Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • What do you guys think the chances are for her?   She followed the law, they didnt, then they engage in deception, would the judge take kindly to being lied to by these clowns? If we have a case then we should proceed and not allow these blatant dishonest cheaters to succeed 
    • I have looked at the car park and it is quite clearly marked that it is  pay to park  and advising that there are cameras installed so kind of difficult to dispute that. On the other hand it doesn't appear to state at the entrance what the charge is for breaching their rules. However they do have a load of writing in the two notices under the entrance sign which it would help if you could photograph legible copies of them. Also legible photos of the signs inside the car park as well as legible photos of the payment signs. I say legible because the wording of their signs is very important as to whether they have formed a contract with motorists. For example the entrance sign itself doe not offer a contract because it states the T&Cs are inside the car park. But the the two signs below may change that situation which is why we would like to see them. I have looked at their Notice to Keeper which is pretty close to what it should say apart from one item. Under the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 Schedule 4 Section 9 [2]a] the PCN should specify the period of parking. It doesn't. It does show the ANPR times but that includes driving from the entrance to the parking spot and then from the parking place to the exit. I know that this is a small car park but the Act is quite clear that the parking period must be specified. That failure means that the keeper is no longer responsible for the charge, only the driver is now liable to pay. Should this ever go to Court , Judges do not accept that the driver and the keeper are the same person so ECP will have their work cut out deciding who was driving. As long as they do not know, it will be difficult for them to win in Court which is one reason why we advise not to appeal since the appeal can lead to them finding out at times that the driver  and the keeper were the same person. You will get loads of threats from ECP and their sixth rate debt collectors and solicitors. They will also keep quoting ever higher amounts owed. Do not worry, the maximum. they can charge is the amount on the sign. Anything over that is unlawful. You can safely ignore the drivel from the Drips but come back to us should you receive a Letter of Claim. That will be the Snotty letter time.
    • please stop using @username - sends unnecessary alerts to people. everyone that's posted on your thread inc you gets an automatic email alert when someone else posts.  
    • he Fraser group own Robin park in Wigan. The CEO's email  is  [email protected]
    • Yes, it was, but in practice we've found time after time that judges will not rule against PPCs solely on the lack of PP.  They should - but they don't.  We include illegal signage in WSs, but more as a tactic to show the PPC up as spvis rather than in the hope that the judge will act on that one point alone. But sue them for what?  They haven't really done much apart from sending you stupid letters. Breach of GDPR?  It could be argued they knew you had Supremacy of Contact but it's a a long shot. Trespass to your vehicle?  I know someone on the Parking Prankster blog did that but it's one case out of thousands. Surely best to defy them and put the onus on them to sue you.  Make them carry the risk.  And if they finally do - smash them. If you want, I suppose you could have a laugh at the MA's expense.  Tell them about the criminality they have endorsed and give them 24 hours to have your tickets cancelled and have the signs removed - otherwise you will contact the council to start enforcement for breach of planning permission.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Endowment (again!) - early encashment PENALTY...


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6519 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Ok, its me again. By now you will realise we are thinking of cashing in our endowments as they are next to useless.

 

HOWEVER... I've just phoned one company and asked what the process is for cashing it in. The lady was very nice and she said that we were being offered £5800 for the early surrender of the policy (I also have that in writing.)

 

However, she also told me that the actual policy is worth £10,800 and that the £5,000

that I will loose is an "early encashment PENALTY". Made up of admin charges (although most of these will have been paid she tells me).

 

So in effect, this is simply a PENALTY for cashing in early.

 

I've seen similar threads to this for early mortgage repayment and wondered what the general thoughts were....

.

Barclays - £268 - Moneyclaim

Capital One - £172 - Moneyclaim

Abbey (2nd claim) - Moneyclaim

---------------------------------------------------

 

HSBC - £2164.46- PAID IN FULL

MBNA - £471 - PAID IN FULL

NatWest - £307 - PAID IN FULL

Abbey Business - £314.15 - PAID IN FULL

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ouch!!! I knew there was a penalty for cashing in early but thats just silly.

 

Have you looked into selling the endowment. You can usually get far more for it this way.

 

EDIT... Sorry just read your thread about them being unit linked.

Just the FAQ’s ma'am. Please read 'em thoroughly before jumping in. Cheers :)

 

Find all the letters under the rainbow here

 

Being a man, I am always right (however I will make no admission of liability if you have misinterpreted my instructions!! :) ) If you are in any doubt, then consult a professional. All opinions offered on this site are just that, and should not be taken as legal advice.

 

Halifax - £1400 reclaimed. Now on a crusade to help others!

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have contacted a compnay, and they will get an offer in the post in the next couple of days, but its not going to be a great deal over what I've been offered is it?

 

I have contacted the OFT and they have asked me to send in the terms and conditions once I receive them from the endowment company.

 

I requested them a couple of days ago so hopefully in a week I'll be better informed.

 

Strangely enough, when I spoke to the OFT about the situation, their standard reply was "well, what does it say in your terms and conditions?". I reminded them that the banks terms and conditions tell us there will be costs/penalties, but that it doesn't make it legal!!!

 

Watch this space...

.

Barclays - £268 - Moneyclaim

Capital One - £172 - Moneyclaim

Abbey (2nd claim) - Moneyclaim

---------------------------------------------------

 

HSBC - £2164.46- PAID IN FULL

MBNA - £471 - PAID IN FULL

NatWest - £307 - PAID IN FULL

Abbey Business - £314.15 - PAID IN FULL

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Hi

Was the endowment covering an interest only mortgage , if it was did the adviser fully explain the contract to you at the point of sale if not i would consider complaining about the advice (not the performance) i have done this and recieved all premiums back plus compen , also were you aware that it was unit linked .Who is the endowment with?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi John,

 

thanks for all the advice in various threads.

 

Latest situation is...

 

1) Policy is with Phoenix (was Royal Sun Alliance

2) Surrender value is £5800

3) They tell me the actual policy value is £10,800 but because I am cashing in early (an early encashment penalty) then I loose £5K

4) I have put it up for sale and have been offered 8K

 

5) Don't quite know what to do now. Obviously, it would seem that financially, the best thing to do is to sell it rather than surrender, but I wondered if this "early encashment penalty" falls under the same legislation as the we are using against the banks. 5K seems like a lot of money to me.

 

I'm prepared to sell and cut our losses, but its still best part of 3K to be lost.

 

Any advice out there?

.

Barclays - £268 - Moneyclaim

Capital One - £172 - Moneyclaim

Abbey (2nd claim) - Moneyclaim

---------------------------------------------------

 

HSBC - £2164.46- PAID IN FULL

MBNA - £471 - PAID IN FULL

NatWest - £307 - PAID IN FULL

Abbey Business - £314.15 - PAID IN FULL

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

An update on this - I've attempted to sell the policy, but unfortunately, we can't find our original documents, and it's Phoenix's policy not to re-issue original documents, so we can't sell.

 

Our only three options now are

 

1) Cash policy in for £5800 - £5000 less than the policy is valued at

2) Freeze further payments and claim the £10,800 in 10 years when the policy is due

3) Continue to pay into a cr*p policy

 

 

I'm thinking option one is best, but I'd still like to pursue the idea of "early encashment penalties" as being possibly refunded.

 

I did have a letter of explanation as to why we were getting so little. If anyone is actually interested in what Phoenix had to say, let me know and I'll post it up on here. It runs to 2 poages, so I can't be bothered unless anyone thinks they can help me!

 

Sorry to be so glum!

.

Barclays - £268 - Moneyclaim

Capital One - £172 - Moneyclaim

Abbey (2nd claim) - Moneyclaim

---------------------------------------------------

 

HSBC - £2164.46- PAID IN FULL

MBNA - £471 - PAID IN FULL

NatWest - £307 - PAID IN FULL

Abbey Business - £314.15 - PAID IN FULL

Link to post
Share on other sites

Dear Sirs

 

I now know that the Early Encashment Penalty you charge for early encashment of your endowment policies is a disproportionate penalty and therefore unlawful at Statute and Common Law. It is quite clear from it's title that this is a penalty for not carrying the agreement through to its full term which is clearly an unenforceable term in our agreement. If it is not a penalty but truly does reflect the costs to which you are put as a result of my early encashment activities, then you will be pleased to provide me with a full itemised breakdown of these costs detailing exact expenditures.

 

Failing this, I expect you to provide me with, and honour, a quotation for early encashment which does not include this unlawful and unenforceable penalty charge. I will accept a quotation which includes a reasonable and believable pre-estimate of your costs related to early encashment, whereupon I will make a decision as to whether to proceed. I remind you that I am protected by legislation which relates to the terms of our agreement to do business, and also to the appropriate, proper and professional selling of endowment policies, and I will if necessary pursue the fullest remedy possible within those laws.

 

Yours faithfully

 

Thoughts anyone?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok, someone has listened, so here is (most) of my letter to them - I kept it informal as I didn't want them getting a sniff at this stage that I may take it further ...

 

Dear sir,

 

 

I have recently written to you in regards to cashing in the above policy. However, I was more than a little disappointed in the surrender value of £5851.00. I phoned earlier today and spoke to a very friendly woman and asked what I needed to do to surrender the policy.

During the conversation, I also enquired about how the final value was arrived at. I was just given a general indication that the actual policy is currently worth £10,800, but because we are cashing in early, there is an “early encashment penalty” (did I get that right?) of approx £5K and therefore that is how the final figure is arrived at.

 

It would be immensely helpful if you could give me a breakdown of how that figure is arrived at and what the individual charges are (such as admin costs etc).

Also, could you please forward a copy of any original documentation in regards to this policy, and the information that specifically relates to early redemption/surrender charges.

 

I am also led to believe that there may be within the policy, set times where it can be redeemed without being charged an MVR (market value reduction). If this is the case, could you please inform me when this might be.

It’s difficult for us to know whether to surrender this policy now or to wait for it to mature, and this breakdown might give us the necessary info in helping us to make this choice.

 

Your immediate help with this matter would be deeply appreciated.

.

Barclays - £268 - Moneyclaim

Capital One - £172 - Moneyclaim

Abbey (2nd claim) - Moneyclaim

---------------------------------------------------

 

HSBC - £2164.46- PAID IN FULL

MBNA - £471 - PAID IN FULL

NatWest - £307 - PAID IN FULL

Abbey Business - £314.15 - PAID IN FULL

Link to post
Share on other sites

And they replied with....

 

 

Dear gordonhall,

 

 

In order for us to answer the points you have raised, it is necessary for us to expalin how your policy works.

 

A life assurance policy is a long term contract where the policyholder pays premiums over a lengthy period, and Phoenix are due to make a payment to the policyholder on maturity or earlier death.

 

The policy does not contain guarantees regarding the amounts which would be payable on surrender before the maturity date. Indeed if the values were guaranteed it would be necessary for us to invest the premium in fixed-interest securities with guaranteed payments, and this would be expected to reduce the overall return to policyholders compared with the present position where we make substantial investments in shares and property.

 

Part of the premium received by Phoenix is used to meet the cost of the life assurance cover which is provided. This is a valuable benefit to the policy holder. Furthermore in addition to the cost of the life assurance risk, there are expenses incurred in the setting up and ongoing administration of a life assurance policy. These expenses need to be recovered whether the policy is continued for its full term or whether it is surrendered early.

 

We are unable to prepare a numerical breakdown of how the surrender value has been calculated. However, broadly speaking, the surrender value is calculated using an actuarial formula by discounting the basic sum assured plus bonuses from the expected date of payment back to the present date and deducting the discounted value of the expected future premiums.

 

Naturally the actual calculation method is somewhat more sophisticated. However the above description does give a good idea of the reasoning behind the calculations.

 

As detailed above the investment income and other expenses are not attributed seperately. These expenses include marketing and litereature costs, administration setup costs, regular administration costs such as premium collection and annual bonus mailings. Thus bearing in mind the above surrender value of the policy less the individually incurred costs is not available.

 

We trust this explains our position blah blah blah

 

 

 

So, what does it mean and do I have a claim??????

.

Barclays - £268 - Moneyclaim

Capital One - £172 - Moneyclaim

Abbey (2nd claim) - Moneyclaim

---------------------------------------------------

 

HSBC - £2164.46- PAID IN FULL

MBNA - £471 - PAID IN FULL

NatWest - £307 - PAID IN FULL

Abbey Business - £314.15 - PAID IN FULL

Link to post
Share on other sites

LOL. I just didn't want to spark off any suspicions. If I decide to make that claim , then I shall be as direct as you suggested and as much as I have been with the banks. I'll have nothing to loose so what do I care - I don't want to be friends with these people!

.

Barclays - £268 - Moneyclaim

Capital One - £172 - Moneyclaim

Abbey (2nd claim) - Moneyclaim

---------------------------------------------------

 

HSBC - £2164.46- PAID IN FULL

MBNA - £471 - PAID IN FULL

NatWest - £307 - PAID IN FULL

Abbey Business - £314.15 - PAID IN FULL

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think you do; there's no way that marketing leaflets cost them £5,000. Also, the "Admin Charges" are paid out of your premium in these things in the early years of the policy... and they even show you this in the unit statements they send out each year in the early years and every five years later on. (Not specifically referring to endowments here, just generally to unit-based money-growth policies).

 

 

I think that the "Early Encashment Penalty" is precisely that; a penalty for you pulling out early... which means they don't make as much money out of you as they would have done. They can't charge you for that. I would still go with my letter TBH - but bear in mind the red in my sig and think what YOU want to think, not what I say you should think.

Link to post
Share on other sites

My Plan Of Action:

 

1) Cash in the endowment.

2) See if we get anywhere in regards to the mis-selling of the endwoment (totally seperate issue) - we are currently dealing it.

3) See if anyone else has any further advice on the matter

4) send them a letter regarding the amounts (again) and start the ball rolling with legal action.

 

I'd still appreciate opinions from a wider circle (no offense Stone, just that more heads are better than one (or two))

 

Nice that you agree, but will a judge?

.

Barclays - £268 - Moneyclaim

Capital One - £172 - Moneyclaim

Abbey (2nd claim) - Moneyclaim

---------------------------------------------------

 

HSBC - £2164.46- PAID IN FULL

MBNA - £471 - PAID IN FULL

NatWest - £307 - PAID IN FULL

Abbey Business - £314.15 - PAID IN FULL

Link to post
Share on other sites

thanks Stone.... not been made a mod yet?!?!?

.

Barclays - £268 - Moneyclaim

Capital One - £172 - Moneyclaim

Abbey (2nd claim) - Moneyclaim

---------------------------------------------------

 

HSBC - £2164.46- PAID IN FULL

MBNA - £471 - PAID IN FULL

NatWest - £307 - PAID IN FULL

Abbey Business - £314.15 - PAID IN FULL

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...