Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • That isn’t actually what the Theft Act 1968 S1 actually says, BTW. https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1968/60/section/1 (1)A person is guilty of theft if he dishonestly appropriates property belonging to another with the intention of permanently depriving the other of it;   The difference between what you’ve said and the Act? a) intent to permanently deprive rather than  just depriving (which is why the offence of “taking without consent” was brought in for motor vehicles, as otherwise "joyriders" could say "but I intended to give it back at the end") b) dishonesty : If I honestly believed A's pen belonged to B, and took it and gave it to B - B might be found guilty of theft but I shouldn't be. 
    • Received a call and follow on confirmation email from the police about my cabinets! They wanted to confirm that I was prepared to support police action for the matter and that I would be happy to provide a statement and attend court at a later date!!! I think that something might actually get done - it won't get my cabinets back I know that but hopefully it will put a stop to this so called courier doing this to people!
    • Around a month ago I had to send a sympathy card to a friend in GB. Logistically it made sense to buy a personalised one on eBay and get it sent straight to my mate, rather than faffing around getting it sent to me.  This mighty purchase set me back all of £3.05 (including postage costs). I was taken aback that, when it was sent, I got a tracking number.  For a flippin' three-quid card!  I had no idea that technology had moved on so much and that tracking was so easy.  The shop has feedback for 16,300 purchases so tracking must be easy & automatic. It's unlikely your case will get to court, but in cases that do this got me thinking that we need to aggressively challenge the PPCs where they have lied about the timescales of sending their rubbish and have no proof at all of posting - when it would be so easy to provide it.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

aria.co.uk - Faulty Graphics card 17 months old


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6549 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi,

 

I have just asked Aria for a replacement or fix for a graphics card I brough back in January 2005. I had the card replaced in August 2005 as it had a fault.

 

The graphics card is a Radeon 9800 Pro and cost £136

 

I have just sent them an e-mail asking for them to fix or replace it. Lets hope they don't put up a struggle. Graphics cards should last at least 3 years as is the usual life cycle refresh of computers.

regards,

 

InterSimi

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry I dont know anything about graphics cards, but good luck

If you find my post helpful please click on the scales at the top. Thank you

FAQ SECTION HERE

 

Halifax Bank Claim filed and settled

Halifax Credit Card settled

Argos Store Card settled

 

CCA requests sent to

Halifax Credit Card

LLoyds TSB Credit Card

Capital One

Moorcroft (Argos)

NDR

18/06/09

Link to post
Share on other sites

I deal with aria fairly often. I find them to be reasonable. Of course, their concern is whether they can get their money back from the manufacturer/distributor.

 

All the best,

.

Barclays - £268 - Moneyclaim

Capital One - £172 - Moneyclaim

Abbey (2nd claim) - Moneyclaim

---------------------------------------------------

 

HSBC - £2164.46- PAID IN FULL

MBNA - £471 - PAID IN FULL

NatWest - £307 - PAID IN FULL

Abbey Business - £314.15 - PAID IN FULL

Link to post
Share on other sites

i have a similar problem. i bought a graphics card online from overclockers, it was advertised to have 2 dvi connections. when i got it there was one dvi connection and one vga... i didn't really care so i set up a dual monitor system anyway.. now the 2nd monitor keeps flicking on and off.

 

i hop they replace yours, certainly the SOG Act would be worth quoting.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I will phone them later on today to address the issue in person rather than email. The email is just so I have records and a time line of events. I will keep you all updated

regards,

 

InterSimi

Link to post
Share on other sites

I've used Aria before last time was when we bought some RAM from them when it arrived it was faulty.

 

Tried it in the missus's Imac and in FOUR other PCs and they wouldnt even POST with it in sent it back, they say nothing wrong with it. At this point got very angry as i'm a field engineer with 10 years experience so I know a faulty stick of RAM when I see one ended up with a huge argument, would never touch them again after that.

 

Im sure there are people out there who have never had a problem with them though I stick to trade accounts now, a little cheaper and dont get any grief about returns at all (theyre much better to trade customers in that regard than the public in my experience)

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have just sent Aria this email:

 

From:

Intersimi

Address

 

 

To:

Aria Technology Ltd.

Aria House

Belle Vue Avenue

Pottery Lane

Manchester

M12 4AS

 

 

Request for repair replacement of Goods

Dear Sir/Madam,

 

Order Number: xxxxxxxx

RMA Number: xxxx

 

 

My request

I am writing to ask you to repair or replace to me the defective Radeon 9800 Pro graphics card.

I understand that under the Sales of Goods Act, goods are to be of an acceptable quality and last for a reasonable amount of time. A graphics card is expected to last in excess of 3 years. The graphics card first purchased in January 2005 and replaced 8 months later due to defect and then defective again after a further 6 months is not a reasonable amount of time.

 

Your responsibilities

I would draw your attention to the terms of the Sales of Goods act 1994 and the Sales of Goods act (as amended) 1995. There is an implied term that the goods supplied under the contract are of satisfactory quality and durability.

 

I am frankly shocked that you have not responded to my previous request for assistance.

 

What I require

I would like for Aria to accept responsibility for the faulty goods and to accept them under their returns policy and repair or replace the faulty item.

 

My targets to resolve this matter

I hope that you will enter into a sincere dialogue with me about this matter and I am writing this letter to you on the assumption that you will prefer to do this than merely respond with standard letters.

I will give you 7 days to reply to me accepting unconditionally my request in principle and letting me know a date by which the matter will be resolved.

 

If you do not respond or you do not respond positively within this time period, I shall send you a letter before action giving you a further 7 days in which to reflect. I believe that these targets are more than sufficient for a large company such as yours with dedicated staff.

After that will be no further communication from me and I shall issue a claim at the expiry of the second deadline.

 

 

Yours faithfully,

regards,

 

InterSimi

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...