Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I re-read the extract from your  solicitor's letter this morning and think I might understand what they have in mind. I believe (and it’s only a guess) their strategy is this: 1.    You will make your SD 2.    You will enter fresh pleas to the four charges (not guilty) but will offer to plead guilty to speeding on the understanding that the FtP charges are dropped. 3.    If this is accepted they will attempt to argue that the two offences were committed “on the same occasion” 4.    You will be sentenced for those two offences (the sentence depending on whether the “same occasion” argument succeeds). They also have a plan in the event that your offer at (2) is unsuccessful and you are convicted again of the 2xFtP charges (and so face disqualification under “totting up”): 5.    They will make an “exceptional hardship” argument to avoid a ban. 6.    If that is unsuccessful they have already lodged an appeal in the Crown Court against that decision. (This is the only “appeal” I can think of). 7.    They plan to ask the court to suspend your ban pending that appeal. If I’m correct, I’m surprised the Crown Court has agreed to accept a speculative appeal (against something that hasn’t happened). The solicitor says this is to lodge it within the normal timescales. But you will have 21 days from the date of your conviction (which will be next Wednesday) to lodge an appeal with the Crown Court, so there is no need for a speculative appeal. I have to say that an application to have your ban suspended pending an appeal is unlikely to succeed. The Magistrates Court is unlikely to agree to it for one very good reason: if they make such an order (suspending your ban until your appeal is heard), all you need to do is not to pursue the appeal and the Magistrates order suspending your ban will remain in place. Hey Presto! No ban and no need for you to trouble with an appeal. Perhaps he will ask for your ban to be suspended for (say) three months or until your appeal is heard (whichever occurs first). This potentially creates a problem because if your appeal is not heard in that time either your ban will kick in or you will have o go back to court to get the suspension extended. But the solicitor obviously knows more about these things than I do. I would want to be very clear about this solicitor’s fees and what he proposes to charge you for. As I said, there is absolutely no need to lodge an appeal with the Crown Court. That can be done if and when it becomes required. But I am still firmly of the opinion that it is overwhelmingly likely that you will not need to progress beyond point 2 above. Point 3 is optional and I don’t know whether he solicitor has made It clear to you that the only thing you will avoid in the event of success is three penalty points. You will still be fined for the second offence and your driving record will still be endorsed with the details, but no penalty points will be imposed. Do let us know how it goes.  
    • I'm really trying, but worst case I can't find what are my options?
    • John Lewis' Privacy Notice states that their CCTV Systems does not use facial recognition or collect biometric data - so I assume it should be fine?    Thank you a lot for your reply. I've scheduled my first therapy session ne t week. Really the time to turn my life around..
    • absolute rubbish, whomever told you that lied to make them sound important. no stores are using face recognition, they are not allowed too it's not been generally licenced by the gov't. it's only in a very few stores in central london. and they most certainly would never waste staff time searching old CCTV they dont even have. it should be wiped by GDPR laws etc after 30days. if you get any silly letters BIN THEM. go see your GP ASAP 
    • Thank you both so much for the reply. I am worried because they told me they have face detection systems in place, that they go back through the CCTV from their other stores and find out I've shoplifted from them before. How likely is this? Also they did not mention anything about DWF solicitors or retail loss prevention. Should I still expect a letter from them? 
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Student Loans Company/Smith Lawson & Company Recovery Se


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4624 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi there

 

As you will see this is my first post on this site and I would like to begin by saying that I was somewhat relieved (whilst also slightly disturbed) to see that I am far from the only one having terrible problems with SLC/ Smith Lawson.

 

My issue is a slight variation on those shown above, but I would be grateful if anyone could advise me if they have had a similar problem and of course offer any advice on the matter.

 

My problem regards the deferment of my student loan for the last financial year (2005/2006) and I can confirm that I am currently repaying the loan from April 2006 onwards. To cut a very long story short the SLC refused to defer my loan as one of the wage slips which I sent in was above the monthly threshold for that year (due to a one off project for which I was paid overtime). When I sent in the deferment Application I also sent them my new address (which they conveniently "lost"). The next thing I heard from them was a letter from a debt collecting agency saying I owed over £700 in arrears. I have of course disputed this and thus far refused to pay the arrears as my annual earnings for the year in question were below the annual limit.

 

I have since had many unpleasant dealings with SLC regarding this matter both over the phone and via written correspondence, but I must confess I have now given up on calling them as they are extremely rude and aggressive and also every time I call I am told a completely different story.

 

From what I can ascertain so far, my case seems to revolve around the following issues;-

 

1) Deferment - is this a right if you earn below the limit or is this discretionary?

 

2) If discretionary at whose discretion is this and where are the rules for deferment in the original agreement?

 

3) The deferment limit - is this annual or monthly or does this depend on when you took out the loan (I am a pre - 98 borrower / victim)?

 

4) Does the fact that they claim to never have received my notification of change of address give them the right to refuse to defer my loan (the are arguing that until I receive written confirmation that the loan has been deferred that I am liable to pay it, even though I have never received this before)?

 

I must confess that this is now a matter of principle. I am sick and tired of going round in circles with these people and have been tempted to just pay the damned alleged arrears and have done with it, but I must say that other peoples' experiences which I have read on this site have inspired me to hold firm and not be bullied by these Charlatans.

 

Your help would be appreciated!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 70
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Deferment- from what the SLC have said to me, it is discretionary- HOWEVER I am currently trying to get info from them regarding my accounts, and I no longer know whether what I have previously been told by people there is necessarily the correct info. Sad but true.

If you provide the correct info for deferment- and if you have now given them the accurate info showing you are below the earnings threshold for deferment they have the ability (and obligation?) to defer the loan and backdate the deferment for 3 months.

If anyone has any info about deferment and the SLC I would greatly appreciate it, as it is deferment- or the lack of it which is what I'm trying to look at. Those bloody arrears are about £2k- and I've paid them nearly a grand on top of that. I've never earned over the threshold.

Nationwide-A&L-Halifax 1-Student Loans Company-NatWest-Virgin Media-Link-Capital One ALL WON!

Thames Credit -statute barred sent 13/11/08

BCW- prove debt letter- 14/08/08

Apex- CCA 14/08/08

Redcats UK- SAR 14/04/09

Call Serve- CCA 14/08/08

Littlewoods- no CCA letter 03/09/08- Lowells now

Wescot- CCA 19/9/08

Capital One/Debitas- now with Lowells

 

Any opinions are without prejudice & without liability. All information has been obtained from this site. If you are unsure, please seek professional advice. .

Link to post
Share on other sites

Oh, and them phoning about 3 times every day makes me glad I have caller display.

Nationwide-A&L-Halifax 1-Student Loans Company-NatWest-Virgin Media-Link-Capital One ALL WON!

Thames Credit -statute barred sent 13/11/08

BCW- prove debt letter- 14/08/08

Apex- CCA 14/08/08

Redcats UK- SAR 14/04/09

Call Serve- CCA 14/08/08

Littlewoods- no CCA letter 03/09/08- Lowells now

Wescot- CCA 19/9/08

Capital One/Debitas- now with Lowells

 

Any opinions are without prejudice & without liability. All information has been obtained from this site. If you are unsure, please seek professional advice. .

Link to post
Share on other sites

If you took out a loan when you were under 40 years of age the debt is written off when you reach the grand old age of 50. Above 40 and the debt dies when you get to 65.

 

hello noomill060, thats what I thought! i distincly remember this clause but so far no one else has mentioned it.

'rise like lions after slumber, in unvanquishable number, shake your chains to the earth like dew, which in sleep had fall'n on you, ye are many, they are few.' Percy Byshse Shelly 1819

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 months later...

Would somebody be kind enough to state Smith lawson and company 's P.O Box number as what little paper work i had has dissapeared and there not a real company so their not on the net.

Once again, these people are not debt collectors just student loans under another name...for those who hadn't read previous threads...

 

cheers great site

Link to post
Share on other sites

'rise like lions after slumber, in unvanquishable number, shake your chains to the earth like dew, which in sleep had fall'n on you, ye are many, they are few.' Percy Byshse Shelly 1819

Link to post
Share on other sites

copied from The Badger, very helpful

 

Forgot to say:

Cheques for the S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) and the CCA requests are made payable to "Student Loans Company"

 

In case anyone wasn't sure.

 

Also the address of the data controller (a legally required position for all institutions holding personal data under the Data Protection Act) for the Student Loans Company is:

 

Data Controller

Student Loans Co.Ltd,

21 St. Thomas Street,

Bristol.

BS1 6JS

 

You can address your S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) there as an alternative to that given in the Template above.

 

21 St. Thomas St. is also the address of Smith Lawson & Company Ltd. as mentioned above - so if you're dealing with that pseudo-branch of the Student Loans Company thats where to send information

 

THIS IS COURTESY OF THE BADGER that I copied over for convenience, thanks for your excellent work badger:)

'rise like lions after slumber, in unvanquishable number, shake your chains to the earth like dew, which in sleep had fall'n on you, ye are many, they are few.' Percy Byshse Shelly 1819

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hey no problem.

 

just got my allocation questionaire through for Student Loans Claim.

 

By the way it helps when you get to filing a claim at the court stage if you quote the Civil Jurisdiction and Judegements Act 1982 as amended. This is because the SLC main office is in Scotland and so you want the case heard under English law here in England - I'll add the text of the additional paragraph to a template on the general thread.

 

The Badger

Link to post
Share on other sites

thanks thats brilliant - new letter from a debt collection agency, Direct Legal & Collections which they say has been referred to them by their client, SLC, who have totally ignored my letter informing them of my circumstances for about the thrid time! how frustrating they are, they are threatening court action and a CCJ being registered. Can I put a claim into court to get rid of them pestering for a loan I do not owe, I am not claiming back charges of any kind?

'rise like lions after slumber, in unvanquishable number, shake your chains to the earth like dew, which in sleep had fall'n on you, ye are many, they are few.' Percy Byshse Shelly 1819

Link to post
Share on other sites

maybelline-

 

If they have added any of their £20 penalty charges to your debt, you may start a small claim to recover these in the same way as any other penalty charges.

 

This is exactly what I have done.

 

Once the papers land on their (SLC's) desk with a thud the boot is on the other foot and they will have to respond to the Court. After this there is no way they can hassle you until the actual debt is established.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...
  • 4 months later...

This is my first posting here and I found it whilst doing a search for Smith Lawson.

 

I have had years of problems with SLC/SLco

 

My wages decreased in Jan 2007 and I applied for deferment. I paid for Nov. & Dec. 2006, but applied to defer from Jan. 2007 onwards.

 

It took me months to get an application form out of them and I'd even sent them proof of the wage change before that, by recorded delivery. I finally got an application form in March 2007 and had to get a written letter of proof of wages as SLC lost the payslips I'd sent them in Jan. 2007.

 

I got my deferment, but they refused to remove the charges incurred during Jan, Feb. and March.

 

Now I was granted deferment and it was backdated, yet they will not remove the arrears charges that my deferment period covers. They phoned again today.

 

I am right in ignoring them? I did formally, in writing dispute the arrears on the details I have just relayed. That the arrears occurred due to their clerical error and loss of vital documents.

 

In addition, to those that may not know you can have deferment back dated up to three months. One of the main reasons I am disputing the arrears as my deferment covers the months they are charging me for, so my argument to them is that no arrears can exist in that time period.

Link to post
Share on other sites

First thing to do is to send them a SAR to get hold of ALL the data they hold on you.

 

They *should* have a note of when you applied for a deferment form.

 

When you get this, all you have to do is wave it at them and tell them you will be taking small claim action to force them to remove the unlawfully applied charges and arrears, as it is clearly their own clerical error that you didnt get your deferment form in time.

 

Also, write to your MP.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Then tell them you dispute the amount owed and tell them that you will only comunicate by letter. Check out the CAG library for a letter to this effect, then send it.

 

You should also send them a s.78 request for a copy of the original agreement. They have to supply you with one within 12 working days.

 

After which time they cant hassle you until they do.

 

This just gives you enough hassle-free time to get enough info from advice on here to be able to take them on.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Send all letters to SLC by Recorded Delivery. They are are very good at "not receiving" them, as you've discovered already!

 

I will make a note of all the info you have relayed and make sure I am armed with this if they call again. Though I rarely answer the phone. If they should write then I will of course use the same info in writing.

 

I always send everything to SLC recorded delivery and last time was able to confirm that they had indeed signed and received my payslips.

 

The last time I was on the phone with them, I was forced to put the phone down as they were so abusive in regard that I had all the proof needed they'd received the right data to dismiss arrears ever occurring and I refused to pay the arrears and they said I had to, which I of course dispute. Especially given that the deferment by their own confirmation in writing, proves the fact in covering the time period they claim I must pay for.

 

They act as if a law unto themselves.

Link to post
Share on other sites

As you have a letter from them, stating you were defered for the period they now want payment for, start a small claim to force them to remove the alleged arrears from your account.

 

They do act as iof they are above the law. Most proper banks like to do that as well.

 

But they are sh!t scared of facing a judge and will do anything to avoid it.

 

Do you want a hand with it?

Link to post
Share on other sites

As you have a letter from them, stating you were defered for the period they now want payment for, start a small claim to force them to remove the alleged arrears from your account.

 

They do act as iof they are above the law. Most proper banks like to do that as well.

 

But they are sh!t scared of facing a judge and will do anything to avoid it.

 

Do you want a hand with it?

 

It was the message left for me that prompted me to do a search on them when I found this place. What I need to do now is gather my paper work together.

 

Once I am armed I'll be back here with more of the info I have to hand. Then I may indeed need some help (thank you for your offer)

 

Its a comfort to not have to face these monsters on my own. I am really glad I found this place :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4624 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...