Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

CCA to Lloyds tsb Visa


madh21
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6051 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 58
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

ahh yeah i see now, didn't read your previous posts fully.

 

When they replied to your SAR and CCA and sent a copy of the application form did you notify them that they have not complied fully and that the app form is not an agreement? Wat I'm getting at is that in their eyes they assume they have complied and as a result the dispute is over unless they told them otherwise.

 

it would be useful if you could post up a copt of the agrement and t&c's so i can check if it is legally enforcable or not.

 

Also, if they do record a default notice against you you can get it removed when you claim your charges back

 

kind regards,

shane

____________________________________________

All advice is offered freely & without prejudice

 

 

If my post has been useful to you please click the scales

Link to post
Share on other sites

yes, I have done all of that. It actually took them until september to send the SAR and then only in part. The rest came about a week ago.

 

Their collections dept have hounded me since I swapped my current account and they could no longer take the monthly payment ( or rather helped themselves!)

 

They're just not bothered about anything you say or letters you send. I'm getting pretty fed up now.

 

I'm also in the same situation with Barclays - now legal letters turning up.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi there,

 

I know what you mean about ignoring letter`s. I CCA`d and SAR`d them over a month ago.

 

I received my statements but they have totaly ignored my CCA request, they commit an offence next Wednesday, although they are still asking for money and still adding on interest and still hounding me and still being morons and still ........

 

I too changed banks so they couldn`t help themselves.

 

I`ll keep watching with interest.

 

Regards

 

 

N.P.

If I have helped or made you laugh in any way in your hour of need, then please click my scales <<<<<<<<<< ;)

Link to post
Share on other sites

I was told earlier this year by someone at TSB Collections that they could see the Payplan payments going in and that the account would be sent to their Debt Recovery Dept. within a month. I was told to expect a letter from their in-house solicitors (SC&M) before that happened, because that's the way the system worked. But he would make a note we'd had the conversation and he'd told me what would happen.

Sure enough, we had letters from SC&M, but the account didn't pass to the Debt Recovery Dept, it went to BCW. Meanwhile Payplan had tried sending payments to SC&M and had a huge job trying to find out who had the debt. Nobody knew where it was!

We will not be intimidated.

'The pen is mightier than the sword'.

Petition to Outlaw Debt Sale and Purchase

- can't read/post much as eye strain's v.bad.

VIVA CAG!!! :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Seems like there are lots of us in the same boat.

 

I CCA'd Lloyds nearly a month ago, I have not received a response however they have issued a default.

 

Nice people arn't they!

The only man who sticks closer to you in adversity than a friend is a creditor.

 

Debt Collection Charges

 

There is no legal basis for a creditor or a debt collection agency acting on its behalf to claim collection costs from a debtor unless there is an express provision in the original agreement.

 

Without such provision, collection charges cannot be demanded as a debt due under the agreement.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

 

Seems like there are lots of us in the same boat.

 

I CCA'd Lloyds nearly a month ago, I have not received a response however they have issued a default.

 

Nice people arn't they!

 

You mean a bunch of moron`s don`t you?

 

Looks like everyone`s going to land a nice little Default. Do we care really? As in your other thread, it could be a blessing in disguise, no Credit - no Debt.

 

Maybe it`s time for a mass invasion on Lloyds!

 

Regards

 

 

N.P

If I have helped or made you laugh in any way in your hour of need, then please click my scales <<<<<<<<<< ;)

Link to post
Share on other sites

They're a lovely bunch, Under Siege!

I'm just scanning in their last letter to put on here tomorrow.

We started our Debt Management Plan in October 2006. They were contacted by Payplan, who had our authority to act on our behalf. They ignored Payplan whilst accepting payments anyway, defaulted one of hubby's credit cards in November 2006, reduced his credit limit (bizarrely!) to £3650 in January 2007, when £9907 was owing. They sent him a letter in March this year, demanding full payment of arrears of one penny - yes, £0.01. We ignored this at our cost. In May they demanded payment of 3 pennies - yes £0.03! So we gave up at that point and wrote them a cheque for 3 pence - which they cashed! All the while accepting Payplan's payments.

They defaulted the second card in January 2007. Same thing - we were paying by Payplan.

We still haven't received our SAR request. They might be having problems because there's a lot to hide. The third account - our current account - was a shambles because of the charges they applied, that they're now admitting were wrong.

We will not be intimidated.

'The pen is mightier than the sword'.

Petition to Outlaw Debt Sale and Purchase

- can't read/post much as eye strain's v.bad.

VIVA CAG!!! :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

You couldn't make it up!

The only man who sticks closer to you in adversity than a friend is a creditor.

 

Debt Collection Charges

 

There is no legal basis for a creditor or a debt collection agency acting on its behalf to claim collection costs from a debtor unless there is an express provision in the original agreement.

 

Without such provision, collection charges cannot be demanded as a debt due under the agreement.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...