking forward to a vote of no confidence in the Guv by the newly majority labour party as early as next week has allegedly been overheard
    • You were given this PCN because you overstayed not because you went to Starbucks or MaccyDs from the other car park. I assume therefore that the parking time is only 30 minutes as you were recorded as being there for 38 minutes. Given that there is a Consideration time and a Grace period  as well as the time between their photographs of your car arriving and leaving one wonders why they gave you a ticket. Force of habit I suppose. Because they are on airport land which is governed by Bye Laws that supercede PoFA we do not usually look at their PCNs there because in none of them can the charge be transferred from the driver to the keeper  as would normally happen after 28 days if the charge is unpaid and the land is not subject to Byelaws. In your case as they have failed to specify the Parking period  which is the time car is spent actually parked in a parking space not the bit that they include which is driving from the entrance to the parking space and the other bit from the parking space to the exit. As that reduces the lawful time you were actually parked I would suggest that they have breached your GDPR.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

paythemback vs lloyds - Guildford County Court


paythemback
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6141 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

First thread tonight, as i join the rest of you in the (hopefully) final stages of my claim against LLoyds tsb.

 

I have been going through the process on line to date, and after an acknowledgement Lloyds have now moved to notify they intend to defend the whole claim. And Ive just recieved today notification from the County Court in Northampton (money claim on line) that my case is being transfered to Epsom in Surrey my local court.

 

The notes say that ----

 

IT IS ORDERED THAT-- 1. The filing of an allocation questionaire be dispensed with in this case unless the district judge at the court of transfer orders otherwise.

 

Is this standard ?---Do i now wait to be asked for a AQ (if at all) by Epsom?

 

Lloyds have sumbmitted their standard 9 point defence ( as seen on this site) from a solicitor in Brighton SECHIARI CLARK AND MITCHELL so if it does move to the court there is a well documented approach to my claim.

 

i would be very interseted to hear from anyone who is on the same "timeline" in their own claim to compare notes.

 

regards

Link to post
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Hello all, especially those in Surrey

 

new development today, recieved a letter from Epsom County Court saying that my case has now been transfered to Guildford (seems a pity as the staff at epsom let on that as yet no claimant to their knowledge had ever lost there)---also seem to remember that Reigate cc are doing the same transfering to Guildford

 

anyway the real point of the post is to see who else is out there who has their case moved too or has been to Guildford to defend.

 

I figure that we could cooperate and share relevant information and give each other support against a common defendant LTSB, so if your case is now under Guildford cc or just as importantly you have recently been through the court there i would be very pleased to hear from you.

 

as we must all live close (ish) maybe we could get together to turn this rather solitary (the good community of CAG and this site excepted) into a shared mission to recover our monies.

 

paythemback

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hey there, im in the same boat as you so your welcome to put your feet up next to me an see how it all pans out.

 

would be worth you checking out my thread (Ukcrow v Lloyds TSB) as i have just recieved an order of direction from the QC there. I would imagine you will recieve the same as the next court date for all lloyds claimants is apparently in septmeber, Anyways, if you read my thread you'll get a good idea of the mood and the direction the court want to take.

 

Off to bed now but good luck an keep in touch. :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Paythemback,

 

Not sure how many people are claiming in Guildford but the chances are no one has lost in Guilford either. The only lost cases to date have been in Birmingham.

 

keep strong and they will payout in the end.

 

Keep us posted

 

Best wishes

 

Zoot

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Steve, just put up a thread (Sid takes on Lloyds) before I saw your thread. Maybe I can get it moved here. My original claim was filed thru Reigate. They warned me that my case was likely to be going to Guildford if lloyds defended the claim.

As i said in my thread, It's now at G'ford and Lloyds solicitors have said that Lloyds are willing to negotiate a settlement.

So sitting in limbo at moment waiting to see what happens next, a credit to my account or a Court date on the small claims track in s****y Guildford.

Will keep you informed of all occurrances.

Let me know if you require any other info to do with this whole sorry affair.

Bear with me.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok guys, good luck with your claims. Im going to be away from a computer till after Guilfest where i'll be marshalling on night shifts till next tuesday. Fingers crossed they'll have sent a response in our favour by then!

 

Cheers - Monty:)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Monty,

 

Enjoy the weekend at Guilfest, apparently the weather could be much better than of late, lets hope that some good mail comes through all of our letter boxes soon.

 

likewise away for a few days, til the 15th

 

Hopeing to recieve the same directions as issued to the bank in sidtherangers case arriving shortly (please), to put some pressure on the lovely people at SC&M, ------ when i do get a settlement then its into round two, as despite repeated ( 3 letters, cc to local branch, headoffice, andover and copy statement unit ) requests for complete disclosure of charges (now at least 120 days and counting!) Lloyds have only sent 5.5 yrs of statements, so a critical 6 mths when we really were on the recieving end of some serious charges with the account back in early 2001 is still to be claimed.

 

perhaps they will see the sense of paying those back without all this monumental waste of my time and legal systems time and money----although sadly i doubt it.

 

PAYTHEMBACK

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello all,

 

Just got back from a few days away and have recieved a letter from SC&M with an offer of a "without prejudice" settlement.

 

Hadnt got as far as a court date, but had sent a letter to them asking them to settle before court, which maybe had an effect on their actions.

 

They are requesting the usual confidentiality and offering a full refund with interest and covering all court fees.

 

I will be accepting the money but none of their terms and look forward to getting my money back in my account soon,will only celebrate when the moneys cleared.

 

good luck to the rest of you

 

Paythemback

Link to post
Share on other sites

Congratulations :D :D :D

 

Here's a link to the letter I used to refuse t&c's of offer letter. It works because I have just been paid out :D

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/barclays-bcard-woolwich-successes/48032-jakena-barclays-4.html

Come on the mighty reds!!!!!!

 

Lloyds TSB - Success - 14/7/07

Lloyds TSB - Pending -

Halifax - Pending -

 

 

Tip my scales if I have been of assistance :D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ive phoned and spoken to SC&M today, and have faxed and sent my acceptance of their offer, Ive used a version of Red Rebels letter from the link he posted earlier in this thread and modified it slightly to my personal circumstances .

 

I told the lady i spoke to that their offer was acceptable but i would not comply with any of their terms/obligations and got a rather resigned "ok then, that will be alright".

 

this is my second (lloyds tsb group) "victory" as ive also just got a refund from an overcharged mortgage exit fee from C&G --- this just took a single phone call to secure, but what is unbelievable is that the building societys must easily know who theyve overcharged but you have to chase them!

 

hope some of you get good news soon, i will be staying in touch as i will be hopefully starting a new claim very soon, when they forward the six months of statements that they still havent sent from early 2001.

 

Whilst im talking could anyone tell me how do you actually calculate the six year period? --is it six yrs back from the last charge you claim for? ---six yrs from the date you recieve your statements? --- or something else?

 

paythemback

Link to post
Share on other sites

I first requested the data on 13.03.07 --- received letter back on 17.04.07 with a list of all charges --- but they only provided data from 10.09.01 until 01.12.06, its possible that i havent had any charges from 01.12.06 so this later date could be correct as the request was for a list of all default charges, not a full list of statements ie. all transactions.

 

Lloyds have not cashed the £10.00 cheque i provided , which i assumed was a tactic so they could initially dispute the date my first letter was recieved ( to stay within the 40 days ), and the cheque remains uncashed to date.

 

so do they owe me statements at both "ends" ie from 01.12.06 til 13.03.07 and from 13.03.01 until 10.09.01 ? ---- its the period in 2001 that im wanting to claim back the default charges for.

 

has any one sucessfully been refunded back further than 6 yrs yet?

 

also what action can i take against Lloyds for obstructing my request?

 

 

paythemback (hopefully to be paidthemback soon)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...