Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • is the home in joint names but this is solely your debt? need far more history to be able to comment if it's paid off and was not just written of by one partly on their books and sold to anther, thus the cra file says £0. dx
    • So, Sunak has managed to get someone to 'volunteer to go to Rwanda hasn't he? .. for just £3000 payment to the person plus 5 years free board and lodging isnt it? - cost to UK taxpayer over £300M+ (300 million quid+) isnt it? - Bargain says Rwanda, especially with all the profit we made privately selling those luxury chalets Bravermann advertised for us   I wonder how many brits would jump at that offer? Thousands? Hundreds of thousands? Lets see, up to 5 years free board and lodging and £3k in my pocket .. I'd go - and like that person - just come back if/when I get bored. First job - off to Botswana for a week to see the elephants.   Of course the paid volunteers going to Botswana are meaningless - Rwanda have REPEATEDLY said they wont take any forcibly trafficked people in breach of international law eh? Have the poops actually got any civil servants to agree to go yet - probably end up as more massive payments to VIPal contractors to go and sit there doing nowt shortly eh?    
    • Hi Wondered if I could get a little advise please. I entered into a commercial lease (3 years) and within a few months I had to leave as the business I was trading with collapsed. I returned the keys to the landlord and explained the situation and no money, also likely to go on benefits but the landlord stuck to their guns. They have now instructed solicitors to send letter before action claiming just over £4000. The lease was mine and so the debt. I know this. I have emailed the solicitors twice to explain I am out of work and that with help from family I could offer a full and final settlement figure of £1500 or £10pw. This was countered by them with an offer to reduce the debt by £400, or pay off the amount over 12 months. I went back with an improved full and final offer of £2500 or £20pw. This has been rejected with the comment 'papers ready to go to court'. I have no hope of paying the £4000 and so it will have to go to court. Pity as I have no debts otherwise but not working is a killer. I wondered if they take me to court, could I ask for mediation? I also think that taking me to court will result in a pretty much nothing per week payment from my benefits. Are companies just pushing ahead with action even if a better offer is on the table? Thanks for your help.
    • Hi all, Many thanks for the advice! Unfortunately, the reply to the email was as expected…   Starbucks UK Customer Care <[email protected]> Hi xxxxxx, We are sorry to read you received a parking charge after using our Stansted Airport - A120 DT store. Unfortunately, the car park here is managed by MET parking. Both Starbucks and EuroGarages who own and operate this site are not able to help and have no authority to overturn any parking charges received. If you have followed the below terms then you would need to send all correspondence to [email protected], who will be able to assist you further. Several signs around the car park clarify the below terms and conditions: • Maximum stay 60 minutes, whilst the store is open. If the store is closed, pay to park applies. • The car park is for Starbucks customers only who make a purchase in our store, a charge will be issued if you left the site. • If you had made a purchase and required additional time, you must have inputted your registration number into the in store iPad which would have extended your stay up to 3 hours • To park in a disabled bay, you must have displayed a valid disabled badge. • If Starbucks was closed, you must have paid for parking as charges still apply, following signage located on site. • If you didn’t use the store, you must have paid for parking, following signage located on site Please ensure all further correspondence is directed to MET parking at the above email address, and accept our apologies that we cannot help you further on this matter.  Kind Regards,  Lora K  Customer Care Team Leader Starbucks Coffee Company, Building 4 Chiswick Park, London, W4 5YE
    • Thanks HB edited and re-uploaded. Thanks for the heads up 👍
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

car2403 -v- Halifax


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5249 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hello everyone,

 

I'm in the process of claiming charges from the Halifax and find myself with some questions, if you don't mind;

 

Data Protection Act Breach;

 

I wrote to my branch address (I've since found out it should have been the Data Protection Officer address I should have used, but took the address from my statement!) requesting statements and enclosing a £10 postal order on 10 April 2007.

 

On 26 May I sent another letter telling them they'd failed to comply with the 40 day period, giving 7 days before I claim in the County Court.

 

The still haven't replied/complied.

 

Question is, do I have to make a complaint to the Information Commissioners Office first before making a claim for an enforcement order? I'd prefer not to, as I did the Information Commissioners Office thing with Barclaycard and had to wait weeks for a reply.

 

I also don't have proof of delivery of the S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) letter, (didn't find this site until after it was sent!) so can't prove receipt - can I find out from the Post Office if the postal orders have been "cashed"?

 

Claiming charges I know about;

 

I do have some statements, showing some charges, so I've started the process for claiming these alongside the above.

 

I wrote to them on 13 April 2007 asking for these (£564.00) to be repaid. Got a standard reply apologising for me being unhappy, promising a response within the 8 week period.

 

They wrote again on 7 May 2007 saying they were still investigating.

 

I sent LBA on 9 May 2007, but didn't issue the claim as I didn't have the money for the fee at the time.

 

They've sent their final response saying "sorry, but no refund" on 1 June 2007.

 

Can I contact the FSO and avoid taking this claim to Court? Is the Court route more advisible?

 

Both issues;

 

Is the failure to provide statements relating to my complaint? Would they not send statements because of some marker on my account because of the complaint?

 

Can I issue one claim for;

- Specific Performance/Damages for failure to provide the SAR?

and,

- Claim for charges I know about, which will save me some Court fees? (£564.00)

or does there have to be two claims?

 

I read on the Information Commissioners Office's site that a claim for Specific Performance without damages will go via "Part 8" and may be fasttracked through the process - does this mean two separate claims will mean I get my statements faster? If so, I may as well do one claim for a "fast tracked compliance" order and do a second claim for the total amount when I receive my statements.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Halifax sent me a letter saying that they had "ordered" my statements as requested and these would be with me shortly - this was AFTER I sent them an LBA for enforcement proceedings with the Court and enclosing a copy of a complaint form that I sent to the ICO, however!

 

I've received the statements this week and decided to go down the Ombudsman route to see if it's quicker - I'm having to wait 10 weeks for hearing dates through the Courts on other claims, so the FSO may be quicker...

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

ICO have upheld my complaint re: the SAR - bizarre that they've told me they can't help with my claim for bank charges though, as I never asked them to in the first place. (Must be a standard response because they are receiving so many complaints because of the Banks' failure to comply with the 40 day timescales)

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm waiting for the Ombudsman to complete his investigations with the Bank.

 

I've heard that he charges them £350 just to investigate my complaint, so maybe they'll back down and fold before even going there.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Best of luck with your claim car, hope you hear something sooner than you think.

--------------------------------

If you approve of my Post, please tip my scales.

13/07/07 **WON** Halifax

Any advice or opinion I give, is what I have learnt from CAG, If in doubt, please consult a professional.

 

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi, Car2403.

 

I, like you have went down the FOS route. Trying to get about £5,000.

Still waitng for a response. Let us know when you hear anything.

 

Regards.

 

Scott.

Any advice I give is honest and in good faith.:)

If in doubt, you should seek the opinion of a Qualified Professional.

If you can, please donate to this site.

Help keep it up and active, helping people like you.

If you no longer require help, please do what you can to help others

RIP: Rooster-UK - MARTIN3030 - cerberusalert

Link to post
Share on other sites

I've just spoken to the FSO about another of my complaints with them and they have admitted to "losing" my paperwork for the Halifax - they said this is happening often due to the amount of complaints they are receiving.

 

I now have to send my complaint to them again and start from scratch on their turnaround times again too.

 

If you've sent a complaint to them and haven't received confirmation of receipt from them, I suggest you ring them to confirm they have it and send it again if not.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Well . . . there you go.

 

It would seem that you've done everything properly and in order.

 

Information Commissioners Office also told me that they couldn't investigate claims - only breaches or non-compliance to Data Protection Act. But that's fine. Unfortunately HBOSplc's deadline with Information Commissioners Office expires just as I'm about to go on me hols for 5 weeks, though.

Dummie's Guide to CAG: http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/welcome-consumer-forums/107001-how-do-i-dummies.html

Me v BofS: Charges: £13,048.10 #2a/c Statements from 08/01/01 received. Charges:£5,156.39 Information Commissioner's Office informed June 12th who wrote to BoS, June 22nd for non-compliance. #1a/c: passed to BoS Senior Review Team. Discovered 2 further a/cs, and 3 Loan accounts. "Goodwill offer" of £7,424.23 06/07/07. Accepted (partial repayment). 20/07/07 Top-up payments of £2,558.10 & £1,154.00

£11,136.33 paid back thus far.

New claim issued: 9/07/2007 for 3rd account: £500+ PRESSING ON!

Don't forget - when you win - a donation to CAG would be welcome!

If anything I've said has remotely been of any assistance, then please tip my scales!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Letter from Litigation team;

 

It will cost the Bank to defend your claim and, as these costs will be unrecoverable as the claim will be allocated to the small claim tracks, blah, blah, blah... without admission of liability, Halifax is willing to reimburse [the full amount of the claim], etc, etc

 

We are keen to help you avoid charges in the future, blah, blah, blah...

 

Get in there!

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes you have won!!

 

Let us know when the money appears in your account, keep checking as it will appear anytime from today. :D

HOW TO...DUMMIES GUIDE TO CAG...Read here

STEP BY STEP GUIDE...Read here

F&Q's... Read here

EVERYTHING YOU NEED THE A~Z GUIDE...Read here

 

Go to our Cag Toolbar Download page here

 

Please don't forget this site is run on DONATIONS If this site has helped in any way, then please give a little back. ;-)

Any opinions are without prejudice & without liability. All I know has come from this site. If you are unsure, please seek professional advice. .

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have some charges that weren't included in the claim because of the 40+ day delay I had on the SAR - should I start another claim for this, (LBA, etc, etc) or just write to them to ask them to take this in to account as well? Will they do that or drag it out as long as poss?

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

you will have to claim again.

HOW TO...DUMMIES GUIDE TO CAG...Read here

STEP BY STEP GUIDE...Read here

F&Q's... Read here

EVERYTHING YOU NEED THE A~Z GUIDE...Read here

 

Go to our Cag Toolbar Download page here

 

Please don't forget this site is run on DONATIONS If this site has helped in any way, then please give a little back. ;-)

Any opinions are without prejudice & without liability. All I know has come from this site. If you are unsure, please seek professional advice. .

Link to post
Share on other sites

The money for this claim hit my account today.

 

Strangely, there's another transaction that looks the same for a lower amount which is the same amount of the charges that weren't included in this claim - seems I won't need to make another claim, now. (I'll wait to see what happens on the statement tomorrow, as it doesn't say what the references are yet)

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

!!! CONGRATULATIONS !!!

Dummie's Guide to CAG: http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/welcome-consumer-forums/107001-how-do-i-dummies.html

Me v BofS: Charges: £13,048.10 #2a/c Statements from 08/01/01 received. Charges:£5,156.39 Information Commissioner's Office informed June 12th who wrote to BoS, June 22nd for non-compliance. #1a/c: passed to BoS Senior Review Team. Discovered 2 further a/cs, and 3 Loan accounts. "Goodwill offer" of £7,424.23 06/07/07. Accepted (partial repayment). 20/07/07 Top-up payments of £2,558.10 & £1,154.00

£11,136.33 paid back thus far.

New claim issued: 9/07/2007 for 3rd account: £500+ PRESSING ON!

Don't forget - when you win - a donation to CAG would be welcome!

If anything I've said has remotely been of any assistance, then please tip my scales!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Maybe not! The charges/interest were split and the transactions didn't appear right on my online statement - they've sorted themselves out now and there's only the first claim which has been paid.

 

Oh well, I'll start a second claim from scratch again.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Good luck with it. Let us know.;)

HOW TO...DUMMIES GUIDE TO CAG...Read here

STEP BY STEP GUIDE...Read here

F&Q's... Read here

EVERYTHING YOU NEED THE A~Z GUIDE...Read here

 

Go to our Cag Toolbar Download page here

 

Please don't forget this site is run on DONATIONS If this site has helped in any way, then please give a little back. ;-)

Any opinions are without prejudice & without liability. All I know has come from this site. If you are unsure, please seek professional advice. .

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Received the settlement/wasted costs order back saying I hadn't paid the fee of £35 for the Judge to consider it - I haven't bothered sending it back with the fee, as the costs were only £78 anyway. MCOL still have it showing as Acknowledged despite a Defence being entered by Halifax - I'm just going to remove the application for costs and send the order to withdraw the first claim.

 

Just got round to sorting the second claim out now - £265.00 plus interest of £36 and Court fees, as I intend to kick this off now. Prem. letter off today.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...