Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Evening all looking for bit of advice again , currently doing my own debt management , but think may have burgered up on 1 of the creditors (creation loan) had got sold to Intrum around nov 23 , it never went to default ( I thought it did  , now checking credit file , intrum is there and says 1 missed payment and doesnt say account defaulted can i let that go and intrum will default it? hope that makes sense what i have said
    • Hi. You've left the PCN number on the 22nd March letter and your name on the one below that. It's best to cover those up please. HB
    • 1 Date of the infringement 14/02/24   2 Date on the NTK [this must have been received within 14 days from the 'offence' date] 21/02/24   [scan up BOTH SIDES as ONE PDF- follow the upload guide] please LEAVE IN LOCATION AND ALL DATES/TIMES/£'s   3 Date received 23/02/24   4 Does the NTK mention schedule 4 of The Protections of Freedoms Act 2012? [Y/N?] Yes   5 Is there any photographic evidence of the event? Yes   6 Have you appealed? [Y/N?] post up your appeal] No   Have you had a response? [Y/N?] post it up N/A   7 Who is the parking company? Euro Car Parks   8. Where exactly [carpark name and town] St Nicholas Street, Weymouth   For either option, does it say which appeals body they operate under. POPLA / BPA   There are two official bodies, the BPA and the IAS. If you are unsure, please check HERE   If you have received any other correspondence, please mention it here -Final Notification Letter from Euro Car Parks -Warning Of Legal Proceedings Letter from Debt Recovery Plus   Please can anyone advise on how to proceed from this point? I've read a number of threads about snotty letters etc but with the fact it's gone straight to a debt recovery company i doubt a snotty letter will get me anywhere. Is it just a case of waiting for a potential claim to come through or is there something i can be researching / doing in the iterim from this point forward? Many thanks, MDG convert-jpg-to-pdf.net_2024-05-02_17-59-16.pdf
    • wont remove the rest k , it was a joint vol charge. both your names are on the charge too.  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
        • Thanks
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

stetford1 v Lloyds Tsb


stetford1
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6106 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

BUMP

 

In a pickle now..... Should I not send in the AQ as I need to amend claim.....How the heck do I do that? Will I be charged? AQ has to be in by 5/8/07 - panic, panic. Is there a special form for POC to go on or just type it out/cut and paste it onto plain paper?

 

Really appreciate some reassurance here.........stand to lose a lot of cash:o

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 68
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

:D BUMP:D

 

Help think I have got cheque mate!!!!!!!!!!

 

Received 2 letters off SC&m today both dated 17th July. First one says please contact bank within 14 days to arrange appt. with local Bank Manager. Second one offers full and final settlement of £2158.51 which includes Court fees - no interest claimed. I have to sign letter agreeing to 7 outlined points.... confidentiality, arrange review of account...blah, blah, blah. I have to send this back to SC&M no later than 31 July. What do I do? I know there are some things I have to cross out and is there a letter I need to send them too?

My AQ is due in Court by latest 5th August - Do I still need to lodge this now or wait for a payout and if no payout lodge it bwefore cut off date of 5th August?

 

Gone all giddy as due to go on jollies 07.09.07:lol: :cool::smile::p

Link to post
Share on other sites

No need to sign their letter, send your own:

 

Date

Dear Whoever

Ref: Your Offer of Settlement

 

Account: xxxxxxxx

Sort Code xx-xx-xx

Claim No: XXXXX in XXXX County Court

 

I acknowledge receipt of your letter date xx/xx/xx and your settlement offer of £XXX.

 

I accept your offer as full and final settlement only for this claim of bank charges made on my account between xx/xx/xx and xx/xx/xx(dates of first and last charge).

 

However I will only accept an unconditional offer and will therefore not be signing your acceptance agreement

 

I accept this offer without prejudice and I reserve the right to make any further claims should you apply future charges that may be considered unlawful under common law or in violation of the Unfair Terms in Consumer Contracts Regulations 1999 or Unfair Contract Terms Act 1977.

 

I will be willing to withdraw my claim and will send a Notice of Discontinuance to the Court upon receipt of unconditional full settlement of my claim

 

I am also not prepared to agree to any confidentiality clauses you try to impose, unless of course your client wishes to make an offer of due consideration in addition to the amount of £xxxxx, in order to be afforded this privilege by myself.

 

I trust that you will find this arrangement acceptable.

 

Yours sincerely

 

As regards AQ, you are unlikely to be paid before 5th Aug. I would submit the Aq now and pay the fee. This will keep the claim on going in case they don't pay (although very unlikely) and mention in the letter that the claim will not discontiniued until this fee is paid.You will need to amend the letter accordingly.

 

Alternatively send the letter as is and also write to the court explaining you have had a full offer and asking the court to defer your case for 14 days in order that you receive payment and you will inform the court whether payment is made and that you wish to discontinue the claim at that time

Link to post
Share on other sites

BUMP:)

 

I have posted letter back to SC&M today accepting their offer minus terms and conditions and reminding them that case will continue unless they pay up - fingers crossed.

 

One question though when I write to the Court asking them to defer the case for 14 days to allow for payment does this mean that my AQ does not have to be in on 5th Aug but 19th Aug? - confused:???:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you Michael :D - so just to clarify as my head is in a whirl right now!!!!

 

As I have sent back acceptance to SC&M for full and final settlement by cut off date of 31 July 2007 this means I should still receive the money? Really confused as I have seen reports saying that until today's test case is sorted then cases will be frozen!!!!!:eek::!:

 

Sure I ma not the only one having a wobble with this one:rolleyes:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for reply - last wobble I promise........ I did not SC&M's letter of acceptance back accepting full and final I sent the one Michael suggested in earlier post.........will still get 'me money':confused:

 

Yes:)

I WON!!!! :D :D :D

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/lloydstsb-successes/1774-barty-lloyds-tsb.html

 

IF I HAVE BEEN HELPFUL PLEASE CLICK THE SCALES:)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

BUMP

Still not been paid out:mad: - I know SC&M signed for my acceptance letter on 25 July Rec Del. Rang them last week and they said wait 2 weeks to be paid out. Rang today as 2 weeks passed. Told me that I had to wait 2-3 weeks due to backlog. Told me to ring back next week if not paid then said it could take 3-4 weeks. If I rang back nex week they would tell me where things were up to. I said why can you tell me next week and not this week when I will be paid - got some feeble fob off answer.........................

 

QUESTION:

 

What can I say next week to hurry them up - I have asked deferment off the Court to allow them time to pay up.............HELP...............just want to be paid before jollies on 7th Sept.............ANY STRONG WORDS OF WISDOM OUT THERE????????????????????? :rolleyes:

Link to post
Share on other sites

BUMP

 

HELP

After not receiving payment in 3 weeks, I rang SC&M again today to be told that they may have closed my file and forgot to pay me and that they will pass it to a something or other department and they will ring me within 2 days to tell me where things are up to.

Getting worried as read a thread on this site where somebody had been made a full and final settlement but not signed t's and c's and had the offer withdrawn. I too sent my own letter and dd not sign SC&M's t's and c's...........HELP

Also if they keep stalling me what can I use as a means to make th4em pay up. I have written to the Court for a deferment to enable payment to take place. What next?

Link to post
Share on other sites

I saw a case yesterday where Lloyds are using not sending back an unconditional acceptance of their offer as a reason not to pay and relying on the OFT case to defer payment.

 

I can only say keep on pestering them.

 

I would not seek to defer the court date as this only takes the pressure off them.

If I have been helpful please click on my star and add a comment.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...