Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • sorry I have been confused by Statute Barred meaning. I thought with Statute Barred the debt cannot be chased 6 years after you have stopped paying.  Originally I set up a payment arrangement with all the companies around 2008 when things went horribly wrong. At that time the payment arrangement was with the original creditors.  I still have one of the original creditors who I pay each month (Cap1). I thought that if you make a payment arrangement you have to stick to that situation throughout. Also, MDR (Moorcroft) have been taking a monthly payment on behalf of M & S Bank for about 5 years. When I sent MDR a CCA request I got a copy of the original agreement sent to me directly by M & S Bank about 5 weeks after my CCA request. Sorry for my ignorance but would you suggest I stop paying all including Cap1 who are the original creditor? TIA
    • London1971 without divulging too much into his mental health he has issues regarding anything to do with government and so is it ok to fill the forms provided and what do I put on there  thanks  
    • Dear all, I am hoping for some advice/guidance on this matter. I received a LoC dated 12/04/24 and replied to this on the 2/05/24 disputing claim with the following reasons: 1: [Inadequate Affordability Assessment]: I contend that your institution failed to conduct a thorough assessment of my financial circumstances prior to approving the loan. As a result, the loan amount and repayment terms were not suitable for my income and financial situation. 2: [Unsustainable Repayments]: The repayment schedule imposed by the loan agreement placed an undue burden on my finances, making it impossible for me to meet my other financial obligations without experiencing significant hardship. 3: [Lack of Transparency]: Your institution did not adequately disclose the risks associated with the loan, including any potential increases in interest rates or fees over the loan term. I also added the following: Under the Consumer Credit Act 1974 and the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) regulations, lenders have a legal obligation to conduct thorough affordability assessments and ensure that loan agreements are suitable for borrowers' circumstances. I hereby request that your institution: 1: Conduct a full investigation into my claim of irresponsible lending. 2: Provide me with copies of all documentation related to the loan application and approval process, including affordability assessments, credit checks, and correspondence. 3: Cease all collection activities related to the loan until this matter is resolved. Yesterday i received the attached reply via email and it included: 1: The Original Loan agreement 2: An account statement 3: A copy of a default notice letter. The email included a link for a direct debit set up page where you enter their reference and your bank account details (looks like a standard D/D set up page) but there is nothing to indicate the amount of the D/D that I might be agreeing to. I also think two days response time is not long enough to appropriately reply. Any thoughts appreciated   Email-compressed.pdf
    • Easy to set one up on Gov.uk , search on Google.
    • Hi London  he doesn’t have government gateway. Should we do it via post?
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Help with Halifax issues (ChloeJane)


k1308
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6230 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

ok, my ex went bankrupt and halifax sent me a letter saying they would send £900 as refund of charges to insolvency service within 14 days if I didn't respond.

I sent back within 6 days and they received the letter on 13th April. Had no response so rang them and she said she hadn't responded to letter.

So she read it and said she couldn't help and I needed to speak to collections who wanted to pass me onto their solicitors who are deling with the outstanding amount I owe them.

anyway the halifax lady spoke to insolvency service and said they will put my half of charges (£459.50) in the joint account which I can't use, don't use and can't get at cause I owe them about £1000 in overdraft

to be honest I don't know how much the charges add up to - I think it is about £900

I just rang them back again and said it was my right to have it

paid however I want and that coventry did the same and she said that

because the account is open and there is an outstanding balance it is their policy to put them straight back into the account

and that was final. I said on the phone that if they were not prepared to send me a cheque I will have to take it further and file a claim.

 

Do you think it is wise to go and try to close the account today or will they not close it because of outstanding balance and my ex being on it?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest ChloeJane

Hi !

 

You have done your first post to the forum!

 

Ok as we discussed in chat.

 

Point 1. The issue of your partner going bankrupt and you claiming the fees, you rightfully as a joint account holder, are entitled to half the fees back as yours.

 

Their agreement to pay your half is correct and they were wrong in paying the full amount to the Insolvency Service.

 

Point 2. Is that they took fees unlawfully from the account. You have a right to have these returned as per your requests and paid to you.

 

You! You the individual in whatever means you have requested it be paid to you.

 

THEIR POLICY - is not your request nor as you clearly stated you wanted the money paid to you.

 

So I would go down and close the account. Close it and arrange a minimal repayment option.

 

Once the account is closed they cannot return monies to a closed account, further more you have requested a cheque for their unlawful fees you have paid as part of your acceptance of offer of settlement without continuing to claim through court. No cheque, they have not complied with your request for payment.

 

When you have closed the account, post back here and let me know and I will happily work with you on ammending the rejection letter to suit what has happened and your demand for a cheque - or you will proceed.

 

They already did it wrong sending the whole amount to the Insolvency trust - so you may have a good bargaining tool!

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think the account has been passed to debt collectors - can I still arrange a payment plan with the bank?

 

Also, can they stop me from closing the account? Is there any way they can say I can't close it cause its got an outstanding balance or cause my ex is still named on it??

 

Just think they might play silly buggers with me !!

Link to post
Share on other sites

also, just checked their website on how to close an account and I am supposed to fill a form in and send it to their head office and I need my ex's signature as well - no chance of getting that. Also that will take ages to close it - by which time they'll prob have put the money back into the account from insolvency service. HELP !!!!!! I'm going mad now :D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest ChloeJane

Hi Hun,

 

My debt was passed to the debt collectors - measly sum of £210 but I closed the account and paid the debt collector at £40 a month.

 

If it is with the debt collector then the debt is already passed on and no longer with the bank. I would check it out which is why I suggested closing the account.

 

They do have a right to offset the account as ecobabe said, but if in part of your settlement terms you requested a cheque, then this is part of your terms.

 

If the account is in debit - and cannot be closed then the debt isn't with a debt collector is my only assumption.

 

At the end of the day, whatever money is outstanding to the bank does have to be paid and the site and beliefs as I understand them and hold value to, is not about avoidance (not suggesting you are!) but is about empowering people to rightfully take back or seek what has been taken unfairly and to empower them to do so. With that and making banks etc responsible, so must we be.

 

So, while you have rights to a cheque for the refund, so does the bank have rights to settlement of the outstanding debt.

 

Good luck.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi, thanks for that.

I have contacted the debt collection agency repeatedly to arrange repayment but they won't accept my offer, even though I proved to them I have no money spare as we are with debt management.

 

Even so, surely I can still have the charges refunded separately to this as in my eyes they are two separate issues??

 

Is there a way I can go about enforcing them to send me the refund in a cheque?

 

I just don't want to let it go as I feel I have been hard done to.

I know I have to pay them what I owe them but likewise I feel they should pay me what they owe me.

 

The main thing that annoys me is that as my ex is now bankrupt I become liable for the whole amount but yet half the charges to be refunded have gone to the insolvency to clear his bankruptcy - I'm not sure though that this wil be reflected in the full amount I now owe them?

 

I hope that makes sense.

Link to post
Share on other sites

i'm busy fighting the HBOs on their right to off set, considering they just took £108 quid from me in refunded charges and put them to another account with is in debt. they say it's their right to do so under their terms and conditions, but the right to off set is clearly stated as an unfair terms in the UTCC regs 1999, which is what i'm challenging them on, i suggest you do the same, ask in a letter for the full T&C's and then hit them with the UTCC and demand a refund or see them in court.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...