Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • That isn’t actually what the Theft Act 1968 S1 actually says, BTW. https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1968/60/section/1 (1)A person is guilty of theft if he dishonestly appropriates property belonging to another with the intention of permanently depriving the other of it;   The difference between what you’ve said and the Act? a) intent to permanently deprive rather than  just depriving (which is why the offence of “taking without consent” was brought in for motor vehicles, as otherwise "joyriders" could say "but I intended to give it back at the end") b) dishonesty : If I honestly believed A's pen belonged to B, and took it and gave it to B - B might be found guilty of theft but I shouldn't be. 
    • Received a call and follow on confirmation email from the police about my cabinets! They wanted to confirm that I was prepared to support police action for the matter and that I would be happy to provide a statement and attend court at a later date!!! I think that something might actually get done - it won't get my cabinets back I know that but hopefully it will put a stop to this so called courier doing this to people!
    • Around a month ago I had to send a sympathy card to a friend in GB. Logistically it made sense to buy a personalised one on eBay and get it sent straight to my mate, rather than faffing around getting it sent to me.  This mighty purchase set me back all of £3.05 (including postage costs). I was taken aback that, when it was sent, I got a tracking number.  For a flippin' three-quid card!  I had no idea that technology had moved on so much and that tracking was so easy.  The shop has feedback for 16,300 purchases so tracking must be easy & automatic. It's unlikely your case will get to court, but in cases that do this got me thinking that we need to aggressively challenge the PPCs where they have lied about the timescales of sending their rubbish and have no proof at all of posting - when it would be so easy to provide it.
    • Thanks for uploading the appeal.  It was a waste of time but well done in not outing the driver. Why have your friends paid £60 they don't owe to a cowboy private company that have no means of making them pay as they don't do court?  If they paid by card, as I presume they did, they should get on to their bank and do a chargeback immediately. We call the £70 the Unicorn Food Tax.  The law specifically states they are only allowed to charge the original £100 but the PPCs and their bezzies in their trade associations allow this made-up extra £70 so £100 becomes £170.  Unfortunately for them the law doesn't. Anyway, snotty letter time. There is an example in post 32 here you can tweak as it's the same company but a different car park   https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/463964-alliance-anpr-pcn-lease-car-appeals-refused-daymer-bay-cornwall/page/2/#comments  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

backdoor CapQuest CCJ for citi Card - set aside?***WON***


deedee1310
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5562 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hello everyone.

 

I still feel like poo but the fever has broken (for now) so I will quickly update.

 

I called the Court and spoke to a nice gentleman who advised me what to do. I did start off by asking for the Court Manager as directed by Laiste but he broke down the process for me and told me to ask for him when I came to submit my forms.

 

I duly went this afternoon and he was as good as his word. He came out from the back office and checked over my form before I submitted it. Just as well really as my fever-addled brain had missed a few things off the form! LOL!

 

Basically I have done the following;

 

1. I DID complete the AOE but stated that I was self employed (not technically a lie as I have set up a business this year, have proof as well)

 

2. The effect of stating self employment is that it effectively cancels out the AOE as an application for one will not be granted if the defendant is self employed.

 

3. I then submitted my N244 using the wording that Laiste kindly supplied which was based on my original draft. I made a small amendment to state that the CCA request etter had been signed for on 18 June 2007 and included a copy of my receipt and the website printout showing that it had been signed for.

 

The effect of the above is that on 18 July when the AOE clerk sees my completed form, the application will be cancelled (due to self employment). If I hadn't submitted it today, regardless of the fact that I only received it (today - Laiste), it would still have been due on this date. When the AOE clerk runs the report on this date, the next stage is AUTOMATED so I would have had a summons issued for non-compliance. Eek.

 

Now when Crapquest get the news that they can't get an AOE, they will more than likely move for a Warrant of Execution to be issued. However, they will now find an N244 blocking their way. I ticked that I would like a hearing on the form and I will be interested to see if they will actually turn up at court. The bar stewards mad0147.gif

 

Oh well if it's a fight they want, it's a fight they'll get. I've rolled up my sleeves and I'm ready for round two.

 

Thanks to Laiste, POET, tomterm, Jo and all of you who have been reading this thread.

 

BATTLE HAS COMMENCED!!! mad0052.gif mad0040.gif

 

PS - sorry for the rude smilies but they sum up how I'm feeling!

 

deedee xxx

My threads

deedee1310 v Abbey, deedee1310 v Capital One, deedee1310 v Halifax Plc, CapQuest CCJ, deedee1310 v Littlewoods & deedee1310 v Smile

If I have been of help in even the smallest way, please click the star and "add to my reputation" :p

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 101
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

well, good news in a way then! keep us posted!

If you found this post useful, please click on the "scales" icon in the bottom left of my post and say so!

 

The opinions of this post are those of monkey_uk and do not constitute sound legal advice. I am not a lawyer.

--

 

Halifax Unlawful Bank Charges: S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) Sent 28/02/07 - CC Statement's rcv'd 18/04/07 Bank a/c statements rcv'd 19/04/07

 

 

 

First Direct Unlawful Bank Charges: Settled in Full 12/05/06 | £2235.50

Link to post
Share on other sites

Now when Crapquest get the news that they can't get an AOE, they will more than likely move for a Warrant of Execution to be issued. However, they will now find an N244 blocking their way. I ticked that I would like a hearing on the form and I will be interested to see if they will actually turn up at court. The bar stewards mad0147.gif

 

deedee xxx

 

 

Oh LOL :D

 

Deedee, reading this has made my day:)

 

Excellent news - rooting for you.

 

BO x

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello everyone.

 

I still feel like poo but the fever has broken (for now) so I will quickly update.

 

I called the Court and spoke to a nice gentleman who advised me what to do. I did start off by asking for the Court Manager as directed by Laiste but he broke down the process for me and told me to ask for him when I came to submit my forms.

 

I duly went this afternoon and he was as good as his word. He came out from the back office and checked over my form before I submitted it. Just as well really as my fever-addled brain had missed a few things off the form! LOL!

 

Basically I have done the following;

 

1. I DID complete the AOE but stated that I was self employed (not technically a lie as I have set up a business this year, have proof as well)

 

2. The effect of stating self employment is that it effectively cancels out the AOE as an application for one will not be granted if the defendant is self employed.

 

3. I then submitted my N244 using the wording that Laiste kindly supplied which was based on my original draft. I made a small amendment to state that the CCA request etter had been signed for on 18 June 2007 and included a copy of my receipt and the website printout showing that it had been signed for.

 

The effect of the above is that on 18 July when the AOE clerk sees my completed form, the application will be cancelled (due to self employment). If I hadn't submitted it today, regardless of the fact that I only received it (today - Laiste), it would still have been due on this date. When the AOE clerk runs the report on this date, the next stage is AUTOMATED so I would have had a summons issued for non-compliance. Eek.

 

Now when Crapquest get the news that they can't get an AOE, they will more than likely move for a Warrant of Execution to be issued. However, they will now find an N244 blocking their way. I ticked that I would like a hearing on the form and I will be interested to see if they will actually turn up at court. The bar stewards mad0147.gif

 

Oh well if it's a fight they want, it's a fight they'll get. I've rolled up my sleeves and I'm ready for round two.

 

Thanks to Laiste, POET, tomterm, Jo and all of you who have been reading this thread.

 

BATTLE HAS COMMENCED!!! mad0052.gif mad0040.gif

 

PS - sorry for the rude smilies but they sum up how I'm feeling!

 

deedee xxx

You will have ruined someones day over in the paralell world that is Crapquest. There they were thinking they had got another rubber stamp CCJ and you come along and pee on their parade. I wonder how they will explain that you werent told of anything

Link to post
Share on other sites

Oh LOL :D

 

Deedee, reading this has made my day:)

 

Excellent news - rooting for you.

 

BO x

 

Thank you BO. Glad it's cheered you up :D

 

I still feel too sick for the implication of it all to hit me - yet. I can't wait for the hearing date. I will be there with bells on!

 

deedee xx

My threads

deedee1310 v Abbey, deedee1310 v Capital One, deedee1310 v Halifax Plc, CapQuest CCJ, deedee1310 v Littlewoods & deedee1310 v Smile

If I have been of help in even the smallest way, please click the star and "add to my reputation" :p

Link to post
Share on other sites

You will have ruined someones day over in the paralell world that is Crapquest. There they were thinking they had got another rubber stamp CCJ and you come along and pee on their parade. I wonder how they will explain that you werent told of anything

 

Well in DCA land anything goes, so I'm sure that they will come up with an excuse(s) that sound plausible to THEM. :evil:

 

I fully intend to stick to them. They're TWITS.

 

deedee x

My threads

deedee1310 v Abbey, deedee1310 v Capital One, deedee1310 v Halifax Plc, CapQuest CCJ, deedee1310 v Littlewoods & deedee1310 v Smile

If I have been of help in even the smallest way, please click the star and "add to my reputation" :p

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well my AOE should have been processed yesterday but I haven't had a chance to check the status with the court.

 

My cheque for my N244 was debited to my account today. Yippeee!! :D

 

Will update again as soon as I receive any paperwork.

 

deedee

My threads

deedee1310 v Abbey, deedee1310 v Capital One, deedee1310 v Halifax Plc, CapQuest CCJ, deedee1310 v Littlewoods & deedee1310 v Smile

If I have been of help in even the smallest way, please click the star and "add to my reputation" :p

Link to post
Share on other sites

FALSE ALARM!!!!

 

The cheque that cleared was for my N1 against shAbbey which I filed last Friday.

 

Never mind. At least that's some progress with one of my claims!!

 

deedee x

My threads

deedee1310 v Abbey, deedee1310 v Capital One, deedee1310 v Halifax Plc, CapQuest CCJ, deedee1310 v Littlewoods & deedee1310 v Smile

If I have been of help in even the smallest way, please click the star and "add to my reputation" :p

Link to post
Share on other sites

YIPPPEEE!!!

 

The cheque for my N244 HAS cleared today. So I'm hoping next week will bring me some paperwork showing a date of service and a proposed hearing date

 

deedee

My threads

deedee1310 v Abbey, deedee1310 v Capital One, deedee1310 v Halifax Plc, CapQuest CCJ, deedee1310 v Littlewoods & deedee1310 v Smile

If I have been of help in even the smallest way, please click the star and "add to my reputation" :p

Link to post
Share on other sites

Oooh - how annoyed am I?!!!!

 

I came home today to find a letter that was posted from the court yesterday. It was from the bailiff who had tried to serve an N61 form on me. This form is an "Order for Production of Statement of Means". This is only sent if the defendant FAILS to return the N56 "Attachment of Earnings Order". The letter has a number on it for me to call the bailiff so that he can serve the papers on me.

 

If you remember I dragged myself from my sick bed to hand this form (N56) in! :mad: Thank goodness I had the presence of mind to ask the clerk to photocopy it for me, so I have a stamped copy showing that it was filed on 16/7/2007.

 

Irritatingly enough, when I called the court on Wednesday to see the progress of my Application Notice and whether the AOE had been processed, I had to deal with a twerp. He took over 10 mins to give me the information I wanted. The long and short of it is that my N244 had not yet been sent to a judge and the N56 had not been processed yet either. He informed me that there was a 10 day (????!!!), backlog and that there was a staff shortage as people were away on holiday. NOT MY FLIPPIN' PROBLEM!!! mad0094.gifmad0094.gif He said that everything would processed in due course.

 

I'm so p***d off and angry as I now have to wait until Monday to try and get to the bottom of this. :mad::mad::mad:

 

RANT OVER!!!!!

My threads

deedee1310 v Abbey, deedee1310 v Capital One, deedee1310 v Halifax Plc, CapQuest CCJ, deedee1310 v Littlewoods & deedee1310 v Smile

If I have been of help in even the smallest way, please click the star and "add to my reputation" :p

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks ODC. Do I send it to the court office?

My threads

deedee1310 v Abbey, deedee1310 v Capital One, deedee1310 v Halifax Plc, CapQuest CCJ, deedee1310 v Littlewoods & deedee1310 v Smile

If I have been of help in even the smallest way, please click the star and "add to my reputation" :p

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks ODC. Do I send it to the court office?

Yes but try ringing the Baliff just to let him know you had already submitted it within the timescale. Its not your fault the Courts are running behind. The baliff should have known this. He was a bit quick off the mark if you ask me

  • Haha 1

Link to post
Share on other sites

It's strange because the N61 was POSTED using the Royal Mail. The franked impression on the envelope was marked 26/7/07. :confused:

 

I'll call the court and the bailiff on Monday.

My threads

deedee1310 v Abbey, deedee1310 v Capital One, deedee1310 v Halifax Plc, CapQuest CCJ, deedee1310 v Littlewoods & deedee1310 v Smile

If I have been of help in even the smallest way, please click the star and "add to my reputation" :p

Link to post
Share on other sites

i just have gotto ask how did capquest get a ccj against you without proof of ownership of the alleged debt, and more so without your knowledge?

 

That's what I'm trying to find out! Apparently this is not as uncommon as one would think. :eek::confused: My CCJ from Capital One was granted in a similar fashion. I didn't receive their response pack, if I had done so, I would have put a defence in. The first I knew of this CCJ was when I checked my credit files

 

Either way they're trying to play dirty now so I'm fighting back. They had FOUR months to try and enforce the debt and only decided to do so because I made a CCA request. Tomorrow 30/7 they will have committed a criminal offence under the CCA Act for not complying with my request. As you will have read from my thread, I have put an Application Notice in as I want a hearing with a judge to have their judgement set aside. I really want to see them in court and to see the document(s) upon which they will rely on to try and dissuade the judge from granting the order. :evil:

 

deedee

My threads

deedee1310 v Abbey, deedee1310 v Capital One, deedee1310 v Halifax Plc, CapQuest CCJ, deedee1310 v Littlewoods & deedee1310 v Smile

If I have been of help in even the smallest way, please click the star and "add to my reputation" :p

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

*Subscribing* Any updates DD, Trying to get a CCJ set aside aswell

I'm not an expert so check everything I tell you, however click me scales if I've been useful.

Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.

 

There is no freemasonry like the freemasonry of Golf

Link to post
Share on other sites

*Subscribing* Any updates DD, Trying to get a CCJ set aside aswell

 

Hi Conar!

 

I've been away for two weeks. Came back on Tuesday to find that a date has been granted for a hearing on September 24th 2007. It is expected to last 20 minutes. I'm going to prepare an ultra mini bundle which will basically consist of the letters I have sent r.e. my CCA request, my credit file entry showing the incorrect spelling of my name and their AOE application which was applied for a full 4 months after judgement was granted plus anything else that I can think of.

 

It is extremely annoying to have to go through this but I'm not backing down on this one.

 

I will update this thread again after the hearing, unless something dramatic happens before then.

 

You will see from my Capital One thread, deedee1310 v Capital One that I am also wanting them to have the CCJ obtained against me set aside too, for similar reasons, as part of the settlement for my claim against them. I'll keep pushing as I'm not forking out another £65 for an N244 Application.

 

Best of luck with your claims. :)

 

deedee

My threads

deedee1310 v Abbey, deedee1310 v Capital One, deedee1310 v Halifax Plc, CapQuest CCJ, deedee1310 v Littlewoods & deedee1310 v Smile

If I have been of help in even the smallest way, please click the star and "add to my reputation" :p

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

I WON, I WON, I WON!!!!

party0003.gif

party0019.gif

 

I will update later as I'm off to work but yes - I got my CCJ set aside and that's what I wanted. :-) There is a slight twist to this however but more on that later.

 

deedee1310

 

 

  • Haha 1

My threads

deedee1310 v Abbey, deedee1310 v Capital One, deedee1310 v Halifax Plc, CapQuest CCJ, deedee1310 v Littlewoods & deedee1310 v Smile

If I have been of help in even the smallest way, please click the star and "add to my reputation" :p

Link to post
Share on other sites

I WON, I WON, I WON!!!!

party0003.gif

party0019.gif

 

I will update later as I'm off to work but yes - I got my CCJ set aside and that's what I wanted. :-) There is a slight twist to this however but more on that later.

 

deedee1310

 

 

 

Congratulations!!! Let us know what happened when you have a mo.

"Why CCJ when you can CCA!"

Link to post
Share on other sites

Excellent! Always nice to see a victory for a CAGger, especially at C*apquest's expense :D

  • Barclays: WON!!! It took four months but was totally worth it!
  • Cabot: I'm still waiting for an enforcable agreement, more than a year after requesting it. Go on, Uncle Ken, take me to court if you dare. You know you want to!
  • Elephant.co.uk: VICTORY - they admitted there was no debt!
  • Ashbourne Management (gym membership): Finally got my default removed and out-of-court settlement; I'm not finished with them yet!

<--- If I've been helpful please remember the scales ;)

Link to post
Share on other sites

36_2_68.gif

 

Well done deedee - I am absolutely chuffed to bits for you.

 

There is some justice in the world after all!!

 

Looking forward to reading all the details.

 

Lotsa luv

 

Jo xx

Six Nations Champions 2009

Triple Crown 2009

Grand Slam 2009

:cool::-D:cool:

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...