Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • It will be years before Banks would sell to a debt buyer.  Sometimes Banks will use external debt collectors to try to collect, but generally Banks don't take Court action.  So you could be looking at 3 to 6 years, before any dca owning debt looks to take any Court action. And it is not definite that this would happen. So no need to feel pressured at this stage. In the event you found yourself unemployed, you have time to engage with Banks to advise of your situation and ask for time to deal with the situation, find new employment. As long as you inform the Banks they will offer assistance they can. E.g offer payment holiday or accept reduced payment for period. What you should not do, is not contact the Banks and simply default on payments. 
    • I'd get back to them tomorrow, and explain the circumstances, that you have a wedding reception, and just appeal to their better nature. Hopefully they will be able to move sooner rather than later, especially if you go in in person and speak to them, and show them the issue.
    • The 3 pieces of mortar that fell on the same day, at the same time, were approx. 25-30cm long and weighed around ½-1 kilo each from a roof that is above the 2nd floor; they were by no means tiny pieces of mortar but large chunks falling from a rather great height. I believe the size and weight is enough to cause serious injury and if it falls on your head, I assume it could potentially be lethal if unlucky, but we don't wish to put that theory to test... We can't in good conscience let a contractor install a patio and a gazebo as it is in the exact spot where the mortar fell, nor do I think anyone would be willing to take the chance. Looking at the roof, there are multiple other remaining pieces from the same 'line' or 'row' of mortar that can potentially fall. The mortar is right underneath the slate tiles on the neighbour's roof and I don't know whether the tiles are also (becoming) lose due to the loss of the mortar. I was trying to upload a photo but it seems it's not allowed. The first contractor to work in our garden in preparation for the patio and gazebo is scheduled to start on 10th June, that leaves the neighbour 5 workdays to sort their roof which is unlikely, so it seems we will have to postpone our patio contractor without knowing when they can come back. We have already had extensive work done in the garden in preparation for the wedding reception and it will become very costly for us if we have to move the wedding reception to a venue (if we can even get one at this short notice) rather than have it at home which was our dream.
    • Is this sufficiant for a letter of claim  ? Letter Of Claim       Reference: Techzone Mobile Phones Samsung A71 Mobile Phone £140 Purchase date 29. 5. 24     I the claimant purchased a 2nd hand Samsung A71 mobile from Techzone Mobile Phone unit 10 of the indoor market at the Potteries shopping centre. Initially the phone worked well until I used the camera and found debris in the camera lens spoiling pictures making it not fit for purpose. I contacted the seller who offered a replacement which I initially accepted but later rejected and wanted a refund in full which the seller refused saying they Do Not give refund is unlawful and goes against the Consumer rights act 2015. Therefore I intend to issue proceedings against you in a county court without further notice unless you reimburse me the above amount in Full within 7 days from the date of this Letter     ------------------------------------------    I think its best if i hand him the letter as posting it might not get through so can claim expenses traveling up there ?   or would it be best to just post and get 'Signed for'  ?   Should i also put in the letter of claim interest added or leave that till the Particulars letter ?
    • Ok thanks, I really need help with my mental health over this I’ve called 111 Hi sorry just one more thing can they contact my workplace?
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

im4347 Vs Barclays


im4347
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5907 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi all

 

I have 2 accounts with Barclays, one being a joint account with my wife.

The amounts to be claimed are:

 

ACC 1 - £1905

Interest - £108.87

 

Acc2 - £1750

Interest - £19.87

 

Total= £3783.74

 

I sent my first letter requesting the amounts above and I recieved a 'Full and Final' settlement letter back offering us the amount of £2235.00.

 

We obviously declined the offer and sent a second letter back stating that if the full amount is not received within the next 7 days we will be taking County Court Action against them.

 

We heard nothing back and decided to give them a call to ask if they had received my second letter. The Customer Relations Manager who I dealt with was so robotic, as if she was reading out of a book, and giving me all this 'goodwill gesture' jargon. I told her that you are giving me no choice but to take this matter to Court, to which she replyed, 'that's fine, take us to court'.

 

We have now prepared our spreadsheets with the 'Schedule of Charges' including the 8% daily interest to date, bringing the total amount to:

£4207.65

 

Could someone please advice us whether to take the MCOL Route or the N1 Route? :confused:

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 55
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

both have their good and bad points

 

mcol has limited space for particulars of claim ... can sometimes cause problems later BUT has the advantage of being able to see exactly where your claim is upto You cant submit your schedule of charges with mcol and need to send it after filing

 

N1 has the advantage of a fuller particulars of claim you can attatch your schedule BUT you cant easily see where your claim is upto

 

It really boils down to personal preference

 

Hope that helps

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

My wife and I are only about 4 weeks ahead of you - we asked the same question within our group of friends who are reclaiming monies and the general concenous is that the MCOL route is easier and less time consuming - its also a lot easier to 'cut and paste' from the CAG template liberary (with the obvious minor adjustments). Also the MCOL website checks the defendants postal address to ensure action can be taken. The MCOL web site is very easy (surprisingly easy) to follow.

Hope this Helps and good luck

Link to post
Share on other sites

The N1 can be done on the pc .. just not saved so as long as you print off the 3 copies required once you have dont it theres no problem ... N1 removes the need for the case to be transfered to your local court once Barclays defend the claim which they will do

Link to post
Share on other sites

The thing to consider with MCOL is that it is clogged up and slow at the moment. Then you will have the delay of it being transferred to your local court.

 

I have read several threads lately advising N1 route

 

madeleine150x120.gif

Link to post
Share on other sites

There seems to be about a 3 to 4 week delay in MCOL cases being transferred to local courts. If you go N1 route at least you are that time further up the waiting list for a court date. Only downside to N1 is that you physically have to take papers to court in the first place

 

madeleine150x120.gif

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ref N1 route, not only that there seems to be a LOT of judges who are dismissing the POC's as inadequate from MCOL because of the limited space you are allowed..

.

http://www.findmadeleine.com/

http://news.sky.com/skynews/madeleine

 

If I dont reply to a direct question please feel free to PM me.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I agree that where it is easy enough to get into your local court, it can not only be time saving, but the court send the POC and SOC onto the bank; no more hold up with bank claiming weeks down the line that they didn't receive details of claim.

 

Also remember that anyone who is on low income and exempt from court fees, still has to intially pay out through MCOL however your local court can accept the claim without payment as long as you take along Exemption Form (downloadable from Court Services Website) plus documentary proof of income/benefits.

 

It also gives you the opportunity to familiarise yourself with the court building, nearby parking facilities etc plus you can ask direct questions to the court clerk regarding court procedure and timeframes.

3 Active Claims:

Barclays Refund of Bank Charges (Sole account) - Applied to lift court ordered Stay

Barclays Refund of Bank Charges (Joint account) - Awaiting court date

Barclays Refund of Bank Charges (Joint account) Pre-6 yrs- LBA sent.

 

 

3 Wins :

Barclays t/a The Woolwich (Data Protection Act breach costs & compliance)

HSBC (on behalf of brother)

Settled Out of Court - £3,874.76

Alliance & Leicester (on behalf of friend)

Settled Out of Court - £723.41

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

yes you can . just make sure that details of both accounts and that you include both SOC' ...... also that you take 3 of each with you

 

1 for the court

1 for the court to stamp and issue to Barclays

1 for the court to stamp and return back to you :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hiya

 

We went to court today and filed the county court claim. We understand that we now have to wait to hear back from the court with a date by which Barclays should reply.

 

Do we need to send Barclays our Particulars of Claim and SOCs separately aswell? (I know the court are sending one copy to the bank)

 

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi im

 

Since you went down the N1 route, you will have provided the court with 3 copies of the Application plus 3 accompanying Schedule of Charges. That's your part done.

 

THe court will send on everything Barclays require - if the court didn't stamp and give you back your copy, you'll have it through post soon (as will Barclays).

 

Just sit back, keep reading the forum and wait for the court to contact you with next stage :)

3 Active Claims:

Barclays Refund of Bank Charges (Sole account) - Applied to lift court ordered Stay

Barclays Refund of Bank Charges (Joint account) - Awaiting court date

Barclays Refund of Bank Charges (Joint account) Pre-6 yrs- LBA sent.

 

 

3 Wins :

Barclays t/a The Woolwich (Data Protection Act breach costs & compliance)

HSBC (on behalf of brother)

Settled Out of Court - £3,874.76

Alliance & Leicester (on behalf of friend)

Settled Out of Court - £723.41

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

Hi all,

 

Just to update you on our progress so far:

 

A 'Notice of Issue' was served to Barclays on the 13th July 2007 and they had until the 27th July 2007 to reply. We received nothing from Barclays, but they faxed an 'Acknowledgement of Service' to the Court on the 27th July (typical).

 

Will keep you posted.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

Hi all

 

We received our 'Allocation Questionnaire' and the deadline is 31st August, yes today!!!

 

A quick question regarding Section G (further info), is there any latest templates or advice that I will need to complete this section?

 

I have also received a letter from Barclays stating that they will be applying for an order to stay from the court until the resolution of the Bank's proceedings with the OFT.

 

:idea:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Im,

 

Think this is the link you want - http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/general/53570-new-strategy-allocation-questionaires.html.

 

Ignore B's letter, stick to your own agenda.

 

Slick

We could do with some help from you

                                                                PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

                                            Have we helped you ...?  Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

Please give something if you can. We all give our time free of charge but the site has bills to pay.

 

Thanks !:-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for that Slick.

 

I found this on one of the threads regarding the bank asking for a stay order to be attached to the AQ;

 

"The Claimant is aware that the defendant is now routinely requesting a stay in proceedings in claims of this nature, by indicating an intention to negotiate a settlement in section A of their allocation questionnaire.

 

The claimant is strongly opposed to such a stay, upon the basis that the defendant, both during and prior to this litigation, has rebutted or ignored all prior attempts by the claimant to narrow the issues in dispute, or otherwise engage in meaningful dialogue which may have facilitated an amicable settlement to these matters.

 

It is submitted that the request by the defendant is highly likely to be an attempt to further frustrate and delay proceedings, and the pattern of settled cases so far would strongly suggest that the defendant does not intend to settle these matters until a hearing date is imminent.

 

Accordingly, the claimant respectfully requests that any such request by the defendant is turned aside."

Should I attach this to the Allocation Questionnaire?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Hi all

 

Had a letter from Wolverhampton County Court stating:

 

"IT IS ORDERED THAT

UPON the court considering the papers in this case and

 

UPON it appearing to the court that

(i) the issues to be determined in this case are the same or similar to those to be determined a test case ('the test case') being brought by the Office of Fair Trading against a representative number of clearing banks and

(ii) it would be appropriate and proportionate in the circumstances for this case to be stayed pending the conclusion of the test case

 

IT IS ORDERED THAT

Each party shall by 4pm on the 18th October inform the court in writing why this case should not be stayed pending the conclusion of the test case."

Any advice would be really appreciated.

 

Thanks

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok they are asking you to submit an argument against a stay .. have a look here http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/bank-templates-library/17065-application-removal-stay-updated.html#post1046820 amend the witness statement to suit :)

 

 

Hope that helps also have a look here http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/barclays-bank/111127-new-forum-stays.html

 

 

Saint :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...