Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I see jenrick has stuck his head up with them, and I'm sure this wont faze their nasty rhetoric one wit-less UK growth since 2010 has been lacklustre and largely driven by immigration, says report UK growth since 2010 has been lacklustre and largely driven by immigration, says report | Economic growth (GDP) | The Guardian WWW.THEGUARDIAN.COM Resolution Foundation report suggests parties are dodging the economic challenges facing the country   Net migration is more than two and a half times the 2010 figure despite a string of Tory pledges to reduce it Immigration: how 14 years of Tory rule have changed Britain – in charts | General election 2024 | The Guardian WWW.THEGUARDIAN.COM Net migration is more than two and a half times the 2010 figure despite a string of Tory pledges to reduce it    
    • Will get them done asap My job changes week to week so at the time I didn’t know. 
    • You will probably get a couple more reminders followed by further demands fro unregulated debt collectors with even increasing amounts to pay. They are all designed to scare you into paying.  Don't. It's a scam site and they do not know who was driving and they know the keeper is not liable to pay the PCN. Also the shop was closed so they have no legitimate interest in keeping the car park clear. So to charge £100 is a penalty as there is no legitimate interest which means that the case would be thrown out if it went to Court.  Keep your money in your wallet and be prepared to ignore all their letters and threats. Doubtful they would go to Court since a lot more people would not pay when they heard  MET lost in Court. However they may just send you a Letter of Claim to test your resolve.  If yoy get one of those, come back to us and we will advise a snotty letter to send them.  You probably already have, but take a look through some of our past Met PCNs to see how they are doing.
    • Hello, been a while since I posted on here, really hoping for the same support an advice I received last time :-) Long, long story for us, but basically through bad choices, bad luck and bad advice ended up in an IVA in 2016. The accounts involved all defaulted, to be expected. In 2018, I got contacted by an 'independent advisor' advising me that I shouldn't be in an IVA, that it wasn't the solution for our circumstances and that they would guide us through the process of leaving the IVA and finding a better solution. I feel very stupid for taking this persons advice, and feel they prey on vulnerable people for their own financial gain (it ended with us paying our IVA monthly contribution to them)-long and short of it our IVA failed in 2018. At the same time the IVA failed we also had our shared ownership property voluntarily repossessed (to say this was an incredibly stressful time would be an understatement!) When we moved to our new (rented) property in August 2018, I was aware that creditors would start contacting us from the IVA failure. I got advice from another help website and started sending off SARs and CCAs request letters. I was advised not to bury my head and update our address etc and tackle each company as they came along. Initially there was quite a lot of correspondence, and I still get a daily missed call from PRA group (and the occasional letter from them), but not much else. However, yesterday i had a letter through from Lowell (and one from Capital One) advising that they had bought my debt and would like to speak with me regarding the account. There will be several.of these through our door i suspect, as we did have several accounts with Capital One. Capital One have written to us with regular statements over the last 5 years, and my last communication with them was to advise of of our new address (June 2019), I also note that all of these accounts received a small payment in Jan2019 (i'm assuming the funds from the failed IVA pot). Really sorry for the long long post, but just thought id give (some of) the background for context.... I guess my question at the moment is.....how do I respond to Lowell...do I wait for the inevitable other letters to arrive then deal with them all together or individually...? Do I send them a CCA?  Many thanks
    • hi all just got the reminder letter, I have attached it and also the 2nd side of the original 1st pcn (i just saw the edit above) Look forward to your advice Thanks   PCN final reminder.pdf pcn original side 2.pdf
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Is this Cap1 default valid? **WON IN COURT**


ammani
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5945 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi Armsoft, hope your well. Thanks for that. I am ready to go lol, cant wait to see what the judge thinks of Cap One's behaviour, especially contacting the court twice, to say they had paid up and settled everything. Still no cheque!

 

ammani,

Did you get a claim in for Quantifiable losses (compensation at the descretion of the court)?

I may well have read that you had, but I`ve done a lot of reading today LOL

 

:)

VIEWS EXPRESSED ARE MY OWN - IF THEY HELP - PLEASE CLICK MY SCALES

Halifax - S.A.R - June 06

- Pre-Lim(£1665) July 06

- LBA - July 06

- MCOL - 15th Aug 06

- Acknowledged 18th Aug

- Settled IN FULL :eek:

- 2nd Claim Started - 12 Dec 2006

- SETTLED IN FULL:eek:

- 3rd Claim Started (Phone Call) 1st March 2007

- SETTLED IN FULL:eek:

Abbey National - S.A.R - 23/08/06

- Default Removal Letter sent 21st Sept

- LBA sent with Estimated Charges 4/10/06

- 2nd LBA 23/10/06

- N1 filed 9/11/06 - Deemed Served 16/11/06

- AQ & Draft Directions filed 19/12/06

- Court Hearing 22/3/07

- SETTLED IN FULL:o INCLUDING £5k COMPENSATION

Capital One - S.A.R. 10/10/06

- SETTLED IN FULL:eek:

Alliance & Leicester - Mortgage E/S/C Claim 02/03/07

- SETTLED IN FULL:eek:

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 64
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Hi Armsoft, my original poc asked for £120 in damages, which they refused to give. But i read on this site about the Kpohraror v Woolwich Building society case, in which a precedent was set, of the claimant recieving £1000 in damages, so put this in my witness staement in my court bundle.So will be interesting to see what the judge decides.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Armsoft, my original poc asked for £120 in damages, which they refused to give. But i read on this site about the Kpohraror v Woolwich Building society case, in which a precedent was set, of the claimant recieving £1000 in damages, so put this in my witness staement in my court bundle.So will be interesting to see what the judge decides.

 

So ammani,

How did you get on?

I`ve rushed home from work today to be able to log on for an update.

Don`t keep us in suspense for too long

VIEWS EXPRESSED ARE MY OWN - IF THEY HELP - PLEASE CLICK MY SCALES

Halifax - S.A.R - June 06

- Pre-Lim(£1665) July 06

- LBA - July 06

- MCOL - 15th Aug 06

- Acknowledged 18th Aug

- Settled IN FULL :eek:

- 2nd Claim Started - 12 Dec 2006

- SETTLED IN FULL:eek:

- 3rd Claim Started (Phone Call) 1st March 2007

- SETTLED IN FULL:eek:

Abbey National - S.A.R - 23/08/06

- Default Removal Letter sent 21st Sept

- LBA sent with Estimated Charges 4/10/06

- 2nd LBA 23/10/06

- N1 filed 9/11/06 - Deemed Served 16/11/06

- AQ & Draft Directions filed 19/12/06

- Court Hearing 22/3/07

- SETTLED IN FULL:o INCLUDING £5k COMPENSATION

Capital One - S.A.R. 10/10/06

- SETTLED IN FULL:eek:

Alliance & Leicester - Mortgage E/S/C Claim 02/03/07

- SETTLED IN FULL:eek:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello Armsoft, what a day i had lol. I got there for 1.30 for 2pm hearing. Eventually got in to see judge at 2.30, only to find out, that he had not expected anyone, (so not read my court bundle), as Cap One had written to court to say all had been settled, I told him that i had informed the court 1 week ago that this was not the case and they should have let him know.So it was decided to let 2 more cases go before me, as they were his last and then see me. Of course Cap One didnt send anyone, as they had said they had settled.Of course it was not a good state of affairs as there was no way the judge was going to be able to read my 300 page court bundle in 5 minutes. He asked me to outline what it was i was seeking, and i told him, charges, interest and damages and for Cap One to stop processing my data.The poor man didnt have a clue, i tried to explain what had gone on, but he didnt know about data protection issues and would not make any judgements to do with this. So in the end he agreed to award me my charges of £144, interest of £107 and £120 damage, and also £50 for days earnings. I had mentioned the 2 cases where £1000 was awarded but he said because i had not put that amount on my poc he couldnt award it to me.He said he couldnt issue a declaration saying charges were unlawfull as it was up to Oft case to decide this.He was very helpful, and it was a shame he had not had the time to read my court bundle, as i am sure i would have had a better outcome.He did say that if Cap One still continued to process data, i should start another claim, as the claim he was hearing was to do with charges and not about processing data. He did ask if i knew under what duristiction he could request that they stop, but i didnt know, except that they were commiting a criminal offence in doing so.He said if that was the case, it would have to be heard in a criminal court! Checking my credit reference today, they have removed their data to do with this account, so at the end of the day, i got what i asked for, so thankful for that. Just wish i had put more in for damages on my poc, but i didnt know about the 2 other cases then. Hopefully others can learn by my mistake.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello Armsoft, what a day i had lol. I got there for 1.30 for 2pm hearing. Eventually got in to see judge at 2.30, only to find out, that he had not expected anyone, (so not read my court bundle), as Cap One had written to court to say all had been settled, I told him that i had informed the court 1 week ago that this was not the case and they should have let him know.So it was decided to let 2 more cases go before me, as they were his last and then see me. Of course Cap One didnt send anyone, as they had said they had settled.Of course it was not a good state of affairs as there was no way the judge was going to be able to read my 300 page court bundle in 5 minutes. He asked me to outline what it was i was seeking, and i told him, charges, interest and damages and for Cap One to stop processing my data.The poor man didnt have a clue, i tried to explain what had gone on, but he didnt know about data protection issues and would not make any judgements to do with this. So in the end he agreed to award me my charges of £144, interest of £107 and £120 damage, and also £50 for days earnings. I had mentioned the 2 cases where £1000 was awarded but he said because i had not put that amount on my poc he couldnt award it to me.He said he couldnt issue a declaration saying charges were unlawfull as it was up to Oft case to decide this.He was very helpful, and it was a shame he had not had the time to read my court bundle, as i am sure i would have had a better outcome.He did say that if Cap One still continued to process data, i should start another claim, as the claim he was hearing was to do with charges and not about processing data. He did ask if i knew under what duristiction he could request that they stop, but i didnt know, except that they were commiting a criminal offence in doing so.He said if that was the case, it would have to be heard in a criminal court! Checking my credit reference today, they have removed their data to do with this account, so at the end of the day, i got what i asked for, so thankful for that. Just wish i had put more in for damages on my poc, but i didnt know about the 2 other cases then. Hopefully others can learn by my mistake.

 

ammani,

Let me be the first on here to say "Bloody Well Done To You!"

The outcome was what you had asked for, and ok, a bit more on the compo would have been nice, but being aware of the Judges feelings about Crap1 not turning up is Priceless.

Everyone learns from others experiences, and the one thing that anyone embarking on this from now,having read your thread will firstly learn is to Persevere, Stick to your Guns, Get set for the Long Haul, because at the end of the day, it`s all worth it when you get the right result.

 

Enjoy yourself.

VIEWS EXPRESSED ARE MY OWN - IF THEY HELP - PLEASE CLICK MY SCALES

Halifax - S.A.R - June 06

- Pre-Lim(£1665) July 06

- LBA - July 06

- MCOL - 15th Aug 06

- Acknowledged 18th Aug

- Settled IN FULL :eek:

- 2nd Claim Started - 12 Dec 2006

- SETTLED IN FULL:eek:

- 3rd Claim Started (Phone Call) 1st March 2007

- SETTLED IN FULL:eek:

Abbey National - S.A.R - 23/08/06

- Default Removal Letter sent 21st Sept

- LBA sent with Estimated Charges 4/10/06

- 2nd LBA 23/10/06

- N1 filed 9/11/06 - Deemed Served 16/11/06

- AQ & Draft Directions filed 19/12/06

- Court Hearing 22/3/07

- SETTLED IN FULL:o INCLUDING £5k COMPENSATION

Capital One - S.A.R. 10/10/06

- SETTLED IN FULL:eek:

Alliance & Leicester - Mortgage E/S/C Claim 02/03/07

- SETTLED IN FULL:eek:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you Armsoft. I would love to be a fly on the wall, when Cap One get the judgement, as they kept saying i was abusing the court system lol. I wonder if they might delay, in sending payment,just so i can have the satisfaction of sending the baliffs in!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you Elizabeth1, it did go well considering, as at one point the judge did think about ajourning the case.Cap One will get a suprise when the judgement comes through serves them right. They didnt even acknowledge that they recieved my court bundle!

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry it's a bit late in the day but WELL DONE.

 

OK, you didn't know about the compensation on the POC, but look at it this way - you took on a MAJOR FINANCIAL INSTITUTION and whopped them!! You got everything you asked for.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you Steven.Its been a long haul but worth it. If they take as long to pay up as they did sort this out lol, i will be able to get a warrant of execution, which would be most satisfying indeed.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well done

You may receive different advice to your query as people have different experiences and opinions. Please use your own judgement in deciding whose advice to take.

 

If in doubt seek advice from a qualified insured professional. Any advice I have offered you is done so on an informal basis, without prejudice or liability.

 

If you think I have been helpful PLEASE click the scales

 

court bundles for dummies

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Josie and Wendy B. I recieved a cheque today for charges lol, but sent it back with a covering letter, saying as they deemed fit, not to turn up in court, the judge has given me a judgement against them for charges, interest, damages and costs, and that they will recieve notification from the court. Let them sweat it out a bit. That should upset them lol, would love to be a fly on the wall, when they recieve it back.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

Quick update, as court is so busy, judgement has still not been processed, called them last friday and they have promised to get it done by monday latest! We will see.Has been a month so far.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...